Transcript Slide 1
Targeting Survival and DNA Repair Pathways in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Dr. Lawrence Panasci Potential Conflict of Interest • Research Grant – Luitpold Pharmaceuticals / 2007-2009 – Novartis Pharmaceuticals / 2009- Targeting Survival And DNA Repair Pathways In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Raquel Aloyz PhD Dr Lawrence Panasci MD Department of Oncology & Program in Cancer Genetics McGill university Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) • CLL is characterized by the accumulation in the blood of affected patients quiescent B-lymphocytes in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. • At an early stage of the disease, B-lymphocyte accumulation occurs likely as a consequence of an undefined defect in the apoptotic machinery rather than an increased proliferation of leukemic cells. • While the patients often initially respond to conventional treatment with chlorambucil or fludarabine, they eventually become resistant to the drugs. B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) 1) Is a disease characterized by the proliferation of abnormal, developmentally regulated immature B lymphocytes that accumulate in the blood of affected patients 2) The nitrogen mustard (NM), chlorambucil (CLB), was commonly used as fist line therapy for CLL with an initial response rate of 60-80%, often to low dose CLB therapy, but eventually (usually after years of therapy), all CLL patients become resistant to CLB 3) Thus CLL is an excellent clinical model of NM drug resistance since: an homogenous population of malignant B lymphocytes is easily obtainable these malignant B lymphocytes are representative of the clinical status, i.e. in-vitro/in-vivo NM resistance and the chronic nature of the drug treatment allows for the development of drug resistance DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Cyclophosphamide Chlorambucil Interstrand Crosslink Removal DNA INTERSTRAND CROSSLINK (ICL) NER Non Limiting Step Double Strand Break DSB Homologous Recombinational Repair Non Homologous End joining Repair Fig. 1 Christodoulopoulos, G. et al. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2178-2184 Copyright ©1999 American Association for Cancer Research LINEAR REGRESSION Rad51 and Xrcc-3 Protein Level vs. LD50Chlorambucil In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia summary • Resistance to DNA crosslinking agents is associated with: a) Accelerated repair of interstrand crosslinks induced by these agents. b) Increased drug-induced-Rad51 foci density. c) 3) In CLL primary lymphocytes increased protein levels of xrcc3/Rad51 and in epithelial cell lines increased levels of XPD and xrcc3. Overexpression of xrcc3 results in DNA cross linking agent drug resistance. DNA INTERSTRAND CROSSLINK (ICL) NER Double Strand Break DSB BRCA1 RAD51 NUCLEAR FOCI c-Abl Sensitization to ICL-inducing agents Decreased Rad51 Foci Untreated B-lymphocyte Homologous Recombinational Repair CLB treated B-Lymphocytes DNA DAMAGE BRCA1 ATM c-Abl Activation RAD51 c-Abl Activation BRCA1 Tyr 315 RAD51 RAD52 1-c-Abl positively regulates Rad51-related Homologous Recombinational Repair 2-Homologous recombinational Repair is implicated in CLB drug sensitivity in CLL We investigate the effect of the c-abl inhibitor Imatinib/STI571 in CLB cytotoxicity in CLL lymphocytes STI571 Tyr 412 REGULATED Tyr 245 ACTIVE Determination of Drug Synergy Using the MTT Assay CLB y = 106.63e-0.026x R2 = 0.9648 IC50=29.12mM y = 109.53e-0.0469x R2 = 0.9797 IC50=13.72mM 120 100 80 80 % of Control 60 40 120 100 80 20 60 40 50 0 100 60 20 0 0 IC50= 2.8 mM 40 20 0 20 40 0 60 0 STI571 (mM) CLB (mM) 5 10 CLB (mM) IC50 CLB 5mM STI571 120 IC50= 2.8 mM 100 % of Control % of Control 100 CLB 5mM STI571 % of Control 120 STI571 80 60 40 I= 20 0 0 10 I< 1 Synergy 20 30 CLB (mM) 40 IC50 CLB IC50 CLB + [ STI571] IC50 STI571 50 I=1 Additive I> 1 Antagonism = 0.46 15 STI571(Imatinib) Sensitizes CLL cells to CLB (Chlorambucil) Independently of the clinical status CLB IC50 mM Imatinib IC50 mM CLB IC50 mM+ I Value 5mM Imatinib CLB IC50 mM+ 10 mM Imatinib I Value Patient U1 14.6 55.93 3.35; (4.0)a 0.32 3.35; (4.9) a 0.32 Patient U2 28.49 29.79 2.90; (9.6) a 0.27 2.96; (9.6) a 0.27 a 0.37 4.70; (4.2) a 0.37 0.58 21.20; (2.5) a 0.59 0.75 a 0.96 3 Patient U 20.02 36.8 4.70; (4.2) Patient U4 54.2 101.8 21.20; (2.6) a 5 a Patient U 18.08 47.9 11.70; (1.5) Patient U6 7.84 46.7 0.49 Patient U 12.27 44.9 3.04; (2.5) a 79.9 13.80; (1.3) ND 6.5 70.1 Patient T1 9.29 33.29 1.20; (7.7) a 0.28 1.09; (8.5) a 7 Patient T 2 Patient T 3 Patient T 4 79.7 32.2 Patient T 5 49.2 34 23.1 5.56 16.5 53.06 CLB IC50 mM Imatinib IC50 µM 3.00; (7.7) a 3.54; (1.5) a 5.93 0.42 1.10; (21.0) 0.72 a 2.67; (2.0) 59.00; (1.3) a 0.88 35.20; (2.2) 17.20; (2.8) a 0.49 ND 0.41 a a 0.65 0.66 0.75 CLB IC50 CLB+Imatinib µM I Value WSU 34.00±2.80 13.72±2.75 5.95±0.17**; (5.7) a ; 5µM STI571b 3.15±1.82**; (10.7) a ; 10µM STI571b 0.530.82 I83 40.66±2.80 33.73±4.19 17.30±1.00*; (2.3) a 1.5µM STI571b 25.40±1.53*; (1.6) a ; 3µM STI571b 0.450.74 Summary of the mechanisms of action of Gleevec alone or in combination with Chlorambucil in malignant CLLlymphocytes Chlorambucil Constitutive c-Abl activation of Lyn Fludarabine •Inhibition of transcription DNA damage Anti apoptotic signalling •Inhibition of DNA synthesis (cycling cells) Rad51-dependant DNA repair Death Survival Survival APOPTOSIS c-abl kinase inhibition c-abl kinase Src kinase inhibition inhibition Dasatinib Gleevec Survival Survival A phase I -II Clinical Trial is in process to assess the effect of Gleevec in combination with CLB A phase I-II trial of Gleevec (imatinib mesylate) in combination with chlorambucil in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients Study Protocol Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Group/Participating Institutions: Jewish General Hospital Hopital Notre-Dame, CHUM Hopital Charles Lemoyne Investigators: Jonathan Hebb, MD, MSc Sarit Assouline, MD Lawrence Panasci, MD Pierre DesJardins, MD Stephen Caplan, MD Raquel Aloyz, PhD Rationale • • • • • • There is a synergistic effect of imatinib on CLB mediated cytotoxicity in CLL cells in vitro. This effect occurred at concentrations of imatinib (<10mm) that are clinically achievable. Drug sensitivity in CLL lymphocytes is determined in part by the repair capacity of nitrogen mustard-induced DNA interstrand cross links (ICLs). The regulation of this repair mechanism has been associated with a c-abl mediated phosphorylation of Rad51 which is involved in repair of CLB – induced ICLs. Imatinib inhibits c-abl activity; imatinib may sensitize CLL cells to CLB through inhibition of c-abl mediated DNA-repair pathways. Imatinib in vitro inhibits c-abl, with a resultant decrease in c-abl mediated Rad51 phosphorylation in CLB-treated CLL lymphocytes. Encouraging results from these in vitro studies provide a basis for initiating a phase I/II clinical study. STUDY OBJECTIVES Primary Objectives • To determine the maximum tolerated dose of Gleevec in combination with chlorambucil(CLB). • To determine the toxicities of Gleevec in combination with CLB. Secondary Objectives • To determine the efficacy of Gleevec at the MTD in combination with CLB. • To determine the peak/steady state plasma concentration of Gleevec at each level, but mainly at the MTD. • To determine the amount of Gleevec sensitization of CLB in-vitro in pretreatment lymphocytes and correlate these results with in-vivo anti-tumor activity. • To determine the duration of response in patients who respond to Gleevec and CLB at the MTD. SAMPLE SIZE • Up to 18 patients will be enrolled in the phase I portion of this study, with three patients tested at each dose level of Gleevec. • Cohorts will be expanded to 6 patients if there is one dose limiting toxicity in the first three patients enrolled in a given cohort. • Once the maximum tolerated dose has been determined, a total of 16 patients will be enrolled in the phase II component of the study. PATIENT POPULATION Patients with CLL in whom treatment is clinically indicated and who have been previously treated with one or more of the following regimens: • CLB, with a progression free survival of at least 6 months. • Fludarabine or any fludarabine containing regimen. • Any other treatment regimen including monoclonal antibodies, corticosteroids, immunotherapies, or radiation. Patient Eligibility • Patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (a) Rai Stage 0-II with indication for treatment by NCI Working Group Criteria; or (b) Rai Stage III or IV. • The diagnosis of CLL must be pathologically verified according to the WHO classification of hematological malignancies. • Received a minimum of one prior chemotherapy regimen. Additionally, prior treatment with corticosteroids, immunotherapies, monoclonal antibodies or radiation therapy is permitted. • WBC count of > 25 x 109/L. DOSAGE REGIMEN • Gleevec at three dose levels: 300mg, 400mg, or 600mg daily for 10 days (from day 1 to day 10), and a total fixed dose of CLB 8 mg/m2 daily x 5 days (day 3 to day 7) will be administered. The treatment will be administered every 28 days. Patients may receive up to 6 cycles of therapy. • Dose Level Gleevec CLB -1 300mg 6mg/m2 1 300mg 8mg/m2 2 400mg 8mg/m2 3 600mg 8mg/m2 No of patients 3* 3* 3* 3* Lymphocyte counts for CLL patients on protocol GL-CLB-001 (treatment started at Week 0) 120 Dose Level 1 (300 mg Gleevec) 03-01 03-02 03-03 100 80 60 40 Lymphocyte counts (x10^9/L) 20 0 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 16 20 24 36 300 Dose Level 2 (400 mg Gleevec) 250 03-04 01-02 200 150 100 50 0 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 16 20 24 36 24 36 350 Dose Level 3 (600 mg Gleevec) 300 01-03 03-05 03-06 01-04 01-05 250 200 150 100 50 0 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Weeks 7 8 12 16 20 Dose Level Patient # Age Current Staging Prior Tx Response on Gleevec/Chlora mbucil at Cycle 3 Response on Gleevec/Chlora mbucil at Cycle 5 Best Response at Follow-up Long Term Follow-Up Plasma Concentration* 2 - 4h uM 1 300mg 03-01 L-G 71 Rai II Chlorambucil (PR) SD PR PR (6 mth F/U) Pt developed Hodgkins Died of pneumonitis rltd to bleomycin 1 300mg 03-02 R-C 71 Rai II Fludarabine (PR) Cycloph/Flud (CR) SD off study (AE neutropenia) SD (6 mth F/U) PD (9 mth F/U) 6 - 9.7 1 300mg 03-03 M-B 57 Rai II Fludarabine (PR) PR PR CR (1 mth F/U) CR (9 mth F/U) 3 - 4.4 2 400mg 03-04 T-P 86 Rai III Fludarabine (CR) SD Increased Lymphocytes - - 3.8 - 6.2 2 400mg 01-01 LHT 49 bulky adenop - - - 4.5 - 8.9 2 400mg 01-02 L-S 73 Rai III Chlorambucil (PR) Chlorambucil (PR) Fludarabine (PR) PR PR FU not done. Pt decision PD (6 mth F/U) 7.0 -08.1 3 600mg 01-03 F-Z 80 Rai III Chlorambucil (PR) CLB/Pred (PR) PR off study (SAE - disseminated herpes) - - N/A 3 600mg 03-05 L-L 78 Rai I Fludarabine (CR) PR PR PR 3 600mg 03-06 M-H 59 Rai 1 Fludarabine (PR) Cycloph/Flud (SD) R-FCM (PR) R-CHOP (PR) 3* 600mg 01-04 M-D 77 Rai IV Chlorambucil (PR) Fludarabine (CR) Cycloph (PD) 3* 600mg 01-05 P-O 3* 600mg 10 - 14 PD at Cycle 4 Rai I 76 Rai II Fludarabine (CR) Chlorambucil (PR) Cycloph/Fludar (PR) CLB (Unk, 1 course) Flud (Unk, 1 course) Flud/Retuximab (Tox to chemo after C1) Unk Offstudy at C2 (SAEpneumonia) 5.0 - 5.6 N/A Off-study at C1 - - - N/A - - - Not available (low platelets) PD at Cycle3 DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Cyclophosphamide Chlorambucil Interstrand Crosslink Removal DNA INTERSTRAND CROSSLINK (ICL) NER Non Limiting Step Double Strand Break DSB Homologous Recombinational Repair Non Homologous End joining Repair Non Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) Pathway DNA damage recognition and processing: •H2X2 • Ku70/80 •DNA-PKcs •Artemis Ligation: • Ku70/80 •DNA-PKcs •Ligase IV/xrcc4 LINEAR REGRESSION Ku86 Protein Levels and DNA-PK activity vs LD50Chlorambucil In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 6 y = 0.024x + 0.625 r=0.5225 2 Ku86 Levels DNA-PK Activity (Arbitrary Units) 2.5 1.5 1 0.5 y=7.51x+4.0 r=0.875 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 10 20 Chlorambucil IC50 (mM) 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Chlorambucil IC50 (mM) Muller C et al. Blood. 1998 Oct 1;92(7):2213-9 NHEJ in CLL NM drug resistance • KU80 protein levels and DNA-PK activity correlate directly with CLB drug resistance in-vitro in CLL lymphocytes • These results suggest that NHEJ may play a role in CLB drug resistance in CLL • In order to investigate this, we utilized relatively specific inhibitors of DNA-PK NU7026 • Wortmannin, a nospecific DNA-PK inhibitor’ sensitizes CLL lymphocytes to chlorambucil. • Wortmannin is a noncompetitive, irreversible inhibitor of DNA-PK , whereas NU7026 (2-(morpholin-4-yl)benzo[h]chomen-4-one) is competitive inhibitor of the ATP site of DNA-PK • Although Wortmannin is primarily a PI 3-K inhibitor, being 90-fold more active against PI 3-K than DNA-PK or ATM, NU7026 is more selective for DNA-PK with a 60fold greater potency against this enzyme than PI 3-K and inactive against both ATM and ATR. Thus, in contrast to Wortmannin, NU7026 demonstrates excellent specificity for DNA-PK. Effects of NU7026 and CLB on survival and DNA-PK phosphorylation a b DNA-PK expression in I83 cell line after 48h drugs treatment. NT: Untreated Bar: 10mM Amrein L et al J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jun;321(3):848-55. c NU7026 (a DNA-PK inhibitor) Sensitizes Primary B-CLL Lymphocytes to CLB in Vitro •We determine the IC50 of CLB or NU7026 alone and CLB in combination with 1, 5 or 10 mM NU7026 in vitro in a cohort of 19 B-CLL patients (14 untreated and 5 treated patients) •The IC50 (mM) range for the drugs was: CLB 7.14 to 61.17 (I value: 0,4-2,0) NU7026 17.35 to 67.48 (non toxic (>100 mM) in 50 % of patients) •NU7026 sensitizes the B-CLL lymphocytes to chlorambucil in all the patients but one. The effect of 1, 5 or 10 mM NU7026 on chlorambucil sensitivity was synergistic (I value<1) in 14 patients additive in one patient (I=1) and antagonistic (I>1). I= I< 1 Synergy IC50 CLB IC50 CLB + [ NU7026] IC50 Nu7026 I=1 Additive I> 1 Antagonism Amrein L et al J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jun;321(3):848-55. Effect of NU7026 on CLB cytotoxicity in lymphocytes from CLL patients Patients IC50 (mM)CLB alone IC50 (mM) NU7026 alone IC50 (mM) CLB+1mM NU7026 Synergy Value I IC50 (mM) CLB+5mM NU7026 Synergy Value I IC50 (mM) CLB+10mM NU7026 Synergy Value I U1 16±4.3 17±3.2 11± 3.5 (1.4)a 0.76±0.17 6±2.9 (2.6)a 0.68±0.10 3±0.4 (4.6)a 0.79±0.14 U2 27±3.7 > 100 23± 1.3 (1.2)a 0.86±0.14 12±2.8 (2.2)a 0.46±0.21 4±0.3 (7.6)a 0.13±0.03 U3 17±3.1 > 100 17± 6.4 (1.0)a 0.99±0.19 17±1.1 (1.0)a 1.00±0.12 13±3.6 (1.4)a 0.72±0.16 U4 47±5.4 41±0.2 42±4.9 (1.1)a 0.92±0.21 34±6.4 (1.4)a 0.84±0.20 7±1.3 (6.3)a 0.40±0.09 U5 25±2.0 65±4.7 29±2.3 (0.9)a 1.17±0.16 26±1.1 (1.0)a 1.11±0.18 11±2.4 (2.2)a 0.60±0.06 U6 24±6.3 67±2.7 11±3.2 (2.2)a 0.47±0.05 2.6±0.3 (9.2)a 0.18±0.04 2.3±0.8 (10.1)a 0.25±0.05 U7 52±2.8 48±5.6 29±7.8 (1.8)a 0.58±1.13 19±3.8 (2.7)a 0.47±0.07 17±3 (3.0)a 0.55±0.03 U8 9±0.8 20±2.0 24±2.3 (0.4)a 2.73±0.22 34±1.5 (0.3)a 4.05±0.20 16±4.1 (0.6)a 2.27±0.57 U9 44±3.5 > 100 29±1.4 (1.5)a 0.65±0.05 31±2.8 (1.4)a 0.71±0.14 28±1.3 (1.6)a 0.63±0.05 U10 61±3.7 39±4.8 25±1.3 (2.5)a 0.43±0.04 9.6±4.4 (6.4)a 0.28±0.02 6.8±1.1 (9.0)a 0.37±0.01 U11 7.1±2.3 20±1.7 5.1±1.0 (1.4)a 0.77±0.19 4.4±0.9 (1.6)a 0.87±0.04 2.9±0.07 (2.4)a 0.92±0.15 U12 32±3.3 33±3.9 22±1.7 (1.5)a 0.72±0.02 13±1.7 (2.5)a 0.55±0.01 12±1.6 (2.7)a 0.67±0.01 U13 31±3.1 > 100 26±2.5 (1.2)a 0.83±0.14 27±0.2 (1.1)a 0.89±0.07 21±1.1 (1.4)a 0.70±0.11 U14 12±2.8 > 100 5.9±0.2 (2.1)a 0.48±0.12 8.8±1.8 (1.4)a 0.72±0.18 6.3±1.6 (1.9)a 0.52±0.02 T1 24±5.5 24±6.2 12±3.4 (2.0)a 0.54±0.15 6.9±1.4 (3.5)a 0.49±0.09 5.9±1.9 (4.0)a 0.66±0.18 T2 59±2.8 > 100 49±5.2 (1.2)a 0.84±0.05 40±2.7 (1.5)a 0.68±0.03 17±4.5 (3.4)a 0.30±0.05 T3 32±2.2 > 100 30±3.1 (1.1)a 0.95±0.13 22±3.7 (1.4)a 0.70±0.07 14±1.3 (2.2)a 0.45±0.01 T4 43±6.0 > 100 66±5.8 (0.6)a 1.54±0.12 48±12 (0.9)a 1.11±0.37 29±2.3 (1.5)a 0.67±0.20 T5 16±0.7 > 100 10±0.8 (1.4)a 0.71±0.07 6.9±0.4 (2.1)a 0.48±0.05 5.3±1.0 (2.7)a 0.37±0.07 Using the MTT assay, we evaluated the effect of NU7026 on CLB cytotoxicity in malignant B lymphocytes from CLL patients. The I-value, I<1 or I>1, indicates that the CLB and NU7026 act synergistically or antagonistically, respectively. a Ratio between CLB IC50 alone/CLB IC50 in the presence of NU7026. The results are expressed as the mean value ± s.d. Amrein L et al J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jun;321(3):848-55. Fig. 1 Panasci, L. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:454-461 Copyright ©2001 American Association for Cancer Research Dr Aloyz and myself would like to Acknowledge the following scientists James Johnston Spencer Gibson Manitoba CLL tissue bank Lilian Amrein Annette Hollmann Tiffany A Hernandez David Davidson CIHR- “ Dasatinib Cytotoxicity and sensitization to standard therapy in CLL” Operating Grant to R Aloyz & Leukemia & Lymphoma Society “Inhibition of DNA-PK to improve the efficacy of CLB in CLL”. Translational Research Grant to L Panasci