Transcript Slide 1

Corrective and Preventive
Action
By Superlative BioSciences Corporation
October 13, 2007
What is CAPA?
Corrective and Preventative Action
(CAPA) is a system of quality procedures
required to eliminate the causes of an
existing nonconformity and to prevent
recurrence of nonconforming product,
processes, and other quality problems.
Regulatory Guidance
“Corrective and Preventive Action,” Quality System Regulation (QSR), 21
CFR Part 820, Medical Devices, Subpart J, Sec. 100, Became effective
on June 1, 1997, Replacing the 1978 GMP for Medical Devices.
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=820
“Overview of the Quality System Regulation for Medical Devices,”
Kimberly Trautman – Food and Drug Administration, USA and Chair,
Study Group 3, June 29, 1999.
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/reuse/events/cdrom-9.ppt
“QSIT Corrective & Preventive Actions,” Quality System Inspection
Techniques (QSIT) Guide, August 1999.
http://www.fda.gov/ora/inspect_ref/igs/qsit/qsitguide.pdf
“Establishment and Maintenance of a Quality Program.” Human Cells,
Tissues, And Cellular And Tissue-Based Products (HCT/P's), 21 CFR
Part 1271 Subpart D, Current Good Tissue Practice (cGTP), Sec. 160,
May 25, 2004. Revised as of April 1, 2006,
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=1271
Terminology
Nonconforming Material or Process (Discrepancy) - Any
material or process that does not meet its required specifications
or documented procedure.
Correction – Refers to repair, rework, or adjustment and relates
to the disposition of an existing nonconformity.
Corrective Action - To identify and eliminate the causes of
existing nonconforming product and other quality problems.
Preventive Action - To identify and eliminate the causes of
potential nonconforming product and other quality problems.
Seven Quality Subsystems
Components Of Corrective And Preventive Action
(CAPA)
Collect and analyze data to identify nonconforming
product and other quality problems
Investigate cause
Identify and implement corrective and preventive action
Verify or validate effectiveness
Components Of Corrective And Preventive Action
(CAPA)
Communicate information about quality problems,
changes made, outcomes, and trends to those persons
directly responsible and to the staff in general
Forward information for management review
Work with staff and management to produce continuous
quality improvement
Quality Data Sources
CAPA Case Studies
 Weak CA, Weak PA (Common)
 Weak CA, Strong PA (Unusual)
 Strong CA, Weak or Unlinked PA (Common)
 Strong PA Linked to a Strong CA (Ideal)
Case Study No. 1
 The company develops biopharmaceuticals
 The company has a CAPA program
 A review of existing internal and external audits
reveal that:
• nonconformities are documented
• corrections are proposed (a temporary or permanent
change, repair, rework, or scrap)
• corrections made are timely
• but the same nonconformities seem to reoccur over and
over again
• customers are complaining
 The current investigation indicates that:
• nonconformities are not adequately categorized and trended
• the root causes of existing nonconformities are not
adequately investigated or addressed
• preventive actions are not sufficient to eliminate the
reoccurrence of the nonconformity
• discrepancy and CAPA procedures are not well-written or
difficult to follow
• the forms utilized don’t follow the flow of the procedure
• the forms do not provide enough space for more than a brief
entry
• verbal decisions are not written down
• responsible people are assigned but a timelines for the
follow-ups is not given or is vague
The Solution
 Revise all Quality Assurance Procedures to
emphasize CAPA and to link discrepancy reporting
and disposition to preventive action
 Initiate a trending and root cause analysis program
 Present these programs to management and to the
staff
 Revise the nonconformity, CA, and PA forms
 Conduct formal CAPA training
 Reinforce CAPA awareness in verbal
communications
 Provide a “Quality Update” at the company’s monthly
staff meeting
The Results
 Easier to follow quality procedures
 More user-friendly forms
 A better understanding of processes obtained
through root cause analysis
 More proactive thinking vs. reactive thinking
 Fewer nonconformities
 Less scrap and rework
 Fewer customer complaints
Number of Nonconformities
120
Pre-CAPA
Relative %
100
80
Post-CAPA
60
Post-CAPA
40
20
0
1
2
Year
3
Thank you