PPP AOCA 2007 Economic Impact

Download Report

Transcript PPP AOCA 2007 Economic Impact

AOCA Conference 2006

1.11.2006

Impact of events on a Destination Venue. The value chain

Benefits for Companies and the State.

Günther Kruse Messe Frankfurt Germany

B1 GGK 1

What business does Messe Frankfurt?

2

Messe Frankfurt corporate group 2005: a global player in the trade fair sector

 Organiser of

117 trade fairs

worldwide  Shareholders: City of Frankfurt (60%), State of Hesse (40%) 

14 subsidiaries outside Germany, 5 branch offices and 50 foreign representatives covering more than 151 countries

 Turnover in 2006:

over 400 million EUR

 More than

60,000 exhibitors 3.9 million visitors

and some  Third largest exhibition centre worldwide: Total

exhibition space: 578,000 m 2

(indoor: 322,000 m 2 , outdoor: 83,000 m 2 ) Messe Frankfurt Group 3

We make markets. Worldwide.

Mexico City Atlanta São Paulo 

14 Subsidiaries 5 Branch Offices

Buenos Aires

50 Foreign representatives 151 countries in the portfolio

Paris Milan Moscow Istanbul Dubai Beijing New Delhi Mumbai Singapore Seoul Tokyo Shanghai Taipei Hong Kong Messe Frankfurt Group 4

117 events worldwide with more than 60,000 exhibitors and 3.4 million visitors

2005 business year Trade fairs and exhibitions at the Frankfurt exhibition venue (of which group events) Number of events Exhibitors 41 (22) 38,663 (23,000) Visitors 2,394,604 (832,000) Net area in m² 1,432,000 (960,000) Other trade fairs and exhibitions in Germany 8 2,648 84,120 72,163 Events outside Germany Total 68 117 18,850 60,151 914,733 3,393,457 412,926 1,917,851 Messe Frankfurt Group 5

Exhibitors from all over the world

 International participation at the Frankfurt exhibition venue* in 2005:

14,415 exhibitors from 100 countries Top 10 exhibiting countries

1. Italy 1,663 2. China 3. India 1,526 838 7. France 4. Taiwan 5. UK 788 737 662 9. Spain 572 10. Turkey 524 * own events Konzern Messe Frankfurt 6

Trade visitors from all over the world

 International participation at the Frankfurt exhibition venue* in 2005:

250,983 visitors from 180 countries Top 10 visitor countries

1. Italy 21,109 2. Netherlands 3. UK 4. France 5. USA 15,802 15,495 15,466 12,964 6. Switzerland 7. Spain 8. Belgium 10. China 12,013 11,928 11,849 9. Austria 9,254 9,238 * own events Konzern Messe Frankfurt 7

Highlights in 2006

 

Ambiente

with record visitor numbers and even more international orientation

Musikmesse/Prolight+Sound

– record results in terms of exhibitors, visitors and net space   In September, the largest

Automechanika

ever is expected “Fair trio” Paperworld, Christmasworld, Beautyworld with two figure

increase in visitors

from Europe and significant increases from abroad   Successful relaunch of the

Fine Art Fair Frankfurt Light+Building

abroad with powerful boost in growth from German and   Successful debut of

Design Annual Joint Venture

Exhibition in China: Guangzhou International Lighting  Launch of

Productpilot

Messe Frankfurt Group 8

Economical Impact is a difficult topic

9

Economic impact on the venue

• • •

Exhibition and convention centers earn money with:

renting out space

, squaremeters and rooms

selling monopoly services

else then the landlord: – Electricity, water, heating (which cannot delivered by anybody

selling other services

like – Standconstruction – Personnel services like security, hostesses – Cleaning, waste disposal – Signing – Printing – Letting technical equipment – Catering 10

What‘s important about economic impact?

• Economic impact calculation for venues and convention centers is a

topic of great interest

.

Different approaches

to calculationg and presenting such figures.

• Level of interest understandable: the venues

have to demonstrate their value

to the community and the shareholders, particularly when an

operating deficit

may need to be justified.

intensifying competition

increases this need in the future.

11

What‘s important about economic impact calculation?

Many different models

developed for measuring economic impact.

• Economic impact calculation has a

„black box“ reputation

.

• the calculations are a matter of

common sense

.

Understanding the purpose and audience, actual delegate and planner surveys

• This presentation is rather an

identification of the factors to approach the calculation

and

how

and how the resulting information can be put to work

12

Why do an economic impact analysis?

• It‘s a

basic measure

to estimate the benefits of a facility •

Comparing performance

with other venues or business sectors.

• Governments deciding over

investments

economic return.

look first at overall • Useful for

estimating return on investment (ROI)

and get get the

whole picture

.

justifying financial performances

environment.

in an increasingly competitive •

Discussion: overall net benefit

• Convention Centers

typically operate as a „loss leader

“ -

the situation

,.

justify

13

Before you begin the economic impact evaluation…

• One of the most important preparations is to ensure you have

confidence in your own business figures

and what they represent.

Different types of facilities

requirements, this can impact the way you approach the calculations.

have different accounting and reporting • Recognize that

carrying out a proper economic impact analysis represents a real commitment

of time and funding. To be done properly, an analysis must be based on accurate, original survey information collected over a period of time.

• „Cutting edges“ in this process will only weaken the value and credibility of the results and of the presenting persons.

14

Economic impact evaluation simplified:

Four steps of an economic impact evaluation:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Designing appropriate surveys

for all relevant data from organizers, delegates, exhibitors and other participants.

Gathering spending data

by applying the survey over an appropriate period and to the right sample group.

Running the data through an appropriate input / output (I/O) model

to calculate induced effects and spin-off benefits such as taxes

Using

the resulting information effectively and

adapting specific target groups

.

it to 15

Clarifying the purpose

• .

Define exactly who it is being done for and to what uses it will be put.

Who‘s the audience

? local or national government, local or national industry or the overall community.

Adressing business or community interests

? •

Depending on what level:

delegates and visitors.

including resident or non-resident •

It‘s not a feasibility study

with projections about new business. •

Yes or no:

joint approach with other partners: •

Other, existing studies

received.

may influence how own results are 16

Different models for performing the calculation:

Delegate day multiplier factor

. Estimates of delegate days by a „standard“ figure for per diem expenditures by a typical delegate or visitor.  Problem: actual expenditures vary considerably depending on the region. 

Example Frankfurt

Delegate spending calculation

with actual survey, how much they spend in a certain time and in what areas.

Expanded spending surveys

: delegate spending surveys enhanced by identifying various categories instead of lumping them together in a single figure.  Input-Output model with exhibitors and organisers.

Direct plus induced impacts

: The most advanced economic impact model: Direct spendings by delegates and exhibitors and also those „induced“ effects that result as those expenditures move through the local economy. 17

Delegate day multiplier factor

Increase and preview of convention business Spending per Delegate: 1994: 70 €, 2004: 117 €, 2014: 160 €

1994 2004 2014 Delegates

2.201.989

3.393.395

5.000.000

Hotel nights

452.145

1.133.815

2.200.00

75.000

Number of conferences Business turnover Big conventions and events

44.177

153,6 23

TCF

Source: Frankfurt Convention Office

57.966

399 Mio.

80

800 Mio.

120

Preview

18

Components of the calculation

• • • • The key is to capture as many of the different areas of spending associated with conventions and exhibitions as possible. Some items to consider:

Survey design

: generating original spending information through surveys. Applied to the proportion of the numbers of delegates, visitors, organisers and exhibitors

Production costs

: those associated with actually staging the event. Site and off-site event, food and beverage or through suppliers not associated whith the venue.

Indirect spending

: associated with pre- and post-travel and by accompanying persons.

Input/output calculation

: accurate spending estimate can be run through an I/O-model for induced benefits with spin-offs and taxes.

19

Accessíng and using an input/output (I/O) model

Two major factors

comprehensive picture possible of the economic benefits a venue creates: in generating the most accurate and 1.

Carrying out a

comprehensive client survey

to determine as accurately as possible the spending by delegates, visitors, organizers, exhibitors and accompaying persons 2.

Performing an input/output calculation

to get a broader picture of the overall effects resulting from that spending.

20

I/O model

• Survey questions correspond to the

„input“requirements

of the model. • Access an appropriate I/O model

specializing on behalf of clients

.

• Selecting the appropriate:The more general the model, the less accurate. Better use a

specifically for your own area developed model

.

Price structure

is a consideration.

• Additional benefit with using a

local government model

.

• Identify the

necessary outputs for different audiences

(i.e. tax revenues and employment calculations) 21

Creating a framework for sampling: how much is enough?

Statistical requirement

to ensure to have enough surveys • Calculate the

number of surveys

„confidence limits“ that reflects the statistical validity and representativeness.) (statistical principle known as •

Capturing seasonality

: Schedule the timing of survey process.

Categorizing business types

: reflecting the ratios of different business type (convention/exhibition/conference etc.) •

Categorizing respondents:

outside Capability of being separated into resident and non-resident figures. The latter may be identified with „new“ money entering the local or regional or national economy from 22

Categories of information required from surveys

To ensure surveys that they gather all possible information about spending •

Spending categories: (transportation, accomodation, food and beverage, retail, entertainment

) •

Duration of the event

daily expense figures.

to supply an appropriate „multiplier“ factor for •

Accompanying persons spending

Pre/post event spending

Production costs on and off-site

Additional exhibitor costs

associated with client hospitality, booth construction and local production, goods handling, shipping costs.

23

Example Messe Frankfurt – some years ago

1.

a)

1989 : Survey of different big exhibitions (Exhibitors and visitors)

How much money was spent to the venue, to booth constructor to hotels, food and beverage, entertainment, b) c)  How long did visitors stay in Frankfurt The result was about

800 US $ in 3 days per person Meanwhile the average spending grew, but the average length of the stay decreased dramatically to 1,3 days.

2.

1993: Early ifo-analog model: general „multiplier“ of 6,0 to the allover turnover of the fairground.

3.

1998: Survey of federal minister for economics and technology

of the general economical impact of exhibitions in Germany, made by ifo-institute Munich. Delivered

a general „multiplier“ of 10,5 to the turnover for squaremeters.

24

Example Messe Frankfurt – primary effects 1999 General „Multiplier“ 10,5

Turnover of Messe Frankfurt with Squaremeters

Multiplier 10,5

Minus „security-figure“ 15 %

general national economic impact of fairs made in Frankfurt

200,3 million US $ 2,04 billion US $ 1,8 billion US $

1,7 billion US $

25

Tax impact of exhibitions in Frankfurt 1998

Taxreason Employment effect Social economical effect Fair business in Frankfurt Sum National Federal K US $

3.040

Regional State K US $

3.040

Communal City K US $

1.075

50.340

12.395

65.775

50.340

12.177

65.557

18.120

8.218

27.413

Sum K US $

7.155

118.800

32.790

158.745

26

In the End …

„Like most other management tools, economic impact figures are only as valuable as managers make them. The first step is getting good information – the second, and equally important step, is putting that information to good use.“

AIPC-guide 27

Using economic impact data effectively

What to do with reliable, defensible figures representing the economic benefits your venue generates?

• Prepare an

announcement

: Media release • Make sure your

local and regional governments are aware

of the information.

Supply the important audience

.

• • • • • • Include Ec. Imp. Calc. Information in

community and corporate information materials Annual „year to year“ comparisons:

Even a negative story can have benefit: to point out issues of increasing competition or a need of new investments.

Include in business statistics Communicate with beneficiaries Explain the breadth of spending and its impact. (I/O) Think about timing

28

It‘s not just about economic data!

Because there will always be those who will want to measure the benefits of a venue in other terms. So translate it into other contexts.

• The data should be

interpreted in the sense

(i.e. the third largest industry in the region.

to the local community. • •

Induced Employment benefits Trade and investment impacts

Broader community benefits:

educational opportunities, technological, professional and cultural development

,

• Conferences, exhibitions and congresses

promote international cooperation

• Be on the lookout for ways of

community issues linking your announcments to local

• Finally this information

can be the basis for a common set of performance goals amongst facility managers and shareholders

29

If you have the right message…

30

…you just have to bring it over!

31

Thank you for your attention

32