Transcript Slide 1

Gender & Technology:
Is it Biology or Society?
Samantha Richards and Eric Schmidt
To give you an idea…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHOID
GIP-ZM
The basis for our research…

37 percent of bachelor's degree recipients
in computer science were females in 1985.

In more recent years (2004 and 2005), only
28 percent of CS majors were females.

In most research universities, only 17
percent of CS graduates are women.
The basis for our research…
This Pie Chart shows
the majors of all the
female students in
this section of COMP
380.
 In this class alone, the
majority of females
are COMM and
JOMC majors.

Female Majors
BIOA
ENGL
MUSC
UNDC
COMM
EXSS
PSYA
ELEM
JOMC
PUPA
Why does this matter?

Between 1988 and 2001:
 the
number of United States published papers
in science and engineering rises by only 13%
 the number of Japanese papers increased 67%
 papers from East Asian countries… increased
492%

Number of CS Majors was 40% lower in
2004 than in 2000
 Dot.com
Bust
Why does this matter?

In 2005, the United States produced 60,000
engineers.
 China

produced close to a million!
The US economy will add 1.5 million
computer- and information-related jobs by
2012.
 The
US will have only half that many
qualified graduates.
Biology or Society?

Samantha says, “Women are equally
capable of excelling at math and science
but that their gender has different ways of
processing language and information.”

Eric says, “The decrease in women in the
sciences (and specifically computer
science) is due to societal constructs that
are hostile to females.”
How to decide?
We compare the
influence of society
and gender by
discussing how both
impact females
throughout their life
span (from early
education into the
workplace
environment).
Birth through Pre-teen
Early education must take advantage of the
curiosity of young children to spark an interest
in math and science.
 While middle school provides opportunities
such as math and science clubs, these are less
directed towards females.
 These clubs do provide a social environment,
but are stigmatized with being nerdy and male
dominated.

Birth through Pre-teen
Males & females process language and
information differently due to organization of
each brain
 Removal of…
-left temporal lobe: interferes with verbal
skills (Women use this more than Males)
-right temporal lobe: impairs nonverbal
skills
 Inferior-parietal lobe is larger in men than
women (manipulates spatial relationships)

Birth through Pre-teen

Typical Female brain development is to
form close relationships
ex: playing house or with dolls

A typical boy brain is about the game or
toy, power, physical strength, etc.
Teenage Years

OVERALL PROBLEM… under qualified
teachers are finding themselves in science and
math classrooms.

“Finding role models—both in materials and in
person—that fit a girl’s image of a successful
woman helps break down these barriers.”

Betty Shanahan, the Executive Director and CEO of
the Society of Women Engineers
Teenage Years
Females are trying to fit in with peers (inner-self
is telling them they have to feel attractive to be
part of the “group”)
 Males don’t have the same personality traits as
females – they aren’t necessarily worried about
what other people think
 Males are interested in more science classes
* It may be their advantage with spatial
reasoning

How were your high school
math and science classes?
College

One study showed that girls actually receive better math
grades than boys, but parents of daughters were more
likely than parents of sons to report that math was more
difficult for their child.



Rise in popularity equaled rise in the class size.


Daughter success=hard work
Son success=talent
Eliminates students uncomfortable or marginalized in that
environment… not necessarily the worst students.
Females are not worse in science but less comfortable in
the environment geared towards males.
College

Since females have 2 ‘X’ chromosomes & a male has
1..Male brain fills with testosterone
(Testosterone kills cells in the communication centers 
leads to less communication by males)

Females are better at verbal skills
-Use 20,000 words per day
-Men use approximately 7,000

Asperger’s Syndrome
-Eight times more common in males than
females
Work Place

“Compared with men, women [CS] faculty
members are generally paid less and promoted
more slowly, receive fewer honors, and hold
fewer leadership positions.”


National Academies report
The report further says… “These discrepancies
do not appear to be based on productivity, the
significance of their work, or any other
performance measures
Work Place
Biology influences a female when
choosing between a career and a family
 Takes 5-6 years to earn doctorate postdoc years  search for a tenure position
 Prime childbearing years
 Taking time off for a maternity leave may
disqualify females from a tenure position
 60+ hours/week isn’t practical when
trying to balance both

Conclusion
While some biological differences do exist
between men and women, these
differences do not keep women out of the
field of computer science. Rather, the way
that society responds to these differences
has the greatest affect on women pursuing
science.
Sources







Are There Differences Between the Brains of Males and Females? Renato Sabbatini.
1997. State University Campinas
Excerpt: The Female Brain-Learn What Women Really Think. 7 Aug. 2006. ABC
NEWS, Washington, D. 31
Hendrick, Bill. “Scientists Mine the Gender Gap.” Cox News Service 17 Sep. 2006
Brownlee, Shannon, and Monika Guttman. "Having Children Poses Threats for Female
Scientists." U.S. News & World Report 131.11
Bombiardi, Marcella. “In computer science, a growing gender gap.” The Boston
Globe 18 Dec. 2005. 18 Sept. 2006
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/12/18/in_computer_science_a_gro
wing_gender_gap/
Shanahan, B. “The Secrets to Increasing Females in Technology.” The Technology
Teacher 66.2 (Oct. 2006) 22-24.
Honawar, V. “U.S. Leaders Fret Over Students’ Math and Science Weaknesses.”
Education Week 25.3 (14 Sept. 2005) 1. 30 Oct. 2006.
<http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/09/14/03threat.h25.html>