THE INTER-TESTAMENTAL PERIOD
Download
Report
Transcript THE INTER-TESTAMENTAL PERIOD
THE
INTER-TESTAMENTAL
PERIOD
400 Years of History in Ten
Minutes
LIFE UNDER THE GREEKS
• Alexander the Great dies in 323 BC
• His empire is divided among his general
• Israel is caught between
Ptolemy in the south (Egypt)
Seleucids in the north (Syria)
• Greek culture has powerful influence,
leading to translation of OT into Greek
The Septuagint (LXX)
LIFE UNDER THE GREEKS
• 198 BC, the Seleucids defeated the
Ptolemies and gained control of Judah, but
not Egypt.
• The Seleucids were determined to
“civilize” the people of Judah.
ANITIOCHUS IV
• 175 B. C., Antiochus IV, Epiphanies
(the illustrious one).
• The Jews called him “Epimanes”
(the madman).
• Antiochus looked upon orthodox Judaism
as an obstacle to the unification of his
empire.
ANITIOCHUS IV
• He looked upon the office of high priest as a
political office.
A Benjaminite named Melanus pays money to
become High Priest.
The orthodox Jews were infuriated.
• Antiochus attacks Egypt.
Almost won, but was defeated by the Romans.
ANITIOCHUS IV
• Antiochus takes his anger out on Israel.
He sent his army to attack the orthodox Jews
on the Sabbath.
He decreed that Greek deities were to be
worshipped.
He put a statue of Zeus in the Temple and
sacrificed a pig on the altar.
He held drunken orgies to the god Bacchus
and forced attendance.
ANITIOCHUS IV
• Antiochus takes his anger out on Israel.
He forbid the Jews to practice circumcision on
the threat of death.
The Sabbath was forbidden.
The observance of Jewish feasts was
forbidden.
Copies of the Scriptures were burned.
THE MACCABEES
• 165 BC, An aged priest, named
Mattathias, was commanded to offer a
sacrifice to Zeus at the town of Modin.
• He refused and killed the next man who
tried.
• Together with his five sons, he destroyed
the altar and ran for the hills.
THE MACCABEES
• For the next few years, they fought a guerrilla
war against the Seleucids.
• After having several killed on the Sabbath, when
they would not fight, Mattathias decreed that
fighting in self-defense on the Sabbath was
allowed.
JUDAH THE MACCABEE
(the Hammer)
• He continued the raids and guerrilla
warfare.
• Antiochus had battles in other parts of his
kingdom and couldn’t focus on them.
JUDAH THE MACCABEE
(the Hammer)
• Eventually, the Maccabees took Jerusalem,
entered the Temple and removed all signs of
paganism that they found there.
They tore down the altar to Zeus and built a new altar
to the Lord.
One day of oil burned for eight.
This is the Festival of Lights or “Hanukkah.”
JUDAH THE MACCABEE
(the Hammer)
• Judah’s victory was short-lived.
Antiochus sent his army against him, promising
religious freedom if they surrendered.
The people chose to surrender and Judah ran away.
He did not stop fighting, however, and died in battle.
JONATHAN,
JUDAH’S BROTHER
• Won by diplomacy.
• Jonathan sought to become high priest,
even though he was not of the right
lineage.
• The Syrians later murdered him.
SIMON,
ANOTHER BROTHER
• Became both military commander and
high priest.
• Expelled the Syrians from the land.
• The offices of priest, field commander, and
ruler were all given to him by the people
and made hereditary.
• Began the Hasomanean dynasty.
THE HASOMANEAN DYNASTY
• The parties of the Pharisees and the Sadducees
began
• After about 75 years, the Hasomeaneans fell to
fighting each other.
• The Roman general, Pompey, offered to
mediate.
He conquered the land and ended the arguments.
In 63 BC, Israel came under Roman domination.
THE ROMANS
• Jews generally fared well; Romans gave a
lot of independence
• Still, longed for freedom
• Herod the Great
Began ruling in 37 BC
Rebuilt several cities and six fortresses
In 20 BC, began building Temple; finished in
68 AD
THE NEW TESTAMENT
ENVIRONMENT
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
• Genuine belief in the gods and goddesses
of Greece and Rome had given way to a
general agnosticism.
• Growth in superstition and astrology
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Philosophies
• Platonism
Taught that true reality is not found in the objects of
sense, but in the idea or form which lies behind each
object.
By grasping and participating in the eternal forms, the
soul is lifted and attains true well-being.
The soul’s real home is the world beyond the senses.
The body is a prison for the soul.
This release takes place at death.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Philosophies
• Cynics
Believed “simple pleasures are the best” and taught
an extreme frugality.
Salvation lies in returning to nature.
Cynics took their beliefs to the people.
Cynics’ style called the “diatribe” which consisted of
questions and answers.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Philosophies
• Epicureans
Rejected Plato
How you feel should be the standard of truth.
Wisdom consists in the pursuit of happiness and
enjoying life, but not to excess.
There is no afterlife, so you best enjoy life now while
you can.
The gods, if they do exist, have nothing to do with us.
At death, the body dissolves.
This tended to bring about atheism and selfindulgence.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Philosophies
• Stoics
Encouraged the development of a moral fiber.
Divine Reason pervades the universe and it is our
duty to live in accord with Reason.
Ethical living was very important to the Stoics.
Interpreted the Roman myths allegorically.
The soul is the divine spark of Reason trapped within
the human body.
We have the ability to rise above our circumstances
and face them with dignity.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Mystery Religions
• Most of these started in the east and were
brought to Rome later.
• Believed everyone worshiped the same god or
gods, just used different names.
• They are called “mystery religions” because the
members were not supposed to tell nonmembers what was going on.
• Generally, anyone could join.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Mystery Religions
• Eleusians
Founded at the Eleusis a small town near Athens.
Based on the myth of Persephone and Pluto.
As she was searching for Persephone, Demeter
came to Eleusis.
She was so well treated by the people that she
initiated the king into the sacred mysteries.
The worshippers would re-enact the mythic story, thus
brining the people into the reality of the tale.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Mystery Religions
• Mithraism
We have more information on this group than just
about any other cult.
Very popular among the military.
Restricted to men.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Mystery Religions
• Mithraism
In the worship area, there was a statue of Mithra
slaying a bull.
His left knee is astride the bull, which is forced to its knees.
His left hand pulls back the nose of the bull and the right
hand plunges in a dagger.
From the wound comes three stalks of grain.
The picture is the light of Mithras in victory over the wild life
of the bull.
GRECO-ROMAN WORLD
Mystery Religions
• Mithraism
Ethics were very important for this group.
There were seven degrees of membership,
with costumes and head pieces for each level.
The final level was a baptism in the blood of a
bull which was supposed to give eternal life.
JUDAISM AND ITS DIVISIONS
• Synagogues
“Synagogue” means “meeting place”.
Not sure when they began, probably during
the Babylonian Captivity.
The synagogues were places for the reading
of Scripture and prayer.
JUDAISM AND ITS DIVISIONS
• Synagogues
There was a synagogue in virtually every village in
Israel
One rule for the establishment of a synagogue: there
had to be ten men.
Men and women sat in different sections of the
building.
The “God-fearers” stood along the back wall.
THE TEMPLE
THE TEMPLE
THE TEMPLE
VARIOUS GROUPS AND HOPES
JEWISH MESSIANIC
EXPECTATIONS
JEWISH MESSIANIC
EXPECTATIONS
• The Spirit of God would return to-the covenant
land.
• God would send the Messiah to free His
covenant people and the covenant land from
the Romans
Of Davidic line
Man, not divine, but empowered by God's Spirit sad
kept righteous
He would be righteous and just in His rule, serving as
God's Messianic agent.
JEWISH MESSIANIC
EXPECTATIONS
• The Messiah's victory would be marked by
Judgment
Non-Jews and all wicked Jews destroyed --Taxcollectors, prostitutes, other public sinners
The covenant people would be set free and
empowered to live totally as God’s people.
JEWISH MESSIANIC
EXPECTATIONS
• An age of "heaven on earth"
Imagery of the year of Jubilee
An abundance of food with little work and toil
No more sorrow, sickness and death
No more oppression ant unrighteousness
Non-Jews would, sometime in the future, stream to
Jerusalem to become part of the covenant people.
The coming of a "new heaven and a new earth"
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
OTHER CRITICAL
THEORIES
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• What is the relationship among the three
Synoptic Gospels?
The Synoptic Gospels are Matthew, Mark and
Luke
• A historical question, does not necessarily
impinge upon authorship and inspiration.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• That there is a relationship is obvious
The general scheme of the three Gospels is
the same.
Not only do Jesus’ words match, but also the
narrative events.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
Where there is a difference
Matthew and Mark agree the most often.
Sometimes Luke and Mark agree.
Rarely, Matthew and Luke agree.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
There are passages that Matthew and Luke
have that Mark does not.
Some stuff in Matthew and Luke is similar, but
not identical.
Each Gospel has its own material.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• What is the relationship?
• St. Augustine
Matthew wrote first.
Luke used Matthew.
Mark wrote a Reader’s Digest version of
them.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• Early Church
Matthew wrote first.
Mark wrote his Gospel independently, using
Peter as his source.
Luke used Matthew to write his Gospel.
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• Current Scholarship
Mark was the first Gospel written.
Matthew and Luke used Mark and an
unknown source called “Q.”
From the German Quelle meaning
“source.”
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• Why do scholars think that Mark is the first
Gospel?
The amount of Mark found in the other Gospels.
Generally, Mark’s order of events used.
Sometimes, Matthew and Mark have a different order than
Luke.
Sometimes Luke and Mark differ from Matthew.
But Matthew and Luke never differ from Mark.
Historical candor
Style
THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM
• Biggest problem with Markan priority
Early church witness states that Matthew was
the first Gospel written.
There is no external evidence to back up this
claim.
Still, most scholars think this scheme answers
more questions that it gives.
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
• Q = Information that is common to Luke and
Matthew, but not in Mark
About 250 verses, mostly sayings with very little
narrative material s.
Eusebius quotes a man named Papias who wrote
early in the second century.
Papias states that Matthew wrote down the “logia”
(sayings, oracles) of Jesus in the “Hebrew dialect.”
Many think that this might have been a type of Q
document.
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
Except for the temptation of Jesus, most of
this material is in different locations in each
Gospel.
This means one of two things:
Jesus taught the same thing more than once
That one or the other edited the material and put it
where he wanted.
Most scholars think Luke has the “original” order.
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
• Q Problems
There is no hard evidence of its existence.
There is absolutely no parallel type of
literature in that era.
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
• Q Problems
Q had no passion account.
Scholars have come up with no less that 18
different possibilities of what was in Q.
Some of the stuff in Q strikes me as two
different parables or something that Jesus
would have taught more than once.
Q AND SOURCE THEORY
• What Do We Do With All This?
This is a historical question and does not
necessarily impinge on authorship or
inspiration.
We know that Luke, at least, used sources.
A good argument can be made for putting
Mark first.
Q is a open question.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Form Criticism
Definition: The task of inferring what the oral
tradition of Jesus was like before it was
written down.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Form Critics identify five types of literature
• Paradigms
A story that ends with an important saying.
Plucking ears on the Sabbath.
• Tales (Miracle stories)
These have no important sayings and tend to show
Jesus as a miracle worker.
The stilling of the storm.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Sayings
Not attached to a narrative.
The Sermon on the Mount and the parables.
• Legends
Poor choice of words.
The idea was an extraordinary story about a holy
person.
The infancy narratives.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Myths
Another poor choice of words.
Times when Jesus and God interacted.
The transfiguration.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Positives of Form Criticism
The Form Critics help bring attention to the
preaching and teaching character of the
Gospels.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
Biggest problem: the presuppositions which the critics
use.
Began with the belief that the Church either
modified or totally made up the words and actions
of Jesus.
The Gospels tell us more about the life situation of
the early church than they do about Jesus.
They divided the “Jesus of history” from the “Christ
of faith.”
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
Biggest problem: the presuppositions which the critics use.
The Gospels have layers: geographical notations, dating,
miracles, and doctrinal elements were all added by the later
church.
• Critics argue that we need to strip the layers from Gospels
to get to the “real Jesus” and “the real words of Jesus.”
• This lead to the so-called “search for the historical Jesus.”
• When the search for Jesus is stripped away, you are left
with someone who looks much like you do.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
The uncertainty of exact classification
Often arbitrary in selection of forms: paradigms,
tales, sayings, legends, myths
All interest in the person and life of Christ are ruled
out
The "community myth"
Contradicts all we know about primitive
communities
Rules out the influence of Christ and of the
apostles on the community
The Good News produced the community, not vice
versa
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
The folk-lore analogy is dubious
A little more or less than a generation separates
Mark from the event
Ignores the memory of men who were
eyewitnesses
Neglects the tradition of Jesus' actual words
Makes insufficient allowance for the existence of an
authentic tradition of Christ's words, e.g. 1 Cor.
7:10, 12, 25; 15:3 - 11
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
Ignores the way people learned
Memorization—the only way to preserve a
statement or text and the Jews were very tenacious
about it.
• The Rabbis spoke tersely and incisively. The avoided
wordy talk; they expressed themselves in concise terms.
• There were poetic devices: alliteration, parable, rhythmic
phrases, etc.
Repetition—which would answer why the same
stuff shows up in more than one gospel in a
different location, Jesus was repeating himself.
Recitation
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Negatives of Form Criticism
Overstepped the legitimate limits of their method
Went from form, speculative in itself, to content
Over-ruled or ignored literary and historical truths
If the main contention of form criticism were true, then
the burning issues of the early church would be
reflected in the Gospels, e. g.
The problem of integrating the non-Jew into the
Christian community;
Speaking in tongues.
OTHER CRITICAL THEORIES
• Redaction Criticism
Why the material is arranged the way it
is
Overall, pretty positive
However, comes from form-critical
school with its problems.
Tends to see a theological motive where
others might night.
FEATURES IN THE LIFE
AND MINISTRY OF JESUS
THE BIRTH OF JESUS
• When was Jesus born?
Herod the Great died in 4 BC
There was an imperial census in 8 BC.
THE BIRTH OF JESUS
• The Problem of Quinirius.
Quinirius was governor around 6 AD, which is too late
for the birth of Jesus.
There are three possible answers:
Luke is in error here.
Luke has been mistranslated.
• “First” should be translated “before”
• “Governor” should be translated “governing”
Luke doesn’t give the whole story.
• Started under Herod
• Completed under Quinirius
THE BIRTH OF JESUS
• The Genealogies
• Two suggestions:
Matthew is highlighting Joseph’s heritage;
Luke is highlighting Mary’s.
But both say they are Joseph’s heritage.
If Mary, Jesus would be considered illegtimate.
Joseph is the product of a Levirite marriage.
JESUS’ MINISTRY
• PARABLES
One third of Jesus’ teaching was done in parables.
The parables describe the Kingdom of God in action.
There are 3 kinds of parables:
A simple saying
A comparison
Allegories
A parable has only one main point of comparison
JESUS’ MINISTRY
• MIRACLES
Jesus’ miracles are well-attested to.
Josephus calls Jesus a “doer of wonderful
deeds.”
Babylonian Talmud accuses Jesus of sorcery.
JESUS’ MINISTRY
• MIRACLES
Miracles were part of Jesus’ message.
Jesus’ Mission statement: Luke 4.
The Kingdom of God had come to set people free from:
•
•
•
•
Sickness
Demons
Evils of nature
Death
The key to understanding the miracles was faith:
realizing that the miracles were the kingdom of God at
work.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• The Last Supper
Did Jesus celebrate the Passover?
Synoptics: Most definitely yes!
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
Did Jesus celebrate the Passover?
John: Well, maybe not… John 18:28, 19:14
• John uses the word “Passover” in a wide
sense Passover and the “Feast of the
Unleavened Bread
• Friday was normally called “Preparation
Day” meaning “Preparation for the
Sabbath.”
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
Did Jesus celebrate the Passover?
John: Well, maybe not… John 18:28, 19:14
• Saying this was “Preparation for the Passover”
could mean “Friday in Passover Week.”
• There were other important meals during
Passover week that might be what John is
referring to.
• There is some discussion as to whether or not all
the Jews used the same calendar
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• THE LAST SUPPER
The Order of the Meal
First cup of wine (Luke 22:15-18) At this time,
Jesus would have spoken the blessing over the
wine.
• The footwashing (John 13:1-20)
• “One of you will betray me” (Luke 22:22;
Matthew 26:23-24)
• Washing the right hand was followed by
preliminary dish.
• It consisted of herbs that were dipped in sauce.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• THE LAST SUPPER
The Order of the Meal
First cup of wine (Luke 22:15-18) At this time,
Jesus would have spoken the blessing over the
wine.
• Jesus says that the betrayer would be one who
dipped his hand into the dish with me.
• John asks Jesus who the betrayer was.
• Jesus says it is the person he gives a dipped
portion to: Judas.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• THE LAST SUPPER
The Order of the Meal
First cup of wine (Luke 22:15-18) At this time,
Jesus would have spoken the blessing over the
wine.
• Judas leaves.
• “All of you will leave me.” Matthew 26:31-35;
Mark 14:27-31; Luke 22:31-38; John 13:31-38
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
The Main Part of the Meal
• After the preliminary dish, the second cup of wine was
distributed.
• The meal was put on the table.
• The youngest would ask, “Why do we eat this meal?” and
the father of the family would respond with the Passover
story.
• This was followed by singing some of the Hallel Psalms
(Psalms 111-118).
• The second cup of wine was then drank and both hands
would be washed.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
The Third Cup, the Cup o Blessing or
Thanksgiving (Eucharist).
• It was at this point that Jesus instituted the
Lord’s Supper.
Finally, after the meal, Jesus had his great
discourse in John.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• PONTIUS PILATE
Pilate served from 26 to 36 AD.
There were three major incidents before the trial of
Jesus (RAGS):
Roman Standards
Aqueduct
Golden Shields
When the Jews protested, they basically threatened
Pilate.
Tiberius was not well.
Pilate would have faced exile or suicide.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• Crucifixion
There were two types of crosses: T and Latin cross
The cross beam was carried by the accused; it
weighed about 100 lbs.
A superscription given the reason for the crucifixion
was either put above the head or around the neck.
A wooden seat was positioned about half way up.
A piece of wood was used to help the body stay on
the cross.
Death was caused by suffocation.
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• If Jesus Didn’t Rise, then What happened?
The “stolen body” theory
The “wrong tomb” theory
The “swoon” theory
The “hallucination” theory
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• Evidence in Scripture for the resurrection:
The women
Early church preaching
The Gospels vary in their accounts
The disciples
Paul
THE PASSION AND
RESURRECTION
• What did the Resurrection mean?
That Jesus is the Son of God.
That God accepted Jesus’ sacrifice for us.
That we live a new, forgiven life.
That we will rise again.
THE FOUR GOSPELS
THE GOSPELS
• The Gospels are not biographies as we
would normally understand that term.
• The purpose of the Gospels is to present
Jesus to the readers.
MATTHEW
• Author: Matthew, the apostle
Attested to throughout church history
Best argument against it: Why would rely so
heavily on Mark’s Gospel?
This is an assumption.
He could have read Mark’s Gospel and then
decided to incorporate it to show apostolic unity.
If Matthew not the author, then you have to
show why church tradition is wrong.
MATTHEW
• Place of writing: Somewhere in Palestine
• Written to Jewish Christians
• Date of writing: Depends on presuppositions.
Probably around as 50-60 AD.
MATTHEW
• Key Themes
Messianic interest
Jesus is the new Moses
Structure:
• Birth and Infancy of Jesus (1-2)
• Book 1—The Kingdom of Heaven is Announced
Narrative (Galilean ministry; 3-4)
Teaching (Sermon the Mount; 5-7)
• Book 2—The Kingdom of Heaven is Preached
Narrative (8:1-9:34)
Teaching (9:35-11:1)
MATTHEW
• Key Themes
Messianic interest
Jesus is the new Moses
Structure:
• Book 3—The Mystery of the Kingdom of Heaven
Narrative (11:2-12)
Teaching (parables) (13:1-52)
• Book 4—The Church as the Kingdom of Heaven
Narrative (13:53-17)
Teaching (18)
MATTHEW
• Key Themes
Messianic interest
Jesus is the new Moses
Structure:
• Book 5—The Advent of the Kingdom of Heaven
Narrative (19-22)
Teaching (23-26)
• The Passion and Resurrection (26-28)
MATTHEW
• Key Themes
Jesus is the fulfiller of prophecy
His passages sometimes bring questions
Jew first, then the Gentile
The Church
Only Gospel writer to use the word “Church”
Eschatology (end times)
MARK
• Author: John Mark
Papias states that he wrote from Rome with
Peter as his source.
Is he the naked guy?
• Date: 50 to 60 AD
• Written to Roman Christians
MARK
• Key themes:
Jesus as a busy man
Gospel for gentiles
Blunt view of people
• Textual question: The ending of Mark
LUKE
• Author: Luke, a doctor and companion of
Paul’s
Author of both Luke and Acts
Both dedicated to same man
Only Gentile author in the NT
Some wonder if there is medical language or
interests in his Gospel
LUKE
• Date: 60-65 AD ?
• Written to Theophilus
“Most Excellent” a social rank
Strong catechetical emphasis
LUKE
• Themes in Luke:
Universality of the Gospel—Gentiles and women are
prominent
Prayer
Holy Spirit
JOHN
• Author: John the apostle.
John Drane: “The question of authorship has
always been rather confused.”
No, it has not.
JOHN
• Author: John the apostle.
Early Church evidence
Irenaenus states that Polycarp, who was a student of John’s,
said that he was the author of this Gospel and that it was
written in Ephesus.
“The Elder John”
• This comes from Papias, once again quoted in Eusebius.
• Would the early church would give a Gospel to man of whom
nothing was really known?
• Eusebius mentions the Elder John is to get away from the idea
that Revelation was written by the apostle.
JOHN
• Author: John the apostle.
Internal evidence
Gives great deal of geographical detail
Author claims to be an eyewitness
John, son of Zebedee, is never named.
There is the “disciple whom Jesus loved.”
• This disciple is one of the 12
• Close connection with Peter
• Given care of Jesus’ mother
JOHN
• Date: Around 85-100 AD.
• Purpose: John 20:30-31
• Themes:
Emphasis on the Old Testament
The Sprit
Love, truth, light, life, and abiding are all abstract
themes that keep coming up.