Transcript Kein Folientitel - Link & Learn Aviation Training Gmbh

Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Introduction of new European Requirements on
Continuing Airworthiness
(Not yet published)
The presentation is based on the final draft.
Franz Graser, Austro Control
Page 1
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Presentation - Content
•Basic Rule / European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
•Implementing Rule on Continuing Airworthiness
•PART-M
“Continuing Airworthiness, C of A”
•PART-145“Maintenance Organisations”
•PART-66
“Certifying Staff – Licence”
•PART-147“Training Organisations”
Page 2
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
Page 3
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002
“Essential Requirement”
• Basis for Common rules in the aviation field within
European Union
• Basis for establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency
• Publication: 7 September 2002
• Entry into force: 28 September 2002
Page 4
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002
“Essential Requirement”
• Entry into force: 28 September 2002
• Agency commencement of operations:
12 months after entry into force: 28 September 2003
Page 5
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002
“Essential Requirement”
• Article 5.2(c) – Continuing Airworthiness (C of A)
• Article 5.2(d) – Maintenance Organisation Approval
• Article 5.2(e) – Certifying Staff
• Article 5.2(f) – Training Organisation Approval
Page 6
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
Article 5 of the “Essential Requirement” form the basis for the
Commission Regulation (EC) No…/..
“Implementing Rule on the continuing airworthiness of
aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and
on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in
these tasks”
Entry into force 28 September 2003, Not yet published
Page 7
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
• Implementing Rule on Continuing Airworthiness…….regulates
the transfer from JAR Maintenance Codes to European
Regulation and has 4 Annexes:
• I:
• II:
• III:
• IV:
PART-M (based on Draft JAR-M)
PART-145 (based on existing JAR-145)
PART-66 (based on existing JAR-66)
PART-147 (based on existing JAR-147)
Page 8
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Basic Rule / EASA
• Each PART is divided into
Section A - Technical Requirements (Applicant) and
Section B - Administrative Procedures (Competent Authority)
• Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance to PARTs are
currently under development by EASA
Page 9
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Relationship between Regulations / The Concept
Graph 1
Implementing Rules
Essential Requirements
IR-Maintenance
Certificate of A/W
Continuing Airworthiness
5.2(c) and ANN1-1d
In Service Continuing Airworthiness
Commercial Aircraft
Heavy/ complex a/c
In Service Continuing Airworthiness
Non Commercial Aircraft
Light/simple a/c
Approved Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation
Maintenance Organisation
Approval
5.2(d) and ANN1-1d
PART-145
Maintenance Organisations
Certifying Staff
5.2(e)
PART-66
Aircraft Maintenance Licences
Training Organisation Approval
5.2(f)
PART-147
Maintenance Training
Organisations
PART-M Approved Maintenance
Organisations
Licenced A/C eng.
Obligations
Optional
Page 10
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Transition Schedule for maintenance implementation rules
Sept. 03
Sept.04
Sept.05
Sept. 06
Sept. 07
Sept.08
Part- M Compliance
1. C.A.T. and large aircraft to
use Part 145
2. Continued Airworthiness
for C.A.T.
Part-145 Compliance
1. Human Factors
2. Part 66 licence > 5700 kg
3. Part 66 licence < 5700 kg
4. Differences JAR 145/Part
145 (as level 2 findings)
5. 145 Org. outside EU
acceptance of CRS
6. Time limited certificates.
Part-66 Compliance
1. Issue of licences 5700 kg
and below.
2. Issue of licenses above
5700 kg.
Part-147 Compliance
1. Differences JAR 147/Part
147 (as level 2 findings).
2. Time limited certificates
Note:
1. Regulation 1592/2002 is effective from 28 September 2003.
A red line (----) indicates a transition period.
2. A blue arrow indicates immediate effectivity.
3.
Page 11
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Implementing Rule
PART- M
Page 12
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Content
• Accountability
• Continuing Airworthiness
• Maintenance Standards
• Components
• Maintenance Organisation
• Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation
• Certificate of Release to Service
• Certificate of Airworthiness
Page 13
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Concept
2 ways of managing continuing airworthiness
Approved
• Approved Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation
- Subpart-G
• Maintenance released by:
- Subpart-F
- PART-145
Non Approved (only for non Commercial Air Transport)
• Continuing Airworthiness Management by the owner
• Maintenance released by:
- An Approved Maintenance Organisation
- An PART-66 licensed Engineer
Page 14
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Concept
The Certificate of Airworthiness of
unlimited duration
+
An Airworthiness Review Certificate
• Valid 1 to 3 years
• Validating the C of A when accompanying it
Page 15
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Concept
3 ways of issuing an “ARC” Airworthiness Review Certificate
By an Approved Continuing Airworthiness Management
Organisation
Only for aircraft managed by the same approved organisation for
the last 6 months
By the Member State based on a recommendation by an Approved
Continuing Airworthiness Management Organisation
For aircraft not managed by an approved organisation or not having
been managed by the same approved organisation for the last 6
months
By the Member State after direct inspection
For certain cases where the authority feels it must intervene. Some
cases will be listed.
Page 16
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart A: General
Applicability:
- Contains the Continuing Airworthiness requirements
applicable to all aircraft and their components issued with
a certificate of airworthiness
• Effectivity
• Definitions
Page 17
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M SubPART-B: Accountability
General Aviation: The owner/lessee
Can delegate tasks to approved organisations with a
“Continuing Airworthiness Arrangement”
Page 18
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M SubPART-B: Accountability
Commercial Air Transport: The Operator
• Must be approved according to Subpart G for continuing airworthiness
management.
(Subpart G for AOC holders is based on Subpart M of JAR-OPS)
• In the case of Commercial Air Transport, it is important to stress that:
- The continuing airworthiness management is the
operator’s direct responsibility
- Responsibilities and tasks remain unchanged
- Only the C of A renewal has been added to the responsibilities
Page 19
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart C: Continuing Airworthiness
• Continuing Airworthiness Tasks
• Maintenance Programme
• Airworthiness Directives
• Data for Modifications and Repairs
• Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Record System
• Operator's technical Log System
• Transfer of Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Records
Page 20
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart D: Maintenance Standards
• Maintenance Data
• Performance of Maintenance
• Aircraft defects
Page 21
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart E: Components
• Installation
• Component Maintenance
• Service Life Limited Components
• Control of Unserviceable Components
Page 22
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart F: Maintenance Organisation
• Applicability
• Application and issue
• Extent of Approval
• Maintenance Organisation
Manual
• Facilities
• Personnel Requirements
• Certifying Staff
• Components, Equipment
and Tools
• Maintenance Data
• Maintenance Work Orders
• Maintenance Standards
• Aircraft Certificate of
Release to Service
• Component Certificate of
Release to Service
• Privileges of the
Organisation
• Organisational review
• Continued validity of
approval
Page 23
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart G: Continuing Airworthiness
Management Organisation
• Applicability
• Application and issue
• Extent of Approval
• Continuing Airworthiness
Management Exposition
• Facilities
• Personnel
• Airworthiness review Staff
• Quality System
• Continuing Airworthiness
Standards
• Documentation
• Airworthiness review
• Privileges of the
Organisation
• Organisational review
• Continued validity of
approval
Page 24
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart H: Certificate of Release to Service
• Aircraft Certificate of Release to Service
• Component Certificate of Release to Service
• Pilot-Owner Authorisation
Page 25
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Subpart I: Certificate of Airworthiness
• Validity
• Aircraft continuing airworthiness review
• Transfer of aircraft registration within the EU
• Airworthiness review of aircraft imported into the EU
Page 26
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
PART-M Appendix I to VIII
• Appendix I: Continuing Airworthiness Arrangement
• Appendix II: Authorised Release Certificate (EASA Form 1)
• Appendix III: Airworthiness Review Certificate (EASA Form 15)
• Appendix IV: Approval Ratings - Subpart F Organisation
• Appendix V: Approval Certificate – Subpart F Organisation
(EASA Form 3)
• Appendix VI: Approval Certificate – Subpart G Organisation
(EASA Form 14)
•Appendix VII: Complex Maintenance Tasks
•Appendix VIII: Limited Pilot Owner Maintenance
Page 27
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Implementing Rule
PART-145
Page 28
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
The basis for PART-145
• PART-145 is based upon JAR-145 Amendment 5, dated 1
January 2003
• Changes are made in order to ensure consistency with newly
introduced PART-M and PART-66, to include aeroplane and
helicopters with a maximum take-off mass below 5700kg
• No further changes to the content of the requirement
Page 29
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Implementing Rule
PART-66
Page 30
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
The basis for PART-66
• ICAO Annex 1
• PART-66 is based upon JAR-66 Issue 1 dated 3 April 1998.
This code applied to certifying staff on aeroplanes and
helicopters with a maximum take-off mass of 5700kg and
above
• This code has been completed to include aeroplanes and
helicopters with a maximum take-off mass below 5700kg
• Other additional changes are made in order to ensure
consistency with newly introduced PART-M, in particular as
concerns the use of the PART-66 licence outside the PART145 environment
Page 31
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes to JAR-66 – General
• Finally changes were introduced with the objective of
clarifying the border between PART-145 and PART-66.
• PART-145 deals with the requirements and privileges of
certifying staff within an Approved Maintenance
Organisation, while PART-66 deals with the requirement and
privileges associated with the licence.
• This change has also been made necessary because of the
introduction of PART-M, where the privileges of the licence
holder will be different to those from an PART-145 Approved
Maintenance Organisation.
Page 32
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Definition of “Large Aircraft” according to Commission
regulation … continuing airworthiness of aircraft…
“Large Aircraft” means an aircraft, classified as an aeroplane
with a maximum take off mass of more than 5700kg, or a
multi-engined helicopter”
Remark:
All other aircraft are „non-large aircraft“, the wording „light aircraft“ will be
used for this part of the presentation
Page 33
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes to JAR-66 – Light Aircraft
• The scope of existing A, B1, and B2 categories is extended to
include light aircraft
• The scope of existing C category is extended to include light
aircraft. Category C is an option and not required by PART145 and PART-M. Release to service for light aircraft will be
performed by Category B1 and/or B2 certifying staff, as
appropriate
Page 34
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes to JAR-66 – Light Aircraft
• Category B1.2 (piston engine aeroplanes) examination
syllabus is simplified in order to reflect the fact that the
technology of the piston engine aeroplane group is simpler
than that of the turbine engine aeroplane group. A new Module
11b specific to piston engine aeroplanes is introduced, the
number of questions required for Subcategory B1.2 and A2 has
been reduced
• Category B1.4 (piston engine helicopter) examination syllabus
remains almost the same (some changes in Module 5 only)
Page 35
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes to JAR-66 – Light Aircraft
• Experience requirements for categories B1.2 and B1.4 are
reduced to 3 years instead of 5 years previously
• Light aircraft will require type examination only, instead of
type training for large aircraft. The text includes however a
provision for the Agency to require type training for those
light aircraft it would consider as complex aircraft
• Group Ratings instead of type ratings will be possible for
light aircraft
Page 36
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes due to the introduction of PART-M
• The minimum age to apply for an PART-66 licence is 18 years
old. This aligns with ICAO Annex 1.
• The scope of B1 and B2 licence holders includes now line and
base maintenance. This is due to the fact that PART-M
requires all maintenance (including based maintenance) to be
released to service by B1 and B2 certifying staff. It should be
noted that for large aircraft PART-145 still limits the scope of
B1 and B2 certifying staff to line maintenance.
• Continuing experience requirements are introduced. This is
based upon ICAO Annex 1 requirements and makes the
PART-66 licence ICAO compliant.
Page 37
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• “Protected rights” are now covered in PART-66.A.70
(conversion provisions)
• PART-66.A.1 defines the licence categories/sub-categories
• PART-66.A.30 includes reduced experience requirements for
Subcategories B1.2 and B1.4. The experience required to add
a category C to a subcategory B1.2 or B1.4 is increased to 5
years.
• PART-66.A.30 new sub-paragraph is introduced which
specifies the experience requirements to add a Category or
subcategory to an existing category. The detailed requirement
is included in Appendix IV to PART-66.
Page 38
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
PART-66 Appendix IV
To:
From:
A1
A1
A2
A3
A4
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B1.4
B2
6 months
6 months
6 months
2 years
6 months
2 years
1 year
2 years
6 months
6 months
2 years
6 months
2 years
1 year
2 years
6 months
2 years
1 year
2 years
6 months
2 years
2 years
1 year
2 years
6 months
2 years
6 months
6 months
6 months
1 year
2 years
6 months
2 years
6 months
1 year
A2
6 months
A3
6 months
6 months
A4
6 months
6 months
6 months
B1.1
None
6 months
6 months
6 months
B1.2
6 months
None
6 months
6 months
2 years
B1.3
6 months
6 months
None
6 months
6 months
6 months
B1.4
6 months
6 months
6 months
None
2 years
6 months
2 years
B2
6 months
6 months
6 months
6 months
1 year
1 year
1 year
2 years
1 year
Page 39
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• PART-66.45 new sub-paragraph is introduced which specifies
the type training requirements. The detailed requirement is
included in Appendix III to PART-66.
• Appendix III “Type training and examination standard”. This
Appendix is based on ATA Specification 104 and TGL40.
Page 40
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• PART-66.45 new sub-paragraph is introduced which allows
group ratings instead of type ratings for light aircraft.
Category B1 or C
• helicopter piston engine
• helicopter turbine engine
• aeroplane single piston engine – metal
structure
• aeroplane multiple piston engine –
metal structure
• aeroplane single piston engine –
wooden structure
• aeroplane multiple piston engine –
wooden structure
• aeroplane single piston engine –
composite structure
• aeroplane multiple piston engine –
composite structure
• aeroplane turbine – single engine
• aeroplane turbine – multiple engine
Category B2 or C
• aeroplane
• helicopter
Page 41
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• Manufacturer group ratings may be granted after complying
with the type rating requirements of two aircraft types
representative of the group from the same manufacturer.
• Full group ratings may be granted after complying with the
type rating requirements of three aircraft types representative
of the group from different manufacturers. However, no full
group rating may be granted to B1 multiple turbine engine
aeroplanes, where only manufacturer group rating applies.
Page 42
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• PART-66.45 new sub-paragraph is introduced to allow type
examination instead of type training for light aircraft. The type
examination standard is defined in Appendix III “Type
training and examination standard”.
Page 43
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• PART-66.75 New paragraph for certifying staff of aircraft
other that aeroplanes and helicopters. It refers to the existing
Member States national requirements.
• PART-66.80 New paragraph for certifying staff of
component. It refers to the existing Member States national
requirements.
Page 44
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
•PART-66.B.135 New paragraph based upon Chapter 25 –
conversion report - National Standard versus PART-66
standard
•PART-66.B.150 New paragraph based upon Chapter 25 –
examination credit report – National Standard versus PART66 Syllabus
Page 45
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• Appendix I to PART-66 Basic Knowledge
Requirements
Module 5 Digital Techniques - is simplified for
subcategories B1.2 and B1.4.
New Module 11b: Piston Aeroplane Aerodynamics,
Structures. Based upon former Module 11 but simplified
to cater for piston engine aircraft technology. Applicable
to Subcategories A2 and B1.2 only.
Module 16: Piston Engine, New - Diesel engine
operating principles. New paragraph 16.4.3 deals with
Electronic Engine Control (FADEC) - piston engine.
Page 46
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
• Appendix II to PART-66 Basic Examination Standard
New Appendix based upon Chapter 23
• Appendix III to PART-66
Definitions of type training levels (ATA Spec. 104).
Type training standard based upon TGL40.
Type training examination standard based upon TGL 40.
Examination standard for light aircraft exempted from
type training.
Page 47
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Detailed explanation of main differences to JAR-66
•Appendix IV to PART-66 Experience Requirements
New Appendix based upon TGL 30, but revised due to
the change of experience requirement for Category B1.2
and B1.4.
•Appendix V to PART-66
Application Form (EASA Form 19)
Licence Form (EASA Form 26) - The page entitled
‘conditions’ has been changed to reflect the use of the
PART-66 licence in non commercial air transportation
(PART-M).
Page 48
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Implementing Rule
PART-147
Page 49
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
The basis for PART-147
• PART-147 is based upon JAR-147 Amendment 1 dated 1 July
2002 Issue 1 dated 3 April 1998. Minor changes were
introduced subsequent to the PART-66 changes arising from
the extension of the rule to cover ‘light aircraft’.
• This code has been completed to include aeroplane and
helicopters with a maximum take-off mass below 5700kg.
Page 50
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes in PART-147 - light aircraft
The extension of PART-66 to cover ‘light aircraft’ induced the
following changes in PART-147:
• The approved basic training course duration for subcategory
B1.2 has been reduced to 2000 hours.
• The approved basic training course duration for subcategory
A2 has been reduced to 650 hours.
Page 51
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes in PART-147 - light aircraft
• Appendix I to PART-147 – Basic Training Course Duration
Minimum Duration of complete basic courses
Basic Course
Duration in hours
Theoretical training ratio in %
A1
800
30 to 35
A2
650
30 to 35
A3
800
30 to 35
A4
800
30 to 35
B1.1
2400
50 to 60
B1.2
2000
50 to 60
B1.3
2400
50 to 60
B1.4
2400
50 to 60
B2
2400
50 to 60
Page 52
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Changes in PART-147 - light aircraft
• Appendix II to PART-147
Approval Certificate (EASA Form 11) is based on Appendix 1
to JAR-147
• Appendix III to PART-147
Certificate of Recognition is based upon Appendix 3 to
JAR-147.
Page 53
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
EASA Internet-Address: www.easa.eu.int
Page 54
Symposium Maintenance Requirements, Vienna 23 October 2003
Questions
Page 55