Transcript Document

Test Data Review
and
Adequate Yearly Progress
1
2
Idaho Reading Indicator (IRI)
• Grades K-3.
• Individual reading test administered three
times/year.
• 2007-2008 was a new test and is a new baseline
• Scores:
3 – Benchmark
2 – Strategic
1 – Intensive
• On Target:
– Reach the Spring Benchmark or
– Increase the percentage of students meeting Benchmark
3
(3) by 5% from Fall to Spring.
Kindergarten
13 out of 14 schools met the
Benchmark for Kindergarten.
4
First Grade
12 out of 14 schools met the Benchmark
for first grade.
5
Second Grade
9 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for second grade.
6
Third Grade
7
12 out of 14 schools have met the Benchmark for third grade.
Idaho Standards Achievement Test
(ISAT)
• Reading, language usage, math in grades 3 through 8
and 10.
• 2007-2008 Fall & Spring – 2008-2009 Spring only.
• Science in grades 5, 7, & 10.
• Given on computer.
• Used to measure adequate yearly progress (AYP) in
the spring.
• Passing score required for graduation.
– Retest opportunity offered four times each year.
8
ISAT DATA
The first set of graphs show:
• The percent of students proficient in grades
3-8 & 10, state and district longitudinal
data, based on the NCLB items from the
ISAT.
9
Percent Proficient
3rd Grade Reading
86.4
87.1
84.1
84.2
81.0
82.1
82.1
80.8
83.7
82.7
78.0
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
AYP
Target
S08
86.3
88.6
87.5
Percent Proficient
3rd Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
81.9
86.2
91.6
91.6
82.3
79.3
83.2
70.0
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
72.0
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
3rd Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2004-2008
3rd Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
86.4
District
S04
88.4
State
S04
78.9
District
S05
81.5
State
S05
84.4
District
S06
83.6
State
S06
66.2
66.5
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
10State
S08
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
4th Grade Reading
83.0
82.4
District
S04
State
S04
88.0
District
S05
86.5
85.0
84.9
84.5
80.6
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
86.0
82.5
78.0
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
AYP
Target
S08
82.0
84.7
84.2
Percent Proficient
4th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
80.4
83.7
90.3
90.1
90.7
89.7
82.4
70.0
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
AYP
Target
S08
4th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2004-2008
4th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
89.8
District
S04
88.9
State
S04
82.1
82.9
83.6
83.7
83.0
80.0
79.9
77.6
78.0
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
AYP
Target
S08
11
Percent Proficient
5th Grade Reading
76.3
75.9
District
S05
State S05
83.1
82.8
80.7
78.5
District
S06
State S06
District
S07
State S07
86.5
84.3
District
S08
State S08
80.6
78.0
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
5th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
76.3
District
S05
81.4
State S05
87.4
District
S06
88.2
State S06
73.4
73.0
District
S07
State S07
District
S08
State S08
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
5th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2005-2008
5th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
77.7
District
S05
79.1
80.6
State S05 District
S06
78.9
State S06
73.6
68.8
District
S07
State S07
78.3
74.2
78.0
District
S08
State S08
12
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
6th Grade Reading
82.6
81.0
82.9
82.1
81.3
77.4
District
S05
State S05
District
S06
State S06
District
S07
State S07
82.9
81.6
78.0
District
S08
State S08
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
6th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
84.9
70.7
71.4
District
S05
State S05
District
S06
85.9
State S06
74.2
74.7
79.0
77.1
District
S07
State S07
District
S08
State S08
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
6th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2005-2008
6th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
79.3
District
S05
79.3
80.2
State S05 District
S06
78.3
State S06
67.2
67.4
District
S07
State S07
75.0
71.7
District
S08
State S08
13
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
7th Grade Reading
72.3
73.9
District
S04
State
S04
81.2
80.8
District
S05
State
S05
85.5
85.5
District
S06
State
S06
82.4
80.7
78.0
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
AYP
Target
S08
70.0
72.9
74.8
65.8
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
68.4
64.9
68.4
69.0
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
80.2
77.0
District
S07
Percent Proficient
7th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
68.5
69.2
68.5
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
75.5
State
S05
72.0
76.0
District
S06
State
S06
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
7th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2004-2008
7th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
70.5
71.7
75.7
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
77.9
State
S05
77.3
District
S06
78.3
State
S06
14State
S08
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
8th Grade Reading
77.2
77.7
District
S04
State
S04
86.3
85.7
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
85.2
84.5
83.2
83.6
79.5
78.8
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
8th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
68.4
70.6
68.4
69.7
69.9
71.3
72.0
72.7
73.7
76.6
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
68.4
64.2
66.3
68.8
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
8th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2004-2008
8th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
78.5
District
S04
80.9
State
S04
77.4
District
S05
78.4
State
S05
79.7
District
S06
80.6
State
S06
15State
S08
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
10th Grade Reading
77.2
77.7
District
S04
State
S04
86.3
85.7
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
85.2
84.5
83.2
83.6
79.5
78.8
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
10th Grade Math
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
68.4
70.6
68.4
69.7
69.9
71.3
72.0
72.7
73.7
76.6
District
S04
State
S04
District
S05
State
S05
District
S06
State
S06
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
State
S08
68.4
64.2
66.3
68.8
District
S07
State
S07
District
S08
70.0
AYP
Target
S08
10th Grade Language
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2004-2008
10th Grade
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
78.5
District
S04
80.9
State
S04
77.4
District
S05
78.4
State
S05
79.7
District
S06
80.6
State
S06
16State
S08
78.0
AYP
Target
S08
Percent Proficient
5th Grade Science
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
57.8
District S07
State S07
District S08
60.1
State S08
Percent Proficient
7th Grade Science
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
49.3
47.7
District S07
State S07
53.6
51.0
District S08
State S08
10th Grade Science
Percent Proficient
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2007-2008
Science
64.3
53.4
100.0
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
66.9
53.4
58.1
58.9
17
District S07
State S07
District S08
State S08
ISAT DATA
The next set of graphs show:
• The percent of students proficient in grades
3-8 & 10, Spring 2008 school data, based
on the NCLB items from the ISAT.
18
3rd Grade Reading
C
S
Te
nd
oy
In
di
an
G
H
il
re
e n ls
ac
re
W
s
as
hi
ng
to
C
hu n
bb
uc
Ed k
ah
ow
Sy
rin
ga
D
is
tri
ct
St
at
e
Ty
h
AY
ee
P
Ta
rg
et
Je
ffe
rs
on
W
Le
i lc
w
ox
is
&
C
la
rk
PC
El
li
ity
G
at
e
C
s
91.2 91.1 90.0 88.9 88.1 87.3 87.2 86.5 86.5
85.2 83.7 82.7 82.4
78.0 75.4
73.1 68.5
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
3rd Grade
3rd Grade Language
87.7
100
80
79.6 78.9 78.0 77.2 76.6 75.6 75.0 74.4
72.0 72.0 70.2 70.0 68.9
65.2 63.4
60
53.4
40
20
St
at
e
Ty
h
Je e e
ffe
rs
on
Le Wi l
co
w
is
x
&
C
la
rk
S
C
in
ga
In
di
an
H
W
il ls
as
hi
ng
to
C
hu n
bb
uc
k
D
is
G
tri
re
ct
en
ac
re
s
s
El
li
PC
Sy
r
G
at
e
C
ity
Te
nd
o
Ed y
a
AY how
P
Ta
rg
et
0
19
4th Grade Reading
P
W
i lc
ox
T
Le
ar
w
ge
is
t
&
C
la
rk
70.2
AY
St
at
Je
e
ffe
rs
on
Sy
rin
ga
G
PC
W
a s CS
hi
ng
to
n
G
at
e
C
it
Ed y
ah
ow
El
re
l
e n is
ac
re
s
Te
nd
o
C
hu y
bb
uc
k
D
is
tri
In
ct
di
an
H
il ls
Ty
he
e
97.1 95.7 94.4 92.3
92.2 91.4 90.0 88.5
86.0 85.4 83.6 82.5
81.0 79.7 78.0 78.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
4th Grade
4th Grade Language
94.4 88.9 88.4
87.2 82.4 82.0 81.6
80.0 79.9 78.1 78.0 77.6 77.2 76.5
100
80
68.9 68.4 67.6
60
40
20
El
l
Ed i s
ah
W
ow
as
hi
ng
to
n
PC
C
In
S
di
an
H
i
C
hu l ls
bb
uc
k
Te
nd
oy
D
is
tri
c
Sy t
rin
AY
ga
P
Ta
rg
et
St
at
Je
e
ffe
r
so
G
re
n
en
ac
Le
re
w
s
is
&
C
la
rk
W
i lc
ox
Ty
he
e
G
at
e
C
ity
0
20
5th Grade Reading
G
W
E
a s l li s
hi
ng
to
n
Te
nd
oy
D
is
t
Je rict
ffe
rs
on
In
di
an
H
i
C
hu l ls
bb
uc
k
St
at
Sy e
r
AY ing
a
P
Ta
rg
et
Ty
he
e
W
i lc
ox
C
re
en S
ac
re
Ed s
ah
ow
89.5 88.8 88.0 87.8 86.9 86.5 85.8 85.5 84.9 84.3
81.5 78.0
76.7 76.4
PC
C
la
rk
at
e
C
Le
w
is
G
&
ity
98.4 95.7 94.2
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
5th Grade
5th Grade Language
94.2
100
80
86.9 83.7 83.3 83.2 81.6
80.6 80.5 78.3 78.0 76.1 74.3 74.2
73.6 70.4
65.8 65.8
60
40
20
El
re
l
e n is
ac
r
Je es
ffe
rs
on
Te
nd
oy
D
is
tri
AY
ct
P
Ta
rg
In
et
di
an
H
i
C
hu l ls
bb
uc
k
St
at
e
PC
C
S
Sy
rin
ga
Ty
he
e
W
i lc
ox
21
G
W
as
hi
ng
to
Ed n
ah
ow
la
rk
C
&
is
Le
w
G
at
e
C
ity
0
6th Grade Reading
62.5
Ty
he
W
e
as
hi
ng
G
to
re
en n
ac
re
s
Sy
rin
ga
St
at
e
P
Ta
r
Je get
ffe
rs
on
AY
C
PC
C
S
hu
bb
Le
uc
w
is
k
&
C
la
rk
D
is
tri
ct
W
i lc
ox
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
6th Grade
s
87.6 87.5 85.3 84.5 84.1 82.9 82.6
81.6 78.0
75.0 75.0 71.5 70.5
El
li
98.0 94.6 93.8
Te
nd
o
Ed y
ah
ow
G
at
e
C
ity
In
di
an
H
il ls
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
6th Grade Language
100
80
95.9 92.8 90.1
82.0 78.0
75.0 74.1 73.9 73.3 71.7 70.6 69.6 68.5 68.3 68.2
60
59.5 53.6
40
20
St
at
e
PC
Le
w
C
is
S
&
C
la
rk
Je
ffe
rs
on
Ty
he
G
re
en e
ac
r
W
a s es
hi
ng
to
n
Sy
rin
ga
ox
s
El
li
W
i lc
Te
nd
o
Ed y
ah
ow
G
at
e
C
ity
In
di
an
H
AY
il ls
P
Ta
rg
et
D
is
tri
ct
C
hu
bb
uc
k
0
22
7th Grade Reading
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
97.0
85.1
81.7
80.7
80.5
78.0
30.8
PCCS
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
7th Grade
82.4
Franklin
District
Irving
State
Haw thorne AYP Target
Kinport
7th Grade Math
100
80
77.6
76.7
74.8
72.9
70.0
67.6
67.1
60
40
23.1
20
0
Franklin
Irving
State
District
AYP Target
PCCS
Hawthorne
Kinport
7th Grade Language
100
78.0
80
76.4
71.8
70.8
69.0
68.4
63.7
60
40
23.1
20
23
0
AYP Target
PCCS
Franklin
Irving
State
District
Haw thorne
Kinport
8th Grade Reading
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
96.8
89.7
88.3
86.3
85.7
78.0
26.7
PCCS
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
8th Grade
90.8
Haw thorne
Franklin
Irving
District
State
AYP Target
Kinport
8th Grade Math
100
81.7
80
77.3
76.9
76.6
73.7
70.0
64.5
60
40
26.7
20
0
Irving
Hawthorne
Franklin
State
District
AYP Target
PCCS
Kinport
8th Grade Language
100
78.0
80
71.9
70.7
68.8
67.7
66.5
66.3
60
40
13.3
20
24
0
AYP Target
Franklin
Irving
State
PCCS
Haw thorne
District
Kinport
10th Grade Reading
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92.4
86.3
85.7
84.9
78.0
50.0
Century
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
10th Grade
87.5
Highland
District
State
Pocatello
AYP Target
New
Horizons
10th Grade Math
100
87.5
76.6
80
75.2
73.7
70.0
65.1
60
40
29.5
20
0
Century
State
Highland
District
AYP Target
Pocatello
New Horizons
10th Grade Language
100
78.4
78.0
80
68.8
67.7
66.3
61.7
60
40
20
9.1
0
Century
AYP Target
State
Highland
District
Pocatello
25
New
Horizons
5th Grade Science
80.5
Pocatello/Chubbuck
School District #25
ISAT % Proficient
based on the NCLB
items from the ISAT
Spring 2008
Science
in
ga
Sy
r
W
i lc
ox
53.4 48.7
48.2
is
tri
ct
Je
ffe
rs
on
In
di
an
H
il ls
St
at
e
Ty
he
e
C
&
65.5 64.3 61.1
60.4 60.1
la
W
rk
as
hi
ng
to
n
C
hu
bb
uc
G
re
k
en
ac
re
s
Ed
ah
ow
S
C
PC
Le
w
is
G
at
e
El
li
s
71.1 70.6 70.5 67.3 66.6
65.8
D
86.9
C
ity
Te
nd
oy
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
7th Grade Science
100
80
67.7
60.6
60
53.6
53.4
51.0
46.2
40
20
7.7
0
PCCS
Franklin
District
Irving
State
Hawthorne
Kinport
10th Grade Science
100
80
68.6
66.9
59.6
58.9
60
52.9
40
22.8
20
26
0
Highland
State
Pocatello
District
Century
New Horizons
ISAT DATA
The next set of graphs show:
• The percent of students proficient in grades
3-8 & 10 based on AYP calculations from
the ISAT by sub-groups.
27
Percent Proficient by Ethnicity
Reading
AYP Data
American Indian/Alaskan Native
100%
80%
60%
75.4%
53.6%
50.0%
40%
Hispanic
82.5%
86.0%
71.5%
72.8%
70.0%
53.3%
70.2%
White
86.3%
76.5%
77.2%
57.5%
60.7%
Spring 2005
Spring 2006
Black/African American
85.8%
78.4%
71.6%
60.2%
88.0%
84.7%
78.7%
64.6%
43.6%
20%
0%
Spring 2003
Spring 2004
Spring 2007
Spring 2008
28
Percent Proficient by Ethnicity
Math
AYP Data
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Hispanic
White
Black/African American
100%
74.7%
80%
63.1%
60.0%
60%
40%
37.5%
34.9%
20%
59.2%
42.0%
77.6%
66.3%
60.1%
82.9%
71.5%
69.1%
78.6%
82.8%
77.6%
63.3%
71.0%
62.9%
57.3%
48.2%
47.8%
54.7%
28.6%
0%
Spring 2003
Spring 2004
Spring 2005
Spring 2006
Spring 2007
Spring 2008
29
Percent Proficient by Special Programs
Reading
AYP Data
Eco no mically Disadvantaged
Special Ed
LEP
100.0%
80.0%
71.3%
75.6%
74.5%
77.5%
61.0%
60.0%
40.0%
75.9%
45.5%
62.8%
51.1%
48.9%
25.0%
34.2%
20.0%
52.0%
38.5%
36.6%
54.6%
46.9%
22.3%
0.0%
Spring 2003
Spring 2004
Spring 2005
Spring 2006
Spring 2007
Spring 2008
30
Percent Proficient by Special Programs
Math
AYP Data
Eco no mically Disadvantaged
Special Ed
LEP
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
68.2%
75.0%
65.9%
72.9%
48.7%
62.9%
44.0%
40.0%
37.5%
33.0%
20.0%
65.1%
38.0%
43.9%
70.6%
57.5%
44.9%
56.8%
42.4%
18.8%
0.0%
Spring 2003
Spring 2004
Spring 2005
Spring 2006
Spring 2007
Spring 2008
31
NCLB and AYP
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act
requires that all:
• students meet the standards for reading and
math by 2014.
• schools demonstrate adequate yearly
progress (AYP) toward achieving that goal.
32
NCLB and AYP
Each state has set incremental benchmarks to reach
100% proficiency by 2014.
• Math requirement:
– 2006-2008: 70% students proficient
– 2008-2009: 70% students proficient
– 2009-2010: 80% students proficient
• Reading requirement:
– 2006-2008: 78% students proficient
– 2008-2009: 78% students proficient
– 2009-2010: 85% students proficient
33
AYP Incremental Benchmarks
Year
2007
-08
2008
-09
2009
-10
2010
-11
2011
-12
2012
-13
2013
-14
READING
Intermediate
Goals
78%
78%
85%
85%
92%
92%
100%
Year
2007
-08
2008
-09
2009
-10
2010
-11
2011
-12
2012
-13
2013
-14
MATH
Intermediate
Goals
70%
70%
80%
80%
90%
90%
100%
34
NCLB and AYP Facts
•
•
•
Sixth year held accountable for No Child Left Behind
(NCLB) / Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
41 targets to meet proficiency benchmarks.
Entire student population – or any one of the subgroups –
does not meet targets, school is deemed not to have made
AYP.
•
AYP is only one measure of a school’s success.
35
School AYP Accountability
Accountability Timeline for Schools Not Making Adequate Yearly Progress
Years
1&2
School on
alert
Year 3
Improvement
1
Year 4
Improvement
2
Year 5
Improvement
3
Year 6
Improvement
4
Year 7
Improvement
5
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
Choice
Choice
Choice
Choice
Choice
Supplemental
Services
Supplemental
Services
Supplemental
Services
Supplemental
Services
Implement
improvement
plan
Corrective
Action
Planning
Implement
Corrective
Action
Create
improvement
plan
Restructuring
Planning
Year 8
School starts
over
Implement
Restructuring
Plan
36
Pocatello/Chubbuck School District AYP Status
•
Eight of thirteen elementary schools met AYP.
•One elementary school is on alert.
•Seven elementary schools are in School
Improvement.
• All middle schools are in School Improvement.
• Two of four high schools met AYP.
•All high schools are in School Improvement.
37
Elementary Schools that Met AYP
(and are not in School Improvement)
•
Chubbuck Elementary
•
Ellis Elementary
•
Gate City Elementary
•
Greenacres Elementary
•
Tendoy Elementary
38
Elementary Schools that Met AYP
(but are still in School Improvement)
•
Indian Hills Elementary
•Improvement 2 Reading
•
Tyhee Elementary
•Improvement 2 Reading
•
Washington Elementary
•Improvement 1 Reading
39
Elementary School On Alert
•
Edahow Elementary – Alert Reading
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.51%)
Elementary Schools in School Improvement 1
•
Lewis & Clark Elementary School – Improvement 1 3rd Indicator
– Language, Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 1 Math
•Total Population Language Proficiency (69.32%)
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.88%)
•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.36%)
•
Syringa Elementary School – Improvement 1 Math
•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (68.5%)
40
Elementary School in School Improvement 2
•
Jefferson Elementary School – Improvement 2 Reading,
Improvement 1 Math
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (77.16%)
•Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (25.58%)
•Students With Disabilities Math Proficiency (44.19%)
Elementary School in School Improvement 3
•
Wilcox Elementary School – Improvement 3 Reading
•Hispanic Reading Proficiency (72.97%)
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (71.76%)
•Students With Disabilities Reading Proficiency (52%)
41
Middle School in School Improvement 2
•
Franklin Middle School – Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement
2 Math, Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Language
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (72.41%)
•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (50%)
•Total Population Language Proficiency (73.24%)
•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (54.6%)
•Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (30.36%)
(missed safe harbor because of SWD Language Proficiency)
42
Middle Schools in School Improvement 3
•
Hawthorne Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading,
Improvement 3 Math
•American Indian Reading Proficiency (57.58%)
•Economically Disadvantaged Reading Proficiency (75.24%)
•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (26.32%)
•Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (17.54%)
•
Kinport Academy – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 3
Math
•Total Population Reading Proficiency (41.67%)
•Total Population Math Proficiency (33.33%)
43
Middle School in School Improvement 5
•
Irving Middle School – Improvement 3 Reading, Improvement 5
Math
•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (57.58%)
•Hispanic Math Proficiency (67.5%)
(missed Safe Harbor because of Hispanic Language Proficiency)
44
High Schools that Met AYP
(but are still in School Improvement)
•
Century High School
•Improvement 1 3rd Indicator – Graduation Rate,
Improvement 1 Reading, Improvement 2 Math
•
New Horizons High School
•Improvement 2 Reading, Improvement 2 Math
45
High Schools in School Improvement
•
Highland High School – Improvement 1 Math
•Economically Disadvantaged Math Proficiency (59.26%)
•
Pocatello High School – Improvement 1 Math
•Total Population Math Proficiency (65.97%)
•White Math Proficiency (66%)
46
District AYP Accountability
Accountability Timeline for LEAs Not Making Adequate Yearly Progress
Years
1&2
LEA on alert
Year 3
Improvement
1
Year 4
Improvement
2
Year 5
Improvement
3
Year 6
Improvement
4
Technical
Assistance
from State
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
Technical
Assistance
LEA
Improvement
Planning
Implement
LEA
Improvement
Plan
LEA
Corrective
Action
Planning
Implement
LEA
Corrective
Action
Year 7
Improvement
5
Year 8
47
District Classified in Improvement
•Improvement 1 3rd Indicator-Graduation Rate, Improvement 3 Reading,
Improvement 1 Math
•LEP Reading Proficiency (54.55%)
(missed Safe Harbor because of LEP Language Proficiency)
•Students with Disabilities Reading Proficiency (46.88%)
•LEP Math Proficiency (56.82%)
•Students with Disabilities Math Proficiency (42.37%)
48
What Plans Are Being Made
for Improvement?
•
•
•
Implement Total Instructional Alignment
Implement Professional Learning Communities
Continue to expand ‘Response to Intervention’ (RtI) model
–
•
•
Continued use of Instructional Reading & Math Coaches
Strengthen the District’s Professional Development Offerings
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
•
•
•
Continue to expand and offer interventions
Effective Instructional Strategies
Highly Effective Questioning
Framework for Understanding Poverty
Cultural Competency Training
Love & Logic
Reach Out
Continue to focus improvement efforts through the School Improvement planning process
(Effective Schools Research)
High School / Middle School Redesign
After school English and math help sessions for middle school
After school math help sessions for high school
Continued use of Academic Success Coaches
49
CELEBRATE!
*We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*
•AYP is one indicator of school success.
•The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District was selected for the “What Parents Want”
award by School Match
•Based on:
•competitive test scores
•accreditation
•recognition for excellence by a national foundation
•competitive teacher salaries
•average instructional expenditures
•library/media services
•class size
•Only 16% of the nation’s school districts have received this recognition
50
CELEBRATE!
*We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*
•AYP is one indicator of school success.
•Pocatello High School and Lewis & Clark Elementary School designated as
“FastTrack” Gold Cap Schools
•awarded by Scientific Learning for exemplary implementation of a
computer-based program that helps improve reading, attention and
memory
•PHS had a record-setting five academic state championships
•Each of the district’s three high schools had academically successful
athletic teams
51
CELEBRATE!
*We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*
•AYP is one indicator of school success.
•Franklin Middle School implemented a National Junior Honor Society
•induction of 102 students who met the rigorous academic, leadership
and citizenship criteria
•Over 300 high school students took concurrent enrollment courses
•67 high school seniors graduated with highest honors in 2008
52
CELEBRATE!
*We are continuing to Maximize Student Learning*
•Students excelled at the regional, state and national level:
•Irving Middle School science students were recognized for their
exemplary performance at the Science Olympiads competition
•Four elementary students qualified for the State Geography Bee and
one qualified for the National Geography Bee
•A Franklin Middle School student received the Spirit of Idaho Award
from Congressman Mike Crapo
•A Hawthorne Middle School student placed 11th in the state
MATHCOUNTS competition
•Two students from Century High School placed seventh in a National
Debate Competition
•A parent and teacher in the district’s Head Start program were selected
53
for awards by the Region 10 Head Start Association