Transcript Slide 1

Spokane County District Court Mental
Health Therapeutic Court
Sales Tax Initiative


The Spokane County Commissioners requested
a vote of the public to fund SSB 5763 which
would fund therapeutic courts. The citizens
voted in November 2005 for an increase in 1/10
of one percent of the sales tax to fund mental
health treatment and therapeutic courts.
In December of 2008, this initiative was
extended by the BoCC until 2014.
Mental Health Court


The Mental Health Court represents an effort to
increase effective cooperation between the mental
health treatment system and the criminal justice system.
The project has achieved the following outcomes for
the mentally ill misdemeanant population:




improved access to mental health treatment services
improved well-being
reduced recidivism
improved public safety
Mental Health Court


In the regular system, misdemeanant defendants
often interact with multiple defense attorneys,
prosecutors and judges.
In the past, mentally ill offenders often spent
unnecessary time in jail and, lacking access to
mental health treatment services on release,
became repeat offenders and cycled through the
justice system again and again.
Mental Health Court


The Mental Health Court Team consists of a Judge,
Court Manager, Prosecuting Attorney, Defense
Attorneys, Forensic Evaluator, Court Case Manager,
Probation Officers and support staff.
The team interacts regularly with treatment providers,
Eastern State Hospital Legal Offender Unit, jail
discharge staff and other important partners, including
housing specialists and financial resource officers.
Referrals





Referral Sheet
Release of Information (ROI)
Criminal History
Exclude Convicted Sex Offenders, Felonies,
Conviction of serious violent offenses
Accept Felony Reductions
Criteria

Clinical Criteria: serious and persistent mental
illnesses (Axis I)

Legal Criteria: low-risk, non-violent offenses
(misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors)
Spokane County District Court
Mental Health Courts
MH Criminal Court
MH Therapeutic Court
Defendant has diagnosis of major
mental illness *
Defendant has diagnosis of major
mental illness
Defendant incapable or
not amenable to completing MHTC
Phases (or MHTC not feasible)
Defendant is amenable to treatment and
capable of completing the MHTC Phases
Traditional negotiation
towards resolution of case
Defendant “Opts-In” to the MH
Therapeutic Court & enters into SOC
Probation, where appropriate,
considers Defendant’s mental health
issues and existing services
Defendant enters Phases of the MHTC
& accesses services of the Court CM
Defendant appears for periodic
Treatment Reviews
Defendant appears for treatment reviews
& completes assignments/requirements
Defendant graduates from the MHTC
and Case is dismissed
*Documented non-criteria mental health cases are accepted
into the MH Criminal Docket only, and strictly on a case-bycase basis
2009
410 Defendants, 1073 Cases, 1425 Charges
Domestic Violence
Theft
Traffic Violations
DUI
DWLS
Assault
Trespass
Harass./Mal. Mis.
Resisting/Obstruction
Neg. Driving
Other
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Defendants per District/Municipal
410 Total
Both Courts
105, 26%
County Only
122, 30%
City Only
183, 44%
Average defendant has 3 open cases (1-8)
Felony Reduction Cases in MHC
Rejected from MHC
30, 42%
Rejections
Violent Offenders
Sex Offenders
Did Not Meet Criteria
Accepted in MHC
41, 58%
In Services at Acceptance
Total
Defendants
Defendants in
Services at
Acceptance
Defendants Not
in Services at
Acceptance
% of Defendants in
Services
2009
410
160
250
39%
2008
341
127
214
37%
2007
238
56
182
24%
Services Obtained by MHC
Total
Defendants
In Services
Prior to MHC
Total Enrolled
by MHC
% in Services MHC
2009
410
160
216
92%
2008
341
127
152
82%
2007
238
56
86
60%
8% not in services for 2009 were in BW status, incompetent or deceased
Referred Services
537 Referrals
SA Inpatient Treatment
19
SPARC
26
SSI
32
CHAS
33
Education/Employment
37
39
M edical
FSS
49
Other M H Treatment
50
DSHS
51
SM H
57
65
SA Out Patient Treatment
79
Housing
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Evaluations
90
82
80
70
68
60
53
51
50
40
30
20
10
10
0
M H Court
ESH
M edical Facilites
VA
Other (Private, etc)
2009 MHC Defendants
w/Co-Occurring Diagnosis
MH Diagnosis Only
Co-Occuring Diagnosis
64%
36%
Defendant Contacts
4007 Individual Contacts
County Probation
In-Person Appointments
181
Court CM Appointments
601
MH Criminal Court
Appearances
2409
MH Therapeutic Court
Appearances
816
410 Defendants
2009 Average MHC Defendant Ages
Ages
Defendants
18 - 29
118
30- 39
110
40 - 49
113
50 – 59
57
60 - 69
12
70 and over
0
2009 MHC Male/Female
Defendant Breakout
Male
Female
241 (59%)
169 (41%)
2009 MHC Homeless Population
In Housing
78%
Incoming Homeless
22%
Outcomes

Reduce jail costs through decreasing recidivism

Serve the criminal system and the community

Serve mentally ill offenders in an effective
process
Jail Stays
91 Defendants
Stays
Days
Before MHC
251
3,395
After MHC
130
1,817
52% Decrease
54% Decrease
MHTC Graduates Recidivism
Total Graduates
21
Graduate
Re-Offenses
2
9%
For Further Information
Judge Sara Derr
Presiding MH Court Judge
509-477-2959
[email protected]
Sandy Manfred, MS
MH Court Manager
509-477-2277
[email protected]
2009 Service Providers
RSN
Non-RSN
% in Services
Prior to MHC
130
30
39%
By MHC
103
113
53%
Totals
233
143
92%
35% of Defendants Not Eligible for Medicaid
Inmate Referrals
113 (398 Total)
Judicial Officers
8
7%
Other
11
10%
County P.D.
23
20%
City P.D.
30
27%
County Jail
41
36%