Transcript FY01 - VLHC

f
FARDOG 04JAN01
•
Discussion of FY01 Budget and Goals for RF Structures
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
1
f
FY01 LC R&D Goals / Technical Division
•
RF Structure Factory
•
Make first Fermilab Xband structure
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Have made, now send, 20 disks to SLAC
•
•
•
Need expertise from BD and TD
Using expertise from INR Collaboration (see
later slide)
Now have BD Network Analyzer from BD
(Thanks, John)
Need a second NA bySEP01 (Peter?)
Full Size Furnace by SEP01 (we hope)
Baby Furnace (~120K$) by APR01
•
•
•
Finish four prototypes
Measure with mostly existing equipment
Take over some motion control
development
Understand beam alignment requirements
First, we do RF QA on them
SLAC provides couplers etc and assembles into
a complete structure
“Same as” SLAC / Robertson model
Make two entire “20 cell” structures
•
aka “1st Fermilab Xband structures”
To get on SLAC “High Power Testing” List,
need to “Show me the structure!”
IB5 CDR w/ FESS
•
•
•
Magnets
•
•
By about mid-March01 or so (we hope)
(See below also)
Get first furnace operating
•
•
Collaboration High Gradient Tests
Occupy IB4 SW Corner
Finish RF QC Lab
•
•
•
$25K from RAT, $25K from TD
Assembly Line for beam line units
Not necessarily “NLC Project” building …
could instead be for additional space needed
for ongoing TD activities
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
2
f
Industrial Building 4 (IB4)
Notes:
1. Southwest Corner is lower right
of picture
2. RF structure work
- Uses all of SW corner (2 clean
rooms, rf lab, work area, furnace
area)
- Shares QC Laboratory for
mechanical QC
- Shares Machine Shop
3. This is not an optimum
arrangement for the work flow for
making structures
4. “Beam Line Unit” Assembly
area would occupy most (if not
all) of IB4
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
3
f
IB4 SW Corner
Copper parts go in … structures come out
Note: Furnace area is large enough for baby furnace … full size furnace is mounted over Clean Room B (the one on the left)
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
4
f
INR Collaboration (Troitsk, Russia)
•
Reference:
Finley to Yarba 12/20/00
email “INR and TD”
•
Item 2: In support of
understanding structure vacuum
•
•
Item 1: In support of the RF QC
Lab
•
Gennady Romanov (TD Guest)
coordinating the setting up of the RF
QC Lab
•
•
What is to be done in IB4?
•
•
•
Short stack and full length structure
measurements
plunger and bead pull techniques
•
•
•
•
•
How fast does the gas move?
Which direction?
How long does it take to pump down
so that processing can continue?
FY01 New Guests
•
•
•
•
with Ding Sun (BD), Tug Arkan, Brian
Smith, Evgueni Borissov(TD)
•
To be done at INR
Develop realistic and useful computer
codes
Start with 1.8 meter RDDS as specific
example at appropriate level of detail
Example: Model the time development
of the vacuum after a discharge and
outgassing
Gonin: rf calculations to help
understand measurements
Khabibulin: improve throughput (aka
automation)
3rd person: Brazing
Small piece of hardware from INR
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
5
f
FY01 LC R&D Goals for TD / Background
•
•
Top Down
•
•
$195K Salaries, $70K M&S
$540K Salaries, $495K M&S
•
•
•
•
Make Structures so that SLAC can do High
Gradient tests on them
Integrate into ETF
•
$735K Salaries, $565K M&S
Caution: November 2000 obligations
already close to linear budget for FY01
…
Develop funding “understandings”
•
Integrate into SLAC tests
•
Sum
•
•
•
RF Structures (RAT)
•
•
(see slide from LaDaune T.)
Update multi-year plan
Magnets (MAT)
•
•
•
Budget $1.3M
~100K$ TD Equipment for Baby Furnace
“Small%” FTEs not charged to LC R&D?
•
Have made no changes in TD reporting
yet, small changes might be needed.
~$75K TD Equipment for 2nd Network
Analyzer
~$600K Full Size Furnace - NIU funds
•
•
Will force 1 structure / month issue
Will force “beam line unit” issues into the open
Integrate into Industry
•
•
Need to determine appropriate strategy for
scaling up industrialization issues
Need to determine sensible role for SBIRs
Note on throughput:
R&D needs about 1 structure / month
Project production rate is ~ 6 structures / day
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
6
f
TD NLC R&D Budget Report November 2000
17% of Year Passed
YTD
Cost Cat
Budget Actual
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
1YA PERSONNEL COSTS 735.0
106.7
50.0
56.7
1YB MATERIALS & SERVICES
565.0
71.4
32.7
38.7
Total:
1,300.0
178.1
82.7
95.4
0.0
0.0
Code
Cost Cat
Budget
YTD
Actual
TD-E&F NLC Magnet R&D
4MAT 1YA PERSONNEL COSTS195.0
1YB MATERIALS & SERVICES
70.0
Total:
265.0
Oct
Nov
30.0
20.9
50.9
15.8
15.6
31.4
14.2
5.3
19.5
TD-E&F NLC Structures R&D
4RAT 1YA PERSONNEL COSTS540.0
76.7
1YB MATERIALS & SERVICES
495.0
50.5
Total:
1,035.0
127.2
34.2
17.1
51.3
42.5
33.4
75.9
Dec
0.0
0.0
Jan
0.0
0.0
Feb
Mar
0.0
Feb
0.0
0.0
Apr
0.0
Mar
0.0
0.0
May
0.0
Apr
0.0
0.0
0.0
Open
Comm Open
Open Cost + Chg
Prior Comm
Comm in Comm
Jul
Aug
Sep Year Curr Mo Prev Mo (% Spent)
0.0
0.0
15%
59.2
74.9
61.0
15%
0.0
0.0
0.0
59.2
74.9
61.0
15%
Jun
Open Open
Comm Comm
Prior Curr
Year
Mo
Jun
0.0
May
0.0
0.0
Jul
0.0
0.0
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
0.0
0.0
Aug
0.0
0.0
Sep
Open
Comm
Prev
Mo
Cost +
Chg in
Comm
(%
Spent)
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.6
4.6
2.2
2.2
15%
36%
21%
0.0
59.2
59.2
70.4
70.4
58.8
58.8
14%
12%
13%
7
FY01 TD LC R&D FTEs
Projected K$
Actual K$
FTEs by month
10
8
6
FTE Projection
4
Actual FTE
2
Month
01
pSe
1
M
ay
-0
1
Ju
l-0
1
-0
n-
01
0
Ja
ov
-0
N
Se
p-
00
Au
g01
Ju
n01
Ap
r-0
1
Fe
b01
0
De
c00
-0
0
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
O
ct
YTD K$
FY01 TD LC R&D Salaries
M
ar
f
FY01 TD LC R&D FTEs and Salaries
Month
Plan on FY01 Salaries =
$735K
Start with 5.42 FTE at FY00 End
Plan to add ~ 0.3 FTE / month
through August 2001
Have 8.72 FTE at FY01 End
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
8
f
Preliminary FY01 TD LC R&D Projection
M&S by month
FY01 TD LC R&D Projection beyond Nov00
160.0
140.0
120.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
4.0 Assumed MAT Monthly Average without items below
15.0 Assumed RAT Monthly Average without items below
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep
120.0 RAT Feb Baby Furnace
75.0 RAT Jun Network Analyzer
25.0 RAT Apr FESS CDR 5 is done (put all costs here)
Month
•
45.0 RAT Sep Contingency including travel
30.0 MAT Sep Contingency including travel
Note: Oct Nov are history
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
9
f
FY01 LC R&D … Waiting in the Wings
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
… at least not under TD leadership
~ 0.5 FTE
Beam Line Unit Design
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Unit = “rf structures and a magnet” on
a support girder
Unit is “repeated” throughout linac
Need final structure design (Q: “Are
there three or four per unit?)
“Generic design” for support girder is
not appropriate
~1 FTE
Parametric Study on Bonding
•
$100K M&S estimate
“Windowtron” = single cell (or less) rf
breakdown studies led by SLAC
Grew out of breakdown workshop
Miss opportunity for more global
involvement (CERN, Cornell, Fermilab)
Moderately Damped Design
•
•
•
Windowtron R&D
$75K to $150K M&S estimate
initiated in FY00 when RDDS structure design
was thought to be final ...but is actually
premature at this time
“Parametric Study” = systematically map out
costs of producing disks vs required
performance of bond joints
but will need to be done to determine a
defensible cost estimate of the full linac …
once a structure design has been determined
settle the issue of brazing vs. bonding
Equipment, equipment, equipment ...
•
•
optical measurements (>~ $200K)
laser interferometer for magnet
measurements (~$150K)
D. Finley / Fermilab FARDOG / January 4, 2001
10