Transcript PowerPoint-presentatie

Open Science Framework
The Pro’s and Cons of Sharing Data
Muriel S. Lawerman & Jacqueline N. Zadelaar
Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam
Introduction
Data sharing; Open Science Framework (OSF) makes it easier. OSF is an online platform for sharing, finding and updating data. This data is
open for anyone to see! It supports workflow and helps increase the alignment between scientific values and practices. But is it really a
good idea if ALL DATA is open for anyone?
Pro
•
•
•
•
•
•
Con
QRP’s prevented more easily
No more excuses
Mistakes discovered quickly
Easy and cheap replication
Data-sharing across disciplines
Brining back the trust
•
•
•
Ethical problems
• Privacy problems
• Dangerous research
Not desirable to share expensive data
Doesn’t prevent data fabrication
Conclusion
Open Science Framework is an innovative idea that will create an open and safe environment for scientists. Unfortunately it’s not applicable
to all forms of scientific research. But overall, Open Science Framework will help science progress in an uncertain world.
References:Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis) reporting of statistical
results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666-678
Contract: M. S. Lawerman: [email protected]; J. N. Zadelaar:
[email protected]; Diamantbeurs, Weesperplein 4, Amsterdam
References:
• Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis) reporting of statistical results in psychology
journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666-678.
• Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on
Replicability in Psychological Science A Crisis of Confidence?. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 7(6), 528-530.
• News.sciencemag.org. Opgehaald op 5 april 2014,
http://news.sciencemag.org/2011/11/scientists- brace-media-storm-around-controversial-flustudies
• Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and
practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615631.
• Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related
to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS One, 6(11),
e26828. Chicago
• Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of
psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726.