Transcript Document
Is Gonorrhoea untreatable?
Catherine Ison
Health Protection Agency, London, UK 29 April 2020
Treatment of gonorrhoea
Empirical:
Single dose used to aid compliance Often syndromic, administered before lab results known Co-treatment for chlamydial infection can be given
Choice:
National/international guidelines informed by surveillance data
Outcome:
To achieve >95% therapeutic success (WHO)
Sulphonamides Penicillin
penA, penB, mtr, penC, ponA penicillinase
Tetracycline Quinolones
tet, mtr TETM gyrA, parC
Azithromycin Cephalosporins 23S rRNA
penA
mosaic ?
Antimicrobial resistance in GC
Acquisition
Plasmids
Penicillin (PPNG): tem-1 (Haemophilus)
Tetracycline (TRNG): tetM (Streptococci)
Chromosomal
Penicillin/Cephalosporin (Commensal Neisseriae) Selection
High-level, single step
Spectinomycin
Azithromycin
Additive, multiple steps
Penicillin
Ciprofloxacin
How does it happen
?
Misuse or overuse of antimicrobial agents
Inadequate dosage or incomplete course OTC use Long term use of a single agent
Selection of mutants
First-line therapy Surveillance programmes Global Local Regional National
Monitor trends resistance in Monitor drift susceptibility in Detect emergence of resistance Inform treatment guidelines
Ciprofloxacin (MIC≥1mg/l) resistance by gender and sexual orientation, 2000-2009
Source: Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (GRASP)
EuroGASP – informing guidelines 70 Ciprofloxacin 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2004 (965) 2006 (836) 2007 (1374) 2008 (1284) 2009 (1366) 2010 (1712)
5% EuroGASP – European Gonococcal Surveillance Programme Part of European STI surveillance network coordinated by ECDC Initiated by ESSTI, now funded by ECDC Sentinel study, 110 consecutive isolates over 3 months
Gonorrhoea management guidelines
BASHH guideline 2005
Cefixime, 400mg (Cefotaxime).
Ceftriaxone, 125 or 250mg.
Spectinomycin 2g.
IUSTI guideline 2009
Cefixime, 400mg oral Ceftriaxone, 250mg IM Spectinomycin 2g IM Where susceptibility known:
Ciprofloxacin, 500mg (Ofloxacin, Levofloxacin)
Azithromycin, 1g or 2g.
Ampicillin 2g (+ 3g probenecid).
Alternative therapies
Other single dose cephalosporin regimens;
Cefotaxime (500mg or 1gIM) Cefodizime (500mg IM
Antimicrobial prescribing practice 2000-2010 in GRASP clinics
100 90 80 30 20 10 0 70 60 50 40 2000 Fluoroquinolones 2001 2002 Cephalosporins 2003 2004 2005 2006 % Ciprofloxacin resistance (>=1mg/l) 2007 2008 2009 2010 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 % Cefixime decreased susceptibility (>=0.125mg/l)
Prevalence of cases with gonococcal isolates exhibiting decreased cefixime susceptibility (MIC >0.125mg/L) by gender and sexual orientation. GRASP 2010 (GUM Cases)
Cefixime DS GC (MIC = >0.125mg/L)
Countries with strains that exhibit decrease susceptibility to cefixime (<5%) Countries with strains that exhibit decrease susceptibility to cefixime (≥5%) 2009 2010
Ceftriaxone susceptibility
Challenges for treatment
Use diagnostic tests appropriately Retain expertise for culture When to change?
What is treatment failure?
What treatment?
Test of cure?
Appropriate diagnostic tests
Molecular detection
Highly sensitive and specific
More sensitive than culture at extragenital sites
Uses non-invasively taken specimens, urines, SVS
Easier for screening or testing in primary care
CT/GC result from same test
Poor PPV in low prevalence populations
May require confirmation especially pharyngeal samples
No Molecular test for AMR in routine use
Does not provide a viable organism
Retain expertise for culture
Provides viable culture for GC sensitivity testing
Essential for emerging resistance
Disadvantages
Requires significant resources
Requires invasively taken specimen
Availability of chaperone
Intolerant to delays in transportation to lab
When to change therapy?
Recommendations In response to rise in resistance levels;
WHO >5% of general population CDC >3% in high risk groups
Current situation
Treatment failure emerging –high-level resistance to ceftriaxone in Japan and France documented True level of treatment failure probably unknown
New
alternative therapies lacking Resistance exists to all previously used agents.
Treatment failure
Why important?
To establish link between dosage given, susceptibility data and failure to respond What is definition?
Verified clinical failure; Detailed clinical history, exclusion of re-exposure and re-infection and isolates from pre- and post treatment indistinguishable
Challenge?
Definition in the absence of an isolate
Tapsall JW et al. Expert Rev Anti Ther. 2009;7:821-34
Clinical failures in England
Cefixime (3 cases)
Swindon in 2008, MSM, MIC 0.25mg/l
Newcastle in 2010 – bisexual, MIC 0.25mg/l
Newcastle – verified case – hetero, MIC 0.12mg/l
Isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin and penicillin
NG-MAST ST 1407 or related types (tbpB 110) Ceftriaxone
None documented
Ison et al, Euro Surveill 2011;16(14):pii:19833 Forsyth et al, Int J STD AIDS 2011,22,296-7
Treatment failures in Europe
Cefixime
Small number of cases identified
MICs 0.125mg/L-0.25mg/L
NG-MAST ST1407 or related type
Likely many more cases unidentified
Ceftriaxone
Verified failure, pharyngeal gonorrhoea in Sweden (MIC 0.125-0.25mg/L)
High-level resistant strain from France (MIC 1-2mg/L)
ST1407, also cefixime MIC 4mg/L
No others documented
Unemo et al, Euro Surveill 2010;15(47):pii=19721 Unemo et al. Euro Surveill 2011;16(6):pii=19792U Unemo et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2011
Options for treatment
Single dose therapy
Ceftriaxone – same or higher dosage (?500mg or 1g)
Gentamicin 240mg Combination therapy
Ceftriaxone + azithromycin 1g
Gentamicin + azithromycin 1g Multiple doses
Ceftriaxone followed by cefixime Alternative agents? – no clinical trials
Test of cure
Why?
To confirm compliance and ensure resolution of symptoms
Prevent spread of antimicrobial resistant gonorrhoea
When?
Persisting symptoms or signs
Pharyngeal infection
Treatment with anything other than first-line recommendations
How?
Culture performed at least 72 hours after completion of therapy
Test with NAATs 2weeks after completion of therapy followed by culture if positive
What is the Challenge?
To maintain gonorrhoea as a treatable infection!
Use new diagnostic tests appropriately Retain expertise for culture Collect a representative sample of viable isolates Maintain timely surveillance data Be vigilant for emerging resistance.
Be prepared, responsive and innovative