Transcript Planergy Profile - Texas Efficiency

Energy Efficiency Program Status
Jay Zarnikau
Frontier Associates
On Behalf of the
Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT)
Organization
July 2004
1
Outline


2003 Program Activity
Residential and Small Commercial Sector Activities
 Measures Being Installed
 Demand Savings
 Incentive Costs per kW

Large Commercial and Industrial Sector Activities
 Measures Being Installed
 Demand Savings
 Incentive Costs per kW



Activities in Non-Attainment Areas
Actions Taken to Enhance Program Effectiveness
Outlook for 2005 and Beyond
2
2003 Achievements




Energy efficiency programs offered by the investor-owned
electric utilities in Texas in 2003 resulted in about 150 MW of
demand reduction and over 370 GWh of annual energy
conservation.
This exceeds the demand reduction goal for energy efficiency
programs established by the State Legislature by about 11%.
The Demand Goal was 135 MW, achievements were 150.7
MW.
Administrative costs were held to a comparatively low share of
total program costs – in the 8% range.
3
2003 Program Activity
kW Achieved by Program
Other Programs
13%
Hard To Reach
SOP
6%
Energy Star
Homes MTP
32%
Energy Star Homes MTP
AC Distributor MTP
C&I SOP
Res/SC SOP
Res/SC SOP
17%
C&I SOP
22%
AC Distributor
MTP
10%
Hard To Reach SOP
Other Programs
4
Residential Sector Achievements






Budgets are quickly committed.
Small project set-asides are working well in stimulating program
participation by smaller local providers of energy efficiency
services.
Hard-to-Reach goals are achieved (HTR savings exceed 5% of
the total demand reduction).
A wide variety of measures are being completed, although a
few (like duct efficiency and air infiltration improvements)
dominate.
Programs are cost-effective.
The Energy Star New Home program has been particularly
successful. CenterPoint and TXU Electric Delivery. continue to
win EPA awards for their efforts in this area.
5
Re
Re
p
pla lac e
ce
C
Ma entr
al A
jor
A
C
I
ns
pp
Ins
t
l
i
a
a
tall
ll
n
Ce CFL c e
ilin
g In Bulbs
Wa s ula
tio
t
ES
Du er Sa n
Af
f or c t Ef f v ing
d.
Ne ic ienc
Flo w Ho y
Gr
ou or Ins mes
n
Re d So ulati
p
urc on
A ir lac e
e
Sm Inf i Cen HPs
tr
Co ltrat
mm ion al HP
Imp s
Lig
ro
h
t
Pa
c ka ing R v e
e
Ph
oto ge A tr...
CU
vo
ltai
c S nits
ys
Ro tem
om
W
A
Ins all In
su C
tall
Re
la
pla
E
c e S W tion
Wa ind
ow
ter
He
ate
r
Num ber of Installations
Number of Installations:
Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
6
Re
pla
Re
ce
pla
ce
Ce
ntr
Ma
al A
jor
A
C
I
pp
ns
Ins
l
t
i
a
a
tall
nc
ll C
e
FL
Ce
ilin
B
ulb
g In
s
su
lati
Wa
o
t
ES
Du er Sa n
c
Af
f or t Ef f v ing
i
d.
Ne c ienc
Flo w Ho y
Gr
or
me
ou
nd Ins ula s
Re
So
pla
urc tion
ce
eH
A ir
Ce
Ps
I
n
Sm
ntr
f iltr
al H
a
Co
mm tion
Ps
Lig Impr
ov
ht
Pa
c ka ing R e
et
ge
Ph
oto
A C ...
vo
Un
ltai
its
cS
ys
Ro tem
om
W
Ins all Ins A C
ta
ula
Re
ti
pla ll ES
ce
Wi on
nd
Wa
ow
ter
He
ate
r
kW Savings
Demand Savings:
Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
20,000
16,000
12,000
8,000
4,000
0
7
Re
p
Re
pla lac e
ce
Ce
ntr
Ma
al A
jor
A
Ins Ins ta pplia C
tall
ll
nc
e
Ce CFL
ilin
B
u
g In
lbs
s
u
Wa
l
ter ation
ES
Du
Sa
Af
f or c t Ef f v ing
d.
Ne ic ienc
Flo w Ho y
Gr
ou or Ins mes
nd
ula
Re
tio
pla Sour
ce n
ce
A ir
HP
Ce
Inf
Sm
s
ntr
i
l
t
r
al H
Co
mm ation
Imp Ps
Lig
Pa hting rov e
c ka
Re
Ph
oto ge A tr...
CU
vo
ltai
c S nits
ys
Ro tem
om
W
AC
Ins all In
su
tall
Re
lat
E
pla
c e S Wi ion
nd
Wa
ow
ter
He
ate
r
$ per kW
Incentives Paid per kW Savings:
Res/Sm Comm and HTR SOPs
$2,000
$1,600
$1,200
$800
$400
$0
8
Commercial Sector Achievements



Some programs were under-subscribed in 2003, so the utilities
initiated a number of steps to increase program activity. These
initiatives appear to be working.
A wide variety of measures are being completed.
Programs are cost-effective. Demand reduction is being achieved at a
much lower cost than in the residential/small commercial sector.
9
C&I SOP: Numbers of Installations
500
400
300
200
100
Fi l
m
Wi
nd
ow
r
Ot
he
D's
r/V
S
Mo
to
t em
s
gS
ys
Co
olin
Lig
ht i
ng
0
10
's
Wind
ow
Fil m
Ot h e
r
r/VSD
stem
s
g Sy
Moto
Cool
in
Light
i ng
kW
C&I SOP: Demand Reduction
20000
16000
12000
8000
4000
0
11
ing S
ystem
s
Win d
ow
r
F ilm
Othe
Moto
r/ VS
D's
Cool
Li ght
i ng
Dollars per kW
C&I SOP: Incentives Paid per kW Savings
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
12
Activities in Non-Attainment Areas
Grand Totals by Non-Attainment,
Near-Non-Attainment, & Other 'Attainment' Counties
kW
KWh
% kW
% KWh
Total Non-Attainment
108,008
239,707,635
74%
68%
Total Near-Non-Attainment
17,134
34,947,559
12%
10%
Total Other
20,609
75,708,025
14%
22%
Totals
145,751
350,363,219
13
Actions Taken to Enhance Program
Effectiveness



Program activity in the C&I Sector was lower than anticipated in 2002,
so a number of new program templates were undertaken in 2003 to
increase C&I participation.
These new program efforts are paying off. Many of the utility C&I
Standard Offer Programs are already fully subscribed this year. The
new market transformation programs are off to a good start.
Small project set-asides are succeeding in promoting interest and
participation in the programs among smaller local contractors.
14
Outlook for 2005 and Beyond




Update deemed savings values, as appliance and equipment
standards change.
Continue outreach activities.
We expect continued growth in program activity in the C&I sector.
We are optimistic that, absent major changes in the program structure
or goal, that the programs will continue to promote sufficient energy
efficiency activity to meet their peak demand goals.
15