Transcript Document

LUND UNIVERSITY
Methods to determine particle properties
Chapter 7
1
LUND UNIVERSITY
What ranges do we need to measure
Particle Characterization: Light Scattering Methods
2
LUND UNIVERSITY
Principles for different methods
1. Visual methods (e.g., optical, electron, and scanning
electron microscopy combined with image analysis)
2. Separation methods (e.g., sieving, classification,
impaction, chromatography)
3. Stream scanning methods (e.g., electrical resistance
zone, and optical sensing zone measurements)
4. Field scanning methods (e.g., laser diffraction, acoustic
attenuation, photon correlation spectroscopy)
5. Sedimentation
6. Surface methods (e.g., permeability, adsorption)
3
LUND UNIVERSITY
4
LUND UNIVERSITY
Visual methods
Microscopy
Principe of operation
– Optic or electronic
measures
– Two dimensional projection
•
•
•
•
•
Projection screen or circles
Image analysing programs
Measures
– Feret diameters
– Equal circles
Size range- 0.001-1000 m
Gives number average,or area
average
Benefits
– “Simple” and intuitive
– Give shape information
– Reasonable amount of sample
•
Drawbacks
– Statistic relevance “tedious” if
image analyse can not be used
– Risk for bias interpretation
– Difficult for high concentrations
– Sample preparation might be
difficult
5
LUND UNIVERSITY
Visual methods
Estimations by hand
•
•
•
•
Björn B rule of thumb estimate the size of the
third largest particle
Compare to a known set of circles and count the
number of particles in each group.
Choose a direction and use 0 and 90 degrees
feret diameters
Reliability
– Blind your samples
– Count enough particles
6
LUND UNIVERSITY
Visual
Different types of microscope
•
•
•
•
Light microscope (1-1000 m)
Fluorescence microscope
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Electron microscope
– SEM (0.05-500 m)
– TEM (Å-0.1 m)
7
LUND UNIVERSITY
Visual methods
Image analysis
•
•
•
•
Easy to be fooled
Difficult to get god contrast and separation
between particles
The human eye is much better than any image
analysing tool in detecting shapes
Example in Image J
8
LUND UNIVERSITY
Separation methods
Sieving
•
•
Principe of operation
– stack of sieves that are
mechanical vibration for
pre-decided time and speed
– Air-jet sieving - individual
sieves with an under
pressure and and air stream
under the sieve which blows
away oversize particles
Measures - Projected perimetersquare, circle
Size range - 5-125 000 m
Gives weight average
–
•
Benefits
– “Simple” and intuitive
– Works well for larger particles
Drawbacks
– Can break up weak
agglomerates (granulates)
– Does not give shape
information
– Need substantial amount of
material
– Needs calibration now and
then
9
LUND UNIVERSITY
Separation methods
Powder grades according to BP
Description
Sieve diameter m
Coarse
1700
Sieve that do not
allow more than 40%
to pass m
355
Moderate coarse
710
250
Moderate fine
355
180
Fine
180
Very fine
125
10
LUND UNIVERSITY
Separation methods
Chromatography
•
•
Measures
– Hydrodynamic radius
Principe of operation
– Size exclusion (SEC GPC):
•
•
–
porous gel beads
Size range -0.001-0.5 m
•
Benefits
Short retention times
– Separation of different
fractions
Drawbacks
– Risk for interaction
– Need detector
–
•
Hydrodynamic
Chromatography (HDC)
•
•
Flow in narrow space
Size range capillary -0.0250 m packed column
0,03-2 m
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
11
LUND UNIVERSITY
Separation methods
FFF Field flow fractionation
•
•
Size range 30nm- 1m
Principe of operation
– Flow in a chanel
effected by an external
field
•
•
•
•
Heat
Sedimentation
Hydraulic
Electric
Field
•
•
Benefits
– No material interaction
– High resolution
– Good for large
polymers
Drawbacks
– Few commercial
instrument
– Still in development
stage
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
12
LUND UNIVERSITY
Separation methods
Cascade impactores
•
•
•
Measure- Aerodynamic volume,
Principe of operation
– The ability for particles to
flow an air flow
•
Size range normally 1-10 m
Qui ckTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this pictur e.
•
Benefits
– Clear relevance for
inhalation application
– Can analyse content of
particles
Drawbacks
– Particles can bounce of
the impactor or interact
by neighbouring plates
– Difficult to deaggregate particles
13
LUND UNIVERSITY
Stream Scanning Methods
Coulter counter
•
Measures - Volume diameter
•
Gives number or massavarge
–
–
Size range - 0.1-2000 m
Principe of operation
Measurement on a suspension
that is flowing through a tube,
when a particle passes
through a small hole in a
saphire crystal and the
presence of a particle in the
hole causes change in electric
resistance
Benefits
– measure both mass
and population
distributions
accurately
Drawbacks
•
• Risk for blockage by large
particles,
– More than one particle in
sensing zone
– Particles need to
suspended in solution
14
LUND UNIVERSITY
Methods to measure particle size
Light scattering
•
•
Measures - Area diameter or
volume diameter, polymers
Radius of gyration or molecular
mass
Principal of operation
– Interaction with laser light
the light are scattered and
the intensity of the scattered
light are measured
– Two principals
•
•
–
Static light scattering
Dynamic light scattering
Size range- 0.0001-1000
m
Benefits
– Well established
– instruments are easy to
operate
– yield highly reproducible
data
Drawbacks
• Diluted samples-changes in
properties
• Tendency to
– Oversize the large particles
– Over estimates the number
of small particles
•
15
LUND UNIVERSITY
Static light scattering
•
•
Particle size information is
obtained from intensity of the
scattering pattern at various
angles.
Intensity is dependent on
– wavelength of the light
– Scattering angle
– particle size
– relative index of refraction n
of the particle and the
medium.
Micromeritics Technical Workshop Series (Fall162000)
LUND UNIVERSITY
Light scattering
Small and large particles
•
•
Small particles one
scattering center < 10 nm
Scatter intensity
independent of scattering
angle (Rayleigh
scattering)
Large particles multiple
scattering centres
• Scattering depend on
gives
aQdreue iccnangle
okemTei pdmre
eeds™stoand
oarsnede ath
i s p i c tudiffraction
re .
pattern
•
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Quic kTi me™ and a
decompres sor
ar e needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
17
LUND UNIVERSITY
Light scattering
Mie theory
•
The complete solution to Maxwells equation for
homogeneous sphere
–
Incident light of only a single wavelength is
considered.
No dynamic scattering effects are considered.
The scattering particle is isotropic.
There is no multiple scattering.
All particles are spheres.
All particles have the same optical properties.
–
Light energy may be lost to absorption by the particles.
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
Applicable for all sizes
Needs to know the refractive index to calculate the size
18
LUND UNIVERSITY
Light scattering
Fraunhofer theory
•
•
•
•
•
Treats that the particle as completely adsorbing
disc
does not account for light transmitted or refracted
by the particle.
Only applicable to particles much larger than the
wavelength of the light
Do not need to know the refractive index
Much simpler math
19
LUND UNIVERSITY
Light scattering
Dynamic light scattering
•
•
Particle size is determined
by correlating variations in
light intensity to the
Brownian movement of
the particles
Related to diffusion of the
particle
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
20
LUND UNIVERSITY
Light scattering
Dynamic light scattering the decay function
•
•
Monodisperse particles gives a single
exponential decay rate
Polydisperse samples the self diffusion
coefficient is defined by a distribution function
that includes
– number density of species
– mass M
– particle form
21
LUND UNIVERSITY
Methods to measure particle size
Sedimentation
•
Measures - Frictional drag
diameter, stoke diameter
2d 2 g
v
18
•
Gives weight average

–
–
Principe of operation
• Sedimentation in
gravitational field
• Sedimentation due to
centrifugal force
Size range -0.05-100 £gm)
Benefits
– “Simple” and intuitive
– Well established
Drawbacks
• Sensitive to temperature due to
density of media
• Sensitive to density difference
of particles
• Orientation of particles to
maximize drag
• bias in the size distribution
toward larger particle
22
LUND UNIVERSITY
Methods to measure particle size
Sedigraph
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
23

LUND UNIVERSITY
Surface area analyse
permeability
•
•
Measures:
– Specific area
Principe of operation
– Measures the pressure
drop in a particle bed
3
P
s(m kg) 
*
*
k 2v (1 )2 L
1
2
–
Conditions
•
•
•
Laminar flow
Know Kozenys constant
Homogenous particle
bed
•
•
Benefits
– Simple equipment
– Relevant for many
applications
Drawbacks
– Has to know
•
•
–
Porosity
Kozenys constant
Needs uniform density
of particles
24
LUND UNIVERSITY
Surface area analyse
Gas adsorption
•
Principe of operation
– Measures the
adsorption of gas
molecules
•
•
•
Remove adsorbed
molecules
Introduce gas
Measure pressure
differences
P
1
b 1 P


*
n(P  P0 ) bnm bnm P0
•
•
•
Range
– 0.01 to over 2000 m2/g.
Benefits
– Well established
– High precision
– Gives inner pores
Drawbacks
– Over estimation of available
area
– Experimental difficulties

25