Transcript Slide 1
Willamette Project Biological Opinions Presentation to the NW Power Council December 2008 Mindy Simmons US Army Corps of Engineers PORTLAND DISTRICT Dorie Welch, Daniel Spear Bonneville Power Administration Stephanie Burchfield NOAA Fisheries Chris Allen US Fish and Wildlife Service Operation of 13 multi-purpose dams and reservoirs Downstream habitat effects The Willamette Project Hatchery Mitigation Program 42 miles of bank protection/revetments Willamette Basin – Area: 11,476 mi2 – Rain-driven hydrology – Population ~2.5M – Most populated sub-basin in Columbia River Basin Willamette Basin 1890 Willamette Flood Oregon State Archives, Marion Co Historical Society, MJON0209 1943 Willamette Flood Oregon State Archives, Oregon Water Resources Department, OWR0085 Detroit Dam 1952 North Santiam River Oregon State Archives, Oregon Water Resources Department, OWR0041 Willamette Project Dam Construction Lookout Point Dam 1950 Middle Fork Willamette River Oregon State Archives, Oregon Water Resources Department, OWR0072 Detroit Big Cliff Green Peter Foster Willamette Project: 13 Multi-purpose Dams and Reservoirs Cougar Blue River Dexter Fall Creek Lookout Point Hills Creek 13 Multi-Purpose Dams and Reservoirs •Located in tributaries, not on mainstem Willamette River •Most are large, high-head dams PORTLAND DISTRICT Authorized Purposes • Flood Damage Reduction • Hydropower • Navigation • Irrigation • Fish & Wildlife • Recreation • Water Quality • Municipal & Industrial Willamette Project Hydropower Overview • Eight projects with generation • Projects produce 182.8 aMW • Annual market value of $90 million • Three projects with 300 MWs of capacityscheduled for heavy load hours • Total of 400 MWs of capacity for all projects • Projects can deliver additional energy in a shortage • Projects are close to major west side load centers Willamette Basin Project PORTLAND DISTRICT System Benefits • Hydropower – more than $90 million annually • Flood Damage Reduction – $18.6 billion to date – $920 million annual average damage reduction • Navigation – Flows support water quality • Irrigation – minor use but supports high value crops Corvallis 1996 Total = 1.6 Million Acre-feet 1.2 MAF total PORTLAND DISTRICT Mainstem Columbia Dams •Operated primarily for hydropower, run-of-river; in series on mainstem Willamette Basin Dams •Operated primarily for flood damage reduction (storage) •most are high-head • located in tributaries DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON FISH Willamette Project Biological Opinions • Completed July 11, 2008 after 8 years of consultation • Proposed Action Includes: – Continued operation of 13-dam complex – Continued maintenance of 42 miles of revetments – Operation of hatchery program • View the Supplemental BA at: https://www.nwp.usace.army.mil/pm/e/en _plan_ ba.asp • View the NMFS Biological Opinion at: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Hydropower/Willamette-Basin/WillametteBO.cfm • View the USFWS Biological Opinion at: https://www.nwp.usace.army.mil/pm/e/willametteBO-final_071108.pdf Willamette ESA Consultation Action Agencies • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) • Owns and operates projects • Congressional appropriations • Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) • Markets power from the 8 power projects • Funds power share of USACE budgets • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) • Markets stored water through irrigation contracts PORTLAND DISTRICT Anadromous Fish in the Upper Willamette Basin (NMFS BiOp) Upper Willamette River Spring Chinook salmon Upper Willamette River winter steelhead JEOPARDY Upper Willamette River Chinook 4 3 <------------------------------ Viable -------------------------------> 2 High extinction risk 1 cK en zi e M id Fk W ill M oi a Ca la po Sa nt i S nt ia Sa N am m la ol al M ka m as 0 Cl ac UWR Chinook Salmon Population Status Moderate extinction risk Percent spawning habitat blocked Chinook Spawning habitat loss due to no passage at dams 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Moderate extinction risk rk Fo e dl id e M zi en cK ia M oo ap al m C ia nt Sa m S. tia an .S N la al ol as M am ck la C All Chinook populations affected by Corps dams are populations important for long-term recovery High extinction risk Population Listed Resident Fish in the Willamette Basin USFWS Opinion includes NMFS’ RPA in Proposed Action Oregon chub Columbia River bull trout NO JEOPARDY Oregon Chub Current Distribution (35 Populations) Willamette Basin Bull Trout Distribution Probable Historic Current Clackamas R. (last observed 1963 – reintroduction being considered) North Santiam R. (last observed 1945) South Santiam R. (last observed 1953) McKenzie R. (approx. 300 adults) Middle Fork Willamette R. (15 to 20 adults) rehabilitation program underway since 1998 Summary of Biological Opinions IMPLEMENTATION Short term (FY08-15) Long term (FY16-23) Willamette Reservoir System MM Major Milestone / Decision Point Detailed Design Report (DDR) Conceptual ESA Implementation Strategy AM Annual Milestone / Decision Point Construction IM Interim Mileston / Decision Point Monitoring & Evaluation Flow Actions 6 7 2014 2015 0 2008 Phase / Activity 1 2009 2 2010 3 2011 4 2012 5 2013 15-year Implementation timeframe Configuration / Operation Planning (COP) Plans & Specification (P&S) 8 2016 9 2017 Site / Concept Study Authorization & Appropriation 11 12 13 2019 2020 2021 10 2018 14 2022 15 2023 Flow Management Meet Tributary Flows, Mainstem Flows & Ramp Rates Annual Opearting Plan Updates and Revisions AM1 AM1 AM2 AM2 AM3 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM1 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 AM2 AM3 Near-term Operational changes Action a (Fall Creek Drawdown?) Action b (Detroit Temperature?) Actions/ Annual Fish Passage Management Plan Flow-Related M&E IM2 Cougar Adult Trap Actions/ Construction Upgrade Existing Fish Collection & Handling Facilities IM3 Minto Adult Fish Collection IM7 Dexter Adult Fish Collection IM12 Fall Creek Adult Fish Collection Leaburg Dam Sorting Facility Construction IM10 Foster Adult Fish Collection Construct new Fish Release sites AM3 IM1 IM4 IM8 Configuration / Operation Planning COP Research, Monitoring & Evaluation Reconnaissance Phase Study MM1 MM3 Comprehensive Study / environmental compliance Longer Term Operational Changes Prototype Juvenile Head-of-Reservoir Collector COP Focal Study: Cougar Downstream Passage Evaluations/ COP Focal Study: Detroit Temperature Control IM5 MM2 IM9 IM11 MM4 MM5 Authorization (WRDA 2013?) & Appropriation Preauthorization Engineering & Design IM13 Implementation Config Op Plan COP Focal Study: Lookout Point Downstream Passage MM6 MM7 Authorization (WRDA 2015?) & Appropriation Preauthorization Engineering & Design IM14 Implementation COP Focal Study: Detroit Fish Passage MM8 MM9 Authorization (WRDA 2015?) & Appropriation Preauthorization Engineering & Design IM15 Implementation • Describe Effects on Fish • Highlight Major Actions from Opinions Downstream Effects: Altered Seasonal Flow Pattern • Spring Reservoir Refill (Feb-May) – Inflow > outflow – Lower than natural spring flow – PROBLEM: reduced flows affect winter steelhead outmigration and adult spring Chinook migration; steelhead spawning/incubation flows • Summer Flow Augmentation (May-Aug) – Outflow > inflow – Higher than natural summer flow – Water quality benefits, rearing habitat PROBLEM: Providing adequate water downstream of dams for all life stages Spawning Egg Incubation Redd and eggs out of water Flow Management Actions • Operational changes implemented in 2000 • Minimum mainstem flows • Tributary flows – Spawning – Incubation – Rearing • Process for adjusting targets based on water forecasts • Coordination and in-season management team • Down-Ramping rates (avoid sudden decreases in flow) Downstream Effects: Altered Geomorphic Processes Winter Flood Damage Reduction (Dec/Jan/Feb) – Capture peaks of flood events, slow release – Decreases magnitude of floods PROBLEM: Fewer channel-forming flows + loss of floodplain connectivity + Loss of large wood and gravel from reservoirs PROBLEM: Downstream Loss of Channel Complexity and Floodplain Connectivity Willamette River Planning Atlas (PNW Ecosystem Research Consortium) • Chinook/Steelhead: – Loss of winter rearing habitat; reduced spawning gravel – Loss of floodplain refugia • Oregon Chub: – Loss of population connectivity – Loss of habitat Habitat Restoration Program • On-site actions for Oregon Chub, other species • Action Agencies will develop an off-site habitat restoration program • Recovery Plans, Willamette Subbasin Plan, and other habitat assessments will be synthesized to guide restoration work • Collaborative Habitat Team representing state, tribes, and federal agencies will recommend projects and assist in the prioritization of actions • Action agencies will work with other habitat programs in the Willamette to identify opportunities and leverage funding where possible • Complete 2 habitat projects per year starting in 2010 Downstream Effects: Temperature SUMMER PROBLEM: Water is too cold during the summer Warm Dam Too cold Adult salmon stop migrating to spawning grounds Cold Downstream Effects: Temperature FALL/WINTER PROBLEM: Water is too warm during the fall and winter Reservoir drawn down for flood operations Dam Too warm Salmon eggs in gravel die or hatch too early Cold Downstream Effects: Temperature Detroit Dam 2007 – 8 Detroit Dam 2009? SOLUTION: Temperature Control Operation “surface spill” Warm Dam Correct temperature Correct temp MIX Cold Downstream Effects: Temperature Cougar Dam 2005 Detroit Dam 2018? New Intake Tower SOLUTION: Temperature Control Structure Warm Dam Correct temperature Correct temp Cold Willamette Project Hatchery Mitigation Program Hatchery Mitigation Program • Mitigation for lost production caused by blocked access to habitat upstream of dams • Current program produces: • Spring Chinook salmon (part of ESU; integrated) • Summer steelhead (non-native, segregated program) • Catchable trout • NO winter steelhead program (winter steelhead are ESAlisted) Willamette Basin Hatchery Facilities 5 major hatcheries • constructed by USACE • operated by ODFW • Funded by USACE and ODFW Downstream Effects: Summer Steelhead Hatchery Program • Non-native Skamania stock summer steelhead – Popular sport fishery • Evaluate site-specific effects on ESA-listed winter steelhead • Modify program in collaboration with ODFW Downstream Effects: Spring Chinook Hatchery Program • Use hatchery fish to evaluate reintroduction of Chinook salmon back into their historic habitat above the impassable dams (e.g., NS, SS, McK, MFW) • Implement new HGMPs for integrated programs – supported by Hatchery Scientific Review Group – Increase percentage of natural-origin fish in brood • Minimize risks on stronghold wild populations (McKenzie) – Manage hatchery-origin spawners Action: Leaburg Fish Sorter • McKenzie Chinook is a stronghold wild population • Leaburg Dam is located on the McKenzie River and owned and operated by Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) • Action Agencies will construct a sorting facility at the dam to prevent hatchery fish from straying above the dam and into wild fish sanctuary above Leaburg • Action Agencies will work with EWEB, ODFW and NOAA to design, construct and operate the fish sorter • BPA lead for funding design and construction (USACE and ODFW fund operation and maintenance) • Complete by 2014 Dams blocked access to historical spawning habitat Altered downstream habitat How do the Action Agencies ESA Sec 7 move forward? Consultations Can we JUST improve habitat downstream of projects? • Flows and operations • Improve temperatures • Habitat improvement and floodplain restoration • Hatchery improvements Recovery Planning Do we ALSO need access to habitat upstream of dams? Considerations: Quality adult holding habitat adequate quantities of spawning gravel most is managed by USFS or BLM PROBLEM: Inadequate or nonexistent upstream passage facilities • Upstream passage currently provided only at Foster and Fall Creek dams (trap-and-haul) • Fish ladders are likely infeasible – High-head dams – Variable forebay fluctuations • Existing hatchery facilities designed for broodstock collection SOLUTION: Use Willamette Basin Hatchery Fish Facilities as “trap-and-haul” for adult fish DEXTER DAM Adult Collection Adult Sorting; load on to truck for transport SOLUTION: Use hatchery spring Chinook to evaluate potential for reintroduction in upstream habitat Upstream Fish Passage Actions Cougar Fish Trap Plans • • • Outplanting adult spring Chinook also provides prey base for bull trout • Continue adult “outplanting” program Construct Trap at Cougar Dam (McK):2009 Improve or replace adult fish traps: Minto (N. Santiam): 2012 Foster (S. Santiam): 2013 Dexter (Middle Fk Willamette): 2014 Fall Creek: 2015 Develop 4 to 6 adult release sites above reservoirs by 2012 PROBLEM: Downstream Passage is Challenging • Long reservoirs • Predators Spill gates (rarely used) Regulating Outlets (“spill”) Power Turbines • Deep intakes to passage routes (very little surface spill) Cougar Dam and Reservoir South Fork McKenzie River Powerhouse Regulating Outlet Photo Courtesy of Portland District USACE Regulating Outlet Willamette Project “spill” Photograph of the instruments located in the RO channel Biological Opinion Actions: Step-wise Approach to Downstream Passage • Measures to improve passage through reservoirs and dams until permanent facilities are built – Fall Creek drawdown for Chinook outmigration – Test other measures: reservoir drawdown, pulsing flows, spill, other outlets – Implement feasible alternatives (“simple” by 2009; more “complex” by 2011) • Head-of-Reservoir juvenile collection prototype – – – – Evaluate feasibility – complete by end of 2010 Construct prototype by 2014 Biological and physical evaluations 2015 & 2016 If effective, include in design alternatives for downstream passage at other Project dams • Evaluate fish passage survival, injury, delay, timing and distribution at 8 Project dams and reservoirs, 2008 - 2015 Biological Opinion Actions: Step-wise Approach to Downstream Passage • Downstream fish passage facilities Construction complete by: • Cougar - 2014 • Lookout Point/Dexter - 2021 • Detroit/Big Cliff - 2023 • Evaluate for use at additional dams • Analyze feasibility, alternatives, design through the COP study Configuration Operation Plan “COP” • Reconnaissance Phase Study due 2009 • Feasibility phase to assess alternatives • All major structural modifications will be evaluated for: – – – – Biological benefit Technical feasibility Economic viability Consistency with overall recovery strategies Research, Monitoring & Evaluation • Willamette is data-poor relative to mainstem Columbia – Very little monitoring infrastructure • Developing comprehensive program, to feed into COP – Site-specific field studies – Coordinated through WATER • Currently included in AFEP Annual Review – Expanded outyear efforts in separate process in Willamette Implementation Coordination: Willamette Action Team for Ecosystem Restoration “WATER” Federal and State agencies, Tribes Manager’s Forum Charter/guidelines completed by December 2008 Adaptive Management Steering Team Flow Management Team Fish Passage and Hatchery Management Team Environmental Coordination for Construction Projects Habitat RM&E Oversight Team Funding Strategy • Most large structural modifications will be funded out of the Columbia River Fish Mitigation Fund (CRFM) • Authority: Original project authorities, such as 1950 Flood Control Act (as is the original CRFM Project) • Proposal to use CRFM appropriation made with 2008 budget submittal to Congress (including $800k in funding to initiate actions) • Future Corps budget proposals will account for most critical needs to meet BiOp commitments in both programs • The System Configuration Team (SCT) provides input on priorities for Columbia/Snake program – WATER group will perform a similar function for the Willamette component Willamette dams different than mainstem Columbia dams Different effects on fish The Willamette Project Summary Need downstream habitat for rearing Need to use hatchery program to evaluate reintroduction into spawning habitat upstream of dams Long-term structural modifications may be critical to success Short-term improvements and actions: •Habitat •Temperature •Flow operations •Hatcheries The Willamette Project Approach Evaluate feasibility of long-term actions Improve hatchery collection facilities as trap-and-haul Questions? Willamette Hatchery Mitigation Program Facilities • North Santiam – – • South Santiam – – • South Santiam Hatchery Foster Dam (Collection) McKenzie – – – • Marion Forks Hatchery Minto Ponds Collection/acclimation (nr Big Cliff) McKenzie Hatchery Leaburg Hatchery Leaburg Dam (EWEB) (some Collection) Hatchery collection facility Minto Marion Forks South Santiam Leaburg McKenzie Middle Fork – – Willamette Hatchery Dexter Ponds (Collection, rearing/acclimation) Willamette Cougar Dam Cross Section