Transcript Slide 1

Reducing Infant Mortality
Demonstration Site Model Beeston Hill & Holbeck & Chapeltown
Joanne Davis – Health Improvement Specialist
Sahera Ramzan – Health Improvement Practitioner
Neighbourhoods Team, Public Health,
NHS Leeds
TARGET

Definition:
Infant Mortality: the numbers of deaths of children aged
under one year per 1000 live births.

Starting with children under one year, by 2010 to reduce
by at least 10% the gap in mortality between the routine
and manual group and the population as a whole. The
baseline is 1997-9.

We have set a local target to reduce the IM rate in
“deprived Leeds” to 7 per 1000 live births by 2013.
INFANT MORTALITY RATES 2006-2008
FOR LEEDS, YORKSHIRE & HUMBER,
AND ENGLAND & WALES
Source: NCHOD
Rate per 1000
live births
LCI
UCI
4.8
4.7
4.9
YORKSHIRE AND THE 5.6
HUMBER
LEEDS PCT
5.2
5.3
5.9
4.5
6.1
ENGLAND & WALES
Leeds rate is higher than the England rate, but is lower
than the Yorkshire & Humber rate
TRENDS: LEEDS, Y&H,
ENGLAND
INFANT MORTALITY TRENDS FOR LEEDS, YORKSHIRE & HUMBER,
ENGLAND 2000-2007
Rate per 1000 live births
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
4
England
2000-2002
2001-2003
Y&H
2002-2004
Leeds
2003-2005
2004-2006
2005-2007
WHAT THIS MEANS IN
LEEDS





In Leeds, around 50 babies under one year old
die each year.
Leeds rate = 5.2 per 1000 live births (2005-7).
The IM rate for deprived Leeds (10 % SOA’s)
is higher than the Leeds average.
The single year rate was 4.7 per 1000 for
2008, a marked fall from 5.8 in 2006.
In 2008, 46 Leeds babies died, of whom a high
proportion died within the first 28 days.
WHAT ARE THE CAUSES
OF INFANT DEATH?

Most deaths occur in the “neonatal period”
(first 28 days) from:




Extreme prematurity
Congenital anomalies
Other problems related to pregnancy and
delivery
Deaths after the neonatal period include:




Congenital & chromosomal abnormalities
Infection
Sudden infant death
Accidents and intentional injuries
Risk Factors For IM?
We know the risk factors for infant
mortality are:
 Poverty and deprivation
 Ethnicity (Pakistani and Caribbean)
 Teenage mothers
 Consanguinity
“DEPRIVED LEEDS” 5 YEAR AGGREGATED
INFANT MORTALITY RATES
Infant Mortality 5 year Aggregate Rates
14
Rate Per 1000 Live Births
12
10
8
Deprived
Not Deprived
Leeds
6
4
2
0
1997 - 2001
1998 - 2002
1999 - 2003
2000 - 2004
2001 - 2005
2002 - 2006
Period
We have set a local target to reduce IM rate in “deprived
Leeds” to 7 per 1000 live births by 2013
Part of the Leeds Response:
Reducing IM Demonstration
Site Model
The aims of the RIMDS model:
Through local partnership work provide a range
of complementary interventions to improve
perinatal health and in particular to reduce the
infant mortality rate in Beeston Hill/ Holbeck
and Chapeltown.
(Both areas are made up of 10 % SOA’s and
have higher than the Leeds average ethnic
minority population and higher than the Leeds
average teenage pregnancy rates)
Identifiable Actions to Reduce the
2002-04 Gap in Infant Mortality
What would work
work
Reducing conceptions in under 18s in
the R&M group by 44% to meet the
target
Targeted
interventions to prevent SUDI
by
10% in the R&M group
Reducing the prevalence of obesity in
the R&M group to 23%
Impact on the 2002-04 gap
(percentage points)
1.0
1.4
1.4
2.0
Immediate actions
Optimising preconception care
Early booking
Access to culturally sensitive healthcare
Reducing maternal and infant infections
Reducing overcrowding in the R&M group,
through its effect on SUDI
Reducing the rate of smoking in pregnancy
by two percentage points by 2010
2.8
3.0
Increasing the rate of breastfeeding
initiation in the R&M group to those of
the non-R&M group from 67% to 83%
What would
Meeting the child poverty strategy
4.0
Long-term actions
Improving maternal educational attainment
Practical examples of work
carried out in the RIMDS’s
-
-
Breathing Space.
Making Every Penny Count.
Local Healthy Start Promotion.
Holistic Baby Clinic.
Mosses Basket Loan Scheme
Antenatal / Postnatal Physical Activity
Programme.
Local Midwife teams Malvern team &
Leopold team.
Risk & Resilience Programme.
Making Every Penny Count
Local multi-agency events
 Training front line staff
 ‘Lets Talk Money’ courses
 Local financial information leaflets
 Financial Inclusion audit
 FI briefings for front line staff (CAB,
Credit Union, Loan Sharks)

Healthy Start






Conducted local research
Involving partners
Increasing awareness & knowledge –
general promotion
Implementation of local vitamin scheme
Evaluation
Replicate working in other areas of the city
Risk and resilience
We know that…
Teenage mothers experience 60% higher rates of infant mortality and are at
increased risk of low birth-weight which impacts on the child's long-term health.
Teenage mothers are 3 times more likely to suffer from post-natal depression and
experience poor mental health for up to 3 years after the birth.
Teenage mothers are at far greater risk of living in poverty.
Beeston Hill lies within a Teenage Pregnancy Hotspot Ward (City & Hunslet)
The 2 High Schools within the area are Priority 1 in terms of teenage conception rates
4 Projects under 1
umbrella
o Young Peoples Sexual Health Research Project
o Speakeasy Training programme with local workers and parents
o Sex & Relationship project within 2 High Schools
o Sex & Relationship project with young people in the community
Speakeasy has worked well
because….
9 local workers were trained a facilitators…..
Who then went on to train 32 parents and carers in the
local area……
Who all achieved level 1, 2 or 3 OCN awards
Evaluation of RIMDS Model,
What’s made it work:
Group decision
making process,
e.g. coining the
phrase Making
Every Penny
Counts
Knowing what is
available in the
local area for
women and
families I work
with
The
infrastructure is
there which
enables you to
get projects up
and running
quickly.
Didn’t realise IM was
such an issue in
Chapeltown and the
factors that could be
done to address that.
There are more
local projects.
Opportunity to
share knowledge
and skills with
partners, has
enabled
relationships to be
established with
other professionals
working locally.
The midwifes
and other
professionals
work in a more
holistic way
now.
Evaluation of RIMDS
benefits to local community
The community
are getting a
more effective
service provision.
On home visits
families have
benefited from
accurate
information.
Having the same
midwife through
out.
Individual
families have
benefited from
accessing a
mosses basket
through the loan
scheme.
Been able to
attend a Making
Every Penny
Count event at
school and go to
a local Let’s Talk
Money Course
Raised
awareness
around key SUDI
messages in the
local community.
Grandparents,
families and the
next generation
are more
informed.
Access to local
exercise session
and activities
with baby.
Evaluation of RIMDS Model,
Barriers:
Not always
possible to
demonstrate the
immediate
benefit and
impact in a short
timeframes.
Further funding
would have
helped
Steering group
difficult to get
everyone involved
in the work.
Felt that much
of the
community and
residents would
not be directly
aware of the
work going on
Unable to
attend all the
meetings due to
other
commitments.