Presentation to ASCD Conference
Download
Report
Transcript Presentation to ASCD Conference
Classroom assessment:
minute-by-minute and day-to-day
Session 1249T: ASCD Annual Conference 2007
17 March 2007; Anaheim, CA
Dylan Wiliam,
Institute of Education, University of London
www.dylanwiliam.net
11
Overview of presentation
Why raising achievement is
important
Why investing in teachers is the
answer
Why assessment for learning should
be the focus
Why teacher learning communities
should be the mechanism
How we can put this into practice
22
Raising achievement matters
For individuals
Increased lifetime salary
Improved health
For society
Lower criminal justice costs
Lower health-care costs
Increased economic growth
33
Where’s the solution?
Structure
Small high schools
K-8 schools
Alignment
Curriculum reform
Textbook replacement
Governance
Charter schools
Vouchers
Technology
44
It’s the classroom
Variability at the classroom level
is up to 4 times greater than at
school level
It’s not class size
It’s not the between-class
grouping strategy
It’s not the within-class grouping
strategy
It’s the teacher
55
Teacher quality
A labor force issue with 2 solutions
Replace existing teachers with better ones?
No evidence that more pay brings in better teachers
No evidence that there are better teachers out there deterred
by certification requirements
Improve the effectiveness of existing teachers
The “love the one you’re with” strategy
It can be done
We know how to do it, but at scale? Quickly? Sustainably?
66
Why assessment for learning?
Several major reviews of the research
Natriello (1987): grades K-12
Crooks (1988): grades K-12
Kluger & DeNisi (1996): grades K-16, work
Black & Wiliam (1998): K-12
Nyquist (2003): grades 13-16
All find consistent, substantial effects
77
Cost/effect comparisons
Intervention
Class-size reduction by 30% (e.g.,
from 30 to 20)
Increase teacher content knowledge
from weak to strong (2 standard
deviations)
Formative assessment/
Assessment for learning
Extra months of
learning/yr
Cost/yr
3
$30k
1.5
?
6 to 9
$3k
88
Types of formative assessment
Long-cycle
Span: across units, terms
Length: four weeks to one year
Medium-cycle
Span: within and between teaching units
Length: one to four weeks
Short-cycle
Span: within and between lessons
Length:
day-by-day: 24 to 48 hours
minute-by-minute: 5 seconds to 2 hours
99
Effects of formative assessment
Long-cycle
Student monitoring
Curriculum alignment
Medium-cycle
Improved, student-involved, assessment
Improved teacher cognition about learning
Short-cycle
Improved classroom practice
Improved student engagement
10
10
Five Key Strategies …
Questioning
Engineering effective classroom discussions,
questions, and learning tasks
Feedback
Moving learners forward with feedback
Sharing Learning
Expectations
Clarifying and sharing learning intentions and
criteria for success
Self Assessment
Activating students as the owners of their own
learning
Peer Assessment
Activating students as instructional resources for
one another
11
11
…and one big idea
Use evidence about learning to adapt
instruction to meet student needs
12
12
Keeping Learning on Track (KLT)
A pilot guides a plane or boat toward its
destination by taking constant readings
and making careful adjustments in
response to wind, currents, weather, etc.
A KLT teacher does the same:
Plans a carefully chosen route ahead of time
(in essence building the track)
Takes readings along the way
Changes course as conditions dictate
13
13
Eliciting evidence of student
achievement by engineering effective
classroom discussions, questions and
learning tasks
14
14
Kinds of questions: Israel
Which fraction is the smallest?
1
2
1
1
a) , b) , c) , d) .
6
3
3
2
Success rate 88%
Which fraction is the largest?
4
3
5
7
a) , b) , c) , d) .
5
4
8
10
Success rate 46%; 39% chose (b)
[Vinner, PME conference, Lahti, Finland, 1997]
15
15
Misconceptions
16
16
Misconceptions
3a = 24
a + b = 16
17
17
Molecular structure of water?
18
18
Moving learners forward with
feedback
19
19
Kinds of feedback: Israel
264 low and high ability grade 6 students in 12 classes in 4
schools; analysis of 132 students at top and bottom of each class
Same teaching, same aims, same teachers, same classwork
Three kinds of feedback: scores, comments, scores+comments
Feedback
scores
Gain
none
Attitude
top
+ve
bottom -ve
comments
30%
all
[Butler(1988) Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 58 1-14]
+ve
20
20
Responses
Feedback
scores
Gain
none
Attitude
top
+ve
bottom -ve
comments
30%
all
+ve
What do you think happened for the students given
both scores and comments:
A: Gain: 30%; Attitude: all +ve
B: Gain: 30%; Attitude: top +ve, bottom -ve
C: Gain: 0%; Attitude: all +ve
D: Gain: 0%; Attitude: top +ve, bottom -ve
E: Something else
[Butler(1988) Br. J. Educ. Psychol., 58 1-14]
21
21
Kinds of feedback: Israel (2)
200 grade 5 and 6 Israeli students
Divergent thinking tasks
4 matched groups
experimental group 1 (EG1); comments
experimental group 2 (EG2); grades
experimental group 3 (EG3); praise
control group (CG); no feedback
Achievement
EG1>(EG2≈EG3≈CG)
Ego-involvement
(EG2≈EG3)>(EG1≈CG)
[Butler (1987) J. Educ. Psychol. 79 474-482]
22
22
Effects of feedback
Kluger & DeNisi (1996)
Review of 3000 research reports
Excluding those:
without adequate controls
with poor design
with fewer than 10 participants
where performance was not measured
without details of effect sizes
left 131 reports, 607 effect sizes, involving 12652 individuals
Average effect of feedback substantial, but
Effect sizes very variable
40% of effect sizes were negative
23
23
Sharing learning intentions and
success criteria
Activating students as owners of
their own learning
Activating students as instructional
resources for one another
24
24
Student involvement in learning
3 teachers each teaching 4 year 8 science classes
in two US schools
14 week experiment
7 two-week projects, scored 2-10
All teaching the same, except:
For a part of each week
Two of each teacher’s classes discusses their likes and
dislikes about the teaching (control)
The other two classes discusses how their work will be
assessed
[White & Frederiksen, Cognition & Instruction, 16(1), 1998].
25
25
Student involvement in learning (2)
Iowa Test of Basic Skills
Group
Low
Middle
High
Likes and dislikes
4.6
5.9
6.6
Reflective assessment
6.7
7.2
7.4
26
26
Techniques: questioning
Key idea: questioning should
cause thinking
provide data that informs teaching
Improving teacher questioning
generating questions with colleagues
closed v open
low-order v high-order
appropriate wait-time
Getting away from I-R-E
basketball rather than serial table-tennis
‘No hands up’ (except to ask a question)
class polls to review current attitudes towards an issue
‘Hot Seat’ questioning
All-student response systems
ABCD cards, Mini white-boards, Exit passes
27
27
Questioning in math: discussion
Look at the following sequence:
3, 7, 11, 15, 19, ….
Which is the best rule to describe the
sequence?
A. n + 4
B. 3 + n
C. 4n - 1
D. 4n + 3
28
28
Questioning in math: diagnosis
In which of these right triangles is a2 + b2 = c2 ?
A
b
a
B
a
c
C
b
a
b
D
c
c
b
c
E
c
a
a
b
F
b
c
a
29
29
Questioning in science: discussion
Ice-cubes are added to a glass of water. What
happens to the level of the water as the ice-cubes
melt?
A.
B.
C.
D.
The level of the water drops
The level of the water stays the same
The level of the water increases
You need more information to be sure
31
31
Questioning in science: diagnosis
The ball sitting on the table is not moving. It is not moving because:
A. no forces are pushing or pulling on the ball.
B. gravity is pulling down, but the table is in the way.
C. the table pushes up with the same force that gravity pulls down
D. gravity is holding it onto the table.
E. there is a force inside the ball keeping it from rolling off the table
Wilson & Draney, 2004
32
32
Save the ozone layer
What can we do to preserve the ozone layer?
A. Reduce the amount of carbon dioxide produced
by cars and factories
B. Reduce the greenhouse effect
C. Stop cutting down the rainforests
D. Limit the numbers of cars that can be used
when the level of ozone is high
E. Properly dispose of air-conditioners and fridges
33
33
Questioning in English: discussion
Macbeth: mad or bad?
34
34
Questioning in English: diagnosis
Where is the verb in this sentence?
The dog ran across the road
A B
C
D
35
35
Questioning in English: diagnosis
Where does the subject end and the
predicate begin in this sentence?
The dog ran across the road.
A B C
D
36
36
Questioning in English: diagnosis
Which of these is a good thesis statement?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
The typical TV show has 9 violent incidents
There is a lot of violence on TV
The amount of violence on TV should be reduced
Some programs are more violent than others
Violence is included in programs to boost ratings
Violence on TV is interesting
I don’t like the violence on TV
The essay I am going to write is about violence on TV
37
37
Questioning in history: discussion
In which year did World War II begin?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
1919
1937
1938
1939
1941
38
38
Questioning in History
Why are historians concerned with bias when
analyzing sources?
A. People can never be trusted to tell the truth
B. People deliberately leave out important details
C. People are only able to provide meaningful
information if they experienced an event
firsthand
D. People interpret the same event in different
ways, according to their experience
E. People are unaware of the motivations for their
actions
F. People get confused about sequences of events
39
39
What’s wrong with this item?
There are two flights per day from Newtown to Oldtown.
The first flight leaves Newtown each day at 9:05 and
arrives in Oldtown at 10:45. The second flight from
Newtown leaves at 2:15. At what time does the second
flight arrive in Oldtown? Show your work.
40
40
Figurative language
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Alliteration
Hyperbole
Metaphor
Onomatopoeia
Personification
None of the above
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
He was a bull in a china shop.
May I have a drop of water?
This backpack weighs a ton.
The sweetly smiling sunshine…
He honked his horn at the cyclist.
I’ve told you a million times already.
The Redcoats are coming!
He was as tall as a house.
41
41
Triangle shirt waist factory fire, March 25th, 1911
Triangle factory fire
Which of the following sources is biased?
A.
B.
C.
D.
Photograph of the event
New York Times story on Mar 26, 1911
Description of the fire in the textbook
Transcript of talk by Frances Perkins, Sep 30 1964
43
43
Techniques: feedback
Key idea: feedback should
cause thinking
provide guidance on how to improve
Comment-only grading
Focused grading
Explicit reference to mark-schemes and scoring guides
Suggestions on how to improve
‘Strategy cards’ ideas for improvement
Not giving complete solutions
Re-timing assessment
(eg two-thirds-of-the-way-through-a-unit test)
44
44
Techniques: sharing learning intentions
Explaining learning intentions at start of lesson/unit
Learning intentions
Success criteria
Intentions/criteria in students’ language
Posters of key words to talk about learning
eg describe, explain, evaluate
Planning/writing frames
Annotated examples of different standards to ‘flesh out’
assessment rubrics (e.g. lab reports)
Opportunities for students to design their own tests
45
45
Practical techniques:
peer and self-assessment
Students assessing their own/peers’ work
with rubrics
with exemplars
“two stars and a wish”
Training students to pose questions/identifying
group weaknesses
Self-assessment of understanding
Traffic lights
Red/green discs
End-of-lesson students’ review
46
46
Putting it into practice
47
47
Force-field analysis (Lewin, 1951)
What kinds of forces present in your school/district will
promote or support the development of this kind of work?
What kinds of forces present in your school/district will
oppose or constrain the development of this kind of work?
+
–
48
48
A model for teacher learning
Content (what we want teachers to
change)
Evidence
Ideas (strategies and techniques)
Process (how to go about change)
Choice
Flexibility
Small steps
Accountability
Support
49
49
Supporting Teachers and Schools to
Change through Teacher Learning
Communities
50
50
Implementing AfL requires changing
habits, not adding knowledge
Teachers “know” most of this already
So the problem is not a lack of knowledge
It’s a lack of understanding what it means to do AfL
That’s why telling teachers what to do doesn’t work
Experience alone is not enough—if it were, then the most
experienced teachers would be the best teachers—we know
that’s not true (Hanushek, 2005)
People need to reflect on their experiences in systematic
ways that build their accessible knowledge base, learn from
mistakes, etc. (Bransford, Brown & Cocking, 1999)
51
51
That’s what TLCs are for:
TLCs contradict teacher isolation
TLCs reprofessionalize teaching by valuing teacher
expertise
TLCs deprivatize teaching so that teachers’ strengths and
struggles become known
TLCs offer a steady source of support for struggling
teachers
They grow expertise by providing a regular space, time,
and structure for that kind of systematic reflecting on
practice
They facilitate sharing of untapped expertise residing in
individual teachers
They build the collective knowledge base in a school
52
52
The synergy
Content: assessment for learning
Process: teacher learning communities
Components of a model
Initial workshops
Support for TLC leaders
Monthly TLC meetings
Peer observations
‘Drip-feed’ resources
Web-site
Writings
New ideas
53
53
Summary
Raising achievement is important
Raising achievement requires improving teacher
quality
Improving teacher quality requires teacher
professional development
To be effective, teacher professional development
must address
What teachers do in the classroom
How teachers change what they do in the classroom
AfL + TLCs
A point of (uniquely?) high leverage
A “Trojan Horse” into wider issues of pedagogy,
psychology, and curriculum
54
54