Leveraging Technology in the Selection Process

Download Report

Transcript Leveraging Technology in the Selection Process

Leveraging Technology
in the Selection Process
Alfredo Rocha and Eric Rowen
Personnel Commission
Los Angeles County Office of Education
Presented to: PTC-SC, February 25, 2015
Current Process Improvements
1. Interview Rater Briefing Video
• Standardizes briefing process
• Length: 12 minutes
Current Process Improvements
1. Interview Rater Briefing Video
• Standardizes briefing process
• Length: 12 minutes
2. Video-Rated Interviews (VRI)
• Reduces length of interview schedule
• Increases control and standardization
3. Written Exam Pass Point Excel Workbook (RQS)
4. Rater App
RQS Version 1
Written Exam Pass Point Excel Workbook
• Automated statistical information
− Measures of central tendency
− Measures of variability
− Percentile scores
− Absolute floor
− Correlation coefficients
− Data-driven histograms
• Pass Point Survival tool
• Adverse Impact Analysis tool
RQS Version 1
Disclaimer
• This workbook is provided as a professional courtesy
• Any use in an operational context is solely the
responsibility of the user agency
• Unknown “bugs” or deficiencies may exist or develop
with continued use
• LACOE makes no performance assurance or guarantee
for this Excel-based tool
RQS Version 1
Candidate Results
RQS Version 1
RQS Version 1
Candidate 1
16
17
12
45
Candidate 2
12
14
14
15
13
14
19
18
19
18
6
19
17
18
16
32
52
49
52
47
3
4
5
6
RQS Version 1
Test Characteristics
RQS Version 1
Test Characteristics
20
15
5
20
RQS Version 1
Test Characteristics
Section/Test Reliability
• KR-20
• Cronbach’s Alpha
RQS Version 1
Test Characteristics
Section/Test Reliability
• KR-20
• Cronbach’s Alpha
RQS Version 1
Exam Statistics
RQS Version 1
Exam Statistics
Math
Reading
Safety
Overall
RQS Version 1
Exam Statistics
Math
Reading
Safety
Overall
RQS Version 1
Exam Statistics
Math
Reading
Safety
Overall
RQS Version 1
Exam Statistics
Math
Reading
Safety
Absolute floor can rule out someone
passing by just guessing!
Overall
RQS Version 1
Correlations
RQS Version 1
Correlation Coefficients
RQS Version 1
Correlation Coefficients
Relationship Strength
0 - 0.29 = None – Weak
0.3 - 0.49 = Moderate
0.5 - 0.69 = Strong
0.7 - 1 = Very strong – Perfect
RQS Version 1
Look at the distribution
of scores to
z
establish norm-referenced pass points.
Bimodal
Distribution
Normal
Distribution
Skewed
Distribution
Data-Driven Histograms
RQS Version 1
Can use SMEs to establish
criterion-referenced pass points!
Angoff Method
RQS Version 1
Pass Point Survival
RQS Version 1
Pass Point Survival
Math
Reading
Safety
Overall
RQS Version 1
Pass Point Survival
RQS Version 1
Pass Point Survival
RQS Version 1
Pass Point Survival
RQS Version 1
Adverse Impact Analysis
RQS Version 1
Adverse Impact Analysis
Example #1:
Out of 26 males
taking an exam, 16
pass.
Out of 19 females,
14 pass.
RQS Version 1
Adverse Impact Analysis
Example #1:
Out of 26 males
taking an exam, 16
pass.
Out of 19 females,
14 pass.
Example #2:
White: 4 pass, 2 fail
Black: 2 pass, 10 fail
Hispanic: 3 pass, 8 fail
Asian: 8 pass, 3 fail
Native American:
2 pass, 4 fail
RQS Version 1
Adverse Impact Analysis
What if another
group had a
higher selection
ratio?
Example #2:
White: 4 pass, 2 fail
Black: 2 pass, 10 fail
Hispanic: 3 pass, 8 fail
Asian: 8 pass, 3 fail
Native American:
2 pass, 4 fail
Instead of 8
passing,
only 5 had
passed?
RQS Version 1
Adverse Impact Analysis
What if another
group had a
higher selection
ratio?
Example #2:
White: 4 pass, 2 fail
Black: 2 pass, 10 fail
Hispanic: 3 pass, 8 fail
Asian: 8 pass, 3 fail
Native American:
2 pass, 4 fail
This results in
different
calculations
RQS Version 1
Limitations
• Not all encompassing…yet
• Allows for only 5 test sections and 999 candidates
• May require scrolling to view RQS sections
• Data-driven histograms may not work well with some
types of tests
• Possible issues with workbook after continued use
(Keeping a master copy is necessary!)
• All features may not be supported by previous versions
of Excel
User feedback is welcome!
Rater App
Created by Eric Rowen
& LACOE PC staff, 2014
• Microsoft Access database application
• Used with any competency-based examination
(T&E, Performance, Writing Projects, Interviews, etc.)
• Goal: Simple, yet powerful tool to collect & store ratings
Microsoft Access Basics
Initial Challenges
• Learning how
Access works
• Finding relationships
between Access
objects and how
data links together
• Invaluable resources
– GCFLearnFree.org
– Microsoft Support
– MSDN
– Stack Overflow
Image Credit to GCF LearnFree.org
– YouTube
Microsoft Access Basics (cont.)
• Most difficult parts: setting table relationships and
queries for the data
Image Credit to GCF LearnFree.org
Database Design
Development Goals
• Minimize preparation and output time
– Also remove potential transfer errors from the process
• Increased access to information for Analysts
• Reduce paper use in administration and archiving
Application Limitations
• Limited to use with LACOE rating procedures
– Comp Model 3G, Rating Scale, Weighted Sum Scores , NEOGOV
• Designed for use on our servers & hardware
• NOT available to share (yet) – contact our director 
The Rater App Demonstration
LACOE Experience Takeaways
• Consistently positive feedback
• Trouble with user error and network connections
– Many issues should be fixed with new hardware
• Requires agency-wide training (analysts & specialists)
• Continuous improvement is essential
– ALWAYS adding new features based on user feedback
– Application bugs are inevitable
• Multiple administrators if possible
Thank you!
Questions?
Connect with us on
!