Transcript Slide 1
West Midlands’ Performance & ‘Rebalancing’ in Perspective URESG meeting, Cardiff David Bailey Recession and recovery? (Diagram from the NIESR, 2013) Comparative Recovery The ‘Regional’ Challenge “The weak performance of the UK economy… the ongoing financial uncertainties in the Eurozone and the global economy, declining wages and cuts in the public sector mean supporting private sector growth and jobs in our cities is more critical than ever”. Cities Outlook, Centre for Cities, 2012; p.6 “To boost the scale and pace of economic recovery in the region, create more new jobs and stimulate more demand for higher level skills, there is a need to up-skill the workforce in existing businesses, to improve their productivity and help them to exploit new market opportunities. In parallel it will be important to attract more businesses and jobs in higher skilled and value added clusters” The West Midlands Economy Post Recession: Key Issues and Challenges, West Midlands Regional Observatory, 2010; p.20 Set against a long-term poor track record • Long-term underinvestment in infrastructure • Long run process of deindustrialisation and a wider economic structure reliant on low growth sectors; lower proportion of high growth firms and lower rates of enterprise • A relatively poor employment performance in the private sector • 2% employment growth 1998-2008 compared to 19% nationally • Birmingham -7.7%; Stoke -16.4% (Newcastle +10.2%) • Not enough High GVA industries Set against a long-term poor track record • A relatively poor education and skills record; dependence on lower value added sectors and clusters leads to relatively low skill levels and skills shortages • Relatively poor performance in developing ‘knowledge economy’ sectors and in R&D spend • Pockets of high levels of unemployment and worklessness; issues of high youth unemployment and long-term unemployment especially in Birmingham • • “There are over 32,000 young people claiming JSA in Birmingham - enough to fill Birmingham City FC’s St Andrews Stadium” (Centre for Cities, 2012); youth claimant rate 4th worst of UK cities Long-term unemployed accounted for 24% of Birmingham claimants by end of 2011; whilst long-term claimant rate second worst of UK cities Poor track record in developing knowledge intensive jobs Source: The Work Foundation, 2009 Long-term employment growth 160 South East North East East Midlands West Midlands Eastern Yorks-Humber North West 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 2007 2005 2003 2001 1999 1997 1995 1993 1991 1989 1987 1985 1983 1981 1979 1977 1975 1973 60 1971 Employment Index 1971=100 150 Contrasts in performance of region in recession; since late1990s relative deterioration in West Midlands 18 16 UK West Midlands Regional Claimant Count Rate (%) 14 East Midlands North East 12 South East 10 8 6 4 2 0 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Source: ONS, Regional Claimant Count Rates 9 Widening GVA gap Regional Economic Performance (GVA per head) £22,000 £20,000 £18,000 West Midlands £16,000 England £14,000 £12,000 £10,000 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: West Midlands Regional Observatory 2006 2007 Weak Industrial Structure In GVA and employment terms high value added activities make relatively modest contributions to the regional economy Sector/Cluster Industry / service Emerging high value added private sector activities Environmental technologies (£3bn GVA, 74,000 jobs) Medical technologies (£250m GVA, 7,000 jobs) Specialist business services (£5bn GVA) Digital media (£150m GVA, 9,500 jobs) Electricity, gas and water (£2bn GVA, 14,000 jobs) Traditional private sector activities Transport technologies (£4bn GVA, 92,000 jobs) Building technologies (£11bn GVA, 220,000 jobs) Food and drink (£3bn GVA, 58,000 jobs) Lower value added private sector activities Business services (£23bn GVA, 440,000 jobs) Wholesale and retail (£12bn GVA, 360,000 jobs) Public Sector activities Education (£6bn GVA, 240,000 jobs) Health and social care (£7bn GVA, 277,000 jobs) Source: West Midlands Regional Observatory, 2010 West Midlands – Manufacturing GVA 1997-2009 Fell by 23%: worse than any other UK region Over-valuation of sterling badly affected the region’s auto and transport clusters plus it wasn't until Mandelson arrived that Labour actually had an industrial policy West Midlands: The 08-09 Recession and Beyond • Output drop and unemployment rise in West Midlands worse than many other regions during 2008-9 recession (not a surprise) • BUT bounce back more rapid until 2012 – rebalancing effect? certain parts of manufacturing, exports (?), modest ‘onshoring’ • More rapid jobs growth – WM out performed other regions until 2012 then slowed – now unemployment rising. • Region reasonably placed? (Deloitte, 2011/12): public sector job cuts; tax rises and benefit cuts; ‘mini-revival’ in parts of manufacturing; weakness in financial services; prospect for house prices. • Output PMI early 2013: 52.5 (51.5 UK) for last 12 months • Challenges around youth unemployment esp. in cities • Private sector job growth sufficient to offset public sector cuts? West Mids Economic Performance Not surprising given structure of West Mids economy Exports … where to? Upgrading the ‘middle’? Some recent shifts: • ‘Personalised manufacturing’... Car industry? • ‘Functional’ to ‘hybrid’ goods: hybridity. Creative/design and service element • Brands, market repositioning • Links ‘creative’ non ‘creative’ sectors – ‘platforms’ – see report by Lisa De Propris and others for NESTA on mapping creative industries • Diversity / ‘serendipitous spillovers’ • related variety: ‘smart specialisation’ (clusters and a regional approach) Industrial Policy in the Auto Industry… • • • • • • • • • • • Automotive Council e.g. sourcing road map 2011 Skills Loan Guarantees RGF support JLR, Nissan, GM, supply chain, AMSCI (£125 m) TSB + EPSRC investment into research OLEV MAS Scrappage scheme (2009-10) Automotive Campus at Warwick Uni Local ‘smart specialisation’ approaches: NVN open innovation approach And if we really want to ‘rebalance’ the economy... Industrial Policy targeted at manufacturing • Capital allowances • Focus corporation tax cuts for manufacturing firms that increase output • National insurance holidays for firms that take on workers • Better R&D tax credits • Better support for exporters • Manufacturing loan fund? (Automotive – Relocalisation / Repatriation of supply chain) • Green Investment Bank? SME Bank? Plus... • Lessons from Germany: Part-time wage subsidies • Takeover Law • Rebuilding fractured supply chains • Other instruments: procurement policy Assembly success but more support needed for Supply Chain… Big assembly success, but not enough components sourced here… Reshoring/onshoring opportunity: depreciation of sterling, plus rise in transport costs, plus rising wage costs in far east also make it possible to repatriate some components sourcing to UK… Plus supply chain ‘resilience’ issue (Japanese earthquake/tsunami) Automotive Council, + Work of SMMT in ‘matching’ OEMs and component suppliers Big issue for smaller firms – access to finance, RGF / LEPs bid to address this, and Advanced Manufacturing Supply Chain Initiative BUT small scale Key local question: how to make most of JLR and other investment for supply chain in UK? And help local suppliers win more work? help with winning orders, access to finance, skills. What type of IP is this? • Not ‘picking winners’ – rather sees Industrial Policy as a process of discovery (see Dani Rodrick) + linked to ‘smart specialisation’ Policy: (How) can LEPs be effective RDAs? ‘Old’ system of RDAs not perfect BUT... • Still not clear exactly what regional growth drivers / levers LEPs will be able to influence • What’s the Offer? Localism Act, RGF, Enterprise Zones, possibility for faster planning, Growing Places Fund, City Deals... Recentralisation / Decentralisation Recentralisation of IP to Whitehall Centralised industrial policy not likely to work LEPs: transport, housing, planning, enterprise (?) Skills? ** Business engagement? RGF big cut in funding – need more scope for LEPs to raise finance (TiFs / Business Rates / bonds?) RDAs assets back to Whitehall / HCA. But, ‘City Deals’ a good first step? Cont’d... Risk of excessive fragmentation – functional economic geography? B’ham / Black Country? ** Capability/capacity to make strategically informed decisions on economic development? • Need for ‘intermediate level’: Intelligence, monitoring, accessing EU funding, regional planning, clusters and innovation • Recent BIS Select Ctte Report on LEPs: short-termism, confusion, lack of confidence • Question: can we really ‘do’ smart specialisation regionally? ‘Under-development traps’ - lack of capacity or unwillingness of ‘local elites’. • Lack of trust – Within single local authority – Across two (or more ) local authorities within ‘natural economy’ – Between two overlapping authorities in a two tier situation • Under-bounding – Serious under-bounding of local authority – Inappropriate bounding for LEP – key problem • Culture of ‘conditional localism’ – Priority of ‘local’ becomes to respond to the ‘national’, rather than local needs and priorities • Insufficient local capacity Birmingham, Black Country and Coventry Travel to work Sandwell Lichfield Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP – strange boundaries? Walsall Wolverhampton Dudley Birmingham Built-up area Solihull Coventry Do LEPs reflect natural economies in practice? Economics behind move to LEPs Competing economic ideas in government: neo-classical perspective (NEG) AND place-based approaches Six key limitations of economics behind new approach: • 1. A two region model • 2. tension in approach to cities outside London • 3. Conditional Tone towards cities outside London • 4. limited outcomes in practice? • 5. Bottom-up creation of LEPs ‘right geography’? • 6. what happens to LEPs not connected to a core city? Summary • West Mids: relatively poor long-run economic performance, but reasonably well placed today if we can develop a regional IP? • Industrial Policy: process, smart specialisation but regional scale important • LEPs need genuine powers and the ability to raise funding: for some cities, govt listening? • Right scale? Intermediate ‘join up’ of LEPs’ work critical to use public monies effectively – as a minimum: intelligence and info gathering base, pursuing effective cluster and innovation strategies and accessing EU funding • Heseltine Report how much real decentralisation? • Competing economic ideas in government Thanks for listening. Comments, Questions welcome! [email protected]