Transcript Slide 1

Overview of the
Bridge Evaluation Quality
Assurance Scan
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Federal Highway Administration
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
AASHTO Annual Meeting
September, 2007
Tom Everett
Peter Weykamp
Co-Chair
Principal Bridge Engineer
Federal Highway Administration
Co-Chair
Bridge Maintenance Program Engineer
New York Department of Transportation
Scan Team Member Home States
Paul Jensen
Montana DOT
Dave Juntunen – MI DOT
Larry Hummel – Van Buren County
Tod Kimball
FHWA Vermont
Pete Weykamp
New York DOT
Harry Capers
Arora and
Assoc.
Dr. Glenn Washer
Univ. of Missouri
Tom Everett
Randy Cox
FHWA HQ
Texas DOT
Tom Drda
FHWA North Carolina
AASHTO
FHWA
Academia
FHWA HQ
Consultant
Scan Countries
Red – Visited
Blue – Met with in Denmark
PURPOSE and SCOPE
• Assist in NBIS regulation implementation.
• Explore effective bridge inspection
systems in other countries.
• Satisfy the 2001 Data Quality Act.
• Review types of data collected by other
countries.
TOPICS of INTEREST
• Organizational Structure and
Background
• Inspection Data
• Personnel Qualifications
• Process Control
• Equipment
• Documentation
FINDINGS
European agencies value
their bridge inspection
programs
 to insure highway user safety
 to insure durability and serviceability expectations are met
 to enhance capital investment
decisions regarding their
existing bridge inventory
FINDINGS
Emphasis Placed on Quality
 Well-defined qualifications,
 Uniform inspection type
definitions,
 Periodic calibration of inspectors,
 Data collection processes,
 Appropriate use of NDT methods
 Multi-tiered inspection
 frequency is not fixed
FOCUS AREAS
• Team identified many items that could enhance
bridge inspection practices within the U.S. and
organized them into 8 topic areas for further
evaluation.
Inspection References and Tools
Heavily detailed & illustrated
manuals.
Damage types quantified and
performance indices assigned.
Standards developed to quantify
concrete cracking in reports.
Inspection vehicles equipped with
field equipment, office space and
bridge records.
Reports and Data Management
Standardization of reports, forms, terms and condition
ratings
Digital photographs embedded in inspection reports
Designers required to identify critical areas to be
inspected
Pull down menu of structural condition in software
allowing automated generation of condition rating
Separate asset management systems for major
structures
Training And Certification
A variety of approaches:




technical educational requirements
specialized training
specific training for Inspector, Team Leader, & PM
qualifying exam for each level
Match inspector experience with complexity of bridge.
Keep, at minimum, a core of experts within agency.
Inspection Types and Frequencies
Detailed inspections every 5 to 6
years



Interim inspections focused on areas
of interest identified in the detailed
inspection
Annual inspections by maintenance
Road workers routinely monitor and
report issues of structural condition
European road agencies typically
inspect spans of two meters.
Inspection Types and Frequencies
Inspection frequency - based on:



competency of the inspector
inspector qualifications and
experience
bridge type, condition, age, etc.
Competency standards provide
assurance inspectors can
safely determine the
frequency.
Reference Bridges
Finnish use a population of 106 bridges and 26 culverts
as a control sample
Data gathered is used to:




Monitor bridge serviceability and durability over time
Update deterioration models in bridge management
system
Quality Control of data from non-Reference Bridges by
providing baseline data for comparison
Training and evaluation of inspectors
Several agencies use bridges to be demolished to
evaluate the effectiveness of NDT methods.
Reference Bridges
Data collected from Reference Bridges in Finland is
analyzed to:


determine an inspectors personal “quality points”
monitor trends in data quality and consistency
Quality points are used


As part of procurement process
To develop refresher training for inspectors
Finland requires QC plan in consultant agreements
Non Destructive Testing (NDT)
•
•
•
Used primarily during
in-depth inspections.
Detailed references
outlining appropriate
use.
Unique applications
such as Ultrasonic
Shear Wave
Transducer.
Cause of Damage Determination
Inspectors Determine Cause of Failure
Inspectors are trained to assess damage to a
structural element and recommend action
based on:

structural stability, user safety & effect on the
damaged component’s durability
Procedures to initiate actions based on the
severity of the condition.
BASt SYSTEM
Calculation of Condition Index
D=2
D=3
4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
3
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.0
2
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.9
4.0
2
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.2
4.0
1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.8
4.0
1
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
4.0
0
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.7
4.0
0
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
4.0
S/V
0
1
2
3
4
S/V
0
1
2
3
4
Example:
S = 2 (Structural Stability)
V = 2 (Traffic Safety)
D = 3 (Durability)
DATA USAGE
• POOR to BAD
100%
BRIDGE CONDITION
GOOD
• GOOD to GREAT
– PM
FAIR
POOR
0%
Time
– Replace
• FAIR
– Urgency of Repair
– Can it be Safely
Deferred?
OTHER
German DVD, “Inspection According to
German Industrial Standard (DIN) No
1076”.


Intended for viewing by the general public,
politicians, management officials, etc.
Provides support for bridge and structure
inspection.
Inspection friendly, security wise details
were also incorporated into the
design of bridges on a routine basis
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Develop a nationally accepted basis for
determining bridge inspection frequencies
• Draft national guidelines for developing
QC/QA procedures for use by owners
• Develop a national integrated inspection repair approach in bridge assessments
• Enhance FHWA coding guide will photos
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Develop a bridge inspection central
resource of references and technologies
• Initiate demonstration project of Ultrasonic
Shear Wave Transducer
• Interchange with Finnish Roads on the use
of statistical methods for quality assurance
• Technical interchange between countries
Current and Planned Post-Trip
Activities
Preliminary Summary Report – submitted
Finalize and disseminate final report
Scan Technology Implementation Plan
 Two NCHRP proposals (both submitted and
under consideration)
 Final STIP will be available October, 2007
Technology transfer activities
ILLUSTRATED INSPECTION
MANUALS
GOALS
• National adoption of a QC/QA concepts
that improve the consistency and
uniformity of bridge inspections across the
country
• A reliability based approach for inspection
frequency
• An integrated approach to the inspection
program
Bridge Evaluation Quality Assurance
Thank You
Questions?