A Comparison of Tropical Cyclones Hanna vs. Ike with

Download Report

Transcript A Comparison of Tropical Cyclones Hanna vs. Ike with

2008 “PRE-Season” In Review: A Comparison of Tropical Cyclones Fay, Hanna, and Ike with Regards to Predecessor Rainfall Event (PRE) Development

Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr.

NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop November 5-6, 2008

Fay

Fay Overview  Fay came ashore as a Tropical Storm over the FL Keys on Aug. 19, then slowly meandered across the FL Peninsula the next several days  Synoptic Back-drop:  Cutoff low over the southern plains  Large, building anticyclone over the eastern U.S., to the north and northeast of Fay

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

Ridge Axis

L

Fay

925 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

Ridge Axis

L

Fay

300 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

SR Null-Case Composites

700 mb heights (dam) and upward vertical motion (shaded, μb s-1) 925 mb heights (dam), θe (K), and 200 mb winds (shaded, m s-1) Center of composite TC

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 20 Aug.

Fay’s Direct Rainfall

Radar Mosaic, 2100 UTC, 20 Aug.

Parcel Trajectories Red – About 925 mb Blue – About 700 mb Green – About 500 mb

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 21 Aug.

Ridge Axes

L

Fay

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 21 Aug.

Disorganized Convection Fay’s Direct Rainfall

Radar Mosaic, 1800 UTC, 21 Aug.

Parcel Trajectories Red – About 925 mb Blue – About 700 mb Green – About 500 mb

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 22 Aug.

Ridge Axes

L

Fay

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 22 Aug.

Still Disorganized Convection Fay’s Rainfall

Radar Loop – 20 Aug. to 24 Aug.

A Classic Null-Case  Fay produced tremendous rainfall across parts of the Southeastern U.S.  Several day totals of 20”+ in parts of FL  Due to the direct impacts of Fay’s rainfall shield and her slow movement  PRE development not observed  Expansive mid-level ridge was in place; nearly enveloped Fay  Precipitation maxima stayed tightly clustered around the circulation center

Hanna

Hanna Overview  Hanna came ashore as a Category 1 Hurricane near the NC/SC border around 0600 UTC, 6 Sept.

 Synoptic Back-drop:  Large western Atlantic ridge and central U.S. troughiness  Deep southerly flow regime over the eastern states

700 mb Heights/Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

925 mb Heights/Theta-E and 200 mb Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Theta-E Ridge Line

Hanna Falls Within the SR Category; SR TC Tracks and PRE Locations

All SR TC Tracks All SR PPTC Tracks; with PRE centroids (colored dots)

SR PPTC Composites (PRE - 12)

Trough axis Ridge axis θ e -Ridge axis 700 mb heights (dam) and upward vertical motion (shaded, μb s -1 ) 925 mb heights (dam), θ e (K), and 200 mb winds (shaded, m s -1 ) Center of composite TC

Conceptual Model: LOT PRE Ahead Of SR Or AR TC

UL Jet LL θ e -Ridge Axis PREs Mid-level Streamlines Revised and updated from Fig. 13 of Bosart and Carr (1978) See inset TC Rainfall Representative TC Tracks

PRE Outlook  Synoptic setting seemed somewhat favorable for potential PRE development poleward of Hanna  TC embedded within southerly 700 mb flow, with short wave upstream  However, trough was less amplified than the composites  Strengthening upper-level jet streak to the north  Developing 925 mb theta-e ridge, although a little broader and farther east than the composites  Proximity of low-level boundary

850 mb Moisture Transport, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

850 mb Moisture Transport, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept.

Precipitable Water and Low-Level Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Precipitable Water and Low-Level Winds, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept.

Radar Loop, 0000 – 1500 UTC, 6 Sept.

QPE, 0600-1200 UTC, 6 Sept. “PRE-like” Rainfall

A Quick PRE  A band of heavy rainfall did develop north of Hanna from late Friday, 9/6 into Sat., 9/7  However, it was transient in nature; almost like a progressive warm front feature  Limited rainfall in most areas to 1” or less  Parts of RI/southeast MA did get heavier amounts (2 3” and locally higher, in just a 3-6 hour period) • Best combination of moisture inflow and jet dynamics

Hanna’s Direct Rainfall Shield  A narrow band of heavy rain accompanied Hanna up the Eastern Seaboard  Maximum rainfall shifted increasingly just to the left of track with poleward extent  Typical of transitioning TC  Generally, 3 6” of rain fell within a 6-10 hour period  Dry antecedent conditions and the lack of a significant “Along-Track” PRE mitigated any serious flood problems

Radar Loop from 1200 UTC, 6 Sept. to 0600 UTC, 7 Sept.

QPE, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept. to 1200 UTC, 7 Sept.

Where heavier rains fell earlier

Ike

Ike Overview  Ike came ashore as a Category 2 Hurricane along the TX coast around 0600 UTC, 13 Sept.

 Synoptic Back-drop:  Large southeastern U.S. ridge and western states troughiness  Deep southerly flow regime over the southern Plains and up the Mississippi Valley

700 mb Heights/Winds, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

925 mb Heights/Theta-E and 200 mb Winds, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Theta-E Ridge Line

Ike Falls Within the CG Category; CG TC Tracks and PRE Locations

All CG Tracks All CG PPTC Tracks; with PRE centroids (colored dots)

PRE Outlook  Synoptic setting seemed favorable for potential PRE development poleward of Ike  TC embedded within southerly 700 mb flow, with trough upstream  Strengthening upper-level jet streak to the north/northeast  Sharpening 925 mb theta-e ridge axis  Nearly stationary low-level boundary

Derived Total Precipitable Water, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Channel of Moisture Inflow

L

Ike

Precipitable Water, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

850 mb Moisture Transport, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Radar Loop, 0000 – 1800 UTC, 12 Sept.

Parcel Trajectories Red – About 850 mb Blue – About 700 mb Green – About 500 mb

L

Ike

Total Rainfall for PRE in Southern KS

Flood Pictures (West Wichita, KS)

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

L

Ike

300 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

925 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

L

Ike

850 mb Moisture Transport, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

Precipitable Water, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

Radar Loop, 0600-1800 UTC, 13 Sept.

Total Rainfall for PRE in Northern IL

Ike’s Significant PRE  Two well defined PRE  First from central OK to southern KS late on Thu., 9/11 and early Fri., 9/12  Widespread 6”+ rainfall, with an embedded band of 10 15” (Wichita, KS set all-time 24 hour precipitation record (nearly 11”))  Second from northern MO/southeastern IA to northern IL/IN  Several bands of 5 10” rainfall (locally higher amounts)

Ike’s Direct Rainfall Shield  TC Ike picked up speed as it gained latitude  A band of 3 6” rainfall spread from the southern Plains, to the Mississippi Valley, to the Lower Great Lakes region  Fortunately for KS, most of this rainfall occurred east of the Wichita area  Parts of MO and IL not so lucky  Exacerbated existing flood problems from the PRE

Radar Loop from 1800 UTC, 13 Sept. to 1200 UTC, 14 Sept.

QPE, from 0600-1200 UTC, 14 Sept. Hardest hit areas from Ike’s first PRE

QPE, from 1200-1800 UTC, 14 Sept.

Hardest hit areas from Ike’s second PRE

Flood Pictures (Chicago area)

Summary  Fay produced very heavy rainfall; but no PRE  Strong ridge to the north/northeast prevented significant moisture advection outward from the TC’s circulation center  Hanna produced a transient PRE-like feature to its north  Fast PRE movement kept rainfall amounts down  Not much overlap between PRE and direct TC rainfall  Ike produced two substantial PRE  Stationary forcing features (frontal boundary and back building upper-level jet) were better able to anchor/lift deep tropical moisture plume  PRE had considerably more impact than direct TC rainfall in KS  PRE + TC rainfall created major runoff problems in MO and IL

The End !!

Any Questions ??