Transcript Slide 1
Mass production and its effect upon employment The industrial revolution and mass consumerism meant that the craftsperson was replaced by low-skilled workers in highly mechanised factories. Although working conditions have generally improved modern mass production still has some social consequences: • Reduced workforce • High -skilled workforce required to set up and maintain machinery • Low-skilled workforce for more menial repetitive jobs The ‘new’ industrial age of hightechnology production In this and the last century developments in materials and manufacturing technologies together with changes in lifestyle, revolutionised product design. New materials such as metal alloys, polymers and composites enabled new ways of designing and manufacturing . In particular, the development of digital computers in the 1940s and the silicone chip in the 1960s enabled relatively inexpensive portable computer technology, which transformed modern industrial society. Computers in the development and manufacture of products CIM systems incorporating CAD and CAM have revolutionised modern manufacturing and print industry. On-demand printing quickly supplies the exact amount of copies to satisfy each customer’s needs. Once designs are finalised, printing plates can quickly be produced using computer-to-plate (CTP) technology. This cuts out the long process of producing printing plates manually and instead data is transferred directly to a laser engraver that forms the plate. Printing costs can be significantly reduced with digital printing machines that can operate up to 14,400 pages per hour. Digital printing is well suited to the production of short print runs as it does not require the making of printing plates, unlike commercial; printing processes such as offset lithography. In post-press, the printed materials can be die-cut, folded, glued or bound using automated Digital Printing and Packaging Miniaturisation of products and components The most important technological development in recent years has been in the field of microelectronics. Not only have products reduced in size through technological advances but multi-functional products have become possible. Think of the range of facilities and services now capable through smart phones and digital tablets. The miniaturisation of mobile phones has been possible due to three key developments: Use of smart materials and products for innovative applications The continued development of smart materials has been applied to a whole range of innovative products and systems where their ability to respond to changes and return to their original state is a real advantage. Homework for Monday Question 3 & 4: Exam paper June 2010 The Global Marketplace In order to be competitive many companies sell their products all over the world. It can sometimes be a problem to design for unfamiliar markets or design products that will sell across different countries. In order to overcome this many companies will: • Employ world wide design teams. • Use focused market research to discover the needs of specific markets. Offshore manufacturing of multinationals This is a driving force in the global marketplace. There is an increased awareness by multinationals companies based in developed countries (the West and Australia) of the value of offshore manufacturing as a vital strategic tool. Many companies will draw upon the individual expertise of other countries to develop new products, especially in the field of technology. Companies are relocating to less-developed countries such as India, China and former Soviet nations and outsourcing their work. Initially jobs in developing countries were created through the manufacture of shoes, cheap electronics and toys, and subsequently simple service work such as processing credit card receipts. Now all kinds of ‘knowledge work’ and manufacturing can be performed almost anywhere e.g. UK companies have many call centres in India. The driving forces are digitisation, the Internet and high-speed data networks that cover the entire globe. Design data can simply be sent to another country for manufacture or localised expertise can provide the design and development of products. Why do multinationals manufacture offshore, or outsource? The answer is quite simple: it costs them less. It is now possible to receive the same quality work at a fraction of the cost than if Western companies manufactured in their own countries. The main reduction in cost is in labour and materials. This raises certain ethical issues: • Unemployment in developed countries • Exploitation of labour in developing countries • Dependence upon largely unskilled jobs • Exploitation of natural resources • Environmental concerns in developing countries. Local and global production Issues relating to local and global production are concerned with the effects of the global economy and multinationals on: • Quality of life • Employment • Environmental Whilst the headquarters of multinationals are based in developed countries, some multinationals are based in developing countries. Though economic regeneration is generally welcomed by the governments of developing countries, there are also a number of negative effects on the local population. Advantages and disadvantages of global manufacturing in developing countries: Influence of design history on the development of products The history of design is inextricably linked to the social, political and economic history of the modern world. The timeline below demonstrates the overlapping of design movements and that one movement did not simply end and another take its place. Design movements; Arts and Crafts (1850 1900) Philosophy - Grew out of a concern for the effects of industrialisation upon design, traditional craftsmanship and the lives of ordinary ‘working class’ people. William Morris (1834-1896) ‘Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful.’ Art Nouveau (1890-1905) Philosophy - Art Nouveau or ‘new art’ was an international style of decoration and architecture that developed in the late 19th century. The underlying principle of Art Nouveau was the concept of a unity and harmony across the various fine arts and crafts media and the formulation of new aesthetic values. Art Nouveau forms a bridge between the Arts and Crafts and Modernism. Charles Rennie Mackintosh (1868-1928) In Britain the Art Nouveau style was exemplified by the Scot Charles Rennie Mackintosh. He was an architect, designer, watercolourist and artist. Modernism (1900-1930) Philosophy – Modernist architects and designers rejected the old style of designing based upon natural form and materials. They believed in ‘the machine aesthetic’, which celebrated new technology, mechanised industry and modern materials that symbolised the new 21st century. The Bauhaus (house for building) group in Germany exemplified Modernist theory and practice. The work of Marcel Breuer (1920-1981) exemplified the Modernist style. Style: • ‘Form follows function’- Bauhaus featured functional design as opposed to highly decorative design. Designers produced high-end functional products with artistic pretensions which primarily worked well but also looked good. Simple, geometrically pure forms were adopted with clean lines and the elimination of clutter. • ‘products for a machine age’ – Products respected the use of modern materials such as tubular steel and mechanised mass production processes. As a result products looked like they had been made by machines and were not based upon natural forms as with previous movements. • ‘Everyday objects for everyday people’ – Consumer goods should be functional, cheap and easily mass produced so that ordinary working-class people could afford them. Art Deco (1925-1939) Streamlining (1935-1955) Philosophy- Towards the end of the Art Deco period a new style emerged known as Streamline Moderne, influenced by the modern aerodynamic designs derived from advancing technologies in aviation and high-speed transportation. Style: • Teardrop shape- Sleek efficient forms of airliners and marine life as inspiration, the form adopted as perfect aerodynamicism was that of the teardrop. This aerodynamic form became the new aesthetic direction and guided the design of modern products. • Futuristic design – Science fiction provided optimism for a newer and better future with sleek rocket shapes and atom designs. Post-modernism (1975 – present) Philosophy- The term ‘post-modernism’ was first coined by architect Charles Jencks. He used it to criticise the functionalism of the modernism movement. And to describe the eclectic new design styles being developed by a whole range of contemporary architects and designers. Out of this period came the Memphis Group comprising Italian designers and architects who created a series of highly influential products in the 1980s. Founder member Ettore Sottsass disagreed with the approach of the time and challenged the idea that products had to follow conventional shapes, colours, textures and patterns. They drew inspiration from such movements as Art Deco and Pop Art, styles such as the 1950s Kitsch (tasteless/vulgar) and futuristic themes. The work of the Memphis Group has been described as vibrant, eccentric and ornamental. Philippe Starck (1949-) Starck is a well known French designer and probably the best known designer in the New Design Style. His designs include a diverse range, from spectacular interior designs to mass-produced consumer goods such as toothbrushes, chairs and even houses. His products are often stylised, streamlined and organic in their appearance. They posses humour and individual personality. Page131 Form and function The connection between form and function has been one of the most controversial issues in the history of. When products were first mass produced in Victorian times they were highly decorated to look like hand-made products, whether their decoration was appropriate or not. The development of ‘reform’ groups such as the Arts and Crafts movement gradually brought about change in the concept of design. The form of products was to be simplified and the products well made from suitable materials. Victorian chair Arts and Crafts chair At the turn of the 20th century, developments in materials and technology enabled the production of innovative new products such as the telephone. Many of these products were so innovative that there was benchmark on which to base their designs. The development of mass production techniques required that products be standardised, simple and easy to produce. The modernist movement, which supported functionalism, suggested that the form (shape) of a product must suit its function and not include any excessive or unnecessary decoration. Therefore, for a product to be mass produced at a profit, it needed to be easy to produce. Product performance and reliability are no longer real issues for the consumer as most products carry guarantees and are subject to rigorous quality assurance procedures. The main reason for choosing one product over another with similar functions is its aesthetic qualities. One of the roles of the designer, then is to provide the product with the right style or image for a particular market group e.g. trainers are more often bought for the label rather than functionality. With so many products mass produced designers try to inject a sense of individuality or personality into products to make them more attractive to customers. The designer has to walk a fine line between individual, humorous designs and practical products if they are to be successful. The Alessi did overstep the line between form and function with the Hot Bertaa kettle designed by Philippe Starck, which had to be withdrawn from production as it did not boil water very well or safely. This is an important lesson for any modern designer, who must strike a balance between the form and function of a product. VS Anthropometrics and ergonomics The relationship between anthropometrics and ergonomics: Ergonomics Ergonomics is the science of designing products, systems and environments for human use. This means applying the characteristics of human users to the design of a product – in other words, matching the product to the user. Anthropometrics In order to design products that are comfortable and easy to use data about the size and shape of the human body is required- this branch of ergonomics is called anthropometrics. Anthropometrics deals with human measurements, in particular their shapes and sizes. Sources and applications of anthropometric data When applying anthropometric data to a design problem, the designer’s aim is to provide an acceptable match for the greatest possible number of users. This is achieved by the use of data charts such as those issued by British Standards Institute (BSI). Simple data charts relating to measurements for men, women and children can also be found in the clothing sections of mail order catalogues. Statistical data available from the BSI is associated with heights of people. The height at which 5 per cent of the population is shorter is known as the fifth percentile. Likewise, the height at which only 5 per cent of people are taller is known as the 95th percentile. The anthropometric data that covers 90 per cent of the British population covers those that fall between the fifth and 95th percentile. 90% of the population the Fifth to 95th percentile Scan page 135 See Question 2 June 2010 1a – Designers exclude a percentage of a designed user group because people vary so much in size (1) it can be difficult to produce a design that suits everybody. (1) the design needs to fit the majority and not extremes (1) to make it user friendly. (1) It is difficult to meet the needs of everybody (1) in a range of people (1) from the bottom 5% to the top 95% (1) (2x1) 2 Marks Max. 1b – It is beneficial to consumers because: • People come in all shapes and sizes. (1) • Ergonomics takes into account people’s wide range of sizes/takes account of human measurements. (1) • Designers make products usable for the majority of people. (1) • Ergonomic design makes the product safer/comfortable to use. (1) • Ergonomic design can improve health by reducing back pain. (1) • Ignoring ergonomic design can affect users’ health. (1) • Poor ergonomic design can effect productivity/affect efficiency. (1) • Ergonomic design can affect the sales/success of products. (1) • Fit for purpose/interacts with customer. (1) • Product is made user friendly/easy to use. (1) Do not accept statements that refer to “designed for the majority” (6x1) 6 Marks Max. School chair: The designer has considered form and function as: • An example of function over form. (1) • It has no decoration/simple/basic design. (1) • It is ergonomically designed to accommodate a wide range of users/target market. (1) • The form allows for mass production methods. (1) • The form allows for easy/stacked storage/easily moved. (1) • Purely functional as something to sit on (comfortably may be added). (1) • It easy to manufacture by injection moulding. (1) • Ergonomically designed to suit stated age range. (1) • Materials used suit mass production techniques. (1) • Materials used are durable/hard wearing/strong/support load/sturdy. (1) (4x1) 4 Marks Max. Mackintosh chair: The designer has considered form and function as: • An example of form over function. (1) • Its form makes it a lifestyle statement/product. (1) • The form not necessarily ergonomically designed/not comfortable. (1) • Very decorative/stylised/Art Nouveau. (1) • Form means that it will probably be small batch produced. (1) • Materials used are less functional but enhance the form. (1) • Designed for low manufacturing numbers. (1) • Its function is to be aesthetically pleasing/looks good. (1) • Appearance is its main function. (1) • Designed to fit in with the whole room design/appearance. (1) • Fits a niche market. (1) • Can be sat on. (1) Sustainability Sustainability means safeguarding the world for ourselves and for future generations, using energy and other resources in a way that minimise their depletion, and designing for a better quality of life. In recent years we have had to rethink our approach to design, materials usage and manufacturing methods by moving towards an approach that considers economic, social and environmental issues and the use of cleaner design and technology. These are not simply issues for governments and large companies but for everyone. How do these images affect you? Life-cycle assessment Balancing the needs against the impact to the environment is becoming increasingly more difficult for manufacturers as they strive to develop new products and processes. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is a technique now widely used to assess and evaluate the impact of the product or packaging ‘from cradle to grave’ through extraction of raw materials, the production phase, and life-cycle processes including distribution, use and final disposal of the product. 6 (a) Explain how a company benefits from carrying out a life cycle assessment (LCA) on its product. (Exam Paper June 2011) 6(a) Any two of the following with a relevant explanation :• Reduce the volume / range of materials /processes required (1) enabling materials costs to reduce. (1) • Reduce the amount of energy required to design / manufacture / distribute the product (1) helping the company meet emissions targets / reduce energy costs. (1) • Promote the product /company as being environmentally friendly (1) so increasing its appeal / sales to conscientious consumers.(1) • Setup production nearer to suppliers / markets (1) reducing transportation costs. (1) • Establish a life length for the product (1) so that they know when to launch a new product / establish a warranty length.(1) (b) Reusing products such as printer ink cartridges is one strategy used to minimise waste. Evaluate the issues associated with reusing products to minimise waste. 6(b) Any four of the following points but the response must contain at least one positive and one negative to gain full marks. Positives • Reconditioned products appeal more to environmentally aware consumers. (1) • Fewer products will be discarded to landfill /reduced pollution. (1) • Manufacturer has reduced need for raw materials / production systems / energy. (1) Negatives • Workable collection systems need to be established in order to recover the used products. (1) • A system to refill / reprocess the product needs setting up. (1) • Systems for quality checking the reprocessed products need to be established. (1) • Consumers expect a lower price on a reconditioned product. (1) • Less new products will be sold. (1) • Often costs more to re-process than manufacture new. (1) • Products designed to be re-used need to be more robust adding to production costs / some products are not robust enough to be re-used (1) (4 x 1) Life-cycle inventory Modern consumers expect companies to pay attention to the environmental impact that the production of their products has. British Standards and the ISO 1400 series of standards now demand continuous improvement in a company’s environmental management systems, of which a life-cycle inventory is an important aspect. A life-cycle inventory describes which raw materials are used and what emissions will occur during the life of a product. All the inputs and outputs are collated during the lif-cycle of a product, including: • Environmental inputs and outputs of raw materials and energy resources • Economic inputs and outputs of products, components or energy that are outputs from other processes. The life-cycle inventory can be expressed as a process tree where each box represents a process with defined inputs and outputs that forms part of the life cycle. The second stage of this process is to interpret the data to assess the overall environmental impact of the product. (See Diagram page 138) Cleaner design and technology Sustainable product design Page 139-143 Edwin Datschefski five factors that make up sustainability: • Cyclic • Safe • Efficient • Social Raw materials: • Environmental and economic costs of raw materials for packaging and product manufacture. Manufacture: • Conversion of raw materials into finished products incurs considerable environmental impact and costs The Coca-Cola ‘202’ drinks can: • Reduction in raw materials and costs. Distribution: • Carbon dioxide emissions from transport Alternative to fossil fuels: • LPG • Bio ethanol • Compressed natural gas • Hydrogen • Electricity Use and maintenance: • Built-in-obsolescence • Repair versus Replacement Exam Paper June 2010 question: 7(b) Discuss, from the manufacturers’ perspective, the issue of ‘repair versus replacement’ with regard to consumer goods. 7(b) Any six of the following but must include at least one positive and one negative to gain maximum marks :Positives points that increase profits. • Product has an increased appeal and therefore sales due to having an extended life time. (1) • Increased sales of spares / revenue from repair service. (1) • Reputation of business improves as it is seen as a responsible manufacturer. (1) • It is not economically viable to repair some products, resulting in replacement sales. Eg. biros, DVD’s, (1) Negatives points that reduce profits. • Sell fewer new products / stifles upgrading products. (1) • Increased demand on after sales support team. (1) • Product will need re-designing to allow for easily interchangeable parts. (1) • Stocks of spare parts need to be manufactured and kept, tying up capital / requiring storage facilities. (1) • Repairing products can be very time consuming making it expensive. (1) (6 x 1) [The above answers are from the view point of making products repairable rather than replacing them. Any correctly stated converse point from the replacement Minimising waste production Waste is lost profit! There are some simple options to consider when deciding how to minimise waste production at the end-of-life stage; they are referred to as the four Rs: • Reduce • Reuse • Recover • Recycle • Reduce: Waste prevention, or "source reduction," means consuming and throwing away less. Source reduction actually prevents the generation of waste in the first place, so it is the most preferred method of waste management and goes a long way toward protecting the environment. • Reuse: Reusing items -- by repairing them, donating them to charity and community groups, or selling them -- also reduces waste. Reusing products, when possible, is even better than recycling because the item does not need to be reprocessed before it can be used again. • Recover: Recovering items – by using the product as a source of fuel at the end of its life cycle. Waste that cannot readily be recycled but can burn cleanly can be incinerated in specialised power stations to generate electricity and provide hot water for the local area. • Recycle: Recycling transforms materials that would otherwise become waste into valuable resources. In addition, it generates a host of environmental, financial, and social benefits. Materials like glass, metal, plastics, and paper are collected, separated and sent to facilities that can process them into new materials or products. Renewable and non-renewable sources of energy The industrial revolution brought about a dependence on the burning of fossil fuels to provide energy for machinery. Today we still depend largely upon coal, gas and oil to generate power for industry. The burning of fossil fuels on an increasingly massive scale has resulted in large emissions of carbon dioxide. This is often called a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. The effects of global warming are not accepted by everyone but most scientist agree that climatic change is taking place at a faster rate than normal. The worse case scenario could see a rise in global temperatures and changes in weather pattern leading to massive population displacement. A more sustainable solution for the planet’s future energy needs based upon economic and environmental implications must be sought to help prevent or alleviate this. The ‘Sandals versus the ‘Nukes’ The debate about global warming has seen two paths emerge from the ‘green’ groups: • Those who believe in the wide scale use of renewable energy sources like wind, solar and biofuels. • Those who advocate less dependence on nature and the increase use of nuclear energy and carbon-scrubbed natural gas. Be familiar with tables on Advantages/Disadvantages of renewable and non-renewable sources of energy. Pages 148 & 149 Responsibilities of developed countries. Global sustainable development For the developed nations the challenge we face is one of reducing the use of scarce resources and reduce pollution. This will require a move towards sustainable consumption and the reduction of our ‘carbon footprint’ (a measure of the impact human activities have on the environment in terms of the amount of greenhouse gasses produced, measured in units of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide). You can check your personal or household carbon footprint by using the calculator at: www.carbonfootprint.com For third world or developing countries the challenge they face are different to our own. They have for example to gain access to the basic needs we take for granted: • Clean water • Electricity • Health care • Education • Housing One method might be to trade more with developed countries to bring in much needed foreign investment to domestic economies. They will need to have access to markets in developed countries in order to expand. This is made more difficult when developed countries ‘tighten their belt’ in times of economic hardship. Developed countries need to shrink their markets to address overconsumption, which creates tighter and more impenetrable markets for developing countries to trade with. With the establishment of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) authorised by the United Nations General Assembly sustainable development has become a focal point. Developed countries have to oversee the implementation of the Earth Summit agreements e.g. global trade or reduction in greenhouse emissions. Norway has suggested practical steps towards sustainable consumption that would include: • Improving analysis, public awareness and participation • Providing incentives for sustainable use, efficiency and renewable sources • Implementing new strategies for transportation and sustainable cities. • Accelerating the use of more efficient and cleaner technologies • Strengthening international action and cooperation (Norway 1994) If global sustainable development is to succeed then all nations must firstly agree terms and conditions and secondly, and more importantly, implement the changes needed. Impact of industrialisation on global warming and climate change Kyoto Protocol • The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), aimed at fighting global warming. The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty with the goal of achieving the "stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system." The Protocol was initially adopted on 11 December 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, and entered into force on 16 February 2005. As of September 2011, 191 states have signed and ratified the protocol. The only remaining signatory not to have ratified the protocol is the United States. Other United Nations member states which did not ratify the protocol are Afghanistan, Andorra and South Sudan. In December 2011, Canada renounced the Protocol. “The Kyoto Protocol does not cover the world's largest two emitters, United States and China, and therefore cannot work," Kent said. "It's now clear that Kyoto is not the path forward global solution to climate change. If anything it's an impediment." Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent Participating countries agreed on a set of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’: • The largest share of historical and current global emissions of greenhouse gases has originated in developed countries. • Per capita emissions in developing countries are still relatively low. • The share of global emissions originating in developing countries will grow to meet their social and development needs. This means that developing countries are exempt from emission reduction targets although developing countries such as China and India are undergoing rapid industrialisation and are exempt at present they will still share the common responsibility in reducing emissions. The USA supported it in principle but has never confirmed its participation. This may be due to the massive amounts of energy required to sustain its economy and the reluctance to accept any targets imposed upon it. The Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) The Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation (NFFO) refers to a collection of orders requiring the electricity Distribution Network Operators in England and Wales to purchase electricity from the nuclear power and renewable energy sectors. Similar mechanisms operate in Scotland (the Scottish Renewable Orders under the Scottish Renewables Obligation) and Northern Ireland (the Northern Ireland Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation). The Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation was put in place under the powers of the Electricity Act 1989, under which electricity generation in the UK was privatised. The original intention was to provide financial support to the UK nuclear power generators, which continued to be state owned. The proposals were enlarged in scope before the Obligation was brought into operation in 1990 to include the renewable energy sector. Contracts from the last three rounds remain in place with the generators receiving the agreed amount from the NFPA and the NFPA effectively taking ownership of the Renewables Obligation Certificate (ROC) which the generator is entitled to. The most promising sources of alternative energy in the UK are: • Wind • Wave • Tidal Wind energy is rapidly expanding and the UK has the largest potential wind energy resources in Europe. The cost of wind power has reduced considerably over the last few years due to the fall in cost of turbines, the increase in size of turbines meaning that fewer are needed and decreasing project development costs as developers have gained experience. Although wind farms have been controversial when located onshore, the recent trend for offshore locations could be a compromise that will benefit • Marine renewable technologies such as wave and tidal energies are a huge untapped resource for the UK, having the best wave and tidal resource in Europe. It has the potential of providing a considerable proportion of the UK’s energy needs and a number of innovative marine energy devices are currently under development. However, such technologies face a number of challenges before they become fully operational on a large-scale commercial basis. There are still key scientific challenges to be addressed in areas including, resource assessment and predictability, engineering design and manufacturability, installation, operation and maintenance, survivability, reliability and cost reduction. Reducing your ‘carbon footprint’ Every time you watch television or use any electrical device you are producing carbon emissions because of the burning of fossil fuels in the generation of electricity. Therefore, it is everyone’s responsibility to reduce his or her individual carbon footprint. In the first instance this involves recognising their personal impact on global warming, including: • Annual household energy use, e.g. electricity and gas use • Annual travel, i.e. car and public transport, flights, etc. There are many ways that an individual can save energy in the household, these include: • Installing energy-saving lightbulbs • Turning electrical appliances off when not in use. • Car pooling, cycling or public transport • Carbon offsetting Carbon offsetting is a way of compensating for the emissions produced with an equivalent carbon dioxide saving. These can range in scale from planting trees in the UK to conservation of wildlife habitats in Africa or South America. Some of the larger projects can also benefit local communities by providing employment, which reduces poverty. Manufacturers can reduce their carbon footprint by: • Applying life-cycle assessment (LCA) techniques to products in order to accurately determine the current carbon footprint • Identifying ‘hot spots’ in production processes in terms of energy consumption and associated carbon dioxide emissions (LCI) • Optimising energy efficiency, so reducing carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases contributed from production processes • Identifying carbon offsetting solutions to neutralise the carbon dioxide emissions that cannot be eliminated by energy-saving measures. Sustainable timber production The UK relies heavily upon the import of forest products and accounts for 8% of global trade in tropical hardwoods. The developing countries that produce this timber benefit little from this trade, with only 10.5% of the revenue from timber production benefiting the producing country. Timber has been the focus of considerable efforts over the past decade to establish more sustainable production and trading systems. There are a number of problems associated with forests: Countries dependent upon the import of timber, such as the UK, have a responsibility to encourage the development of sustainable production and trading systems to minimise the amount of deforestation and its effect upon the environment, including: