Elliptic Flow in PHENIX

Download Report

Transcript Elliptic Flow in PHENIX

Elliptic Flow in PHENIX
Hiroshi Masui
for the PHENIX collaboration
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach
Puerto Rico
May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
1
Why Elliptic Flow ?
• Study the properties of
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Z
matter created at RHIC
• The probe for early time
– The dense nuclear overlap is
ellipsoid at the beginning of heavy
ion collisions
– Pressure gradient is largest in the
shortest direction of the ellipsoid
– Spatial anisotropy  Momentum
anisotropy
– Signal is self-quenching with time
Y
X
Py
Pz
– Elliptic flow (v2) is defined by the
2nd coefficient of Fourier expansion
Px
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
2
Outline
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
partonic
direct
D
hadronic

, K, p
time
Elliptic Flow, v2
Partonic degrees of freedom, Thermalization, ..
Elliptic Flow, v2
 Meson
• Bulk, early probe
• Charged hadrons
give us a base line
Penetrating probes
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
• Small interaction cross section,
long lived life time (~40 fm/c)
• Heavy flavor electrons (charm)
• Direct 
3
Baseline : charged hadrons
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
PHENIX : PRL 91, 182301 (2003)
Charged hadrons, v2 vs
pT
v2 ~ k  
• Large elliptic flow at RHIC
– Consistent with hydrodynamics with rapid
thermalization,  ~ 1 fm/c
– v2 scales initial eccentricity () of reaction zone
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
4
Hydro scaling
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
M. Issah, A. Taranenko, nucl-ex/0604011
Hydro scaling of v2
K0S,  (STAR) : PRL 92, 052302
(2004)
 (STAR) : PRL 95, 122301 (2005)
, K, p (PHENIX) : preliminary
Meson v2
Baryon v2
* KET ~ mT – m0 at y ~ 0
• Scaling holds up to KET = 1 GeV
• Meson/Baryon v2
– Possible hint of partonic degrees of freedom
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
5
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
1.  meson v2
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
6
Clear  signal
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
•  reconstruction
via K+K- decay
channel
Before subtraction
Signal + Background
Background
After subtraction
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
– S/N ~ 0.3
• Centrality 20 –
60 %
– S/N is good
– Event plane resolution
is good
– Separation between
meson/baryon v2 is
good
– v2 do not be varied too
much.
7
“Meson” type flow !
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
 v2 vs pT
• Hydro. mass ordering for pT < 2 GeV/c
• v2() ~ v2(), v2(K) for pT > 2 GeV/c
– Mass
Number of constituent quarks
• Consistent with the description by quark coalescence, recombination
models
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
8
Hint of partonic d.o.f
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Hydro scaling of v2
K0S,  (STAR) : PR 92,
052302 (2004)
 (STAR) : PRL 95, 122301
(2005)
 (STAR) : preliminary
, K, p, 0, d (PHENIX) :
preliminary
• Hydro + Nquark scaling
– Works for a broad range of KET
–  meson also follow the scaling
WWND 2006, M. Issah
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
Partonic degrees of
freedom
9
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
2. Heavy flavor
electron v2
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
10
Clean heavy flavor electron
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Cocktail subtraction
Converter subtraction
Signal / Background ratio
Run4
Run2
• Two different techniques show an
excess heavy flavor electron signal
– Signal/Background > 1 for pT > 1 GeV/c
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
11
Hint of Charm flow
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
V. Greco, C. M. Ko, R. Rapp: PL B 595,
202 (2004)
e v2 vs pT
• Data indicate finite v2 of charm quark
– Suggest thermalization of c quark as well as light quarks
• What is the origin of high pT drop ?
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
12
b quark contribution ?
e v2 vs pT
input
v2
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
H. Hees, V. Greco, R. Rapp: PRC 73,
034913 (2006)
output
(1) D or B meson v2
(2)
(1) decrease, (2) flat at high pT
De
B  e (1)
B  e (2)
Simulation
SQM 2006, S. Sakai
pT (GeV/c)
• High pT drop might be explained
by B meson contribution
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
13
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
3. Direct  v2
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
14
Clear Direct  signal
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
PRL 94, 232301 (2005)
• Large direct  excess
• 0 is suppressed but direct  not
– Both results are consistent with pQCD
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
15
Possible 3 different scenarios
 v2 vs pT
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
PRL 96, 032302 (2006)
• Direct  v2
1. Hard scattering
• v2 = 0
• Inclusive 
– Consistent with expected 
v2 from hadron decays
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
2. Parton
fragmentation
• v2 > 0
3. Bremsstrahlung
• v2 < 0
16
v2direct = 0 ?
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
PRL 96, 032302 (2006)
 v2 vs pT
• Direct  v2
– Direct  excess ratio is consistent with v2BG/v2inclusive, suggest
v2direct = 0
– Favors prompt photon production for dominant source of direct 
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
17
Conclusions
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
• Elliptic Flow is powerful tool to study hot and
dense matter at RHIC
•  meson  Partonic degrees of freedom
– Hydro. mass ordering for pT < 2 GeV/c
– For pT > 2 GeV/c, v2() prefer quark composition not mass
– Hydro + Nquark scaling works for  meson as well as other
hadrons
• Heavy flavor electron  Thermalization
– Consistent with non-zero charm flow, suggest thermalization of c
quark as well as light quarks
• Bottom contribution at high pT need to be studied experimentally
• Direct   Coming soon …
– v2direct = 0, consistent with the scenario of direct  production
from initial hard scattering
• Year-4 data may enable us to reduce statistical error bars, and
extend pT reach, and to measure thermal  v2
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
18
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Thank you
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
19
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Back up
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
20
Converter Subtraction method
Ne
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
0.8%
1.1% ? %
1.7%
With converter
Photonic
electron
W/o converter
Photon Converter (Brass 1.7 % X0) around
beam pipe
Conversion from beam pipe
Dalitz :
0.8 % X0 equivalent
Non-photonic electron
0
X0
Source of background electrons
• Photon conversion 0     e+e• Dalitz decay (0 ee,  ee, etc)
• Di-electron decays of , , 
• Kaon decays
• Conversion of direct photons
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
21
Inclusive electron v2 (w., w/o. converter)
• Converter
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
subtraction
method
– Inclusive electron
v2 w. and w/o.
converter.
– Clear difference
between them.
– Electron v2 with
converter include
large photonic
component.
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
22
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Inclusive & photonic electron v2
• Photonic
photonic e v2
inclusive e v2 (w/o. converter)
electron v2
– pT < 1 GeV/c
 Converter method
– pT > 1 GeV/c
Simulation
– v2(inclusive) < v2
(photonic)
 v2(non-photonic) <
v2(photonic)
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
23
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Centrality dependence
• Non zero heavy flavor electron v2 !
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
24
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Run4 inclusive  v2
v2
0
inclusive 
pT
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
25
Independent on system size
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Eccentricity scaling
• Eccentricity scaling
– A wide range of centrality
– Independent of system size
• Integrated v2  eccentricity
– Reduce systematic error from
eccentricity calculation
– Cancel systematic error by the ratio of
v2(pT) / (integrated v2)
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
26
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
Hadron identification
• Time-of-flight
• EM Calorimeter
– || < /4, || < 0.35
– Timing resolution ~ 120 ps
– || < /2, || < 0.35
– Timing resolution ~ 400 ps
• /K separation ~ 2 GeV/c
• K/p separation ~ 4 GeV/c
• /K separation ~ 1 GeV/c
• K/p separation ~ 2 GeV/c
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
27
The PHENIX experiment
• Acceptance
CIPANP 2006, Westin Rio Mar Beach, Puerto Rico, May 30 – Jun 3, 2006
– Central arm: || < , || <
0.35
• Centrality
– Beam-Beam Counter, Zero
Degree Calorimeter.
• Event plane
– BBC
• Tracking
– Drift chamber, Pad chambers.
• Particle identification
– Electron
• Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter
– Hadron
• Time-of-Flight, Aerogel
Cherenkov Counter, EMCal
Hiroshi Masui / University of Tsukuba
28