Can physiotherapists predict within 72hours the functional

Download Report

Transcript Can physiotherapists predict within 72hours the functional

Eghidemwivbie NT and Schneeweis VA






Introduction
Importance of early prediction
Research question
Method and materials
Statistics and results
Discussion and conclusion
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
2


Stroke is the third leading cause of death in
the western world (Department of Health and Human Services, 2009)
Due to its disabling nature, predictions of
functional outcomes are necessary

Stroke units

Early prediction is important
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
3

Inform patients and relatives

Plan discharge

Treatment goals
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
4
How accurate can physiotherapists predict,
within 72 hours after stroke onset and at
hospital discharge, the functional outcome in
terms of dexterity, walking ability, ADLs at six
months and place of living at three and six
months post stroke?
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
5

221 patients

27 trained assessors

10 hospitals
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
6

Within 72 hours
•
•
•
Dexterity
Gait
ADL
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
7


Measured with the Action Research Arm Test
(ARAT)
0-57 points
•
•
•
•
Fully functional (=57 points)
Almost fully functional (53-56 points)
Recovered to some extent (10-52 points)
Non functional (0-9 points)
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
8

Measured with the Barthel Index (BI)

0-20 points
•
•
•
•
•
Complete recovery (19-20 points)
Slightly limited (14-18 points)
Moderately limited (10-13 points)
Severely limited (4-9 points)
Very severely limited (0-3 points)
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
9


Measured with the Functional Ambulation
Categories (FAC)
0-5 points
• Complete recovery on uneven surfaces and slopes
(5 points)
• Almost complete recovery, safe on even surfaces (4
points)
• Only under supervision possible (3 points)
• Only with physical support possible (0-2 points)
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
10

At hospital discharge
•
•
•
•
Dexterity
ADL
Gait
Place of living
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
11

At three and six months

Categorized
•
•
•
•
•
Home
Home with help for basic ADLs
Rehabilitation center
Nursing home
Hospital
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
12
Patients‘ characteristics
Sex (m/f)
Age, years (±SD)
Hemisphere of stroke (L/R)
Type of stroke (OCSP)
TACI
PACI
LACI
CIRS (0-52) (±SD)
MI (0-200)
BFMT upper extremity (0-66)
BFMT lower extremity (0-34)
BFMT Total (0-100)
BBS (0-56)
TCT (0-100)
FAT (0-5)
NIHSS (0-69)
MRS (0-5)
BI (0-20)
FAC (0-5)
ARAT (0-57)
82/104
66.3 (14.1)
81/105
36
62
88
2.56 (2.6)
100.5 (31.0, 151.0)
18.5 (4.0, 53.3)
20.0 (9.0, 29.0)
41.0 (13.8, 79.3)
9.0 (1.0, 39.0)
74 (37.0, 100.0)
0.0 (0.0, 4.0)
8.0 (4.0, 14.0)
4.0 (3.0, 5.0)
7.0 (3.0, 12.8)
1.0 (0.0, 3.0)
1.0 (0.0, 37.0)
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
13

Central tendency and variability statistics
First prediction and
observed outcome
at 6 months
strenght/correlation
Second prediction
and observed
outcome at 6 months
Spearman rank correlation
First Prediction
and observed
outcome
Direction of difference
Second prediction
and observed
outcome
Wilcoxon signed rank test

p < 0.05
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
14
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
15
ARAT
0-57 points
Dexterity
N = 186
AFTER 6 months
BASELINE (within
72 Hours)
≤9
61.3%
10 - 52
27.4%
53 - 56
6.5%
= 57
4.8%
≤≤ 99
30.1%
30.1%
10 - 52
26.9%
53 - 56
10.2%
= 57
32.8%
n=114
n=51
n=12
n=9
n=9
n=56
n=56
n=50
n=19
n=61
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
16
BI
0-20 points
ADLs
N = 185
AFTER 6 months
BASELINE
(within 72
Hours)
≤≤ 33
29.6%
29.6%
n=55
n=55
4-9
32.8%
n=61
10 - 13
16.1%
n=30
14 - 18
14.5%
n=27
19-20
19
- 20
7.0%
n=13
≤≤ 33
3.8%
3.8%
n=7
n=7
4-9
9.1%
n=17
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
10 - 13
4.8%
n=9
14 - 18
22.1%
n=41
29 January 2010
19-20
60.2%
n=112
17
FAC
0-5 points
Gait
N = 186
AFTER 6 months
BASELINE
(within 72
Hours)
≤2
73.1%
3
10.2%
4
8.6%
5
8.1%
≤≤ 22
12.4%
12.4%
3
4.8%
4
15.1%
5
67.7%
n=136
n=19
n=16
n=15
n=23
n=23
n=9
n=28
n=126
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
18
Accuracy of predictions
Chance
(%)
Predicted at Baseline
Second prediction
%accurate %optimistic %pessimistic %accurate %optimistic
%pessimistic
Outcomes
ARAT (0-57)
25.0
50.54
50.54
28.49
20.97
65.14
25.14
9.72
FAC (0-5)
16.6
64.52
64.52
20.97
14.51
71.43
17.14
11.43
BI (0-20)
25.0
58.92
58.92
26.49
14.59
63.43
22.29
14.28
70.52
16.76
12.72
70.52
15.61
13.87
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
Place of living 16.6
at 3 months
Place of living 16.6
at 6 months
19

Accuracy level

Optimism

Consequences
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
20


Physiotherapists can early predict the
functional outcome in terms of dexterity,
gait, ADL as well as place of living at three
and six months post stroke
Prediction models
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
21



Prof. Dr. Gert Kwakkel and EPOS consortium
Janne Veerbeek and Rinske Nijland
Frank van Hartingsveld
WCF-KNGF
St. Jacob, Zonnehuis en Cordaan/Berkenstede in Amsterdam
Laurens Antonius Binnenweg en Reumaverpleeghuis in Rotterdam
Albert van Koningsbruggen in Utrecht en Wiekendaal in Roosendaal
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
22







Brauer SG, Bew PG, Kuys SS, Lynch MR and Morrison G. Prediction of discharge
destination after stroke using motor assessment scale on Admission: A prospective
multisite study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.; 2008;89:1061-1065.
Censori B, Camerlingo M, Caso L, Ferraro B, Gazzaniga GC, Cesana B et al. Prognostic
factors in first-ever stroke in the carotid artery territory seen within 6 hours after onset.
Stroke; 1993;24:532-5.
Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989;20(10):1407-31.
Chaiyawat P, Kulkantrakorn K, Sritipsukho P. Effectiveness of home rehabilitation for
ischemic stroke. Neurology international 2009; 1(1).
Collin C, Wade, DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. BI
Disability & Rehabilitation; 1988; 10(2):61-63.
Department of Health and Human Services. Deaths: Final data for 2006. National Vital
Statistics Report; 2009;57(14).
Dewey H, Macdonell R, Donnan G, McNeil J, Freeman E, Thrift A, Sharples C. Inter-rater
reliability of stroke sub-type classification by neurologists and nurses within a
community-based stroke incidence study. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience; 2001;
8(1),14–17.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
23






Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J: Measurement of motor
recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke
1992;23;1084-89.
Engberg A, Bentzen L, Garde B. Rehabilitation after stroke: predictive power of Barthel
Index versus a cognitive and a motor index. Acta Neurologia Scandinavica; 1995; 91:
28–36.
Feys H, De Weer W, Nuyens G, Van de winckel A, Selz B, Kiekens C. Predicting motor
recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination.
Physiotherapy research international; 2000;5(1).
Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker J. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome
and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients: the dominant role of higher-order
cognition. Stroke; 1993;24;1794-1800.
Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Statson WB. Priorities for future research. Post stroke
rehabilitation. Clinical practice guideline number 16, Rockville, MD: US Dept Health and
Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1995, AHCPR publication
no. 95–0662.
Henley S, Pettit S, Todd-Pokropek A, Tupper A. Who goes home? Predictive factors in
stroke recovery. Jornal of Neurology Neurosurvery and Psychiatry; 1985;48:1-6.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
24







Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Clinical gait assessment in the neurological impaired:
reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35–40.
Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients.
Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530–1539.
Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in
stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(8):7889.
Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G. Predicting improvement in gait
after stroke. A longitudinal prospective study. Stroke. 2005;36:2682-6.
Kwakkel, G, van Dijk GM, Wagenaar RC. Accuracy of physical and occupational
therapists’ early predictions of recovery after severe middle cerebral artery stroke.
Clinical Rehabilitaion. 2000;14:28-41.
Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH. Probability of Regaining Dexterity in
the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute
Stroke. Stroke. 2003;34;2181-86.
Lincoln NB, Blackburn M, Ellis S, Jackson J, Edmans JA, Nouri FM et al. An investigation of
factors affecting progress of patients on a stroke unit. Journal of Neurology
Neurosurgery and Psychiatry; 1989; 52: 493–496.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
25








Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement
scales. Stroke; 1990; 21:78-81.
Lai S, Duncan PW, Keighley J. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke: comparison
of the Orpington prognostic scale and NIH stroke scale. Stroke. 1998; 29:1838-42.
Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical
rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4:483–92.
Olai, L, Omne-Pontén M, Borgquist, L, Svärdsudd K. Prognosis assessment in stroke
patients at discharge from hospital. Age and Ageing. 2006.
Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement,
frequency, and recovery. International Rehabilitation Medicine. 1986;8:69–73.
Schiemanck SV, Kwakkel G, Post MWM, Kappelle J, Prevo AJH. Prediction long-term
independency in activities of daily living after middle cerebral artery stroke: does
information from MRI have added predictive value compared with clinical information?
Stroke; 2006;37;1050-4.
Tennant A, Geddes JML, Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Outcome following stroke.
Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 278–284.
Thornton H, Jackson D, Turner-stokes L. Accuracy of prediction of walking for young
stroke patients by use of FIM. Physiotherapy research international; 2001;6(1):1-14.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
26






Van Peppen RPS, Hendriksa HJM, Van Meeteren NLU, Helders PJM and Kwakkel G. The
development of a clinical practice stroke guideline for physiotherapists in The
Netherlands: A systematic review of available evidence. Disability and Rehabilitation;
2007;29(10):767-73.
Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after
stroke: measurement and recovery. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
1983a; 46: 521–524.
Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Langton Hewer R. Predicting Barthel ADL Score at 6 months after
an acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1983b; 64: 24–28
Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int
Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64–67.
WHO. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the
WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke
1989;20(10):1407-31.
Wolframalpha. Cerebrovascular disease. Computational Knowledge Engine. 2009.
Zhu HF, Newcommon NN, Cooper, ME, Green TL, Seal B, Klein G, Weir NU, Coutts SB,
Watson T, Barber PA, Demchuk,AM, Hill MD. Impact of a Stroke Unit on Length of
Hospital Stay and In-Hospital Case Fatality. Stroke 2009;40(1):18-23.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
27





Homogenous group
Therapy received
11 patients were discharged within 72 hours
 did not have a second prediction
Variety of clinimetrics
normal setting
Physiotherapists‘ characteristics
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
28
Outcome
Our study
Other studies
Dexterity
Accurate within 72
hours
Kwakkel et al. (2000)
within 2 weeks
Gait
Accurate within 72
hours
Jørgensen et al. (1995)
within 3 weeks
ADL
60%
Duncan et al. (1992)
58%
Place of living
71%
Olai et al. (2006) 78%
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
29






Clinical first-ever stroke in the anterior
(carotid) territory
Above 18 years of age
A hemiparesis within the first 72 hours
Able to follow instructions (either verbally or
non-verbally)
Pre-existent not limited in performing basic
ADLs (Barthel Index >18)
Informed consent.
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
30
47 articles
22 excluded
13 new
found
25 included
in project
plan
9 added
4 excluded
34 included
in the final
article
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
31
Eghidemwivbie NT, Schneeweis VA
29 January 2010
32