Black holes as Information Scramblers
Download
Report
Transcript Black holes as Information Scramblers
FAR-FROM-EQUILIBRIUM ISOTROPISATION,
QUASI-NORMAL MODES AND RADIAL FLOW
Comparing numerical evolution with linearisation
Work with Michał Heller, David Mateos, Michał Spalinski, Diego Trancanelli and Miquel Triana
References: 1202.0981 (PRL 108) and 1210.xxxx
Wilke van der Schee
Supervisors: Gleb Arutyunov, Thomas Peitzmann,
Koenraad Schalm and Raimond Snellings
Workshop Holographic Thermalization, Leiden
October 11, 2012
Outline
2/19
Simple set-up for anisotropy
Quasi-normal modes and linearised evolution
Radial flow (new results, pictures only)
Holographic context
3/19
Simplest set-up:
Pure
gravity in AdS5
Background field theory is flat
Translational- and SO(2)-invariant field theory
We
keep anisotropy:
Caveat: energy density is constant so final state is known
P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaffe, Horizon formation and far-from-equilibrium isotropization in supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma (2008)
The geometry
4/19
Symmetry allows metric to be:
A, B, S are functions of r and t
B measures anisotropy
Einstein’s equations simplify
Null coordinates
Attractive nature of horizon
Key differences with Chesler, Yaffe (2008) are
Flat boundary
Initial non-vacuum state
The close-limit approximation
5/19
Early work of BH mergers in flat space
Suggests perturbations of an horizon are always small
Linearise evolution around final state (planar-AdS-Schw):
Evolution determined by single LDE:
R. H. Price and J. Pullin, Colliding black holes: The Close limit (1994)
Quasi-normal mode expansion
6/19
Expansion:
Solution possible for discrete
Imaginary part
always positive
G.T. Horowitz and V.E. Hubeny, Quasinormal Modes of AdS Black Holes and the Approach to Thermal Equilibrium(1999)
J. Friess, S. Gubser, G. Michalogiorgakis, and S. Pufu, Expanding plasmas and quasinormal modes of anti-de Sitter black holes (2006)
First results (Full/Linearized/QNM)
7
Bouncing off the boundary
8/19
IR,
9/19
normal,
UV
Statistics of 2000 profiles
10/19
Recent additions
11/19
Same linearised calculations with a boost-invariant direction
Subtlety: final state is not known initially
Add-on: non-homogeneous and includes hydrodynamics
Works well
Second and third order corrections
The expansion seems to converge
Works quite well
Radial flow
12/19
Calculation incorporating longitudinal and radial expansion
Numerical scheme very similar to colliding shock-waves:
Assume boost-invariance on collision axis
Assume rotational symmetry (central collision)
2+1D nested Einstein equations in AdS
P.M. Chesler and L.G. Yaffe, Holography and colliding gravitational shock waves in asymptotically AdS5 spacetime (2010)
Radial flow – initial conditions
13/19
Two scales: T and size nucleus
Energy density is from Glauber model (~Gaussian)
No momentum flow (start at t ~ 0.05fm/c)
Scale solution such that T 506MeV at t 0.6fm/c
Metric functions ~ vacuum AdS (not a solution with energy!)
H. Niemi, G.S. Denicol, P. Huovinen, E. Molnár and D.H. Rischke, Influence of the shear viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma on elliptic flow (2011)
Radial flow – results
14/19
Radial flow - acceleration
15/19
Velocity increases rapidly:
Acceleration is roughly
Small
1031 g
with R size nucleus
nucleus reaches maximum quickly
Radial flow – energy profile
16/19
Energy spreads out:
Radial flow - hydrodynamics
17/19
Thermalisation is quick, but viscosity contributes
Radial flow - discussion
18/19
Radial velocity at thermalisation was basically unknown
Initial condition is slightly ad-hoc, need more physics?
We
get reasonable pressures
Velocity increases consistently in other runs
Results are intuitive
Input welcome
Conclusion
19/19
Studied (fast!) isotropisation for over 2000 states
Linearised approximation works unexpectedly well
UV anisotropy can be large, but thermalises fast (though no bound)
Works even better for realistic and UV profiles
Numerical scheme provides excellent basis
Radial flow, fluctuations, elliptic flow
What happens universally? What is the initial state?