Transcript Document

APPROVAL OF CORN
MON 810
TRANSFORMATION
EVENT: THE PHILIPPINE
EXPERIENCE
Clarito M. Barron
Chair, BPI Biotechnology Core Team
Bt corn- A Corn protected from corn borer
damage, a GMO, which has bacterial gene
transferred in the laboratory
Non-Bt corn
Bt corn
Monsanto
Philippines, Inc.
Applicant
Bureau of Plant
Industry
Regulatory Agency
STRP, BAFPS,
BAI, FPA
Safety Risk
Assessment-Food,
Feed, and
Environment
Consistent Philippine Government
Policy on
BIOTECHNOLOGY (1979-date)
• Corazon C. Aquino – EO 430-modern biotechnology
regulation; R & D - NCBP, biotechnology high priority
in Science and Technology
• Fidel V. Ramos – first National Modern Biotechnology
R & D Program in Agriculture signed AFMA into law –
support for agricultural biotech
• Joseph Ejercito Estrada – signed statement in support
of agricultural biotechnology
• Gloria Macapagal Arroyo – signed policy statement on
modern biotechnology for national development; DA
AO No. 8 S 2002 – regulation of plant and plant
products produced through modern biotechnology
DA AO No. 8 Series of 2002
Addresses risk of GM crops to
• Human health
• Animal health
• Environment
DA AO. No. 8 – regulates genetically modified
plant and plant products
• Central biosafety measure – science-based risk
assessment, transparent, case by case, targettransformation event
• Science-based risk assessment- Risk – chance of
harm or injury, identification and evaluation of risk
– based on scientific studies
• Design of mitigating measures to reduce the risk –
guided by information derived from scientific
studies, if such information is lacking – regulators
may require new study to obtain information before
a decision is made
POLICY ON RELEASE FOR
PROPAGATION
“No regulated article shall be released for propagation
unless: (i) a Permit for Propagation has been secured
from BPI; (ii) it can be shown that based on field testing
conducted in the Philippines, the regulated article will
not pose any significant risks to the environment; (iii)
food and/or feed safety studies show that the regulated
article will not pose any significant risks to human and
animal health; and (iv) if the regulated article is a pestprotected plant, it’s transformation event has been duly
registered with the FPA.”
Submit:
• 5 copies of Application Form
Applicant
Grace period
of 60 days to
correct
defects
If reg. art. is to be imported:
• certification fr. country of import that reg.art. is of similar
transformation event approved locally;
• support documents (technical dossier; copy of PIS; &
BPI certification that reg.art. has undergone satisfactory
field testing in the Phils.
• notification fr. country of import in accordance w/ existing
international agreements on GMOs
APPROVED
Within 90 days from acceptance
BPI
DENIED
Process & evaluate within
5 days of receipt
For evaluation on risk
assessment
STRP
Shall submit report w/n 30 days
NO
Sufficient in Form &
Substance?
YES
In all instances
BAFPS
Shall submit report w/n 30 days
If pest-protected plant
FPA
Shall submit report w/n 30 days
APPLICATION TO
RELEASE FOR
PROPAGATION
If intended as feed
BAI
Shall submit report w/n 30 days
For conduct of public
consultation
Applicant
Shall publish PIS in 2 papers, & invite
comments w/in 30-day pd.
Risk assessment of Bt corn
The applicant was required to submit
1. Certification from NCBP that Bt corn MON810 field
trials had been conducted and no unnecessary risk
to the researcher or environment has been identified
2. Scientific reports to substantiate claim
a. that Bt corn MON810 is safe and as nutritious as any
ordinary corn variety whether for humans or animals
b. that Bt corn MON810 does not pose risk to the
environment more than the ordinary corn
Food/Feed safety assessment (1)
• Toxicity – level of native toxicants if present must
fall within the range known for varieties of the
species used as food, native toxicant if present,
reacts to processing conditions similarly to native
toxicants in non-GM varieties. No natural toxicant
in corn
• Nutritional value – nutrients levels within range
known of varieties used as food, can substitute
non-GM counterpart in food/feed preparation
Food/Feed safety assessment (2)
• Allergenicity – level of native allergens if any
must fall within the range known for varieties
of the species used as food, native allergens if
any, reacts to processing conditions similarly to
native toxicants in non-GM varieties. No
natural allergen in corn
Food/Feed safety assessment
of Bt corn
• Presence of Bt protein – only
difference between Bt corn and non-Bt
corn
• Bt protein – assessed for possible
toxicity and possible allergenicity
• Bt corn – nutritional profile compared
with ordinary corn
Environmental safety issues in
evaluating GM crop for commercial
planting
How does Bt corn compare with ordinary corn
in the following?
• Gene Flow
• Gene transfer to related plants
• Gene transfer to unrelated species
Weediness potential
Secondary and non-target effects - effect on nontarget organisms and other unintended effects
Agronomic issues
1. Is Bt corn MON810 effective in
controlling Asiatic corn borer, the
advantage can be seen as increase in
yield over borer- damaged non-Bt
corn?
2. Is the Bt gene inherited like any
ordinary corn gene?
Evaluation of Scientific Reports
 To prevent pressure from anybody,
evaluators were not publicly known
during evaluation process and were not
personally known to BPI Director
 2 sets of independent evaluators
a. DA regulatory agencies
b. STRP – Scientific Technical
Review Panel and non-DA
scientists
TECHNICAL
EVALUATORS
A. DA regulatory agencies
1. BAI – feed safety
2. BAFPS – food safety
3. FPA – safety of Bt protein in food
and feed safety in handling Bt corn
4. BPI - environmental safety
B. STRP – assess scientific quality of reports
assess
feed
safety,
food
safety
and
environmental safety of Bt corn
3 former professors of UP
Dr. Emiliana N. Bernardo – former ViceChancellor for Academic Affairs, UPLB
Dr. Filipinas F. Natividad – Director,
Biotechnology Research Division,
St. Luke’s Medical Center, also former
Director, Institute of Biology, UP Diliman
Dr. Teodoro Abilay – former Director, BAI
Basis of Approval by BPI Director
Final conclusion by experts:
1. Bt corn MON810 is safe to humans,
animals, non-target organisms & as
nutritious as ordinary corn
2. Bt corn MON810 is safer than chemical
insecticides
3. Bt corn MON810 is very effective in
controlling Asiatic corn borer
4. The Bt gene is inherited like any ordinary
corn gene
RESULTS OF SAFETY RISK
ASSESSMENT
Human Health
Animal Health
Environment
Remarks
(Result of
Evaluation)
-
Safe
-
For Approval
BAFPS
Safe
-
-
For Approval
FPA
Safe
Safe
Safe
For Approval
BPI
-
-
Safe
For Approval
STRP 1
-
Safe
Safe
For Approval
STRP 2
Safe
Safe
Safe
For Approval
STRP 3
Safe
Safe
Safe
For Approval
AGENCY
/ STRP
BAI
Permit to plant Bt corn – 5 years
Monitoring




Compliance to IRM strategy
Development of resistant insects
Other unintended effects
Continuing submission of data
to BPI
Thank you for your
kind attention