Transcript Document

DATA SNAPSHOT
Jackson County
Data SnapShot Series 1.0
March 2015
Hometown Collaboration Initiative
This report has been produced by the Purdue Center for Regional Development
as a part of the Indiana Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI). HCI is funded,
in part, by the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs.
2
Table of contents
01
02
Introduction
Demography
03
04
Economy
Labor Market
01
introduction
Purpose
About Jackson County
Introduction
Purpose
This document provides information
and data about Jackson County that
can be used to guide local decisionmaking activities.
The Data SnapShot showcases a variety of
demographic, economic and labor market
information that local leaders, community
organizations and others can use to gain a
better perspective on current conditions
and opportunities in their county.
To strengthen the value and usability of the
information, we showcase the data using a
variety of visual tools such as charts, graphs
and tables. In addition, we offer key points
about the data as a way of assisting the
user with the interpretation of the
information presented.
Finally, short takeaway messages are
offered at the end of each section in order
to highlight some of the more salient
findings.
section 01
5
Introduction
About Jackson County
County Background
Established
County
Seat
Area
Neighboring
Counties
1816
Brownstown
514 sq. mi.
Bartholomew, IN
Brown, IN
Jennings, IN
Lawrence, IN
Monroe, IN
Scott, IN
Washington, IN
section 01
6
Population change
02
demography
Population pyramids
Race
Ethnicity
Educational attainment
Takeaways
Demography
Population change
Total population
projections
43,466
43,548
2013
2020
42,376
41,335
2000
2010
The total population increased by 5 percent between 2000
and 2013. The major contributor to that expansion was
natural increase (births minus deaths over that span of
time) with a net growth of over 2,200 persons.
Data on domestic migration (the difference between the
number of people moving into the county versus moving
out) show that out-migration outpaced in-migration by
more than 500 people. On the other hand, international
migration had a net increase of 1,300, indicating that the
county experienced an influx of new people from outside
the U.S.
section 02
The total population is
projected to remain
about the same
between 2013 and
2020.
Components of Population Change, 2000-2013
Total Change
2,865*
Natural Increase
2,219
International Migration
1,359
Domestic Migration
-500
*Estimation residuals are leading to a total change in population that differs from the sum of the components.
Sources: STATSIndiana, U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census, 2010 Decennial Census, 2013 Estimates, Estimates of the Components of Resident Population Change
8
Demography
Population pyramids
Population pyramids are visual representations of the age distribution of the population by
gender.
2000
2013
1.0%
2.6%
2.4%
3.5%
60-69
3.8%
4.2%
50-59
5.5%
5.7%
40-49
7.5%
7.2%
30-39
7.7%
7.5%
20-29
7.0%
10-19
0-9
Male
Age Cohort
70-79
9
6
3
80+
1.3%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
60-69
5.1%
5.5%
50-59
7.1%
7.2%
40-49
7.0%
6.6%
30-39
6.7%
6.4%
6.3%
20-29
6.1%
5.8%
6.9%
6.8%
10-19
6.7%
6.3%
7.5%
6.8%
0-9
6.8%
6.4%
0
Female
3
6
Male
70-79
Age Cohort
80+
9
Percent of Total Population
9
6
3
0
Female
3
6
9
Percent of Total Population
Approximately 50.7% of the population was female in
2000 (20,949 people), and that percent remained about
the same in 2013. What did change is the distribution of
people across the various age categories. A larger share
of people shifted into the higher age groupings over the
2000 to 2013 time period.
In particular, people 60 and over swelled from 7.2% to
9.4% for males, and from 10.3% to 11.5% for females
between 2000 and 2013. Individuals of prime working age
-- 20-49 years old -- dipped from 22.2% to 19.8% for males,
and from 21.1% to 18.8% for females. Also declining were
the percent of residents under 20 years of age.
section 02
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
9
Demography
Race
2000
The number of non-White
residents in Jackson County
increased by two percentage
points between 2000 and
2013.
While every race experienced a
numerical increase, the number of
individuals classified as Asian or of
Two or More Races increased,
fueling the doubling of the percent
of residents classified as nonwhite
between 2000 and 2013.
Black
White
98%
Other
2%
Asian
Native
Two or More
Races
2013
Black
White
96%
Other
4%
Asian
Native
Two or More
Races
section 02
Race Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
10
Demography
Ethnicity
Hispanics - 2000
3
%
Hispanics - 2013
Hispanics are individuals of
any race whose ancestry is
from Mexico, Puerto Rico,
Cuba, Spain, the Dominican
Republic or any other Spanishspeaking Central or South
American country.
There were 1,112 Hispanics
residing in Jackson County in
2000. This figure expanded to
2,697 by 2013—a 142.5 percent
increase.
6%
As a result, Hispanics now make
up 6 percent of the overall
population, a significant increase
since 2000.
section 02
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 Annual Population Estimates
11
Demography
Educational attainment
Jackson County had a 5 percentage point
increase between 2000 and 2013 in the
proportion of adults (25 and older) with an
associates, bachelors, or graduate degree.
The proportion of adults 25 years of age and
older with a high school education or more
improved from 80 percent in 2000 to 86
percent by 2013. Those with only a high
school degree remained at the 47 percent
level in both 2000 and 2013.
Adults with an associates degree grew by 2
percentage points from 2000 to 2013 (5
percent versus 7 percent), while the
proportion with a college degree or more
increased from 11 percent 14 percent over
that same time period. While educational
attainment is improving in Jackson County,
the number of adults with Associate degrees
or higher continues to lag behind the Indiana
rate of 32 percent.
2000
Bachelor's
Degree or
More, 11%
Associate's
Degree, 5%
No High
School, 20%
Some
College,
17%
2013
High School,
47%
Bachelor's
Degree or
More, 14%
No High
School, 14%
Associate's
Degree, 7%
Some
College,
18%
High School,
47%
section 02
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2000 Decennial Census and 2013 ACS
12
Demography
Takeaways
The population of Jackson County has
experienced growth since 2000, and that growth
has been fueled largely by two factors: natural
increase and international migration. These two
factors compensated for the loss of population
due to net migration (more people who moved
out of the county for other counties in Indiana or
other U.S. locations than moved into the county).
In examining the composition of Jackson County,
one finds that a larger share of the population is
now 50 years of age and over. As such, the
number of men and women of prime working
age (20-29, 30-39 and 40-49) is slowly
declining. Furthermore, the county is becoming
more diverse as a result of the growth of the
Hispanic population.
The educational attainment of adults 25 and
over has improved since 2000, but the percent
of adults with a high school education remains
sizable (at 47%). Taking time to assess whether
local economic development opportunities might
be impeded by the presence of a sizable number
of adults with a terminal high school degree may
be worthy of attention. While 1 in 5 adult residents
of the county have an associates, bachelors, or
higher education, this figure is about 11 percent
below the figure for the state of Indiana as a
whole.
Jackson County may wish to assess the
workforce skills of workers with a high
school education only. Enhancing their skills
so that they match the needs of local
businesses and industries may be a worthy
investment.
section 02
13
Establishments
03
economy
Industries
Occupations
Income and poverty
Takeaways
Economy
Establishments
The number of establishments in Jackson
County increased 33% from 2000 to 2011.
The rapid growth of establishments was largely
due to natural change. In particular, 2,723
establishments were launched in the county
between 2000-2011 while 1,945 closed, resulting
in a gain of 778 establishments. There was only a
gain of 2 establishments due to net migration.
Components of Change for Establishments
Total Change (2000-11)
780
Natural Change (births minus
deaths)
778
Net Migration
An establishment is a
physical business location.
Branches, standalones and
headquarters are all
considered types of
establishments.
Definition of Company Stages
0
2
2
Selfemployed
10-99
employees
4
1
3
2-9
employees
100-499
employees
500+
employees
section 03
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
Establishment information was calculated in-house and may differ slightly from publicly available data.
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database 15
Economy
Number of establishments by
stage/employment category
2000
Stage
2011
Establishments
Proportion
Establishments
Proportion
Stage 0
654
28%
993
32%
Stage 1
1,343
57%
1,787
57%
Stage 2
304
13%
311
10%
Stage 3
36
2%
28
1%
Stage 4
6
0%
4
0%
2,343
100%
3,123
100%
Total
The NETS Database is derived from the Dun & Bradstreet archival national establishment data, a population of known establishments
in the United States that is quality controlled and updated annually. Establishments include both private and public sector business
units and range in size from one employee (i.e., sole-proprietors and self-employed) to several thousand employees.
section 03
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
16
Economy
Number of jobs by stage/employment
category
2000
2011
Stage
Jobs
Proportion
Jobs
Proportion
Stage 0
654
3%
993
4%
Stage 1
4,831
20%
5,553
24%
Stage 2
7,801
33%
7,877
35%
Stage 3
5,904
25%
4,929
22%
Stage 4
4,438
19%
3,300
15%
Total
23,628
100%
22,652
100%
section 03
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
17
Economy
Amount of sales (2011 dollars) by
stage/employment category
2000
Stage
2011
Sales
Proportion
Sales
Proportion
Stage 0
$74,664,328
2%
$64,158,834
2%
Stage 1
$587,069,231
17%
$567,922,886
19%
Stage 2
$977,960,387
29%
$789,731,359
26%
Stage 3
$859,248,312
25%
$1,201,083,864
39%
Stage 4
$894,126,170
27%
$435,380,496
14%
Total
$3,393,068,427
100%
$3,058,277,439
100%
section 03
Note: The 2011 figures use 2012 data to include all gains and losses over the entire year.
Source: National Establishment Time Series (NETS) – 2012 Database
18
Economy
Top five industries in 2013
61.7 percent of jobs are tied to
one of the top five industries in
Jackson County.
Manufacturing is the largest industry
sector (6,186 jobs). Accommodation &
Food Services is the smallest of the top
industry sectors with 1,626 jobs.
Of the top five industries in Jackson
County, Government (+14.1%) and
Accommodation & Food Services
(+13.2%) gained jobs between 2002
and 2013. Of the other three top five
industries, Transportation &
Warehousing lost the most, with a
32.9% decrease in jobs.
Accommodation &
Food Services
6.5%
Transportation &
Warehousing
7.3%
All Other
Industries
38.3%
Retail Trade
10.9%
Government
12.1%
Manufacturing
24.9%
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
19
Economy
Industry distribution and change
NAICS
Code
Description
Jobs
2002
Jobs
2013
11
21
22
23
31-33
42
44-45
48-49
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
71
72
81
90
99
All
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting
Mining, Quarrying, & Oil & Gas Extraction
Utilities
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Transportation & Warehousing
Information
Finance & Insurance
Real Estate & Rental & Leasing
Professional, Scientific & Technical Services
Management of Companies and Enterprises
Administrative & Waste Management
Educational Services (Private)
Health Care & Social Assistance
Arts, Entertainment & Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services
Other Services (except Public Administration)
Government
Unclassified Industry
Total
1,202
163
129
1,384
6,745
526
2,956
2,689
149
574
500
628
167
626
143
1,246
196
1,436
1,172
2,639
<10
25,269
1,482
38
115
994
6,186
710
2,719
1,804
123
705
623
518
123
1,291
156
1,367
256
1,626
1,031
3,011
0
24,877
Change
(2002-2013)
% Change
(2002-2013)
280
-125
-14
-390
-559
184
-237
-885
-26
131
123
-110
-44
665
13
121
60
190
-141
372
<10
-392
23%
-77%
-11%
-28%
-8%
35%
-8%
-33%
-17%
23%
25%
-18%
-26%
106%
9%
10%
31%
13%
-12%
14%
100%
-2%
Earnings
2013
$33,527
$156,947
$91,265
$36,593
$61,783
$50,218
$25,231
$55,949
$34,047
$38,839
$25,717
$32,142
$75,489
$25,050
$13,991
$36,430
$14,509
$15,690
$18,881
$54,066
$0
$42,817
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
20
Economy
Industry distribution and change
The largest percentage gains in
employment in Jackson County
occurred in:
 Administrative, Support, Waste

Management, and Remediation
Services (+106.2 percent)
Wholesale Trade (+35.0 percent)
The largest percentage losses
in employment occurred in:
 Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas

Extraction (-76.7 percent)
Transportation and Warehousing
(-32.9 percent)
Industries with the largest gains and losses in
employment numbers between 2002 & 2013:
Administrative &
Waste Management
(+665)
Government
(+372)
Agriculture &
Forestry
(+280)
Transportation &
Warehousing
(-885)
Manufacturing
(-559)
Construction
(-390)
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
21
Economy
Top five occupations in 2013
The top five occupations in
Jackson County represent 56.7
percent of all jobs.
Management
7.6%
Office &
Administrative
Support
10.5%
Production (4,184 jobs) and
Transportation & Material Moving
(2,747 jobs) are the top two
occupations in Jackson County.
Management is the smallest of the top
five occupations with 1,896 jobs.
All Other
Occupations
43.3%
Sales & Related
10.8%
All five top occupations in Jackson
County had a decrease in jobs between
2002 and 2013. However,
Transportation & Material Moving
experienced the largest drop (-18.0%),
while Management suffered the
smallest decline (-0.6%).
Transportation &
Material Moving
11.0%
Production
16.8%
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
22
Economy
Occupation distribution and change
SOC
Description
Jobs
2002
Jobs
2013
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
53
55
99
All
Management
Business & Financial Operations
Computer & Mathematical
Architecture & Engineering
Life, Physical & Social Science
Community & Social Service
Legal
Education, Training & Library
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports & Media
Health Care Practitioners & Technical
Health Care Support
Protective Service
Food Preparation & Serving Related
Building & Grounds Cleaning Maintenance
Personal Care & Service
Sales & Related
Office & Administrative Support
Farming, Fishing & Forestry
Construction & Extraction
Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Production
Transportation & Material Moving
Military
Unclassified
Total
1,907
726
224
568
85
190
72
693
368
823
448
225
1,401
648
627
2,781
2,803
312
1,222
1,112
4,448
3,352
137
100
25,269
1,896
729
168
684
97
209
61
852
362
995
525
227
1,594
730
631
2,678
2,604
541
937
1,058
4,184
2,747
140
227
24,877
Change
(2002-2013)
% Change
(2002-2013)
Hourly Earnings
2013
-11
3
-56
116
12
19
-11
159
-6
172
77
2
193
82
4
-103
-199
229
-285
-54
-264
-605
3
127
-392
-1%
0%
-25%
20%
14%
10%
-15%
23%
-2%
21%
17%
1%
14%
13%
1%
-4%
-7%
73%
-23%
-5%
-6%
-18%
2%
127%
-2%
$24.53
$24.89
$25.62
$33.46
$26.97
$18.43
$31.15
$19.71
$14.33
$28.79
$12.09
$17.48
$9.61
$10.67
$9.67
$13.20
$14.73
$13.23
$16.53
$19.24
$16.25
$15.15
$18.48
$11.31
$16.96
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
23
Economy
Occupation distribution and change
The largest percentage gains in
jobs in Jackson County
occurred in:
 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry

(+73.4 percent)
Education, Training, and Library
(+22.9 percent)
The largest percentage loss in
employment occurred in:
 Computer and Mathematical

(-25.0 percent)
Construction and Extraction (-23.3
percent)
Occupations with the largest gains and losses
in employment between 2002 & 2013:
Farming, Fishing, &
Forestry
(+229)
Food Preparation &
Serving
(+193)
Transportation
(-650)
Construction
(-285)
Production
(-264)
Employment Increase Employment Decrease
section 03
Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – 2014.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, Self-Employed, and Extended Proprietors
24
Economy
Income and poverty
2000
2006
2013
7.8%
10.4%
12.9%
Minors (up to age 17)
in Poverty
11.0%
14.6%
17.8%
Real Median Income
(2013)
$53,315
$49,163
$49,614
Total Population in
Poverty
The median income in
Jackson County dipped by
$3,700 between 2000 and
2013 in real dollars (that is,
adjusted for inflation).
The total population in poverty
swelled from 7.8 percent to 12.9
percent between 2000 and 2013.
The rate for minors was even
higher, increasing by nearly 7
percentage points over the same
period of time.
section 03
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE)
25
Economy
Income and poverty
Median income in Jackson County has experienced significant fluctuation over time,
improving since 2011. Poverty rates for adults and minors have stabilized over the past
two years, although the rates remain high relative to the early 2000s.
54,000
21
52,000
50,000
18
Median Income
15
48,000
12
46,000
44,000
9
All Ages in
Poverty
6
42,000
3
40,000
0
Population in Poverty (percent)
Real Median Income (2013 dollars)
Minors in Poverty
section 03
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates (SAIPE)
26
Economy
Takeaways
Growth in the number of establishments in
Jackson County occurred primarily in
businesses with fewer than 10 employees
(the self-employed and Stage 1
enterprises), components of the local
economy that are often overlooked but
deserve closer attention by local leaders.
Jackson County might consider focusing on
economic development efforts that seek to
strengthen high-growth Stage 1 and 2 firms
since they employ several people and capture
sizable sales. At the same time, sales associated
with Stage 3 firms have expanded at an
impressive pace since 2000, but determining
the factors that may have contributed to the loss
of Stage 3 establishments in the county is
worthy of attention.
Real median income has undergone some
dramatic swings since 2000, but recent trends
suggest that things are improving. So too are the
poverty rates for adults and children under 18
years of age. While these poverty rates have dipped
since 2011, they remain considerably higher than
was the case in 2000.
Fluctuations in real median income experienced
between 2000 and 2013 may be tied to
employment changes in various industries in the
county during that time period. For example, gains
have occurred in some industries paying average
earnings of $50,000 or more between 2000 and
2013. At the same time, several industries that
have experienced solid job growth are providing
employees with average earnings of under
$35,000.
No doubt, the ability of the county to capture good
paying jobs will depend on the availability of a welltrained and educated workforce, something that
may be challenging in light of the smaller
percentage of adults in the county with an
associates degree or higher.
section 03
27
04
labor
market
Labor force and
unemployment
Commuteshed
Laborshed
Takeaways
Labor market
Labor force and unemployment
2002
Labor Force
Unemployment
Rate
2013
22,012
21,465
4.9%
6.2%
The labor force in Jackson County
decreased by 2.5 percent between
2002 and 2013.
This decrease could be due to a rise in the
number of individuals who are either officially
unemployed or who have given up looking for
a job, or an increase in the number of adults
who have left the workforce due to
retirement.
section 04
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Local Area Unemployment Statistics
29
Labor market
Unemployment rate
Unemployment increased dramatically after 2007, peaking at 11.2% in 2009. Since that
time, the rate has been on a steady decline, dipping to 6.2% by 2013.
12
11.2%
Unemployment Rate (percent)
10
8
6
4.9%
6.2%
4
3.9%
2
2.6%
0
section 04
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics – Local Area Unemployment Statistics
30
Labor market
Commuteshed
Out-Commuters
Same Work/
Home
9,106
A county’s commuteshed is the
geographic area to which its labor
force travels to work.
9,112
Commuters
Proportion
Bartholomew, IN
2,963
16.3%
Marion, IN
1,680
9.2%
Monroe, IN
562
3.1%
Jennings, IN
531
2.9%
Scott, IN
384
2.1%
Fifty percent of employed residents in
Jackson County commute to jobs located
outside of the county. Bartholomew
County is the biggest destination for
residents who work outside of Jackson
County.
Twenty-six percent of out-commuters
work in counties adjacent to Jackson
county; however, the second largest work
destination outside Jackson County is
the Indianapolis metropolitan area
(Marion County).
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
31
Labor market
Commuteshed in 2011
Seventy percent of Jackson
County’s working residents are
employed either in Bartholomew
or Jackson Counties. Another five
percent commute to Marion
County. An additional five percent
travel to jobs in Monroe County.
Collectively, these four counties
represent 80 percent of the
commuteshed for Jackson
County.
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
32
Labor market
Laborshed
In-Commuters
A county’s laborshed is the
geographic area from which it
draws employees.
Same Work/
Home
9,563
9,112
Fifty-one percent of individuals
working in Jackson County commute
from another county.
Twenty-two percent of in-commuters
reside in counties adjacent to
Jackson County; however, the fifth
largest source of laborers outside of
Jackson County is the Indianapolis
metropolitan area (Marion County).
Commuters
Proportion
Jennings, IN
1,266
6.8%
Bartholomew, IN
1,230
6.6%
Scott, IN
665
3.6%
Clark, IN
646
3.5%
Marion, IN
437
2.3%
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD)
33
Labor market
Laborshed in 2011
The bulk (70 percent) of Jackson
County’s workforce is drawn from
Bartholomew, Clark, Jackson,
Jennings, and Scott Counties.
Another five percent is drawn from
Decatur, Floyd, Jefferson, and
Johnson Counties. Furthermore,
an additional five percent are
drawn from Lawrence, Marion,
and Washington Counties.
Combined, the twelve counties
represent 80 percent of Jackson
County’s laborshed.
section 04
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD, PCRD
34
Labor market
Takeaways
The Great Recession that impacted the U.S.
economy between 2007 and 2009 took a major
toll on the Jackson County’s unemployment rate.
While the rate was quite low in 2000, it
skyrocketed to over 11 percent by 2009. Recent
figures make clear that the unemployment rate
has improved significantly since 2010.
Despite the modest growth in the population over
the past decade or more, the county’s labor force
has decreased in size since 2002. While it is
difficult to pinpoint the exact reason for the drop
in the county’s labor force, two possible
explanations are as follows. First, an increasing
number of unemployed individuals may be
discouraged workers who have given up trying to
find a job. Or second, more people in the
workforce have opted to retire and their positions
have been eliminated or left unfilled.
Approximately 50 percent of Jackson County’s
residents in the workforce are gainfully employed
outside of the county. This represents a
tremendous loss of human talent that is
unavailable to contribute to the social and
economic vitality of the county. It may be
worthwhile for local leaders and industries to
determine the human capital attributes of
workers who commute to jobs outside the county.
By so doing, they could be positioned to
determine how best to reduce the leakage of
educated and skilled workers to surrounding
counties by spurring the growth of good paying
jobs that will keep these workers in their home
county.
The laborshed and commuteshed data
offer solid evidence of the value of
pursuing economic and workforce
development strategies on a regional
(multi-county) basis.
section 04
35
Report Contributors
This report was prepared by the Purdue Center for Regional Development in partnership
with Purdue University Extension.
Report Authors
Data Analysis
Report Design
Elizabeth Dobis
Bo Beaulieu, PhD
Indraneel Kumar, PhD
Ayoung Kim
Tyler Wright
36
Purdue Extension Community Development
(CD) . . .
works to strengthen the capacity of local leaders,
residents and organizations to work together to develop
and sustain strong, vibrant communities.
FOR MORE
INFORMATION
Please contact
PCRD
Mann Hall, Suite 266
Purdue University
Purdue Center for Regional Development
(PCRD) . . .
seeks to pioneer new ideas and strategies that contribute
to regional collaboration, innovation and prosperity.
765-494-7273
[email protected]