Partnering and Patents in USDA Agricultural Research Service

Download Report

Transcript Partnering and Patents in USDA Agricultural Research Service

Patents in USDA Agricultural Research Service

Gail Poulos Supervisory Patent Advisor

USDA-ARS Office of Technology Transfer

Coordinates Tech Transfer activities in ARS  Has authority to develop and sign Cooperative Research And Development Agreements (CRADAs)  Has sole authority for licensing any inventions developed within any of the USDA agencies (including Forest Service, FSIS, APHIS)

Office of Technology Transfer

Centralized in policy and approvals, licensing, marketing; decentralized in negotiation and implementation of CRADAs Patenting Marketing Licensing

• •

8 registered patent agents Located in Beltsville, MD; Peoria, IL; Albany, CA

• • •

Targeted marketing Web subscribe

Tech Alerts

Partnering opportunities

4 senior licensing specialists

HQ based Tech Transfer Coordinators

7 specialists with life science / ag background

Distributed across geographic Areas of ARS

Office of Technology Transfer

Byron Stover –ERRC Patent Advisors 301-504-4783 [email protected]

Evelyn Rabin -- NAA 301 504-4781 [email protected]

Byron Stover - BA 301-504-4783 [email protected]

Beth Sampson / Howard Owens – PWA 510-559-6067 / 5731 [email protected]

[email protected]

Albert Tsui – NPA 309-681-6512

[email protected]

Albert Tsui – MWA & NPA 309-681-6512

[email protected]

Gail Poulos – SAA 301-504-5302 [email protected]

Evelyn Rabin - MSA 301 504-4781 [email protected]

Randy Deck – MWA & SPA 309-681-6515

[email protected]

OTT as Representative and Liaison

ARS Mission University Interests U.S. Company Interests

    

Professional Services of ARS OTT – Patent Section

Create, manage & convene Patent Review Committees (e.g., Invention Disclosure) Prepare, file, and prosecute U.S. patent applications, Coordinate cooperator-filed U.S. patent applications Facilitate and direct foreign filings with contractor Training of All ARS scientists

Professional Services of ARS OTT – Patent Section

Assist scientist in preparing electronic Invention Disclosure

Determine whether invention under a CRADA is a “subject invention”

Determine need to present CRADA invention to Patent Committee

Perform inventorship determination

National Patent Committees Three

“Subject Matter”

Committees

Life Sciences

Chemical

Mechanical and Measurement

Each cover all geographic Areas of ARS

Advantages To The ARS

Uniform committee recommendations across the Agency

Committee recommendation within three months of filing an Invention Disclosure

Scientists and management notified of annual schedule at the beginning of each fiscal year

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

“The Five Questions”

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

Q1:

Is there current commercial interest in the invention or a high probability of commercialization in the future?

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

Q2:

Is the magnitude of the market relative to the cost of commercialization sufficiently large to warrant a patent?

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

Q3:

Would the patent likely play a significant role in transferring the technology to the user?

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

Q4:

Would a patent be enforceable, i.e., is the invention drawn to, or does it employ a unique and readily identifiable material or device which could be bought or sold?

Patent Committee Criteria

Invention Disclosure Patent Advisor Committee Review

Q5:

Is the invention of sufficient scope to justify patenting?

NEW USPTO RULES

 Strategies  Implications

Strategies

 Review Entire Pending Docket Prior to Effective Date of Rule Change To: a. Determine number applications that have continuation potential b. Determine which applications should be filed prior to effective date of the rule c. Set up standard operating procedures for applications that will be filed after the effective date of rule change.

d. Determine which applications do not comply with the 5/25 rule and correct.

Strategies

  File Provisional Applications for Technologies that will not meet the 5/25 Rule-Use the one year period to determine claims that should be protected by consulting with inventors.

National committees will facilitate determining if other Areas in ARS have inventions that could be considered under 37 CFR 1.78 (f) (3) as having at least one patentably indistinct claim –the Patent Advisors will determine if the inventions can be combined in one application.

Strategies for Jointly-owned Inventions

Will need to work more closely with a partner.

not published.

abandoned by USPTO.

May be an issue in that partner may have to disclose information about applications and claims that are

If partner does not fully disclose, may lose U.S. Government rights if application is Establish that the government is exercising due diligence in complying with rules.

Protect govt. interest by written record of request for solely owned (cooperator) patent applications having overlapping claims.

Note: Filing an explanation that claims are patently distinct creates potential liability for joint owners and office preparing and prosecuting application

Implications to Operations

 Increase in the number of provisional and new applications filed

will increase costs

:

Note provisional fee: $210.00 patent application filing: about $1500-$5,000

 Increase in number of applications going to appeal

will increase pendency & costs: Note: notice of appeal fee $510.00; appeal brief fee $510.00

 Potential for the need to write more focused claims:

Note: will result in narrow claims

Implications to Operations

 Potential for ARS preparing and prosecuting more patent applications for small business partners and university partners.

 Future partnering with large business may be more difficult if development of patentable technologies occurs.

Presumption is that large business will opt for trade secret rather than patent protection

 Thorough review of all CRADAs to determine if there are overlapping technologies with different partners and different research units in the agency.

i.e., CRADAs for biofuel research using same starting materials

Office of Technology Transfer 5601 Sunnyside Ave Beltsville, MD 20705 (301) 504-6905 HTTP://OTT.ARS.USDA.GOV