Transcript Document
JUPITER
Justification for the Use of
statins in Primary prevention: an
Intervention Trial Evaluating
Rosuvastatin
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER
JUPITER is the first large-scale, prospective study to
examine the role of statin therapy in individuals with low to
normal LDL-C levels, but with increased cardiovascular risk
identified by elevated CRP
It assessed the long-term impact of rosuvastatin
(CRESTOR™) in individuals potentially at increased
cardiovascular (CV) risk due to elevated CRP levels who do
not qualify for lipid-lowering treatment according to current
guidelines
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Rationale
Nearly half of all cardiovascular events occur in patients who
are apparently healthy and who have low or normal levels of
LDL-C
hsCRP predicts cardiovascular disease independent of LDL-C
levels
Along with improved screening there is a need to examine
the use of lipid-lowering agents as a method of reducing the
risk of cardiovascular events
Ridker PM. New Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1557–1565
Prevalence of conventional risk factors† in
patients with CHD
Four
Three
(0.9%)
None
8.9%
19.4%
Two
27.8%
43.0%
Total patients=87 869
CHD=coronary heart disease
†smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes mellitus
Khot UN et al. JAMA 2003; 290: 898–904
One
CRP is a strong independent predictor of CV
events in women
Lp(a)
Homocysteine
IL-6
TC
LDL-C
sICAM-1
SAA
ApoB
TC/HDL-C
CRP
CRP + TC/HDL-C
0
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
Relative risk of future CV events
Apo=apolipoprotein; CRP=C-reactive protein; CV=cardiovascular; HDL-C=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IL=interleukin;
LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a)=lipoprotein (a); SAA=serum amyloid A; sICAM-1=soluble intercellular
adhesion molecule 1; TC=total cholesterol
Blake GJ, Ridker PM. Circ Res 2001; 89: 763–771
CRP predicts risk of MI and stroke in apparently
healthy men
3.5
2.0
*
***
3.0
1.5
2.5
Relative
risk of
1.0
ischaemic
stroke
Relative 2.0
risk
1.5
of MI
1.0
0.5
0.5
0
1
2
3
4
Quartile of CRP
CRP=C-reactive protein; MI=myocardial infarction
*p=0.02 versus quartile 1; ***p<0.001 versus quartile 1
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 973–979
0
1
2
3
Quartile of CRP
4
CV event-free survival in women using combined LDL-C
and hsCRP measures
1.00
0.99
Probability
of event- 0.98
free
survival
Low LDL-C, low hsCRP
High LDL-C, low hsCRP
Low LDL-C, high hsCRP
0.97
0.96
High LDL-C, high hsCRP
0
CV=cardiovascular; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Median LDL-C=3.2 mmol/L (124 mg/dL)
Median CRP=1.5 mg/L
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1557–1565
Efficacy of lovastatin in AFCAPS/TexCAPS subgroups by
baseline LDL-C and hsCRP
Study group
Rate of cardiovascular events
NNT
Lovastatin
Placebo
Low LDL-C/low hsCRP
0.025
0.022
N/A
Low LDL-C/high hsCRP
0.029
0.051
48
High LDL-C/low hsCRP
0.020
0.050
33
High LDL-C/high hsCRP
0.038
0.055
58
Median LDL-C=3.9 mmol/L (149 mg/dL). Median hsCRP=1.6 mg/L
AFCAPS/TexCAPS=Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study; hsCRP=high-sensitivity C-reactive protein;
LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; N/A=not applicable; NNT=number needed to treat to prevent one coronary
event
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1959–1965
JUPITER - Objective
• The primary objective was to investigate
whether long-term treatment with
rosuvastatin 20 mg decreases the rate of first
major cardiovascular events compared with
placebo in patients with low to normal LDL-C
but at increased cardiovascular risk as
identified by elevated CRP levels
Ridker PM. Circulation 2003; 108: 2292–2297
JUPITER – study design
No history of CAD
men ≥50 yrs
Rosuvastatin 20 mg (n=8901)
Placebo
women ≥60 yrs
LDL-C <130 mg/dL
run-in
Placebo (n=8901)
CRP ≥2.0 mg/L
Visit:
Week:
1
–6
2
–4
Lead-in/
eligibility
3
0
4
13
6-monthly
Final
Randomisation
Lipids
CRP
Tolerability
Lipids
CRP
Tolerability
Lipids
CRP
Tolerability
HbA1C
Median follow-up 1.9 years
CAD=coronary artery disease; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP=C-reactive protein; HbA1c=glycated haemoglobin
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Study Endpoints
Primary Endpoint
– Time to the first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event,
composite of:
• cardiovascular death
• Stroke
• MI
• unstable angina
• arterial revascularisation
Secondary Endpoints:
– total mortality
– non-cardiovascular mortality
– development of diabetes mellitus
– development of venous thromboembolic events
– bone fractures
– discontinuation of study medication due to adverse effects.
Ridker PM. Circulation 2003; 108: 2292–2297
JUPITER - Major inclusion criteria
Men aged ≥50 years; women aged ≥60 years
Fasting LDL-C levels 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) ,
CRP levels ≥2.0 mg/L and TG levels 500 mg/dL
(5.7 mmol/L) on initial screening
Ridker PM. Circulation 2003; 108: 2292–2297
JUPITER - Major exclusion criteria
Current use of statins or other lipid-lowering therapies
Current use of hormone replacement therapy
Prior history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, such as MI,
unstable angina, prior arterial revascularisation or stroke, or CHD-risk
equivalents
Chronic inflammatory condition, such as severe arthritis, lupus or
inflammatory bowel disease and/or treatment with immunosuppressants
Uncontrolled:
– hypertension: SBP > 190 mmHg or DBP > 100 mmHg
– hypothyroidism: TSH > 1.5 x ULN
CK 3 x ULN
Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL
Evidence of hepatic dysfunction (ALT > 2 x ULN)
History of prior malignancy, alcohol or drug abuse
Ridker PM. Circulation 2003; 108: 2292–2297
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
CHD = coronary heart disease; CK = creatinine kinase; ULN = upper limit of
normal; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure
JUPITER - Patient Flow
89,890 subjects screened
17,802 randomized
Rosuvastatin 20mg
n=8,901
Placebo
n=8,901
Lost to follow up
n=44
Lost to follow up
n=37
Completed study
n=8,857
Completed study
n=8,864
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Baseline characteristics*
Rosuvastatin
n=8901
Age (years)
Male sex (%)
Race (%)
White
Black
Hispanic
Other
BMI (kg/m2)
Systolic BP (mmHg)
Diastolic BP (mmHg)
Placebo
n=8901
66 (60-71)
61.5
66 (60-71)
62.1
71.4
12.4
12.6
3.6
28.3 (25.3-32.0)
134 (124-145)
80 (75-87)
71.1
12.6
12.8
3.5
28.4 (25.3-32.0)
134 (124-145)
80 (75-87)
*All values are median (interquartile range) or N (%).
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Baseline laboratory parameters*
Rosuvastatin
n=8901
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
hsCRP (mg/L)
Glucose (mg/dL)
HbA1c(%)
Glomerular filtration rate,
(ml/min/1.73m2)
Placebo
n=8901
186 (168-200)
108 (94-119)
49 (40-60)
118 (85-169)
4.2 (2.8-7.1)
94 (87-102)
5.7 (5.4-5.9)
185 (169-199)
108 (94-119)
49 (40-60)
118 (86-169)
4.3 (2.8-7.2)
94 (88-102)
5.7 (5.5-5.9)
73.3
73.6
(64.6-83.7)
(64.6-84.1)
For hsCRP, values are the average of the values obtained at two screening and visits
*All values are median (interquartile range) or N (%).
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Medical History
Medical History
Current smoker (%)
Family history CHD† (%)
Metabolic syndrome‡ (%)
Aspirin use (%)
Rosuvastatin Placebo
n=8901
n=8901
15.7
11.2
41.0
16.6
16.0
11.8
41.8
16.6
†Family history of premature CHD defined as first degree relative with CHD at age < 55 yrs (male), < 65 yrs
(female); ‡ Metabolic syndrome defined according to consensus criteria of AHA/NHLBI
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER population compared with previous trials
in patients without established CHD
AFCAPS
WOSCOPS
JUPITER
Patients, n
6605
6595
17 802
% male, n
85
100
62
Duration, years
5.2
4.9
1.9
6
1
0
total cholesterol
221
272
183
LDL-C
150
192
104
HDL-C
36–40
44
51
158
164
138
0.2
NA
4.3
Lovastatin
20–40 mg
Pravastatin
40 mg
Rosuvastatin
20 mg
Diabetes, %
Baseline lipids,
mg/dL*
triglycerides
hsCRP, mg/L
Statin
CVD=cardiovascular disease; CHD=coronary heart disease; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C=high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP=high sensitivity C-reactive protein; *Baseline lipid levels are mean values.
Ridker PM et al. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1659–1664
Ridker PM et al. N Engl J Med. 2001 344: 1959-65
JUPITER - Primary Endpoint
Time to first occurrence of a CV death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal
MI, unstable angina or arterial revascularization
Percent of patients with
primary endpoint
9
Hazard Ratio 0.56
(95% CI 0.46-0.69)
P<0.00001
8
7
Placebo
6
5
Rosuvastatin 20 mg
4
3
NNT for 2y = 95
5y* = 25
2
1
0
0
Number at risk
RSV
8901
Placebo 8901
1
8412
8353
2
3893
3872
*Extrapolated figure based on Altman and Andersen method
Years
3
1353
1333
4
5
538
531
157
174
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Primary Endpoint Components
Placebo
Rosuvastatin
n (rate**)
n (rate**)
[n=8901]
[n=8901]
HR
95% CI
p-value
Primary Endpoint
251 (1.36)
142 (0.77)
0.56
0.46-0.69 <0.001*
(Time to first occurrence of CV death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, arterial revascularisation)
Non-fatal MI
Fatal or non-fatal MI
62 (0.33)
68 (0.37)
22 (0.12)
31 (0.17)
0.35
0.46
0.22-0.58 <0.001*
0.30-0.70 0.0002
Non-fatal stroke
Fatal or non-fatal stroke
58 (0.31)
64 (0.34)
30 (0.16)
33 (0.18)
0.52
0.52
0.33-0.80
0.34-0.79
Arterial Revascularization
131 (0.71)
71 (0.38)
0.54
0.41-0.72 <0.0001
Unstable angina†
27 (0.14)
16 (0.09)
0.59
0.32-1.10
CV death, stroke, MI
157 (0.85)
83 (0.45)
0.53
0.40-0.69 <0.001*
Revascularization
or unstable angina
143 (0.77)
76 (0.41)
0.53
0.40-0.70 <0.001*
0.003
0.002
0.09
** Rates are per 100 person years; † Hospitalisation due to unstable angina; *Actual p-value was < 0.00001
HR – Hazard Ratio; CI – Confidence Limit
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER – Subgroup analysis
Placebo better
Rosuvastatin better
0.53
10,208
7,586
0.51
6,041
11,761
0.14
7,375
10,296
0.07
Family history of CHD
Yes
No
2,045
15,684
0.99
Framingham risk score
≤10%
>10%
1.2
12,683
5,117
Metabolic syndrome
Yes
No
1
0.57
Region
US or Canada
Other
0.8
11,001
6,801
Hypertension
Yes
No
0.6
0.80
Race
White
Non-white
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
8,541
9,261
Gender
Males
Females
0.4
≤ 65 years
>65 yrs
0.2
Age
P- value*
0.32
0
N
8,882
8,895
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER - Total Mortality
Percent total mortality
Death from any cause
7
Hazard Ratio 0.80
(95% CI 0.67-0.97)
p=0.02
6
Placebo
5
Rosuvastatin 20mg
4
3
2
1
0
0
Number at risk
RSV
8901
Placebo 8901
1
2
8787
8775
4312
4319
Years
3
1602
1614
4
5
676
681
227
246
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER
Effects on LDL-C, HDL-C, TG and hsCRP at 12 months;
Percentage change between rosuvastatin and placebo
Percentage change
from baseline (%)
10
LDL-C
HDL-C
TG
hsCRP
4%
0
p<0.001*
-10
17%
-20
p<0.001
-30
37%
-40
-50
p<0.001
50%
p<0.001
-60
*P-value at study completion (48 months) = 0.34
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER
Tolerability and safety data
Placebo
[n=8901]
Adverse Events, (%)
Any serious adverse event
Muscle weakness, stiffness, pain
Myopathy
Rhabdomyolysis
Newly diagnosed cancer
Death from cancer
Gastrointestinal disorders
Renal disorders
Bleeding
Hepatic disorders
Other events, (%)
Newly diagnosed diabetes**
Haemorrhagic stroke
15.5
15.4
0.1
0.0
3.5
0.7
19.2
5.4
3.1
2.1
2.4
0.1
*Occurred after trial completion; **physician reported newly diagnosed diabetes
Rosuvastatin
[n=8901]
p-value
15.2
16.0
0.1
<0.1*
3.4
0.4
19.7
6.0
2.9
2.4
0.60
0.34
0.82
---0.51
0.02
0.43
0.08
0.45
0.13
3.0
0.1
0.01
0.44
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER
Laboratory Safety Data
Placebo
Rosuvastatin
10 (0.10)
17 (0.20)
32 (0.40)
16 (0.20)
23 (0.30)
36 (0.50)
0.24
0.34
0.64
66.8 (59.1-76.5)
5.9 (5.7-6.1)
98 (91-107)
0.02
0.001
0.12
[n=8901]
Laboratory Values, N (%)
Serum creatinine‡
ALT > 3 x ULN#
Glycosuria†
Laboratory Values, median values (IQR)
GFR*, (mL/min/1.73m2)
66.6 (58.8-76.2)
% HbA1c**
5.8 (5.6-6.1)
Fasting plasma glucose**, (mg/dL) 98 (90-106)
[n=8901]
p-value
GFR = Glomerular filtration rate, HbA1c = Haemoglobin A1c
# on consecutive visits, ‡ >100% increase from baseline, *at 12 months, **at 24 months, †>trace at 12 months
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
JUPITER – summary and perspectives
The JUPITER study included patients with low to normal LDL-C who
were at increased CV risk as identified by elevated CRP levels and who
did not require statin treatment based on current treatment guidelines
A 44% reduction in the primary endpoint of major cardiovascular
events (composite of: CV death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, arterial
revascularisation) was observed in patients who received rosuvastatin
20 mg compared with placebo (p< 0.00001)
A 20% reduction in total mortality was observed in patients who
received rosuvastatin 20 mg compared with placebo (p=0.02), a
unique finding for statins in a population without established CHD
In JUPITER, long-term treatment with rosuvastatin 20 mg was well
tolerated in nearly 9000 study participants
There was no difference between treatment groups for muscle
weakness, cancer, haematological disorders, gastrointestinal, hepatic
or renal systems
The results from JUPITER highlight the importance of highly effective
statin treatment for these patients with an increased risk of CV disease
Ridker P et al. N Eng J Med 2008;359: 2195-2207
Acknowledgements
The JUPITER Steering Committee
– P Ridker (Chairman), Boston, MA, USA
– A Gotto, New York, NY, USA
– P Libby, Boston, MA, USA
– J Willerson, Houston, TX, USA
– J Genest, Montreal, Canada
The JUPITER Independent Data Monitoring Board
The JUPITER investigators and participating patients
This study is supported by AstraZeneca