Transcript Slide 1
Interpreting Financial Ratios and Using Financial Ratios for Decision Making on Retention Levels, Setting Target Equity Levels and Dividend Reimbursements CAJPA 2006 Fall Conference and Training Seminar September 20 – 22, 2006 South Lake Tahoe Presented by: Mujtaba Datoo, ACAS, MAAA Actuarial Practice Leader ARM Tech 23701 Birtcher Drive, Lake Forest, CA 92630 (949) 470-4343 • FAX (949) 470-4340 • www.armtech.com Discussion Points • Conceptual framework • Variability Need for surplus Confidence level, contingency margin • Target surplus level • Equity position • Dividend release • Summary 1 So how do you get to your goal? Different people get there differently, or not… The English Plan Depending on the wind, the striker’s position may vary… The German Plan Radical, efficient, unstoppable… (ball’s speed may reach 180 mph) Pooling and Self-Insurance, Insurance mechanism • Essentially the business is an insurance enterprise Pay generally fixed premium up front for a promise to pay claims later Claims will not be known for a while and are subject to variation 5 Balancing Formula Premium + inv income = losses + expenses fixed minimal variable fixed 6 Variance… • Losses estimates are inherently variable • Confidence Level is a statistical measure • Varies by coverage Excess Liability – very variable WC – indemnity less variable than medical part Auto Liability – generally more stable • The greater the SIR, the greater the potential for variability 7 Sources of variation • Process risk risk associated with projection of future contingencies that are inherently variable • Parameter risk risk associated with selection of parameters of the model, e.g. selecting the wrong LDF • Model risk Misidentifying a process model, e.g. Poisson for frequency Surplus provides primary protection against adverse deviation 8 Surplus is key measure • Assets minus Liabilities = Surplus • Surplus a.k.a. Net assets Pool equity Retained earnings Policyholder’s Surplus 9 What are your assets • • • • • • Cash Bonds Other investments Real estate Accounts receivables Etc. 10 What are your liabilities • Claims payable Case reserves Case reserve development Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) reserves Allocated loss adjustment expense (ALAE) • Unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE) • Other expense payable • Etc. Outstanding Losses are the largest component of liabilities 11 Reasons for Surplus • Absorb adverse loss development – KEY reason • Reinsurers may become insolvent Contingent liabilities • Use for rate stabilization • Rating agencies • Make pool more attractive to Prospective members Reinsurers • Required by state regulators (private sector) 12 Determining Surplus Adequacy, the considerations • Lines of coverage Long tail, short tail Amount of reserves • Retention level, i.e. SIR • Annual contribution (premium) volume • Strategic plan Competitive environment Target levels 13 Financial Measures • Used by private sector to determine Financial solidity Developed to weed out financially troubled companies Many measures from simple to complex • IRIS ratios: Premium to Surplus (3:1), etc. • Risk Based Capital (RBC) requirements • Basic building blocks are the same 14 How much Surplus? • Set key financial measure targets Premiums Contributions to Surplus Reserves to Surplus SIR to Surplus • Financial ratios based on private sector experience Applies to public entities – same risk measure concept Not quite apples to apples, say apples to oranges! • Benchmark range is still a good guide 15 Premium-to-Surplus • Premium-to-surplus ratio well within usual range of less than 3:1 AM Bests – Workers Comp 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Increase membership 0.0 benchmark 0.5 2004 Return dividends, 2003 1.0 2002 Increase retention, 2001 1.5 2000 Able to: 16 Loss Reserves-to-Surplus • Reserve-to-surplus ratio well within usual range for WC of 3 (to 4):1 AM Bests – Workers Comp 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 benchmark 2004 2003 2002 0.0 2001 0.5 2000 Able to withstand adverse development 17 Retention Levels Depends on: • Amount of Surplus • Subjective willingness to bear risks The “flinch test” • Excess insurance pricing Market availability • Other benchmarks, measures 18 Freakonomics Risk = hazard + outrage 19 SIR-to-Surplus • SIR-to-surplus ratio well above 10:1 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 benchmark 2005 0.0 2004 2.0 2003 Able to withstand more large claims (up to retention levels) 20 Ratios are relativity concepts • Financial ratios are all relative measures Relative to other companies Data adjusted to common levels • Discounted vs. undiscounted • Market value of investments • Absolute measures do not exist! No one right answer Use reasonable ranges Compare to your similar entities 21 The Italian Plan Iron defense, small ideas in midfield, passes to striker..and…Penalty The Brazilian Plan … no comments! The Australian Plan They manage to lose the game by themselves, no help needed. The Dividend Decision • How much income is available for release? • Relate to Surplus target levels Use confidence level measures Accumulate surplus gradually to target levels Release in staggered amounts Wait for claims to close or sufficient period to minimize variability 25 Equity, conceptually Plus Premium Contribution FY 2004/05 Investment income earned 2004/05 Less Program expenses 2004/05 Losses paid in 2004/05 Loss reserves Other adjustments/dividend payable 26 Equity calculation, Funds available Fiscal Period Ending (1) Contributions Inv. Income accrued Limited Losses Paid Operating Expenses Dividends Declared Funds available (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) = (2)+(3) (4) - (5) -(6) 1997 $1,858 $45 $558 $1,143 $226 ($23) 1998 2,274 197 496 1,090 381 503 1999 1,486 60 937 746 17 (153) 2000 3,234 348 675 1,570 0 1,356 2001 3,082 314 803 1,109 0 1,485 2002 3,097 242 532 1,437 0 1,369 2003 3,174 160 505 1,339 0 1,489 2004 3,356 133 284 1,322 0 1,882 2005 1,250 41 81 608 0 602 TOTAL 22,815 1,545 4,875 10,367 624 8,493 27 Equity calculation, Equity above Confidence Level Fiscal Period Ending Funds available Outstanding Losses And ULAE (1) (2) (3) Equity Confidence Level Target Additional Funds For C/L Equity Above C/L (4) (2) – (3) (5) (6) (7) (4) - (6) 1997 $(23) $0 ($23) 90% $0 ($23) 1998 503 10 492 90% 9 483 1999 (153) 0 (153) 90% 0 (153) 2000 1,356 6 1,329 90% 6 1,323 2001 1,485 156 1,329 90% 137 1,1,91 2002 1,369 670 699 90% 129 570 2003 1,489 612 877 90% 211 660 2004 1,882 903 978 90% 154 824 2005 602 516 85 90% 32 53 8,493 2,876 5,616 680 4,915 TOTAL 28 Equity calculation, Target Equity Release Fiscal Period Ending Equity Above C/L Target Equity Release Equity Above C/L (1) (7) (4) - (6) (5) (7) (4) - (6) 1997 ($23) 100% ($23) 1998 483 75% 362 1999 (153) 75% (153) 2000 1,323 50% 661 2001 1,1,91 50% 595 2002 570 25% 142 2003 660 25% 166 2004 824 0% 0 2005 53 0% 0 TOTAL 4,915 1,752 29 Equity release • Use Fund Year Accounting Relates to members who participated in the same years • Accumulate gradually Through rate additions Assessments • Release in staggered stages When all claims are closed, or Longer waiting and release time for long-tail lines • Ensure overall financial targets are met 30 The French Plan In their plan, they try all possible hypotheses. Oh No! Oui, Oui …they forgot the goal Mujtaba’s Plan Survey the field, build advancing strategies, and strike….. The Big Picture… 33 Projected Financial Position As of June 30, 2005 Program at about 75% confidence level $25 $20 Surplus $4 M $15 $10 $5 $0 Assets Expected 70% 90% Investment Income 1.1 1.1 1.1 Confidence Level Margin 0.0 1.8 5.7 Discounted Liabilities 11.5 11.5 11.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 18.9 18.9 18.9 Other Liabilities 18.9 Assets Available 18.9 18.9 34 What are your goals? Understand underlying concepts, assumptions Surplus is cushion for adverse deviation, etc. Set reasonable targets Make gradual, incremental changes Compare to peer group or entity Monitor regularly, adjust if necessary For a long-term, financially solid win… Summary • Losses are inherently variable • Variability cushioned by surplus • Set target financial measures Reserves, premium and SIR to Surplus • Establish dividend release formula Calculate equity position by Fund Year Accumulate surplus gradually, release slowly • Review plan periodically Details change, e.g. SIRs, membership, etc. Does it work and achieve equity? 36 Questions? Thank you. Mujtaba Datoo, ACAS, MAAA Actuarial Practice Leader ARM Tech (949) 470-4342 [email protected] 37