Transcript Title of the Presentation

GRI SSE
Progress and Outlook
Walter Boltz
GRI SSE Co-Chair
TITRE Forum 22nd and 23rd March 2012
XXI Madrid
GRI SSE
Geographical Scope of the GRI SSE
Austria
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Poland
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Progress and Ongoing work
•2011-2014 Work Plan includes recommendations
of XX. MF
•Further updates to reflect prioritization and new
deliverables, based on stakeholder survey.
•Active participation in ACER GRI Coordination
Group to report on progress
•Lack of involvement by some stakeholders and
NRAs, high level of commitment from others
• Member state involvement should increase
XXI Madrid Forum
Attendance of GRI SSE SG meetings
100.00%
80.00%
NRA
60.00%
TSO
Stakeholder
40.00%
MS
20.00%
0.00%
AUT
BG
CY
CZ
GR
HR
HU
IT
PL
RO
SI
SK
NB: Based on attendance of 5th/6th/7th/9th/10th/11th SG meetings – for illustration.
GRI SSE
Main Achievements (I)
•Succesful pilot project on early implementation of
CAM: GATRAC platform
•Extension of GATRAC platform announced at
December ’11 stakeholder group meeting
•GATRAC platform is already a cross-regional pilot
project
•Day-ahead capacity auction pilot project
introduced at AT/IT border following shipper
consultation
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Main Achievements (II)
•Studies on future market architecture scenarios
launched
•CEGH on track to provide a cross-border connection
to neighbouring market areas in cooperation with
respective TSOs
• Sharing of experiences concerning infrastructure
developments & SoS implementation in the region
•Survey on tansparency monitoring by NRAs started
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Deliverables (I)
DELIVERABLE I.1 Standard products & Interoperability
ACTION
All the TSOs adopt the EASEE standards with special
reference to gas-day definition, unit and OBAs
Harmonization of TSO’ procedures decreasing shippers’ risk
and imbalances in 2012
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
TSOs
2012/2013
SK/CZ/DERO,
BNetzA, URSO
2012
Increased harmonisation in the field of interoperability is particularly
beneficial in GRI SSE region.
XXI Madrid Forum
Implementat
ion of
CBP 2003001/01
Harmonisati
on of Units
Pressure
Energy
Red=milestone
not implemented
Yellow: partially
implemented
Green: fully
implemented
RO+BG+CY: No
answers.
(EASEE Gas
Implementation
Progress
Review 2010)
Volume
Gross Calorific Value
Deliverables (II)
DELIVERABLE II.1 Bundled capacity allocation at Austria/Italy IP
ACTION
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
Agreement on harmonised nomination and renomination rules
SNAM/TAG
2012
Harmonised calculation of available firm and interruptible
capacities
SNAM/TAG
2012
Proposal for a procedure for the coordinated allocation of
daily capacity
SNAM/TAG
2012
Definition of a bundled capacity product to be allocated
by explicit auctions in order to connect PSV and
Baumgarten
SNAM/TAG
2013
GRI SSE
Deliverables (III)
DELIVERABLE III.1 Bundled products
ACTION
Concept for the realisation of bundled
products at all SSE regional IPs
Implementation of bundled product offers
at further SSE regional IPs
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
Net4Gas together with partner
TSOs
2012
Regional TSOs
2012+
DELIVERABLE IV.1 Cross-Regional Balancing Platform
ACTION
Implementation of a cross-regional
balancing platform
XXI Madrid Forum
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
CEGH
2012
GRI SSE
Deliverables (IV)
DELIVERABLE V.1 Structure of future balancing zones
ACTION
Analysis of macroeconomic benefits linked to
implementing different models for balancing and
trading zones
Case study on institutional and practical steps to
implement the provisions of the GTM in the
region
Definition of the model for
balancing and trading zones.
future
Planning and launch of implementation
XXI Madrid Forum
regional
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
NRAs
2012
NRAs / TSOs/
Stakeholders
2012
SG
2012/2013
SG
2014+
Deliverables (V)
DELIVERABLE VI.1+2 Interconnections and available transmission capacity
ACTION
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
Check investment plans against the background
of future market architecture scenarios
TSOs coordinated by GRI
Lead Regulators
ongoing
Consultation of the Gas Regional Investment Plans
TSOs with active
stakeholder involvement
2012
Ensure GRI SSE involvement on all levels in the
process of identifying PCI in the framework of the
EIP
Lead NRAs with active
involvement of all other
parties of the GRI SSE
2012
Deliverables (VI)
DELIVERABLE VIII.1 Security of Supply
ACTION
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
Exchange best practice and consult SoS
preventive action plans within the GRI
SSE
Member States and
NRAs
Ongoing
ACTION
RESPONSIBLE
DEADLINE
Survey NRA activities with regard to
monitoring of transparency requirements
NRAs
2012
DELIVERABLE IX.1 Transparency
GRI SSE
Steps Forward
• Work on all deliverables is ongoing in 2012 with a focus on early
implementation of CAM, with the further extension of the GATRAC
platform, GTM implementation and infrastructure
•Full commitment from TSOs and stakeholders is required for early
implementation pilots
•Strong cooperation needed between NRAs & between NRAs, TSOs
and stakeholders to support implementation of pilot projects
• Sharing of best practices across regions will be promoted, especially
on GATRAC platform.
• New opportunities for regional work due to policy developments
(EIP) within existing priorities
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Outlook and new deliverables: EIP
•Identification of potential PCI in the SSE region in 2012
•Contact between GRI SSE and EC is established
•Stakeholders informed and invited to express interest
• Kick-off meeting to establish working group
•Identification of potential PCI by Q3 2012
•Challenge due to geographical scope of regions: (GRI /
GRIPS /EIP do not exactly coincide)
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Outlook and new deliverables:
Transparency
• Viewed mainly as an NRA responsibility
• Survey of NRA transparency monitoring
activities in the region carried out
•NRAs asked to provide information on level of
compliance with transparency requirements by
TSOs
•Further investigations possible in a second step
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Outlook and new deliverables: GTM
•Pilot project to identify possibilities for GTM implementation
(market areas/trading regions)
• (1) One « macro level » study on possibilities for crossborder market integration in Europe
•
Analysis of macroeconomic/welfare benefits of market
integration – 2 case regions
•(2) One case study on identification of possible
implementation steps of the measures proposed in the Gas
Target Model
•Great potential for sharing outcome on a cross-regional level
XXI Madrid Forum
TITLE OF THE PRESENTATION
Overview on the physical capacity utilization
at IPs in Europe in 2011
?
PT
?
?
?
DE
•
•
•
•
Physical capacity utilization (PCU) is measured
by comparing actual physical
F
LUX
CH
flows with declared technical capacities (TC) on a daily or hourly basis.
F PCU levels.
H
The pie represents the percentage of time of different
TC are usually calculated for long periods and do not consider SL
short term
I
short term changes in market and network conditions.
Interruptible capacities are only interrupted at Oberkappel.
EVENT
TITLE OF THE PRESENTATION
Capacity utilization at Oberkappel
•
•
•
The actual utilization of the IP Oberkappel exceeds the declared TC for most of the
time.
An approximated TC has been determined which is 90% of the monthly average of the
allocated capacities during curtailment periods.
The TC of BOG is usually x% higher than the approximated TC.
Oberkappel
Physical flows and technical capacities Jan 2011 - Jan 2012
10000000
8000000
6000000
Approximated technical
capacity (kWh/h)
4000000
2000000
Technical capacity (exit)
(kWh/h)
0
-2000000
-4000000
Technical capacity (entry)
(kWh/h)
-6000000
Physical flow (kWh/h)
EVENT
01.01.2012
01.12.2011
01.11.2011
01.10.2011
01.09.2011
01.08.2011
01.07.2011
01.06.2011
01.05.2011
01.04.2011
01.03.2011
01.02.2011
01.01.2011
-8000000
TITLE OF THE PRESENTATION
Preliminary conclusions
•
•
•
The actual utilization of the IPs in Europe is generally low, i.e. there are
significant physical transmission capacities available at most Ips.
• The NWE region seems to have significant excess capacities compared
to today‘s utilization (2011).
• The SWE region experienced unusually high utilization rates in 2011 at
the IP in Larrau, most likely of the low temperatures during the winter
2011.
• The SEE (around Austria) is relatively high loaded, but still significant
capacities are available at many IPs.
The transmission requests (nominations) – although exceeding the
calculated TCs - can be executed for most of the time. TSOs and regulators
need to cooperate in the development of guidelines for TC calculation that
are coherent with the expected utilization of the network.
The actually allocated capacity at Oberkappel was significantly below the TC
declared by OGE. By investing in additional capacity in Germany only the
capacity of the entire IP can be increased.
EVENT
GRI SSE
Outlook and new deliverables: SoS
• Always considered a priority by
stakeholders in the GRI SSE
•Sharing of preventive action plans and
risk assessments, exchange of best
practices
•Potential for sharing approach on a crossregional level
XXI Madrid Forum
GRI SSE
Conclusions
• Governance structures to support work of lead
regulators in their GRI
•Definition of pilot projects should be a bottom-up
process from the regions with NRAs, TSOs and other
stakeholders involved
•Involvement of Member states needs to be enhanced
•Commitment from all countries is necessary to
achieve progress towards 2014 goals in the GRI SSE
30 May : GRI SSE-REMIT Conference in Vienna, open to all
stakeholders and market participants
31 May: GRI SSE Stakeholder Group & RCC Meeting, Vienna.
XXI Madrid Forum
Thank you for your attention!
Thank you for
your
attention
www.acer.europa.eu