Transcript Slide 1

„EMMI Workshop and XXVI Max Born Symposium”
Wrocław 9-11.07.2009
Probing resonance matter with HADES
P. Salabura
Jagiellonian University/GSI
for the HADES collaboration
Baryonic matter at 1-2 AGeV
Au+Au
~10fm/c
moderate densities but long system life time
Baryonic matter:
• /N
= 1-3, T< 80 MeV,  ~15 fm/c
nucleons, baryonic resonances (~30%) 33, mesons(π0)~10%
“resonance matter”
HADES
Composition of a barionic matter
Rear probes: dielectrons & strangeness
What is still (after >20 years) exciting in this field ??
•
e.m radiation from „resonance matter” – excess
connection to / in-medium properties ?
• Sub-threshold strangeness production:
 , K+ K- , - (1321)
Dielectrons from C+C @ 1.0 GeV
DLS Data: Phys.Rev.Lett. 79 (1997) 1229
HADES : Phys. Lett. B 663 (2008) 43
2008
-2
DLS
W. Cassing,
E.L. Bratkovskaya Physics
1.0 A GeV
10Data & Transport (1999) :C+C,
Reports 308 (1999) 65
no medium effects
HADES

2
1/N dN/dM [1/GeV /c ]
10
10
-4
10
-5


10
-6
Brems. NN
Brems. N
All
10
-7
10
-8
0.0
 HADES data projected into DLS acceptance
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
E.L. Bratkovskaya and W. Cassing NPA 807, 214 (2008) &
new. -2N-N bremss.OBE Kaptari
NPA 764 (2006) 338
C+C, 1.0&AKämpfer
GeV
10

10
-3
10
-4
10
-5
in-medium effects: CB+DM
Excess ?? above what?
HSD:
do we have a good
reference ? Dalitz
HADES

2
M [1/GeV /c ]
 Very good agreement between 2 experiments
 full confirmation of DLS effect
HSD:

 Dalitz
 Dalitz
 Dalitz
 Dalitz
-3
 Dalitz
 Dalitz
 Dalitz

known

 .. frankly speaking, no!
elementary e+e- sources not fully
Brems. NN
Reference: dielectrons from pp and
“quasi-free” pn @ 1.25 AGeV
Model Calculations:
a) NNNNe+e- OBE calculations Kaptari & Kämpfer (K&K) NPA 764 (2006) 338
b)  , yield constraint by data.  Dalitz decay Krivoruchenko et al. Phys. Rev. D 65 (2001) 017502 + VMD formfactor (Q. Wan and F. Iachello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 1846)
 pp/pn data are not described by recent OBE calculations !
12
Excess or no excess ?
F~3

C+C data reproduced (within 20%) by superposition of NN interactions (reference)
& scaling with pion production

Larger system size – Ar+KCl (4 larger Apart)-first evidence for the in-medium effect
– baryonic radiation : i.e  NN N  N .. (fireball ~10x  ) !

Different mechanism as at SPS ( pion annihilation)
Vector mesons / at SIS
p+ 92Nb 3.5 GeV
p+p at 3.5 GeV

40Ar+ 38KCl
2008
“on-line spectrum!”
1.75 AGeV
2005
preliminary



sM()  15 MeV/c2
• Systematic studies on / production at SIS has been started
• Verification of p+A from KEK (advantage lower beam energy ) & CBTAPS/CLAS
• Only consistent description of the pp/p+A/and A+A can give full picture
K+ K- / - production at SIS
Strangeness Exchange : belived to be dominant
NN  NK  
  K  N
via  ?
sub-threshold, OZI suppressed ?
NN  NNK  K 
N  NK  K 
non-resonant
NN  NN
N  NN
resonant (->K+K- )
- (1321) S=-2
deep subthreshold (~600 MeV) not measured
KY   
Strangeness Exchange +
network of reactions  sensitvity to EOS
SIS?
A.
B.
Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger,
K. Redlich, NPA 765 (2006)
19
/ Production in ArKCl @ 1.75AGeV
s =236 MeV
M  =1017,8 ± 0.9 MeV/c2
s = 6.2 MeV/c2
e+ee+eS. Wheaton and J. Cleymans, hep-ph/0407174
 / ~1 fixed to pp data ,  yield in line with mT scal.
 R(/) = 4.2*10-3 *f

OZI rules for N-N
enhanced R(/) in HI as compared to N-N()
close to stat. model (THERMUS) !(no  suppression)
different absorption?
OZI
/ K- ratio
Statistical model K. Redlich, H. Oeschler-priv.comm
Teff=693
HADES: accepted PRC: arXiv:0902.3487
Teff=894

Teff=848
/K- =0.340.13 &  is enhanced
 is important source of K- in HI collisions at
SIS
- production in Ar+KCl @ 1.75 AGeV
identification:
 


  p
HADES data

THERMUS fit S. Wheaton and J.
Cleymans, hep-ph/0407174
T= 703 b=74615 (MeV)
RC =2.6 0.4 fm
Rfireball =6 0.7 fm
2=2.1 (no - )
?
  p 
23.01.2009
    
P.Salabura
Outlook: future exp.
2008/9/10
2009-2011
SIS18
2010
Upgrade RPC, DAQ, MDC1, EM Calorimeter (for SIS100)
Ag +Ag @ Au+Au
 + N,  + A
dielectrons (/) , strangeness (K-K+ .  ,)
resonance (, N*) radiative decays, strangeness
2011
> 2013
(SIS100)
Hades goes to FAIR ( 8 AGeV)
increase of Mul(/) by 2 orders of magnitue !!
CBM
HADES
23.01.2009
The Collaboration

Catania (INFN - LNS), Italy
 Cracow (Univ.), Poland
 Darmstadt (GSI), Germany
 Dresden (FZD), Germany
 Dubna (JINR), Russia
SIS
 Frankfurt (Univ.), Germany
 Giessen (Univ.), Germany
 Milano (INFN, Univ.), Italy
 München (TUM), Germany
 Moscow (ITEP,MEPhI,RAS), Russia
 Nicosia (Univ.), Cyprus
 Orsay (IPN), France
GSI
 Rez (CAS, NPI), Czech Rep.
 Sant. de Compostela (Univ.), Spain
 Valencia (Univ.), Spain

23.01.2009
Coimbra (Univ.), LIP, Portugal
P.Salaura
12
BACK-UP SLIDES
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
Conference
High Acceptance Di-Electron Spectrometer
Side View
 Beams from SIS18: pions, protons, nuclei
 high invariant mass resolution (2% at / mass)
and powerful PID capabilities : p/π/K/e
 Large acceptance for sys. studies :
•
dielectrons (e+,e-)
•
strangeness: K,0 , , ,
FW
START
Geometry
1m
Full azimuth, polar angles 18 - 85
e+e- pair acceptance  0.35
~ 80.000 channels, segmented solid or LH2 targets
P.Salabura
3
N-N Bremsstrahlung
• Strong
+
electromagnetic process (OBE models)
e+
+
=
(simplified picture!)
e1
+
2
1
2
NN ("quasielastic")-non resonant
resonant -baryon resonances ()
collection of results from E.L
Bratkovskaya & W. Cassing:
E.L. Bratkovskaya and W. Cassing arXiv:0712.0635v1 Nucl.Phys A 807, 214 (2008).
• bremsstrahlung OBE
calculations:
Kaptari & Kämpfer, NPA 764 (2006)
338:
 K&K OBE calculation:
pn bremsstrahlung 4 larger
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
10
e+e- Invariant mass spectrum decomposition
e+e- decays
pp @3.5 GeV
• Mesons (known)
0
,g


e+
,

e-
• Baryon resonances (not measured !) –

important at lower beam energies SIS18
/
N

e+
eExample cocktail
HADES data p+p @ 3.5 GeV
compared to model calc.
•Two-body decays (known):
e+
//
23.01.2009
g*
eP.Salabura
16
Vector mesons: pairs from DLS
Data:
Calculations: C.Ernst et alPhys. Rev. C58 (1998)
• Coupling of  to N*(1520), N*(1700) ?
• Coupling of  to N*(1535) ?
DLS
Relevant for in-medium :
extended VDM
Ch. Fuchs Phys. Rev. C68
(2003) 014904
•  signal not visible due to resolution
• enhancement below / pole – resonance radiation ?
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
Conference
Invariant Mass Spectra of , K S0 and 
K S0    
  p 
 145.000 
 51.000 K S
 S/B  0.3

 s   2.4 MeV/c
23.01.2009
0
2
S/B  1.0
 s K0
 9.1 MeV/c2
S
P.Salabura
  K K 
 168 
 S/B  1.1
 s   6.2 MeV/c
2
Conference
K0-Nucleon Potential
Results from FOPI (HSD)
Kaon-Nucleon Potential: 30 MeV @ =0
(HADES and IQMD)
KN-Potential is repulsive
with a strength of U=20 MeV
C. Hartnack, J. Aichelin, H. Oeschler
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
Conference
p+p @ 1.25 GeV -  Dalitz decay
 Dalitz decay
p
+
PRELIMINARY
g*
e+
q2 = M2inv(e+e-) = Mg*2 > 0
e-
QED
grey band Iachello. VMD
Time-like  - N transition
 branching ratio BR(M) ?
 EM-formfactors (GM , GE, GC)?
d (Δ  Ne  e - )
 f
dq 2


2

q
2
2
2
2
2 
m Δ, q  G M q  3 G E q  2 m 2
Δ

 
 


G q  
2
2
C

VMD
PLUTO calculations:
a) NN-bremsstrahlung Kaptari & Kämpfer (K&K)
b)  Dalitz decay
Krivoruchenko et al. Phys. Rev. D 65 (2001) 017502 +
VMD form-factor (Q. Wan and F. Iachello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20 (2005) 1846)
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
20
d+ppspec e+e-X @ 1.25 AGeV –
„quasifree” p-n collisions
neutron
„target” proton
e+ e–
pspec
PRELIMINARY
proton
pc
neutron
selection of np reactions via
spectator proton in Forward Wall
spectator "tag"
Mult.  1 FW (0.5–7)
cocktail:
a) np-Bremsstrahlung a-la Kaptari & Kämpfer,
 and  (constrained by data)
b) Fermi momentum of nucleon in deuterium from N-N
Bonn potential
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
No satisfactory description
of pp and pn data!!
21
Particle IDentification
HADRONS
Momentum vs velocity (β)
LEPTONS
(RICH tagging)
ep
1
e+
q p
Target
RICH
2
Minv = 2  sin(  / 2) p1 p 2
dE/dx in MDC & TOF
hadron : lepton suppression ~10-4
Kaon identification
log. z axis !
e+
e-
23.01.2009
P.Salabura
22