Transcript Trans-Radial approach
Trans-Radial approach in Overweight Patients
Hakim Ben Amer, MD On behalf the TROP study group
Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions
18,137 PCI pts in northern New England (1997-1999); vascular complication*
2.98%
Variables associated with increased risk in the
multivariate analysis
Age >or=70 OR 2.7 Female gender OR 2.4
Body surface area <1.6 m OR 1.9
History of congestive heart failure OR 1.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease OR 1.5
Renal failure OR 1.9
Lower extremity vascular disease OR 1.4
Bleeding disorder OR 1.68
Emergent priority OR 2.3
Myocardial infarction OR 1.7
Shock OR 1.86
>or=1 type B2 lesions OR 1.32 type C lesions OR 1.7 3-vessel PCI OR 1.5
Thienopyridines OR 1.4
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors OR 1.9
*Vascular complications: access-site injury requiring treatment or bleeding requiring transfusion
Piper WD Am Heart J. 2003 Jun;145(6):1022-9
Complications following diagnostic coronary angiography: Predicting factors
All complications Major complications Vascular complications Factor Heart failure (Killip>1) Left / Right catheterization Senior physician (> 500) French: <6, =6, >6 Smoking Body weight (/10 kg) 0R 2.16; 95% CI 1.12-4.16; p= 0.03
0R 2.62; 95% CI 1.46-4.7; p= 0.003
0R 0.58; 95% CI 0.34-0.98; p= 0.04
0R 2.6; 95% CI 1.53-4.41; p= 0.0004
0R 2.35; 95% CI 1.0-5.51; p= 0.05
0R 2.54; 95% CI 0.93-7.02; p= 0.07
0R 2.76; 95% CI 1.14-6.73; p= 0.02
0R 3.93; 95% CI 1.28-12.06; p= 0.01
0R 1.23; 95% CI 0.95-1.44; p= 0.1
0R 1.4; 95% CI 1.01-1.95; p= 0.04
7,412 consecutive diagnostic cardiac catheterizations between 1990 and 2000 Ammann CCVI 2003;59:13-18
Impact of Access Site Hematoma With Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
6613 PCI (98-00)(NHLBI): hematoma w transfusion 1.8% (97% femoral) Predictors: Older age, Lower BMI, Female, renal disease, HTN, AMI, 3 VD, GPIIb/IIa -, Postprocedure heparin Independent predictors: Older age, female, thrombotic lesion, 3-VD, renal disease, emergent PCI, prior aspirin Procedural death: 10.3% w HWT 1.2% w/o HWT p <0.001
death/MI: 18.1% 3.55% <0.001 HWT is a predictor of death/MI (OR = 3.49; 95% CI: 1.98-6.14) J. Slater Am J Cardiol 2003 (suppl) 92: 18L
Clinical Significance of Bleeding Complications
Any Vascular Site Bleeding or Vascular Complication (Surgical) Median Length of Hospital Stay (Day) Extra Cost + 1 Others Incapacitation (days weeks) Return to normal activity delay Major or Minor Vascular Site Bleeding or Vascular Complication (Surgical) + 2 + 1327 $ Major Vascular Site Bleeding or Vascular Complication (Surgical) + 4 + 5896 $ From Blankenship Am Heart J 1999; 138: S287-S296
Radial / Femoral Approach meta-analysis: Entry site complications
Agostini P JACC
T
rans
R
adial Approach In
O
verWeight
P
atients
Multicentric European Registry , - Coronary angiography ( CA ) or angioplasty ( PCI ) - Centres where there is at least one operator with a wide experience in the transradial approach for CA and PCI. - We include in the registry all the overweight patients with BMI 35 , undergoing CA and/or PCI whatever the vascular approach chosen by the operator. -The primary end point is the occurrence of complications delaying the hospital discharge .
TROP Study Group
TROP Centers
Bergamo (Italy) - Brighton (England) - CHU Caen, (France) - HEP la Roseraie, (France) - Clinic Barcelona, (Spain) - Hôpital Bichat, Paris (France) - ICPS, Massy (France) - ICPS, Quincy (France) - Meixoeiro, (Spain) - Riga, (Latvia) - Szeged, (Hungary) - Val-de-Grâce (France) - Valle de Hebron, (Spain)
Brighton (E) Meixoeiro (S) Valle Hebron (S) Bichat (F) Massy (F) Bergamo (I) Quincy (F) Barcelona (S) Val de Grace (F) Roseraie (F) Szeged (H) Caen (F) Riga (L)
0 4 6 24 29 27 19 17 19 24 32 36 48
N = 346
61 20 40 60 80
TROP Study Group
Mean Age Sexe (Male)
Clinical Datas
61.2 +/- 10.9 years (30/83) 52.9 % Mean Weight Mean Height Mean BMI 108 +/- 15 Kg 1.67 +/- 0.1 M 38.7 +/- 3.4 Kg/m2 (79/155) (1.45/1.90) (35/56) Renal Insuf 7.8% TROP Study Group
%
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Clinical Datas
64,4 11,3 24,3 8,4 ANGIO PCI ANGIO + PCI EMERGENCY
TROP Study Group
Clinical Datas
P = .0006
Angio (%) Radial N = 249 171 (49.4) Femoral N = 97 52 (14.7) PCI (%) Angio/PCI (%) 19 (5.5) 59 (17.1) 21 (6.1) 25 (7.2) TROP Study Group
Clinical Datas
%
80 60 40 20 0 73,9 68,5 23,5 41,6 38,4
Hype rtens Hype ion rcho l.
Fam ily H ist Diab etes Smo king TROP Study Group
5 0 10 15
Clinical Datas
%
20 18,5 17,3 5,5 4,6 3,2 1,7
Prior MI Prior CAB Prior G PCI Vasc ul Dis Prior stro Caro ke tid D is TROP Study Group
Vascular Access
Transradial approach IT: 249/346 ( 71.9% ) Transradial approach AC: 243/346 ( 70.2% ) Reasons for using Femoral access: 97/346 ( 28.1% ) - Physician choice (76): 78.4% - Dialysis (1): 1% - Need for 7F catheters (5): 5.2% - Abnormal Allen test (1): 1% - CABG (double Mam) (4): 4.1% - No or to small radial (4): 4.1% - Other (ring, prior rad failure…) (6): 6.2% IT: Intention To Treat AC: After Cross over TROP Study Group
Vascular Access
Cross over: 17 (4.9%) - Radial to femoral: - Radial to radial: - Femoral to radial: - Radial to Ulnar 9 (3.6%) 4 (1.6%) 3 (3.1%) 1 (0.4%)
TROP Study Group
Vascular Access: Size
N
250 211 200 150 100 50 34 89 12 4 F 5 F 6 F 7 F 0 Patients
TROP Study Group
%
100 80 60 40 20 0
INDICATIONS
4,9 6,1 89
Valvulopathy Cardiac Insuffi.
Ischemic TROP Study Group
%
40
Clinic Presentation
39,3 30 20 10 19,9 11,6 4,64,4 7,2 13
Atypical chest pain ACS ST elevated ACS ST not elevated Silent ischemia Stable angina Post MI No ischemia
0
TROP Study Group
%
Documented Ischemia
40 39,9 34,1 30 20 10 17,9 6,4
No test EKG Scintigraphy Stress test Other
1,7 0 Patients
TROP Study Group
Vascular Access
Radial difficulties: 249 patients - Failure: - No difficulty - Catheterism diff.
- Spasm - Loops - Others - TOTAL 10 (4%) 210 (84.3%) 10 (4%) 6 (2.8%) 10 (4%) 2 (0.8%) 29 (11.6%) TROP Study Group
%
40 30 20 10 0
CAD extension
39,9 29,7 17,9 12,5 4 No vessel One vessel Two vessels Three vessels Left Main
TROP Study Group
PCI
(N = 124 pts) - Transradial access: 78/124 ( 62.9% ) - Femoral access: 46/124 ( 38.1% ) - PCI success/Vessel: 163/169 ( 96.5% ) - Clinical Total Success: 118 ( 95.2% ) - QMI: 4 ( 3.2% ) - MACE: 1 ( 3.2% ) - Emergent CABG: 0 ( 0% ) - Death: 0 ( 0% )
TROP Study Group
Fem vs Rad access
Mean age (y) Male (%) BMI (Kg/m2) Radial (n=243) 61.2 +/- 11.3
138 (56.7) 39 +/- 14 Femoral (n=103) 60.5 +/- 10.1
56 (54.4) 38 +/- 5 P NS NS 0.04
TROP Study Group
Fem vs Rad access
Hypertension (%) Hypercholesterolemia (%) Family History (%) Smokers (%) No Current Past Diabetes (%) No ID NID Radial (n=243) 180 (70) 165 (68) 41 (17) 137 (56) 30 (12) 60 (25) 137 (56) 24 (10) 82 (34) Femoral (n=103) 76 (70) 72 (70) P NS NS 40 (39) 0,001 60 (58) 17 (16) 26 (25) 65 (63) 9 (9) 29 (28) NS NS TROP Study Group
Fem vs Rad access
Prior MI (%) Prior CABG (%) Prior PCI (%) Radial (n=243) 37 (15) 11 (45) 42 (18) Femoral (n=103) 27 (26) 8 (8) 17 (16) P NS NS NS TROP Study Group
Fem vs Rad access
Nb Cath used Angio (n) Contrast Total (ml) Contrast Angio (ml) Total Duration (min) Angio Duration (min) Hosp stay (d) Hosp stay after C (d) Vascular complication (%)* Hematoma (%) * With transfusion Radial (n=243) 1.9 +/- 0.8
159 +/- 95 117 +/- 64 35.3 +/- 25.4
26.1 +/- 19.0
3.7 +/- 4.1
1.7 +/- 2.2
3 (1.2) 4 (1.6) §: with 8 Closing Device Femoral (n=103) 2.3 +/- 0.7
189 +/- 102 122 +/- 70 55.6 +/- 23.3
31.3 +/- 17.7
4.4 +/- 4.6
2.7 +/- 4.3
P 0,0005 0.01
NS 0.0001
0.03
NS 0.02
3 (2.9) 9 (8.7) § NS 0.001
TROP Study Group
BMI (kg/m2) N=95435 Death (%)
Impact of Weight for in Hospital Outcome after PCI
< 18,5 N=924 3,8 18,5/24,9 N=25010 1,1 25/29,9 N=41175 0,8 30/34,9 N=19329 0,7 35/39,9 N6252 0,6 >40 N=2745 1,4 P 0,001 Transmural MI (%) Emergent CABG (%) MACE (%) 0,5 0,9 5 Vascular Injury (%) 1,4 0,3 1,3 2,6 0,6 0,3 1,1 2,1 0,5 0,4 1,1 2,0 0,5 0,3 1,2 1,8 0,5 0,3 0,8 2,4 0,9 0,227 <0,001 <0,001 <0,001 RM, Minuella Am J cardiol 2004;93:1229-32
Conclusion 1
• Obesity is a risk factor for CAD (Hypertension, Dyslipidemia, Diabetes) • Obesity is more frequent in female gender • Obesity is a factor of complication in diagnostic angiography and coronary intervention
Conclusion 2
• Preliminary analysis of this study • Radial approach in obese patients reduces the rate of vascular complications • Subgroup analysis (pending) is necessary to better define patients at higher risk, interest of closure devices for femoral procedures… • Potential other advantage of radial approach: prevention of infectious complication
Bleeding Complications
F.V Aguirre et al, Circulation 1995;91:2882-90
Bleeding complications
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients Distribution of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization procedures by BMI N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients Vascular complications by BMI. The patients with the smallest BMIs experienced the highest rate of vascular complications N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients Overall vascular complication rate in nonobese and obese (BMI >30.0) patient subgroups stratified by vascular access approach N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Comparison of the Risk of Vascular Complications Associated With Femoral and Radial Access Coronary Catheterization Procedures in Obese Versus Nonobese Patients N Cox, Am J Cardiol 2004;94:1174–1177
Low-Normal or Excessive Body Mass Index: Newly Identified and Powerful Risk Factors for Death and Other ComplicationsWith Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Major Cardiac Outcomes and Complications Stephen G. Ellis, Am J Cardiol 1996;78:642-64
Low-Normal or ExcessiveBody Mass Index: Newly Identified and Powerful Risk Factors for Death and Other Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Peripheral Vascular Complications Stephen G. Ellis, Am J Cardiol 1996;78:642-64
Low-Normal or ExcessiveBody Mass Index: Newly Identified and Powerful Risk Factors for Death and Other Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Independent Correlates of Death With and Without BMI Stephen G. Ellis, Am J Cardiol 1996;78:642-64
Low-Normal or ExcessiveBody Mass Index: Newly Identified and Powerful Risk Factors for Death and Other Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Causes of Death Stephen G. Ellis, Am J Cardiol 1996;78:642-64
Low-Normal or ExcessiveBody Mass Index: Newly Identified and Powerful Risk Factors for Death and Other ComplicationsWith Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Stephen G. Ellis, Am J Cardiol 1996;78:642-64
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The Obesity Paradox)
H Gurm, P. Topol Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 42-45
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The Obesity Paradox)
H Gurm, P. Topol Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 42-45
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The Obesity Paradox)
H Gurm, P. Topol Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 42-45
Impact of Body Mass Index on Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The Obesity Paradox)
H Gurm, P. Topol Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 42-45
Impact of BMI on Short- and Long-Term FU in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: Insights From BARI Procedural Characteristics of Study Patients According to BMI H. Gurm J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:834–40
Impact of BMI on Short- and Long-Term FU in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: Insights From BARI Incidence and Odds Ratios of In-Hospital Events According to BMI: PTCA Group H. Gurm J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:834–40
Impact of BMI on Short- and Long-Term FU in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: Insights From BARI Incidence and Odds Ratios of In-Hospital Events According to BMI: CABG Group H. Gurm J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:834–40
Impact of BMI on Short- and Long-Term FU in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: Insights From BARI Incidence and OR of Long-Term Mortality According to BMI: PTCA Group (n=2,090) H. Gurm J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:834–40
Impact of BMI on Short- and Long-Term FU in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: Insights From BARI Incidence and OR of In-Hospital Events According to BMI: CABG Group H. Gurm J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:834–40
Obesity a risk for CABG surgery
N.J.O. Birkmeyer Circulation 1998;97:1689-94
Obesity a risk for CABG surgery
CVA Cerebrovascular Accident SWI Sternal Wound infection N.J.O. Birkmeyer Circulation 1998;97:1689-94