Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Osteoporotic Patients
Download
Report
Transcript Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in the Osteoporotic Patients
Long-Term Data for 884 Patients Show
Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Spinal
Fractures Provides Dramatic Pain
Relief, Greatly Decreases Disability
Giovanni Carlo ANSELMETTI, MD
Institute for Cancer Research and
Treatment Candiolo (TURIN) - Italy
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
STUDY DESIGN
We prospectively evaluated back-pain
improvement, new fracture rate and
complications in a large series of
Osteoporotic Patients underwent to
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for
vertebral fracture refractory to
conservative medical treatment
Patients Populations
884 Patients
(750 female - 134 male mean age 73,1 years)
639 Primary Osteoporosis (72,3%)
245 Secondary to Steroidal therapy (27,7%)
Treated on 3954 Vertebrae
All procedures in Local anesthesia
Patients discharged from the Hospital the same
procedural day
Clinical
Evaluation
Pain was evaluated using a 11-point Visual Analogic
Scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst experienced pain)
before and after the procedure.
Disability improvement was evaluated by external
Brace support and Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
before and after Vertebroplasty
If patients reported back-pain recurrence during followup clinical interview and MRI were performed to
investigate new vertebral fracture
Visual Analog Scale Pre e Post VTP
884 patients
Follow-up up to 52 months
SD±1,5
P<0.0001
Wilcoxon signed rank Test
SD±1,8
845/884 patients (95,6%) reported backpain
improvement
Quality of Life after PV
Brace support
Follow-up up to 52 months
P<0.0001
McNemar’s Test
Quality of Life
Oswestry Disability Questionnaire
884 Pts
P<0.0001
Paired t test
SD ±13,5%
SD±6,9%
New Fractures in Osteoporosis
884 Patients - Follow-up up to 52 months
During follow-up all patients were invited to contact us whenever
backpain occurred again after PV.
MR and plain radiograms showed a new vertebral fractures in:
106 patients (12%)
Occurred 15 days to 36 months (mean 9,4±8,7 months) after previous
Vertebroplasty
They were all successfully retreated!
New Fractures in Osteoporosis
Fracture on Contiguous vertebra
73/106 patients (68,9%)
Pts Retreated
Fract. on Contiguous vertebra
%
Binomial exact Test
Two-tail
106
73
68,9
P<0,001
Highly significant
RETREATMENTS in Osteoporosis
New Fracture during 18 months Follow-up
Vertebroplasty vs. Placebo & Teriparatide
Osteoporotic Pts with 1 or more
vertebral collapses at baseline
Vertebroplasty
Personal Series
New Fracture
During 18 months
%
Chi-square
547
75
13,7
P=0.04
Placebo
Lindsay et al. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:2024-
353
67
18,9
2030.
Signifcant
difference!
20µG Teriparatide
P=0.3
Lindsay et al. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:20242030.
40µG Teriparatide
Lindsay et al. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:20242030.
373
42
11,2
345
36
10,4
No difference!
P=0.18
No difference!
COMPLICATIONS
18/884 patients (2%)
Vertebroplasty was completed in all
patients without any major
complications
12 (1,4%) asymptomatic pulmonary embolism
6 (0,7%) nerve root irritation successfully treated
by local steroidal injection
CONCLUSIONS
Vertebroplasty is safe and effective in the
treatment of back-pain due to osteoporotic
vertebral collapses.
After Vertebroplasty patients can increase
mobility and improve their quality of life.
New fracture rate seems to be similar to not PVtreated osteoporotic pts reported by literature.
Our data suggest that Vertebroplasty should
always be proposed to patients when conservative
medical treatment fails.