EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPs …

Download Report

Transcript EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPs …

EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE
PARTNERSHIPS (PPPS) IN THE
INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR IN
TANZANIA
By: Prof. Marcellina Chijoriga and Mr. Petro
Komba
University of Dar es Salaam Business
School (UDBS)
10TH ORSEA CONFERENCE 2014
1
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTION
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
1.



WHAT IS PPP- Definitions, Reasons and Benefits for Implementing
PPPs
PPP TRENDS AND EXPERIENCE
PPP FINANCING AND OPERATING MODELS
RESEARCH FINDINGS
4. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.
2
1. INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
 Globally, the public sector underwent severe period of
change in the last two decades particularly in its operations
and delivering of public services
 Introduction of the Public Private Partnership (PPPs) has
been considered as a more innovative approach for improved
effectiveness in terms increased value for money; improved
service access; reliability; timely delivery; transparency and
accountability of public money.
4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Definition, Effectiveness Measurements, Empirical
Evidence,
5
What is PPP - Definition
 A PPP is a contractual agreement between a public
agency (national, regional, local) and a private sector entity for
the delivery of public infrastructure services or other
basic (social ) services – for long term relationship
 Skills and assets are shared in delivering a service / facility for
the use of the general public.
 Shared risks and rewards in the delivery of the service and/or
facility
 Joint, symbiotic and collaborative provision and financing of
public projects and services
6
Formal “Classical” and Informal PPPs
Formal PPPs is “a contract between a public sector institution and a
private party, in which the private party assumes substantial
financial, technical and operational risk in the design,
financing, building and operation of a project”
Informal PPs is where development partners (donors, NGOs,
international development agencies or other civil society) take the
role of the “public” in the partnership with the private
entity.
 Projects are typically more informal and projects can be
characterized by coming together of two sectors or public
institution
 PPP - partnership which exists along the continuum of
the two extremes of Public Procurement and Full
Privatization
7
Privatization
Vs
PPPs
 Privatization:
- The Govt get out, or devolve responsibility to private sector;
- Feasible where it can be done commercially;
-Where rewards outweigh risks thus private sector interest;
- All risks of investments and performance are shifted to the
private sector;
- The private sector shoulder the risks and reap the benefits.
 PPPs:
-Where Govt/public must ensure that the service is provided;
- The risks and rewards involved are not attractive for the
private sector (which is profit motivated) to do it alone;
-Where there is scope for sharing the risks and benefits.
8
7/17/2015
REASONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PPPs
Funding
 Government(public) obligations to deliver public infrastructure services or other
basic services
 Lack of fiscal resources to finance the infrastructure investments
 Direct Government financial support may be limited or not required
 Government support may be needed in risk management
Efficiency
 Private sector projects present limited cost overruns and delays, and lower operating
costs compared to public works contracts
Flexibility
 PPP arrangement allows to design the optimum combinations of Public and Private
financing
9
Benefits of PPPs Vs Govt doing it alone
 Creation of Added Value: through synergies between
public authorities and private sector companies, in particular
through the integration and cross-transfer of public and
private sector skills, knowledge and expertise;
 Efficiencies: from integrating design and construction of
public infrastructure with financing, operation and
maintenance/upgrading skills of the private sector;
 Alleviation of capacity constraints and bottlenecks
in the economy through higher productivity of labor and
capital resources in the delivery of projects;
 Accountability: for the provision and delivery of quality
public services through an incentives performance regime.
10
Sector Adoption of PPPs
 Transportation and Infrastructure: - Roads , Bridges; Airports







11
and Sea/lake ports; Rail, Urban Transport and Parking;
Water andWastewater:- Utility Companies
Electricity and Gas: Power Generation and Transmission Systems
Health: Construction and Management of Hospitals and Schools
Public Sector Real Estates – Construction and Management
Social Housing- Construction an Management
Education – School/University/Collage Buildings and service
Security – Prisons- Constructions and Management
PPPs are not standardized
No “one size fits all”; No “cut and paste” PPP solutions;
Each country’s approach to PPP is:
 Designed to meet the policy objectives of its Govt;
 Developed to complement other public procurement and public
service delivery methods;
 Implemented according to the available public and private sector
resources.
12
PPPs Experience - International Context
 Public Private Partnership (PPP) has been in implemented for the past 20 – 30
years in developed countries such as United Kingdom (UK), Denmark,
Canada, Holland, Germany, Spain, United States of America (USA) (Duffield et
al., 2010; Buser et al., 2006; Grimsey & Lewis 2004).
 Countries with active/developing PPP programs include: Australia,
Brazil, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovak
Republic, Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, Taiwan and UK;
 In Africa South Africa had a Legal and Regulatory framework for PPPs for
some time and has over 50 PPP projects national and 300 under municipal level
e.g. Maputo Corridor; water and sanitation –UWASAs
 Mauritius in July 2005 adopted a Legal and Regulatory framework for PPPs.
 Tanzania did adopt in 2009 with the introduction of the PPP policy.
13
14
Measurement of Effectiveness
 Effectiveness of PPPs is measured differently by different
authors.
 Key parameters for effectiveness are adherence to budgetary
provisions, timeliness in project delivery, quality of the
project delivered, project risk transferability, project
accountability (Akintoye et al, 2003)
15
16
PPP FINANCING AND OPERATING
MODELS
•Generic Financing Options
17
Choice of Financing Option Based on Project
Development and Risk Levels
High
Scope of Competition
Strategic interest
BOT
Low
18
Risk BOO
BOOT
Degree of Privatization
High
19
3. RESEARCH FINDINGS
Has Implementation of PPP been Effective?
What are the Challenges in Implementation?
20
MAPPING OF PPPS
21
Measurement of Effectiveness of PPPs
 Only one project used formal PPP financing and operating
approach, the rest were informal.
 Overall PPPs have not been effective to improve timeliness of
completion, quality of services delivered, risk sharing and
accountability.
 Practice does not meet modern PPPs financing and operating
principles.
22
Challenges In Implementing PPPs
 Lack of clear PPP policy – Sector policies missing
 Lack of clear sectoral regulations and guidelines;
 Inactive and underdeveloped private sector,
 Lack of credible and bankable projects to attract private
investors
 Long term financing model
 Lack of competent staff for implementation and management
of PPPs,
 Poor risk sharing mechanism between the public and public
sector.
23
4. CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
24
CONCLUSION
 Overall, the PPPs have not been effective,
 Applicability of the Policy and Regulations
 Timeliness on the delivery of service
 Little accountability to the public
 Low Risk sharing and allocation
 Public trust of private sector participation
 Do not meet PPPs financing and operating principles.
25
RECEOMMENDATIONs
For improved effectiveness, it is recommended to:
 review of both the PPP policy and the regulatory environment,
 enhance the capacity of the public sector to manage the PPP,
 improved risk allocation and sharing among the parties,
 improved effectiveness,
 improved private sector capacity and participation
26
THANK YOU LISTENING
ASANTE SANA KWA KUNISIKILIZA
27