Transcript Slide 1

Learning Brain Connectivity of Alzheimer's Disease from Neuroimaging Data
This work was
sponsored by the
NSF.
Shui Huang1, Jing Li1, Liang Sun1, Jun Liu1, Teresa Wu1, Kewei Chen2, Adam Fleisher2, Eric Reiman2, Jieping Ye1
1: Arizona State University, 2: Banner Alzheimer’s Institute
Introduction
Objective
• Literature suggests functional brain connectivity difference
between AD and normal aging.
• Existing functional connectivity studies have limitations:
-Correlation-based methods capture only pair-wise info.
-Most approaches are confirmative, not exploratory.
-A small number of brain regions are focused on.
-Thorough comparison between AD, MCI, and normal aging
with statistical significant assessment is lacking.
-fMRI data are mostly used, not PET
Approach & Monotone Property
• Build functional brain
connectivity models of AD, MCI,
and normal controls using a
machine learning technique,
called inverse covariance, based
on ADNI-PET data.
• Assess statistical significance of
the connectivity difference and
summarize the results.
Sparse Inverse Covariance Estimation (SICE)
θˆ  arg max log(det(θ))  tr ( Sθ)   || vec(θ) ||1
θ0
Monotone Property
Let Ck (1 ) and Ck (2 ) be the sets of all the connectivity
components of X k with   1 and   2 respectively.
If 1  2 , then Ck (1 )  Ck (2 ).
Intuitively, if two regions are connected (either directly or
indirectly) at one level of sparseness, they will be connected at
all lower levels of sparseness.
Results
Observations:
• AD: between-lobe
connectivity weaker
than within-lobe con.
• AD: left-right same
region connectivity
much weaker.
• MCI: patterns not as
distinct from normal
controls as AD.
AD
λ3 λ2
Large λ
λ1
Small λ
Strong Connectivity
AD
MCI
NC
MCI
Large λ
Small λ
Mild Connectivity
NC
AD
MCI
Weak Connectivity
NC
AD
MCI
NC
Observations:
•Temporal: decreased connectivity in AD, decrease not significant in MCI.
• Frontal: increased connectivity in AD (compensation), increase not
significant in MCI.
• Parietal, occipital: no significant difference.
• Parietal-occipital: increased weak/mild con. in AD.
• Frontal-occipital: decreased weak/mild con. in MCI.
• Left-right: decreased strong con. in AD, not MCI.