Transcript Slide 1
Open Research: 3rd London Conference on
Opening Access to Research Publications
London, 11 June 2007
The UK Research Councils and
access to scholarly publications
Drs. Astrid Wissenburg
Director Communications & Information, ESRC
Chair RCUK Research Outputs Group
[email protected]
www.rcuk.ac.uk/access
Research Councils UK
• Strategic partnership of 7 research councils
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Arts & Humanities RC
Biotechnology & Biological Sciences RC
Engineering & Physical Sciences RC
Economic & Social RC
Medical RC
Natural Environment RC
Science and Technology Facilities Council
(merger of Central Laboratory of the Research Councils, and
Particle Physics & Astronomy RC)
• Operates through working groups
– including the Research Outputs Group (ROG)
Science budget allocation 2006-7
PPARC
12%
AHRC
4% BBSRC
14%
NERC
14%
MRC
19%
CCLRC
7%
ESRC
5%
EPSRC
25%
Source: DTI, SCIENCE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS 2005-06 to 2007-08, May 2005.
Differences
• In funding models
– Research in own institutes and/or on universities
– Responsive and/or directive funding
• In research and user communities
– Size of communities
– Boundaries of ‘research’ community
– Importance of private sector, public and not-for profit sector as
users
– Role of general public and media
• In cultures, e.g.
– Publishing cultures
– Traditions of data sharing
– Longevity of information/knowledge
Research Councils and OA - drivers
• Value for money and generating impact: RC’s fund
research which needs to be communicated and exploited
through e.g. publications
• Ensuring the health of the science base, which includes
high-quality infrastructure to support research with no
major access barriers
• Exploiting the potential of technological developments,
such as e-science
• Stakeholder expectations and activities of other research
funders
RCUK open access principles
for research outputs
• Ideas and knowledge derived from publicly-funded
research must be made available and accessible for
public use, interrogation and scrutiny as widely, rapidly
and effectively as practicable
• Effective mechanisms must be in place to ensure that
published research outputs are subject to rigorous
quality assurance, through peer review
• The models and mechanisms for publication and access
to research results must be both efficient and costeffective in the use of public funds
• The outputs from current and future research must
be preserved and remain accessible not only
for the next few years but for future generations
Pay-to-publish OA model
• Authors choose where they publish
• Both pay-to-publish and subscription models supported
through full economic costs by all RC’s: level playing
field
• Publication costs are part of allowable costs of a
research proposal
– Directly – if within the lifetime of a grant
– Indirectly – through institutional schemes
• Implementation issues:
– Lack of awareness
– Assessing reasonable costs
– Encouraging institutional schemes
Pay-to-publish OA model - issues
Indirect costs are ‘hidden’
Requires universities to setup infrastructure to be able to
charge these
BUT
The principle and funding can be extended to cover nonresearch councils grants
Would allow funding to be transferred between
subscriptions and pay-to-publish model at university
level
How can we support universities to setup such
infrastructure
Is this just moving money around, and will it
make a real difference?
OA Deposit
• Subject to individual councils guidelines
• STFC, ESRC, BBSRC, NERC
– For awards from grant applications submitted from 1 October
2006 (STFC: 1 Dec 2006)
– Requirement to deposit published articles from journals or
conference proceedings
– in an appropriate e-print repository, wherever such a repository is
available
– current copyright and licensing policies, such as embargo
periods, maintained by publishers and respected by authors
– At earliest opportunity
• Except:
– MRC: as above, but deposit within six months. Aligned
with Wellcome Trust requirements.
– EPSRC: no policy
– AHRC: policy expected end June, as part of new
funding guidelines
OA repositories
• Repositories:
– Direct support and management, eg:
• ESRC Society Today
• UKPubMed
– Indirect support of institutional repositories through full economic
costing regime
• Impact will take 3-4 years, considering length of research
projects and publication lead times
OA deposit - issues
Allows subject and institutional repositories to develop
(and they are all interoperable, so does it matter?)
Accepts existing embargo periods
BUT
Accepts existing embargo periods
Funding for institutional repositories is ‘hidden’
Multiple deposit options are confusing to researcher
What is the impact on publishers, embargo period and in
the end repositories?
Can we coordinate landscape for researchers
(deposit & access)?
Thank you
Drs. Astrid Wissenburg
[email protected]
www.rcuk.ac.uk/access