Transcript Slide 1
SHOULD NON-CITIZENS HAVE VOTING RIGHTS, AGAIN? Ron Hayduk Associate Professor of Political Science Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY Three points to consider in thinking about IVR (aka NCV): 1. It’s legal. The Constitution does not preclude it and the courts have upheld voting by noncitizens. Moreover, noncitizens enjoyed voting rights for most of U.S. history. 2. It’s rational. Moral and practical reasons to restore IVR, including notions of equal rights and treatment; democracy means all. 3. It’s feasible. Noncitizen voting is making a comeback today. Noncitizen Voting in History: 1776 to 1926 Noncitizens voted in local, state and federal elections Practiced in 40 states & federal territories Immigrants also ran for office – and won Immigrants often made the difference between winners & losers Voting by noncitizens: American as Apple Pie and older than our national pastime (baseball) Democratic Ideals • • • • No taxation without representation All men (human beings) are created equal People endowed with inalienable rights Government should rest on the consent of the governed • Democracy means rule by the people; not some of the people but all of the people • Otherwise, tyranny (Benjamin Franklin) VOTING is not about CITIZENSHIP Voting is about who shall have a say Women and Blacks were citizens but could not vote They were denied voting rights on the basis of sex and race – not citizenship Voting not inextricably linked to citizenship; Not naturally connected Voting is about who can select representatives; who controls government Voting is mechanism to determine whose interests prevail — about political power Immigrant Voting in Practice Initially, buttressed white, male, propertied class (until 1840s -- property qualifications removed) But also, encouraged newcomers to build a stake in U.S.; nurtured attachments. Budding Americans learned civics by practice Fostered immigrant political incorporation Why Immigrant Voting Eliminated? Fear & Prejudice; Fear of others who were different; discrimination Dominant groups felt threatened by newcomers: held different political views; had different economic interests; practiced different religions Spoke different languages Were not viewed as “white” at the time Seen as inferior Sound familiar? Immigrant voting eliminated in stages; internal conflict or wars French Revolution 1789, influx of radicals – opposed to the Federalists who were in power War of 1812 – fear of foreign enemies Influx of Irish leading up to Civil War – Irish opposed Slavery (also not “white”, Catholic, drinkers, poor, etc); South eliminated NCV 1880s -1920: influx of Southern and Eastern Europeans (Italians, Jews, Greeks); “swarthy,” politically suspect, fear would not assimilate; dilute U.S. culture and identity. Sound familiar? Response to other developments • Mass Social Movements & Third Political Parties – Populist, Labor, Socialist • Posed a threat to both Democrats and Republicans -- voters could take over government • Elimination of NCV during same time as imposition of other barriers to franchise (poll taxes, literacy tests, registration.) • Anti-immigrant sentiment grew; WWI grew even worse • NCV eliminated, state by state, ending in 1926 • National Origins Act passed 1924. Closed doors to non- western European immigrants; established race-based quotas • Race, Class, and Power lie at the heart of struggles over voting Civil Rights -- Immigrant Rights • Civil Rights Movement swept away many obstacles to voting and established anti-discrimination laws • But much of it’s work incomplete; The American Dream, MLK,jr’s Dream, Cesar Chavez’s Dream…still out of reach for far too many • New immigrants are new outsiders; excluded; discriminated; exploited • Join African Americans at bottom of social order Changing Demographics 25 million adults in U.S. are noncitizens Almost 1 in 10 nationally; more in many states NY State – 12% -- one out of ten adults In some areas ¼ to ½ of total population are noncitizens and can’t vote NYC – 22% of total adult population Rivals political exclusion of blacks, women & youth Noncitizens in Selected Towns New York State, 2000 Geography Population 18 years and over Population 18 years and over; Not a citizen (foreign born, not naturalized) %Non-Citizen 18 Years Old & Over 6,078,005 1,394,508 22.9% White Plains, Westchester County 41,825 8,852 21.2% 3 Newburgh, Orange County 18,864 3,886 20.6% 4 New Rochelle, Westchester County 54,977 10,612 19.3% 5 Mount Vernon, Westchester County 51,101 9,681 18.9% 6 Glen Cove, Nassau County 20,990 3,859 18.4% 7 Yonkers, Westchester County 148,640 25,822 17.4% 8 Peekskill, Westchester County 16,940 2,941 17.4% 9 Rye, Westchester County 10,532 1,595 15.1% 10 Ithaca, Tompkins County 26,464 3,314 12.5% 11 Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County 22,170 2,449 11.0% 12 Middletown, Orange County 18,258 1,904 10.4% 1 New York city 2 0.0% California Legislature California Population Texas Legislature Texas Population Arizona Legislature Arizona Population Nevada Legislature Nevada Population Florida Legislature Florida Population New York Legislature New York Population New Jersey Legislature New Jersey Population Latino Representation in Noncitizen Rich States Latino Representation in Noncitizen-Rich States 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% Latino Noncitizens (Percent) 20.0% Latino Citizens (Percent) 15.0% Latino State Legislators (Percent) 10.0% 5.0% Noncitizens by NYC Council District Total Adult Population NYC Race/Ethnicity Number of Adult NonCitizens in NYC % of community that is disenfranchised White 2,385,387 268,203 12% African-American, AfroCaribbean, and African 1,457,119 245,303 17% Mexican 129,837 99,951 77% Puerto Rican 542,029 6,635 1% Cuban 36,717 6,317 17% Dominican 294,598 164,375 56% Colombian, Ecuadorian, and Peruvian 153,878 88,060 57% Salvadoran 15,772 9,983 63% Other Latino 308,624 128,725 42% Chinese 280,390 126,877 45% Indian 120,669 63,929 53% Filipino 46,521 17,104 37% Japanese 19,862 16,752 84% Korean 64,762 37,221 57% Other Asian 62,776 34,321 55% Native American 25,257 11,067 44% Other Multiple 88,141 36,184 41% Total Adult Population # of Adult Non-Citizens % of Borough disenfranchised Brooklyn 2,485,879 502,827 20% Bronx 1,302,955 230,507 18% Manhattan 1,554,110 275,454 18% Queens 2,207,025 550,424 25% 458,309 36,133 8% Borough Staten Island Immigrants’ plight reflects their political exclusion Immigrants score lowest in employment, housing, education, healthcare, welfare, criminal justice 1 in 4 immigrants are poor 1 in 4 children of immigrants go hungry Discriminatory policies and practices are inevitable by-products of immigrant political exclusion Elected officials can ignore their interests Employers, landlords, etc. can take advantage VOTING AND DEMOCRACY Voting is the cornerstone of democracy Government affects you daily Voting keeps government, responsive, representative and accountable Participation = Power Communities with low turnout get fewer services Democracy means rule by ALL the people Non citizen voting is making a comeback: demographic change & mass mobilization Noncitizens currently vote in local elections NYC first to restore NCV (1969-2003) Chicago – School elections (1988) Maryland – local elections in six towns Mass. – Cambridge and Amherst Cities and states where IVR advocates working: Washington D.C., San Francisco, LA, Conn., Maine, Wisconsin, Minn., Fl, CO, NJ, TX, NYS & NYC Globally, 45 countries allow noncitizens to vote in local, regional and/or national elections Primarily for “legal” immigrants in local elections Skeptical? Arguments Against voting by noncitizens (and responses) ► Citizenship first, voting rights second Already a pathway to vote—become a citizen ► Would diminish value of citizenship ► Would erase an important distinction between citizens and non-citizens ► Would reduce incentives to naturalize ► NC need time to learn American political culture ► Create divided loyalties ► Would increase tensions among minorities Citizenship First, Voting Second Not mutually exclusive; Increase pathways to citizenship & expand democracy But the average time is 8-10 years to naturalize Worse, many immigrants (legal, not illegal) are not eligible to become U.S. citizens Earlier times immigrants could naturalize easily In the meantime, immigrants contribute in countless ways to life of our cities and country Pay $18 billion in taxes to NYS (15.5%) Diminish value of citizenship and reduce incentives to naturalize There are ten rights and privileges that one gains by becoming a citizen, including being eligible for numerous benefits, obtaining government jobs, traveling outside the U.S; voting is only one Most legislation only contemplates voting in local elections (not state and/or federal) Plenty of incentives to naturalize Distinctions between citizen and NC sharp Non citizens lack sufficient knowledge to vote and feeling for American Institutions and culture Immigrants can not make informed decisions Specific knowledge is not pre-requisite to vote; Many citizens would fail test of basic political knowledge Comes dangerously close to stated reasons for literacy tests, opposing women’s suffrage, African Americans If you move to new town, you need to learn about that town’s political structure, candidates, issues. Paternalistic Dual or divided loyalties Why allow NC vote without taking pledge of Allegiance? NC might vote against U.S. interests, especially in time of war But no U.S. citizen required to swear oath of allegiance. Flawed to assume native born are “loyal” and, equally, that noncitizens are not “loyal” to U.S. Who determines the U.S. national interest? Dissent can be patriotic Non citizens demonstrate their commitment to U.S. by being engaged and involved community members NCV creates tensions with minorities NCV would exacerbate conflicts that exist between African Americans and Caribbean immigrants, Puerto Rican’s and Dominicans, Chinese and Koreans, and so on. Winner take all elections and “majority minority” districts increase competition Reductions in government spending, growing inequalities related to globalization increasingly pit native-born (of all stripes) against immigrants Expand Opportunities for All – Improve our democracy Campaigns for NCV are part of larger immigrant rights movement Shared interests in safe streets, good schools, affordable housing, health care, and good jobs NCV would insure government is representative, responsive, and accountable to all Idea that NC should vote is older, practiced longer and is more consistent with democratic principles that the idea that they should not vote 189 out of the 231 years of U.S. existence NC voted; NCV is rule—not exception Inclusion and equality • Core ideas of Civil Rights Movement appear today as Immigrant Rights • Democracy is evolving • NCV is suffrage struggle of our time • NY—home of Statue of Liberty and Ellis Island • Let’s restore NCV and make history, again