A new mechanism for heating the corona
Download
Report
Transcript A new mechanism for heating the corona
About the 8 keV plasma at the
Galactic Center
High Energy Phenomena in the Galactic Center
17th June 20005
• CEA, Saclay
Belmont R.
Tagger M.
• UCLA
Muno M.
Morris M.
Cowley S.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
The Galactic
Center:
R ≤ 150-180 pc
(~ Central Molecular Zone)
X-ray and radio
observations:
- SN remnants
- discrete point sources,
- gas, clouds…
- Arcs, Filaments
Pervasive, vertical,
magnetic field
(Morris & Serabyn 1996)
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
6.7 keV
6.9 keV
Spectral
components:
(Muno et al. 2004)
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Soft phase:
Hot phase :
Ionized lines + bremstrahlung
T ~ 0.8 keV
Patchy distribution
= SN remnants
6.7 + 6.9 keV + bremstrahlung
T ~ 8 keV,
Diffuse
large scale: 300pc*200pc (and more)
The hot phase as a diffuse plasma
at 8 keV
Origin of the hard diffuse emission: (Muno et al. 2004)
– Non thermal emission ?
– discrete point sources ?
– Chandra: Diffuse plasma.
Diffuse plasma ? (Kaneda et al., 97)
–
–
–
–
Vertical magnetic field.
Cs > 1500km/s ≥ vescape ~ 1100 km/s not bound to the galactic plane…
Very fast escape: esc~ 40 000 yr
Heating source must be very efficient (> 30 SNe / yr in the Galaxy !!)
Also: heating mechanism ?
I. The confinement problem…
(submitted)
Elements with different weight behave differently:
– Protons alone must escape (vth > vesc)
– Other ions alone would not escape (vth < vesc)
What happens for H+He ?
– Can protons drag other ions ?
– Faint (0.1 cm-3) + hot : ~ e ~ 105 yr > esc
– Collisionless escape => No drag.
Conclusion: plasma of helium and metals
A Hot Helium plasma ?
Too hot => no H- or He lines
New estimates for inferred plasma parameters:
– Lower densities and abundances:
– n(He) ~n(H)/3
– [Fe]/[He] for He plasma ~ 1/3*([Fe]/[He] for H plasma)
Fe trapped in grains in molecular clouds ?
H-like Argon line ?
Radiative cooling time ~ 108 yr = long time scale…
– Reasonable energy requirement
II. A possible heating mechanism
Gravitational energy of molecular clouds
– ~100 of them
– ~10 pc size
– ~100 km/s relative velocity
B
Galactic plane
(Bally et al. 87, Oka et al. 98…)
Viscosity: (Braginskii 65)
B => No shear viscosity: bulk/shear ~ 1017 !!
The bulk viscosity acts on compressional motion:
Efficiency:
–Subsonic motion: vc < cs < va => weak compression
– Very high viscosity: ~ T5/2
=> high
– Depends on the exact flow around the clouds…
The wake of a cloud:
Drell et al. 65,
Neubauer 80,
Wright & Schwartz 90,
Linker 91…
(in a low- plasma)
B
Alfvén wing
-> wing flux: FA
But incompressible !
V
Fast MS perturbation:
Slow MS wing:
-> wing flux: FS
And compressible
- 2D toy model
- asymptotic expansion in vc/va
-> dissipated power: QF
In the Central Region (h*d = 200*300 pc2):
Cloud number: ~ 100
hot component luminosity: ~ 5. 1037 erg/s
Fast:
Too weak…
Slow:
OK…
Alfvén:
1% dissipation would be sufficient… (irregularities, curvature…)
And more:
+ complex clouds structures
+ intermittent accretion
An intriguing coincidence:
– The hotter, the more viscous: ~ T5/2
– The hotter, the less collisional: coll ~ T3/2
– for coll >> 0 the efficiency drops most efficient for coll ~0
– For the clouds: = r/v ~ 5 104 yr ~ He-He = optimal regime
– Coincidence or self regulation mechanism ?
Consequence on accretion:
– emission of Alfvén waves = associated drag (cf artificial satellites)
– => loss of gravitational energy and accretion
Conclusions:
In the conditions deduced from observations, H
must escape whereas heavier elements may remain.
This solves the energetics problem.
A possible heating mechanism is the dissipation of
the gravitational energy of molecular clouds by
viscosity.
The associated drag on the cold clouds would help
in accreting matter to the central object.
more analytical work + simulations
THANK YOU !
Wings
Braginskii Viscosity
Viscosity: =~l2/ ~ P ~ nkT
~ nvv
– Perfect gas: v~cst
~ n-1T-1/2 ~ T1/2
– Ionized gas: v~v-4
~ n-1T3/2 ~ T5/2
Magnetized plasma Braginskii viscosity
(1965):
– Bulk viscosity:
Fi = 0 didjvj
– Shear viscosity:
Fi = 1 dj2vi
– Shear / bulk = 10-20