Future of the University of Saint Joseph

Download Report

Transcript Future of the University of Saint Joseph

A scenario created using Futuring and trends
in education
April Duquette
Future of Education
Professor Foster
10/20/12
•
•
University successfully serving 2000 students
• Undergraduate women’s liberal arts college
• Founded in 1932 by the Sisters of Mercy
• Launched Pharmacy program in 2011
• Changed title from Saint Joseph College in July 2012
Universities Core Values
• Catholic Identity
• Commitment to Women
• Compassionate Service
• Academic Excellence
• Respect/Integrity
• Hospitality
• Multiculturalism/Diversity
•
•
Current technology used:
• SMARTboards or projectors in all classrooms
• Computers in all classrooms
• Blackboard utilized for some classes
• Tablet computing used in some classes
Technology advances that could be made easily
• Mobile Apps
• App allowing for both academic and recreational use
• Athletic updates
• Event times and dates
• Email and Blackboard access
• Tablet use allowed in all classrooms
• Cost effective E-books
• Note taking
• Internet access
•
Scanning
• Data collection
• Find trends in media
• Focuses on trends, not events
•
Scenarios
• End product of futuring
• Shows possibilities of the future
• Negative in that organizers can have drastic
scenarios
• Time consuming
Forces
Demographic
Economy
Government
Ecology
Society
Culture
Technology
Data
Gathering
Scanning
Polling
Trend Monitoring
Interviewing
Brainstorming
Webbing
Historic Gathering
Analysis
Quantitive
&
Qualitative
Methods
Projection
Wild
Cards
Scenarios
Gaming
Modeling
Visioning
*Figure 3 from Lessons from Management: Using
Strategic Planning Concepts to Develop a Universal
Futuring Model
•
•
•
Sufficient training needs to be provided for
teachers wanting to instruct online classes
Students can lack relationship building
skills
Tasks like bios, buddies, service learning,
scavenger hunts, and discussion questions
have students work in groups
•
•
•
•
Insufficient highlighting and note
applications for older students
E-readers all offer different fonts and sizes,
putting students on different pages
Can be positive for younger students, using
animation and sounds
E-readers can utilize multiple intelligences






Students on campus feel like a family
More educational opportunities
Employ professors from all over the country
More online learning opportunities
Connect with other educational institutions
Lower on-campus costs through online
classes





Disconnect between unqualified educators
and students who are technologically
informed
High drop-out rate because of online learning
Need to implement better professional
development
Maintaining a title as a “women’s college”
Not jumping into programs too quickly





Market the University across the country, instead
of just in New England
Hire new faculty specializing in online learning
Hiring in major departments like the registrar
and advising in order to aid the higher student
population
Expand the internet database system to
accommodate new programs and more students
Train all faculty and staff in technology on
campus and technology that may be
implemented






Adams, S., Cummins, M., Johnson, L., (2012).The Nmc horizon
report: 2012 higher education edition. Austin, Texas:The New
Media Consortium
Barrett, Bob. (2010). Virtual teaching and strategies: Transitioning
from teaching traditional classes to online classes.
Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(12), 17-20.
Barron, Phillip. (2011). E-readers in the classroom. (Vol. 22, pp. 133138): New Jersey City University.
Blackboard. (2012). iprinceton. Retrieved from
http://mobile.princeton.edu/
Cost, Patti. (2012). Building relationships in online classes by
incorporating letter writing, buddy systems, and teaching and
utilizing proper netiquette. National Social Science Journal,
38(2), 16-19.
Denning, P. J. (2012). Innovating the future: From ideas to adoption.
Futurist, 46(1), 40-45. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=ae5
2136-85a8-4c83-aa1a4d6270fae65b@sessionmgr111&vid=5&hid=125




Goode, J. (2010). Mind the gap: The digital dimension of college
access. Journal of higher education, 81(5), 583-618.
Larson, Lotta C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book
reading and response. Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22. doi:
10.1598/RT.64.1.2
Mietzner, D., & Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of
scenario approaches for strategic foresight. Technology
Intelligence and Planning, 1(2), 220-239. Retrieved from
http://www.lampsacus.com/documents/stragegicforesight.pdf
Sagi, J. (2007). Lessons from management: Using strategic
planning concepts to develop a universal futuring model.
Futures Research Quarterly, 23(3), 39-45. Retrieved from
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&
hid=8&sid=5c53c95d-ae41-4abb-9ec6
8a1572952903%40sessionmgr12




The National Center for Higher Education Management
Systems.(2012). Graduation rates:six-year
graduation rates of bachelor's students-2009.
Retrieved from
http://www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/?year=2009
&level=nation&mode=map&state=0&submeasure=
27
University of Saint Joseph. (2012, June 13). Six year
graduation rates, fall 2009. Retrieved from
http://www.usj.edu/about/administrative_offices/of
fice_of_institutional_resea
rch_and_planning/fact_book/fact_book_0910/grad_rates.html
University of Saint Joseph. (2012, July 2). Our core
values and mission statement. Retrieved from
http://www.usj.edu/about/core_values.html
World Future Society. (2012). Scanning. Retrieved from
http://www.wfs.org/node/400