Have we seen a QGP at RHIC?

Download Report

Transcript Have we seen a QGP at RHIC?

Azimuthal Anisotropy and the QGP

Yasuo MIAKE, Univ. of Tsukuba

i) Why I Iike azimuthal anisotropy ii) Tsukuba strategy for RHIC-PHENIX iii) What is found at RHIC

Reasons why I love azimuthal anisotropy

Reaction Plane 

ecc

x

2

x

2  

y

2

y

2

v

2 

p x

2 

p

2

x

p y

2

p y

2 λ>>R  b ; Im pact param  Almond shape  λ<<R J .Y. Ollitra ult, P .R.D48('93)1132 Info. on mean free path  vs. R Clear origin of the signal !

 Geometry is clear observable    Conversion of eccentricity to v 2 Anisotropy of the coordinate space converted to that of the momentum space.

Centrailty dependence/different collision(AuAu vs CuCu) gives good tests Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 2

Sensitivity to the early stage

RQMD Kolb et.al., PRC62(2000)054909

Time

  Anisotropy in coordinate space disappears quickly Ratio of eccentricity after a time delay   Disappears quickly 

v 2

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

senses early stage of collision

3

Key1; reliable R.P. determination

QuickTimeý Dz TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ Ç™Ç±ÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉǾå©ÇÈǞǽDžÇÕïKóvÇ­Ç•

0-5% 5-10% 10-20% beam BBC

 north

Central arm BBC

 south   Free from other source of corr such as HBT, decays, jets & auto-corr.

 

→R.P. determination from whole event wide

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 4



Key2; PID with TOF & Aerogel

n

index  1.012

n

pe  20  TOF  100ps

200cm



385cm 200cm e +

p

+ K +

Proton

TIFFÅià• QuickTimeý Dz èkǻǵÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ ÅB

p

e -

p

K -

 High resolution TOF and low index of 1.01 Aerogel Cherenkov  Both Tsukuba contribution Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 5

What we expected before RHIC

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006   There is a tendency of saturation!? Hadron cascade predicts a few %.

6

Surprise !

SPS AGS  Early compilation Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 RHIC 7

Large azimuthal anisotropy

N

  

N

0  1  2

v

1 cos     0   2

v

2 cos 2(    0 )   PHOBOS; nucl-ex/0406021 

Phenix; P.R.L. 94, 232302(2005)

QuickTimeý Dz TIFFÅià• ÅB Central Peripheral Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006   Larger in higher energies.

Increase with pt and saturate 8

Failure of hadronic scenarios

M. Bleicher, H. Stocker Phys. Lett. B526 (2003) 309    Hadronic cascade calculation found to underestimate v 2 at RHIC.

 v 2 ~ 1 - 2 % Mean free path is shorter than that from hadronic rescatternings.

System thermalized early with the mechanism other than hadronic rescatterings.

9 Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

v

2

vs. Eccentricity

Phenix; PRL 89(2002)212301



v

2 

v

2      At low pt region, the ratio stays ~constant Eccentricity scaling observed in comparison of Au+Au, Cu+Cu   Scaling with eccentricity shows v 2 builds up at early stage 10 Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

v

2

with particle identification

PHENIX : P.R.L. 91, 182301 (2003)

PHENIX Preliminary

: Masui@QM05

Extended PID

  Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 Low pt region;     v2( p ) > v2(K) > v2(p)

Mass Ordering

Good agreement with hydrodynamics    Very early thermalization (0.6 fm/c) & high energy density (~20 GeV/fm 3 ) required !

 More from Hirano’s talk Perfect fluid (low viscous) What brings the system thermalization in such a short time!

  Partonic degree of freedom Deviations at high pt region (> 1.5 GeV/c);   v2( p ,K) < v2(p) Other mechanism?

11



Mass Ordering in single spectra

Au+Au at 200 GeV/n

PHENIX, PRC69,034909(2004)

E d

3 

dp

3

e

m t T



m t

 

p t

2 

m

2 m t -m QuickTimeý Dz TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ Ç™Ç±ÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉǾå©ÇÈǞǽDžÇÕïKóvÇ­Ç• QuickTimeý Dz TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ Ç™Ç±ÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉǾå©ÇÈǞǽDžÇÕïKóvÇ­Ç•

T

T

0  1 2

m v r

2 Collective    Known from AGS & SPS era

Mass ordering

of slope parameters   Proof of hydrodynamical collective flow Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 12

Other surprise; baryon dominance

Phenix; P.R.L. 91(2003)172301

   We had many reasons to consider > 2GeV/c is the jet region.

In peripheral, p/ p ratio similar to those in ee/pp suggesting fragmentaton process.

 Fragmentation process should show in ee/pp.

n p < n p as seen In central Au+Au, p/ p ratio increases with centrality, suggesting other mechanism.

High resolution Time-of flight detector

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 

Quark Recombination Model (Quark Coalescence Model)

13

Quark coalescence model (RECO)

Hadron  Quarks, anti-quarks combine to form mesons and baryons from universal quark distribution, w(pt) .

Mom. distr. of meson (2q) ;

W

M   

C

M 

w

2 (

p t

2 ) Mom. distr. of baryon (3q) ;

W

B   

C B

w

3 (

p t

3 )  w(pt) ;  distr. of quarks {

steep in p t

} QGP Because of the steep distr. of

w(pt), RECO

wins at high pt even w. small

Cx

.

Characteristic scaling features expected.

 Quark number scaling 14 Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

Proton dominance by RECO

 Recombination model explains the proton dominance.

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 15

V

2

from RECO

 Characteristic scaling behavior Hadron Azimutal distr. of meson (2q) ;

dN M d

 

w

2  (1  2

v

2,

q

cos2  ) 2  (1  4

v

2,

q

cos2  )  Azimuthal distr. of baryon (3q) ;

dN B d

 

w

3  (1  2

v

2,

q

cos2  ) 3  (1  6

v

2,

q

cos2  ) QGP Azimuthal distr of quark; w 

w

 (1  2

v

2,

q

cos2  ) Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 16 

Quark number scaling observed!

Presented by M. Lamont (QM04)

Meson Baryon

  Quark number scaling clearly observed in v 2 .

Distinct difference between Baryon Meson also seen in R CP , yield ratio of central and peripheral coll.

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 17

Mass ordering of quarks?

WWND 2006, M. Issah KE T = m T – m

Kinetic energy of constituent quarks

Accidental OR ordering in mass of quarks?

 Existence of hypersurface where QGP converted to hadrons?

18 Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

Study of electron for charm

g

conversion

p

0

 g

ee

h  g

ee, 3

p

0

w 

ee,

p

0 ee

 

ee,

h

ee

r 

ee

h

 g

ee

  Origins of electrons   “photonic”   Dalitz decays of phrw Photon conversions “non-photonic”  Semi-leptonic decays of heavy flavored mesons  Electron yields are consistent with those photonic + charm decays.

19 Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006

Charm v

2

from electrons

S.Esumi & S. Sakai@SQM2006  photonic e v 2 inclusive e v 2 (w.o. converter)   Measure v 2 electrons of inclusive Evaluate contribution of photonic electron  Cocktail Method  Converter Method Then, subtract !

N e

[1  2

v

2

e

cos2  ] 

N e

g [1  2

v

g 2

e

cos2  ] 

N e

non  g [1  2

v

non  g 2

e

cos2  ]  (

N e

g 

N e

non  g )[1  2 measured evaluated known Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 

N e

g g

v

2

e N e

g  

N e

non  g

N e

non  g non  g

v

2

e

cos2  ] obtained!

20

Charm seems to flow!

S.Esumi & S. Sakai@SQM2006

V.Greco, C.M.Ko, R.Rapp,PLB595(2004)202.

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006    V 2 of the non photonic electron, mostly charm contribution at low pt Data seem to favor the flow of the charm.

If so, thermalized & flowing charm supports quark coalescence & formation of QGP.

21

2 v 0.2

Study of direct photon

PHENIX, PRL 96,032302(2006) 2 v 0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.0

  Measure v 2 of inclusive photon and p 0 ’s.

Subtract hadronic decays ( p , h , etc) from the inclusive v2 , direct photon!

R; direct photon excess ratio  Direct photons are from compton-like “prompt” process?

Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 22

Summary of my talk

New text book for graduate students

  v 2 is fun!

Establishment of R.P. is great !

  v 2 is even useful !

Thermalization as early as 0.6 fm/c QuickTimeý Dz TIFFÅiLZWÅj êLí£ÉvÉçÉOÉâÉÄ  Large azimuthal anisotropy cannot be generated with hadronic process.

ǙDZÇÃÉsÉNÉ`ÉÉǾå©ÇÈǞǽDžÇÕïKóvÇ­Ç•  Support the quark recombination model    Collectivity at parton level Phenomenological, but universal quark distribution function!

 statistical description of quarks  QGP  Y.Miake, 6th China-Japan Joint Nuclear Physics Symposium, Shanghai, May 16-20, 2006 Much fun to come  Charm & photon !

23