Transcript Slide 1
Clopidogrel in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Disclaimer This slide kit presents data that is not contained in the approved professional label for clopidogrel. The slide kit has been prepared for internal medical education purposes only and should not be distributed to or used with physicians in promotional detailing. Neither sanofi-aventis nor Bristol-Myers Squibb recommends the use of clopidogrel in any manner inconsistent with that described in the full prescribing information Outline Epidemiology and background Current treatments for the acute management of STEMI Rationale for antiplatelet therapy in STEMI Results of new clopidogrel clinical trials CLARITY (CLopidogrel as Adjunctive ReperfusIon TherapY) COMMIT (ClopidOgrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial) The growing body of evidence for clopidogrel Summary and conclusions Epidemiology and Background Pathologic Progression to Atherothrombosis1 Thrombosis Unstable angina MI Atherosclerosis ACS Ischemic stroke/TIA Critical leg ischemia Intermittent claudication CV death Stable angina/intermittent claudication MI=myocardial infarction; ACS=acute coronary syndromes; TIA=transient ischemic attack; CV=cardiovascular 1. Libby P. Circulation 2001; 104: 365–372. Major Role of Platelets in Atherothrombosis1 1 Adhesion Platelets Plaque rupture 2 Activation Activated platelets 3 Aggregation TxA2 ADP ADP=adenosine diphosphate; TxA2=thromboxane A2 1. Cannon CP et al. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2001: 1232–1263. Fibrinogen Major Manifestations of Atherothrombosis Cerebrovascular disease Coronary artery disease Renal artery stenosis Visceral arterial disease Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) Prevalence of Atherothrombotic Manifestations is Increasing Worldwide*1 Prevalence 2000 2005 Populations aged >50 years 205.0 million (5.1% since 1997) 222.2 million (13.9% since 1997) MI 9.1 million (12.8% since 1997) 10.7 million (32.7% since 1997) Ischemic stroke 7.1 million (11.8% since 1997) 8.4 million (31.6% since 1997) *Projected populations of people aged >50 years and estimated prevalence of MI and ischemic stroke accumulated in 14 countries: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) 1. Guillot F et al. Circulation 1998; 98: A1421 (Abstract). Increased Risk in Other Vascular Beds After an Atherothrombotic Event1–4 Increased risk of MI CHD=coronary heart disease 1. 2. 3. 4. Adult Treatment Panel II. Circulation 1994; 89: 1333–1435. Kannel WB. J Cardiovasc Risk 1994; 1: 333–339. Wilterdink JI et al. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 857–863. Criqui MH et al. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 381–386. Increased risk of stroke ACS is an Important Manifestation of Atherothrombosis1 Plaque rupture Old term Stable angina UA New term Atherothrombosis Days– weeks NonQ-wave MI UA/NSTEMI Antithrombotic therapy Q-wave MI STEMI Minutes– hours Thrombolysis primary PCI UA=unstable angina; NSTEMI=non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention 1. Adapted with permission from Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205–218. Incidence of ACS in the US Number of patients with ACS discharged from US hospitals in 2002 (including secondary discharges) ACS 1,673,0001 UA 728,0001* MI 973,0001* NSTEMI 55–70% of ACS patients2 STEMI 30–45% of ACS patients2 *28,000 hospitalizations received both diagnoses for UA and MI 1. American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke statistical update. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association 2005. 2. NRMI-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 365A–366A. Pathophysiology of STEMI1 Generally caused by a completely occlusive thrombus in a coronary artery Results from stabilization of a platelet aggregate at the site of plaque rupture by fibrin mesh Platelet RBC Fibrin mesh GPIIb/IIIa RBC=red blood cell 1. Antman EM. In: Califf RM, ed. Atlas of Heart Diseases, VIII. Philadelphia, PA: Current Medicine, 1996. High Risk of Mortality Following Acute MI Approximately 33% of patients with an MI will die before they reach the hospital1 NRMI 34 (n=81,679)*2 In-hospital mortality GRACE Registry (n=5,476)3 12.3% 7.8% Reperfused 6.6% – Not reperfused 18.7% – 6-month† mortality – 4.8% *Patients with STEMI from the NRMI 34 database (n=153,486); †postdischarge; GRACE=The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; within 6 years 18% of men and 35% of women will suffer an additional heart attack4; NRMI=National Registry for Myocardial Infarction 1. Boersma E et al. Lancet 2003; 361: 847–858. 2. NRMI 3-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 783–789. 3. Goldberg RJ et al. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 288–293. 4. Antman EM et al. 2004 ACC/AHA STEMI Guidelines. Available at:www.accp.org/clinical/guidelines/stemi/index.pdf. Accessed February 2005. Ischemic Heart Disease Has a Devastating Impact on Quality of Life1 Total DALY* loss (%) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Depression Ischemic heart disease Stroke Schizophrenia Lung cancer Breast cancer *Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) combine years of potential life lost due to premature death with years of productive life lost due to disability 1. World Health Organization. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke, 2004. Available at: URL: http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/. Accessed February 2005. Current Treatments for the Acute Management of STEMI Assessing Reperfusion Options for Patients with STEMI1 STEP 1: Assess time and risk (time from symptom onset, risk of STEMI, risk of thrombolysis, time for transport to PCI lab) STEP 2: Determine whether fibrinolysis or invasive strategy is preferred* Fibrinolysis preferred if: Invasive strategy preferred if: Early presentation (<3 hours) Invasive strategy not an option Delay to invasive strategy Skilled PCI lab with surgical backup available High risk (i.e. cardiogenic shock) Contraindications to fibrinolysis Late presentation (>3 hours) Diagnosis of STEMI is in doubt *If presentation is <3 hours from onset and there is no delay to an invasive strategy, there is no preference for either strategy 1. Antman EM et al. Circulation 2004; 110: 588–636. Thrombolysis Remains an Important Reperfusion Strategy Worldwide GRACE1 (n=5,476) EHS2 (n=3,438) NRMI 34*3 (n=81,679) Thrombolytic agent (%) 45.0 35.1 52.0 Catheterization (%) PCI Primary PCI 61.0 44.4 – 53.0 40.4 20.7 – – 48.0 CABG (%) 5.0 3.4 – *Patients with STEMI from the NRMI 34 database (n=153,486); EHS=EuroHeart Survey; CABG=coronary artery bypass graft 1. Goldberg RJ et al. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 288–293. 2. Hasdai D et al. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1190–1201. 3. Wiviott SD et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 783–789. Common Thrombolytic Regimens for STEMI1 Initial treatment Streptokinase (SK) 1.5 million U in 100 mL 5% dextrose or 0.9% saline over 3060 min Co-therapy Contraindications None or iv heparin x 2448 hours Alteplase (tPA) 15 mg iv bolus, then iv heparin x 2448 hours 0.75 mg/kg over 30 min, then 0.5 mg/kg iv over 60 min Total dose not over 100 mg Reteplase (rPA) 10 U + 10 U iv bolus given 30 min apart iv heparin x 2448 hours Tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) Single iv bolus 30 mg if <60 kg 35 mg if 60 kg to <70 kg 40 mg if 70 kg to <80 kg 45 mg if 80 kg to <90 kg 50 mg if ≥90 kg iv heparin x 2448 hours Prior SK or anistreplase Note: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) should be given to all patients without contraindications; iv=intravenous 1. Van de Werf F et al. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 2866. Thrombolysis and ASA in Acute STEMI: ISIS-21 25%* p <0.00001 23%* p <0.00001 14 5-week mortality (%) 12 10 42%* p <0.00001 13.2% 12.0% 11.8% 9.2% 9.4% 8.0% 8 6 4 2 0 Placebo versus SK Placebo versus ASA 162 mg Neither versus both *Odds reduction; ISIS=Second International Study of Infarct Survival 1. ISIS-2 Collaborative Group. Lancet 1988; 2: 349360. Other Routine Therapies in Acute STEMI1 ASA 150325 mg (non-enteric coated) Beta-blockers Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors Oxygen Nitrates 1. Van de Werf F et al. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 2866. Current Limitations of Pharmacologic Reperfusion Lack of initial reperfusion in 20% of patients1 – Associated with a 2 X increase in mortality Reocclusion in 5–8% of patients1 – Associated with 3 X increase in mortality Despite current therapy, 10% of STEMI patients die within one month after hospital discharge2 Within 6 years 18% of men and 35% of women will suffer another heart attack3 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. 2. Goldberg RJ et al. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 288–293. 3. Antman EM et al. 2004 ACC/AHA STEMI Guidelines. Available at: www.accp.org/clinical/guidelines/stemi/index.pdf. Accessed February 2005. Rationale for Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute MI Antiplatelet Therapy is Beneficial1 Category Odds reduction of vascular events (%)* Acute MI 30% Acute stroke 11% Prior MI 25% Prior stroke/TIA 22% Other high risk 26% 22% All trials 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Antiplatelet better Control better *Vascular events=MI, stroke or vascular death 1. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. BMJ 2002; 324: 71–86. Potent, Specific and Complementary Mode of Action of Clopidogrel1 CLOPIDOGREL C ADP ADP GPllb/llla Activation (fibrinogen receptor) ASA COX TXA2 COX=cyclo-oxygenase 1. Jarvis B et al. Drugs 2000; 60: 347–377. Collagen thrombin TXA 2 Early and Long-Term Benefits of Clopidogrel in UA/NSTEMI1 Placebo† (n=6,303) Cumulative* hazard ratio 0.14 20% p <0.001 0.12 0.10 Clopidogrel† (n=6,259) 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 3 6 Follow-up (months) 9 *Cumulative events: MI, stroke or CV death; †all patients received a background of ASA therapy 1. CURE Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494–502. 12 2002 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI* Guidelines Update: Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy1 Class I: Antiplatelet therapy should be initiated promptly. ASA should be administered as soon as possible after presentation and continued indefinitely (IA) In hospitalized patients in whom an early non-interventional approach is planned, clopidogrel should be added to ASA as soon as possible on admission and administered for at least 1 month (IA) and for up to 9 months (IB) In patients in whom a PCI is planned, clopidogrel should be started and continued for at least 1 month (IA) and up to 9 months in patients who are not at high risk for bleeding (IB) *Also known as non-Q-wave MI; ACC=American College of Cardiology; AHA=American Heart Association 1. Braunwald E et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–1374. 2002 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI* Guidelines Update: Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy (cont)1 Class I: In patients taking clopidogrel in whom elective CABG is planned, the drug should be withheld for 57 days (IB) Anticoagulation with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or iv unfractionated heparin (UFH) should be added to antiplatelet therapy with ASA and/or clopidogrel (IA) A platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonist should be administered, in addition to ASA and heparin, to patients in whom catheterization and PCI are planned. The GPIIb/IIIa antagonist may also be administered just prior to PCI (IA) *Also known as non-Q-wave MI 1. Braunwald E et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–1374. 2002 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI* Guidelines Update: Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy (cont)1 Class I: ASA 75–325 mg daily in the absence of contraindications (IA) Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily (in the absence of contraindications) when ASA is not tolerated because of hypersensitivity or gastrointestinal intolerance (IA) The combination of ASA and clopidogrel for 9 months after UA/NSTEMI (IB) *Also known as non-Q-wave MI 1. Braunwald E et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–1374. 2002 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI* Guidelines Update: Key Recommendations for Clopidogrel Therapy1 Class I: In patients in whom an early noninterventional approach is planned, clopidogrel should be added to ASA therapy as soon as possible on admission and administered for at least 1 month (A) and for up to 9 months (B) In patients in whom a PCI is planned, clopidogrel should be started and continued for at least 1 month (A) and up to 9 months in patients who are not at high risk for bleeding (B) For long-term medical therapy, the combination of ASA and clopidogrel is recommended for 9 months after UA/NSTEMI (B) *Also known as non-Q-wave MI 1. Braunwald E et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–1374. ESC Recommended Strategy in ACS Patients1 Clinical suspicion of ACS Physical examination Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, blood samples Persistent ST-segment elevation No persistent ST-segment elevation Undetermined diagnosis Thrombolysis PCI ASA, LMWH, clopidogrel*, beta-blockers, nitrates ASA *Omit clopidogrel if the patient is likely to go to CABG within 5 days High risk GPIIb/IIIa, coronary angiography Low risk Second troponin measurement Positive PCI, CABG or medical management depending upon clinical and angiographic features 1. Adapted with permission from Bertrand ME et al. Eur Heart J 2002; 23; 18091840. Twice negative Stress test, coronary angiography New Clopidogrel Clinical Trials in Acute STEMI CLopidogrel as Adjunctive ReperfusIon TherapY (CLARITY) – TIMI 28 Trial Results1 Purpose: This study investigated whether clopidogrel would produce greater angiographic and clinical benefits over placebo for patients with acute STEMI treated with fibrinolytics and other standard care 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Study Design1 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients aged 1875 years with STEMI ≤12 hours Clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose/75 mg once daily† n=1,752 Thrombolysis, heparin and ASA* R Study treatment until angiography (28 days) or hospital discharge (maximum 8 days) Clinical follow-up at 30 days n=1,739 Placebo† Primary endpoint: occluded artery (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade [TFG] 0/1) on the angiogram or death/MI by time of angiography *ASA=150–325 mg (if no ASA within prior 24 hours) as loading dose. Patients received heparin if they received a fibrin specific thrombolytic †All patients received ASA 75–162 mg/day plus other standard care 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria1 Inclusion criteria Age 1875 years STEMI within 12 hours Planned treatment with fibrinolytic Major exclusion criteria Clopidogrel within 7 days Planned clopidogrel or GPIIb/IIIa before angiography Contraindications to fibrinolysis (stroke, ICH [intracranial hemorrhage], brain tumor) Cardiogenic shock Intention of angiography within 48 hours CABG, creatinine >2.5 mg/dL, hepatic insufficiency, platelets Patients 67 kg who had received >4000 U bolus UFH or >67 kg who had received >5000 U bolus; or >1.1 mg/kg subcutaneous (sc) enoxaparin 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Global Study Sites 319 sites in 23 countries Study Endpoints1 Primary endpoint: Composite of occluded infarct-related artery (TFG 0/1) on predischarge angiogram, or death or MI before angiography Death or MI by hospital discharge (maximum 8 days) if no angiography performed Secondary endpoints: Angiographic (TFG 0/1) Clinical (death, recurrent MI or recurrent ischemia) Clinical events* at 30 days Safety endpoints: Primary: TIMI major bleeding Secondary: TIMI minor bleeding, ICH *CV death, MI, stroke or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent target vessel revascularization 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. TIMI Flow Grade Definitions1 TIMI flow grade describes epicardial blood flow: Grade 0: complete occlusion Grade 1: penetration of obstruction with no distal perfusion Grade 2: perfusion of artery with delayed flow Grade 3: full perfusion with normal flow TFG 0 Occlusion TFG 1 Penetration TFG 2 Slow flow 1. Reproduced with permission from Gibson CM et al. Circulation 2004: 109: 30963105. TFG 3 Normal flow TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade Definitions1 TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Grade (TMPG) or ‘blush score’ describes blood flow in the microvasculature: Grade 0: no dye enters Grade 1: dye slowly enters but fails to exit Grade 2: delayed entry and exit of dye Grade 3: normal entry and exit of dye TMPG 0 TMPG 1 1. Gibson CM et al. Circulation 2004: 109: 30963105. TMPG 2 TMPG 3 Relationship Between Angiographic Outcomes and Long-term Mortality1 2-year mortality (%) 16 HR: 0.41 HR: 0.51 p=0.001 p=0.038 14.6% 14 12 9.1% 10 8 6.4% 6 4.8% 4 2 0 TFG 0/1 TFG 2/3 TMPG 0/1 TMPG 2/3 *Assessed on 90-minute angiogram in TIMI 10B trial; HR=hazard ratio 1. Gibson CM et al. Circulation 2002; 105: 19091913. Baseline Characteristics1 Characteristic Age (years) Male gender (%) Hypertension (%) Hyperlipidemia (%) Current smoker (%) Diabetes mellitus (%) Prior MI (%) Prior PCI (%) Anterior MI (%) 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Clopidogrel (n=1,752) Placebo (n=1,739) 57.7 79.9 42.8 32.2 50.7 16.5 9.1 4.8 41.2 57.2 80.7 43.9 33.0 49.9 16.4 9.1 4.9 40.1 Concomitant Medications1 Characteristic Clopidogrel (n=1,752) Fibrin-specific thrombolytic (%): TNK-tPA rPA tPA Non-fibrin specific thrombolytic (%): SK No thrombolytic given (%) ASA (%) Heparin (%): UFH LMWH 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Placebo (n=1,739) 47.8 11.9 9.1 47.3 12.3 8.9 30.9 0.2 98.5 31.2 0.3 98.6 46.1 30.1 45.5 29.1 Patient Management1 Parameter Symptom onset to fibrinolytic (hours) Fibrinolytic to study drug (minutes) Median doses of study medication Angiography performed (%) Study drug to angiography (hours) Coronary revascularization (%): PCI CABG 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Clopidogrel (n=1,752) Placebo (n=1,739) 2.7 10 4 94 84 63 57.2 5.9 2.6 10 4 94 84 63 56.6 6.0 Other Cardiac Medications During Index Hospitalization1 Characteristic (%) Beta-blockers Statins ACE inhibitors/ARBs After angiography* Clopidogrel Ticlopidine Clopidogrel (n=1,752) Placebo (n=1,739) 88.7 80.4 72.7 89.6 81.1 72.1 54.5 3.5 55.6 2.9 *Some patients received open-label ADP-receptor antagonists after angiography and primary endpoint ascertainment; ARB=angiotensin receptor blocker 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Clopidogrel Improved Coronary Perfusion1 25 36% reduction* Primary endpoint* (%) p <0.001 21.7 20 15 15.0 10 5 Clopidogrel (n=1,752) Placebo (n=1,739) *Based on odds of an occluded infarct-related artery (TFG 0/1), death or MI by angiography for clopidogrel versus placebo (odds ratio: 0.64 [0.530.76]; p <0.001) 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Clopidogrel Reduced Primary Endpoint by 36%1 Clopidogrel Placebo (n=1,752) (n=1,739) Odds ratio (95% CI) p value 0.64 (0.530.76) <0.001 Individual components of primary endpoint (%) TFG 0/1 11.7 18.4 0.59 (0.480.72) Recurrent MI 2.5 3.6 0.70 (0.471.04) Death 2.6 2.2 1.17 (0.751.82) <0.001 0.08 0.49 Primary composite endpoint (%) TFG 0/1, MI or death 15.0 CI=confidence interval 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. 21.7 Consistent Results for Primary Endpoint Across Subgroups1 Characteristic Number of patients Odds reduction 3491 36 15.0 21.7 2466 1015 42 22 13.2 19.0 21.0 23.1 2796 685 35 38 14.5 16.9 20.8 24.7 1416 2065 33 38 15.0 15.0 20.7 22.2 2397 1084 31 44 14.7 15.7 20.1 24.9 1429 1431 621 31 42 26 11.4 17.8 17.1 15.7 27.1 21.9 OVERALL Age <65 years 65 years Gender Male Female Infarct location Anterior Non-anterior Fibrinolytic Fibrin-specific Non-fibrin specific Predominant heparin LMWH UFH None 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 Clopidogrel better 1.6 Placebo better 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Patients with event (%) Clopidogrel Placebo Clopidogrel Improved Angiographic Outcomes1 Clopidogrel Placebo (n=1,752) (n=1,739) Angiographic outcomes (%) TFG 3 67.8 TMPG 3 55.8 Thrombus 43.0 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. 60.8 51.2 50.8 Odds ratio (95% CI) p value 1.36 (1.181.57) 1.21 (1.051.40) 0.73 (0.640.84) <0.001 0.008 <0.001 Clopidogrel Reduced Clinical Events by 20% at 30 Days1 Placebo (14.1%) Patients with endpoint (%) 15 20%* p=0.03 Clopidogrel (11.6%) 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 Time (days) *Odds ratio in CV death, MI or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. 25 30 Consistent Results Across 30-day Endpoints1 Odds ratio (95% CI) Endpoint Odds reduction Patients with event (%) Clopidogrel Placebo CV death 3 4.4 4.5 Recurrent MI 31 4.1 5.9 Recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization 24 3.5 4.5 Stroke 46 0.9 1.7 CV death or MI 17 8.4 9.9 CV death, MI or stroke 18 9.1 10.9 CV death, MI or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization 20 11.6 14.1 21 12.3 15.0 CV death, MI, stroke or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.6 Clopidogrel better Placebo better 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Safety1 Clopidogrel (n=1733) Placebo (n=1719) p value Primary bleeding endpoint, n (%) TIMI major 23 (1.3) 19 (1.1) NS Secondary bleeding endpoints, n (%) TIMI minor TIMI major or minor ICH 17 (1.0) 40 (2.3) 8 (0.5) 9 (0.5) 28 (1.6) 12 (0.7) NS NS NS Bleeding through 30 days, n (%) TIMI major TIMI minor TIMI major or minor 33 (1.9) 27 (1.6) 59 (3.4) 30 (1.7) 16 (0.9) 46 (2.7) NS NS NS NS=not statistically significant 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. Summary1 In patients aged 75 years with STEMI, receiving ASA and standard fibrinolytic therapy, a loading dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel followed by clopidogrel 75 mg once daily resulted in: A 36% reduction (p <0.001) in the odds of an occluded infarctrelated artery, or death or MI by time of pre-discharge angiography or hospital discharge (maximum 8 days) Consistent results across all major subgroups At 30 days, a 20% reduction (p=0.03) in CV death, MI or recurrent ischemia leading to urgent revascularization No significant excess in TIMI major bleeding or ICH 1. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. COMMIT/CCS-2: ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial Purpose: To determine whether adding clopidogrel can produce a further reduction in mortality and the risk of vascular events in hospitalized patients admitted with acute STEMI1 1. CCS-2 Collaborative Group. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 435441. Study Design1 Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily* (n=~23,000) Patients with acute STEMI 24 hours n=~46,000 R Double-blind treatment until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 4 weeks (n=~23,000) Placebo* (2 X 2 factorial with metoprolol) *All patients received a background of ASA 162 mg/day during the study 1. CCS-2 Collaborative Group. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 435441. Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria1 Inclusion criteria: Suspected acute MI (with definite ECG changes: ST elevation or left bundle block branch [LBBB]) Within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms No clear indication/contraindication to trial treatments Exclusion criteria: High risk of adverse drug reactions: Allergy to ASA or any trial drug Active bleeding or hematologic disorder Persistent hypotension or bradycardia High-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, pacemaker, cardiogenic shock Small likelihood of potential benefits: Low risk of MI death (non-typical MI, primary PCI) 1. CCS-2 Collaborative Group. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 435441. Study Endpoints1 Co-primary endpoints: Death Death, non-fatal MI or non-fatal stroke Safety endpoints: Major non-cerebral bleeding (fatal or transfused) Hemorrhagic stroke 1. CCS-2 Collaborative Group. J Cardiovasc Risk 2000; 7: 435441. Patient Baseline Characteristics1 Characteristic Female (%) Age >70 (%) Time delay <6 hours (%) Killip class II/III (%) STEMI/LBBB (%) Fibrinolytic: All patients (%) STEMI <12 hours (%) Clopidogrel Placebo (n=22,960) (n=22,891) 27.7 26.0 33.8 24.1 93.1 27.9 26.0 33.7 24.0 93.1 49.7 67.8 49.8 67.7 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Concomitant Medications During Index Hospitalization1 Therapy Anticoagulants ACE inhibitors Nitrates (oral or iv) Diuretics Anti-arrhythmics Calcium antagonists Clopidogrel (n=22,960) Placebo (n=22,891) 74.1% 68.2% 94.1% 23.3% 22.4% 11.8% 75.0% 68.3% 94.3% 23.3% 22.2% 11.8% 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Clopidogrel Reduced the Composite of Death, MI or Stroke by 9%1 Events (%) Placebo (10.1%) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 RRR=9% p=0.002 Clopidogrel (9.3%) 0 7 14 21 28 Days (up to 28 days) RRR=relative risk reduction 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Clopidogrel Reduced Mortality by 7%1 Placebo (8.1%) 9 RRR=7% 8 p=0.03 Mortality (%) 7 Clopidogrel (7.5%) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 7 14 21 28 Days (up to 28 days) 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Clopidogrel Decreased Re-Infarction1 Outcome after re-MI Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Placebo Odds ratio & 95% CI (n=22,891) Clopidogrel better Placebo better Fatal MI 209 (0.9%) 223 (1.0%) Non-fatal MI 273 (1.2%) 330 (1.4%) ALL 482 (2.1%) 553 (2.4%) 13% reduction p=0.02 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Effects of Clopidogrel on Stroke1 Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Placebo (n=22,891) Ischemic 162 (0.7%) 192 (0.8%) Hemorrhagic 55 (0.2%) 55 (0.2%) ALL 216 (0.9%) 249 (1.1%) Type Odds ratio & 95% CI Clopidogrel better Placebo better 14% reduction p=NS 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. COMMIT: Fatal and Non-Fatal Major Bleeds1 Type Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Placebo (n=22,891) 39 16 40 15 36 46 134 (0.58%) 37 36 124 (0.54%) Cerebral Fatal Non-fatal Non-cerebral Fatal Non-fatal Any major bleed 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Effects of Clopidogrel on Death, Re-MI or Stroke by Days to Event1 Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Placebo (n=22,891) 0 463 (2.0) 523 (2.3) 1 486 (2.1) 527 (2.3) 23 449 (2.0) 451 (2.0) 47 432 (1.9) 463 (2.0) 828 295 (1.3) 347 (1.5) ALL 2125 (9.3%) 2311 (10.1%) Events by day Odds ratio & 95% CI Clopidogrel better Placebo better 9% increase p=0.002 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Consistent Effects of Clopidogrel on Death, Re-MI or Stroke by Age and Gender1 Baseline features Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Placebo (n=22,891) Male Female Age (years) <60 6069 ≥70 1276 (7.7%) 849 (13.3%) 1416 (8.6%) 895 (14.0%) 487 (5.1%) 747 (10.2%) 891 (14.9%) 513 (5.4%) 835 (11.2%) 963 (16.2%) ALL 2125 (9.3%) 2311 (10.1%) Odds ratio & 95% CI Clopidogrel better Placebo better Gender 9% reduction p=0.002 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Effects of Clopidogrel on Death, Re-MI or Stroke by Time Delay and Fibrinolytic Use1 Baseline features Clopidogrel (n=22,958) Odds ratio & 95% CI Placebo (n=22,891) Clopidogrel better Placebo better Time delay (hours) 06 712 1324 776 (9.3%) 672 (9.7%) 666 (8.8%) 904 (10.9%) 735 (10.7%) 666 (8.7%) Fibrinolytic used Yes No 1005 (8.8%) 1120 (9.7%) 1123 (9.9%) 1188 (10.3%) ALL 2125 (9.3%) 2311 (10.1%) 9% reduction p=0.002 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Conclusions1 Clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) on a background of standard therapy including ASA was beneficial at 4 weeks for a wide range of acute STEMI patients Clopidogrel reduced mortality* by 7% (p=0.03) Clopidogrel reduced the risk of death, non-fatal MI or nonfatal stroke by 9% (p=0.002) No significant increase in the risk of major (fatal or transfused) bleeding occurred with clopidogrel *Death during initial hospitalization 1. Chen ZM et al. Oral presentation, ACC 2005. Available at: URL: http://www.commit-ccs2.org. Accessed April 2005. Incidence of ACS in the US Number of patients with ACS discharged from US hospitals in 2002 (including secondary discharges) ACS 1,673,0001 Unstable angina 728,0001* MI 973,0001* NSTEMI 55–70% of ACS patients2 STEMI 30–45% of ACS patients2 Scope of the CURE trial Scope of the CLARITY/COMMIT trials *28,000 hospitalizations received both diagnoses for UA and MI 1. American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke statistical update. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association 2005. 2. NRMI-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 365A–366A. Evolution of Pharmacologic Reperfusion1 Occluded infarct-related artery (%) TIMI 11 1985; 90 minutes 3 APRICOT2 1993; 3 months 2005; 3.5 days 60 57 47% p <0.001 50 40 30 22% p=0.26 32 30 25 20 18.4 10 36% p <0.001 11.7 0 SK TPA Placebo 1. TIMI Study Group. New Engl J Med 1985; 312: 932–936. 2. Meijer A et al. Circulation 1993 87: 1524–1530. 3. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. ASA ASA ASA + clopidogrel APRICOT=Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In COronary Thrombolysis Complementary Results of CLARITY and COMMIT for Patients with STEMI Significant improvement in coronary perfusion and clinical outcomes versus standard care (CLARITY) Significant reduction in mortality for patients receiving clopidogrel versus standard care alone (COMMIT) No significant increase in major bleeding or ICH (COMMIT and CLARITY) The Role of Clopidogrel in Improving Atherothrombosis Management The Ongoing Clopidogrel Clinical Trial Program Covers All Manifestations of Atherothrombosis 1 Cerebrovascular 2 Cardiovascular 3 Peripheral arterial CHARISMA CAPRIE1 MATCH2 ACTIVE CARESS Stroke TIA Acute MI UA Prior MI PCI/stenting Atrial fibrillation CHARISMA CAPRIE1 ACTIVE COMMIT CLARITY3 CURE4 CLASSICS5 CREDO6 Intermittent claudication Peripheral vascular intervention CHARISMA CAPRIE1 CASPAR © Teri J McDermott CMI 2003 1. CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329–1339. 2. Diener HC et al. Lancet 2004; 364: 331–337. 3. Sabatine M et al. New Eng J Med 2005; 352: 1179–1189. 4. The CURE trial investigators. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494–502. 5. Bertrand ME et al. Circulation 2000; 102: 624–629. 6. Steinhubl SR et al. JAMA 2002; 288: 2411–2420. Conclusions STEMI is a sudden and severe consequence of underlying atherothrombotic disease, which requires immediate reperfusion therapy Clopidogrel reduced mortality and improved coronary perfusion and clinical outcomes for patients with STEMI receiving standard medical care (including thrombolytics and ASA) Clopidogrel (including a loading dose) does not significantly increase major bleeding or ICH versus standard care alone CLARITY and COMMIT complement the positive benefits of clopidogrel seen in other clinical trials and atherothrombosis populations