The W-M-D of Disinfection/Sterilization Killiing Germs may

Download Report

Transcript The W-M-D of Disinfection/Sterilization Killiing Germs may

What Can Go Wrong in Cleaning, Disinfection & Sterilization?

TSICP October 2006

Barbara Moody, RN, CIC Director Infection Control Denton Regional Medical Center

and how would you know?

Objectives

Describe at least one infection associated with each: improper cleaning, disinfection & sterilization

Identify > 3 indicators that could implicate inadequate processing.

List 3 methods for investigating possible processing failures.

Background

    

118,000 citations for HAI due to disinfectant failure 299,000 citations for Infections due to disinfectant failure Septic shock in healthy host due to Ochrobactrum antropi from contamination during reconstitution Hepatitis B spread to 6 from improper sterilization Mycobacterium abscessus outbreak post-acu-

 

puncture; towels & hot pack covers possible source 2006 Poor sterilization instruments results in Infection outbreak, Paris 40 years of Disinfectant failure: M.abscessus Infection caused by contam. Benzalkonium Chloride (skin antiseptic before intra-articular injections )

Basic principles

Hosp. Environment visibly clean, free from dust, soil

Equipment used for >1 pt must be cleaned, disinfected or sterilized between patients

Established procedures must be used for clean & soiled linen, food hygiene & pest control

All staff must be educated & trained in prevention of HAI (& competency updated)

Baseline Info

*Things you know

Definitions:

Antisepsis: (Skin only)

 

Cleaning; pre-cleaning Spaulding classification system

 

Disinfection: Low-med-High levels (environment only) concentration – dilution MSDS High level disinfection: (HLD: testing,duration of use - documentation

  

Sterilization: Steam, EO, Plasma Biological indicators Documentation

…WMD

The

W

eapons of

M

icrobe

D

estruction…

  

Weapons: Manual cleaning; automated processors, disinfectants, Sterilants Microbes: fungi, bacteria, viruses, spores, prions Destruction methods: Chemicals, Steam Gas (EO), H202 Plasma, Irradiation

Environmental Cleaning

Yes Virginia, the Environment does matter in the prevention of infection !

MRSA outbreak continued & increased x 21 mos. until doubled cleaning hours, assigned cleaning of equipment & environment = end of outbreak MRSA ICU outbreak after disinfectant changed: U Wisc.

ID residents, Epidemiologist demonstrated room cleaning to Housekeeping. Hskpg. Returned demonstra tion = Outbreak ended. ( techniques not disinfectant )

Legal aspects:Headlines re failure of disinfection, sterilization, etc

 $ 200 million suit – Toronto: non-sterile equipment used on patients 

End Hospital Secrecy & Save Lives!

 Improper sterilization cited in 400 Va biopsy exams!

Disinfectant contamination

 

Intrinsic contamination possible Phenolic solutions Benzalkonium chloride Other “Quats” Extrinsic contamination frequent Most detergent/disinfectants Quats – especially Alcohol – bacillus spores

Environment – Non-critical

No contact with mucous membranes or non-intact skin

Contaminated with microbes: (fungi, bacteria, lipid viruses)

Examples: door knobs, surfaces, counters, shelves, bedpans, beds, rails, ekg leads, walls, bathrooms

Environmental Cleaning agents

(low level) Chemical Disinfectant Strength

    

Ethyl, Isopropyl alcohol 70-90% Chlorine bleach 1:500 (100 ppm) Phenolic (1:120/1:256) Mfr directions Iodophor “ “ “Quats” quaternary ammon.cpd

“ “ ~ Need disinfectant / detergent solution ~ Contact time a minimum of 1 minute * *Rutala W. 2005,6 Disinfection/Sterilization conference

When to check cleaning ?

(

Cluster of HAI patient infections

)

   

Patients in same room as previous case(s) Pathogen easily spread in environment (dry): MRSA, VRE, C.difficile

Check: ~ product - New product?

~ procedure - Change in procedure?

~ staff training - New Staff?

- Initial training - Competency ~ actual practice- Observe ~ population - Shift or increase

Examples

of

Improper / inadequate cleaning

Under-dilution disinfectant: -Too

concentrated

COMMON Outbreak pseudomonas – SICU

 

Over-dilution disinfectant = rare OCCASIONAL: Automated disinfectant dispensing equipment

Inadequate application/ contaminated sol.

FREQUENT: Spray bottles for application, quick spray, dry wipe, insufficient contact time. Bucket system, re=dipping used cloth in solution

Problems Pre- Cleaning instruments

Wrong product

Misunderstanding label or type product “wrong assumptions”

Failure to rinse organic matter promptly

Incorrect dilution (Over -, under -)

Inadequate soak time

Failure of disinfectant to reach all crevices

Storage Contamination

Packaging incorrect, inadequate, integrity compromised: penetrated by heat, moisture, dust

External shipping cartons contaminated remove before contents stored internally

Storage racks must have solid bottom shelf (potential for mop water contamination)

What to look for:

Show me (or tell me) How do you dilute X

?

?automatic, have demonstration ?manual? Need handy measuring devices How should the solution look ?

What color is the solution supposed to be?

How applied? When cloths / mops changed?

Device-associated infections

Automated reprocessors

Bronchoscopes

Depth electrodes

Electrosurgical units

Endoscopes

Laryngoscope blades

Transducers

Rectal/vaginal probes

Device assoc.infections cont’d

Electronic thermometers

EKG leads

Tonometers

Cardioplegic solution/ice machine

Surgical instruments

Powered instruments

BP Cuffs

Powered instrument Issues

Difficult to clean, penetration w/ organic matter likely

Mfrs directions re switch position key

Changing sterilization parameters ~ Contact Mfr. annually re changed recommendations esp. duration steriliz.

Endoscopes: The IC issues

Narrow lumen

Complex inside parts*

Easily damaged

Manual pre-cleaning essential

Frequent repairs necessary

Surface integrity essential

Special connectors to AER a MUST !

Endoscopes: issues cont’d

Mechanical failure

Faulty design

Poor manufacturing quality

Adverse effects of materials

Improper maintenance

User error

Compromised sterility

Endoscopes & Bronchoscopes

GI endoscopy infections

> 300 published cases - 70% Salmonella, Pseudomonas

- C.difficile

Scope: colonization

Bronchoscopy infections

- >90 published cases - M.tb, atypical mycobacterium, pseudomonas Spach et al; Ann Int. Med 1993: Weber D J Gastrointest Dis.2002

What’s wrong with ……………

Nurse cleaning GI endoscope in sink in Endo patient procedure room: Long cotton tipped swabs 1. Phisohex 2. povidone-Iodine 3. Septisol

  

Rinsed, blew powered air into it Dried it on a towel next to the sink Placed it in a large, long drawer

Assessing Endoscope Processing

“Show me….” Show me the steps in processing a scope

Look at everything. Ask, ask, ask, ask

Every solution & test strips need both date opened & expiration date

Check / Ask re every device, cleaning brushes etc. whether reusable or single use.

Review log & testing data, especially dates during regular staff’s vacations

Rinsing after HLD

Endoscopes:

Rinse immediately after patient use

After HLD soak, water flush, alcohol flush

Endoscope contamination

Inadequate channel cleaning

Lack of proper connectors for channels

Improper methods: (Time exposure, some channels non-perfused, over-diluted solution)

Failure to follow recommended disinfection

procedures Flaws in design of endoscopes & AER’s

Lack of proper training, competency , etc.

Disinfection of Endoscope

User: Rinse inside & outside immediately after use

Mechanically clean with water & enzyme

Must HLD/sterilize-immerse scopes, fill channels

Rinse (final) sterile, filtered or tap followed by alcohol

Dry with forced air

Store: hang to prevent pooling. (off floor)

NEVER store in original case!!

Findings that “prick’ up your “EPI-EARS

Unusual gram-negatives in Bronch washes (>2 same one) or duplicate other sites (Urines, surgical wounds, etc)

>1 atypical mycobacteria (same species) from same sites

Initial Steps to Investigate

#1: Notify lab to SAVE THE ISOLATES!

(give a time frame…several weeks, lab to discuss w/IC before discarding)

Check your usual incidence of_________

Check to see how many of X____ the facility has had in the past 1-2 years: Frequency Sites Source of culture (aspirated, surgical excision, etc)

#3 Investigation

Formulate an initial hypothesis: Key factor is whether the patients are clinically ill or pseudo-infection possible

Single vs Clusters SSI

Single SSI cases, different pathogens: frequently patient source, possible aseptic breach Clusters of single pathogen often common source: contaminated source or aseptic breach

Sterilization problems

Inadequate pre-cleaning

Improper sterilization parameters

Personnel not trained sufficiently to recognize seriousness of > parameter failure

Packaging inadequate

Inadequate sterilizer maintenance

Regulations do not assess the efficacy of a cleaning prcess

No easy or objective method to measure cleanliness of a internal parts of a device

Sterilization problems

Failure to meet parameters

Biological failure; next test ok

Biological failure; episodic, intermittent

Bowie Dick test uneven, not clear failure

Assessing sterilizing practice

~“Show me…..” (HIGHLY EFFECTIVE

METHOD)

~ Review graphs, charts & monitoring records ~ Check pre-sterilizing cleaning processes ~ Examine additives to washer/disinfectors

Instrument “milk” preparation, use, shelf life, etc ~

Sterilizer practice assessment cont’d ~ Assess sterilizer loading, drying, emptying ~ Assess proximity soiled instruments to clean ~ Check inst. cleaning tools (brushes, hoses, etc) ~ Clean & Dirty areas separated by walls/closed doors ~ Procedures readily available (tray/container loading, power instrument handling, etc) ~ Check packaging: appropriate for type sterilizer?

Maintenance issue

Sterilizer cleaning:

Check procedure, frequency

Responsibility?

Agent used ?

Documentation?

Preventive Maintenance Log

Look for repeated problems

Check the repairs listed

Repair person credentials

“Peel Pack Pitfalls”

Peel Pack standards:

Remove air; Seal must be intact

No marker ink on paper side (plastic ok)

Check loading of peel packs..

no plastic to plastic

Double peel packs: --Not required; but easier to open, present sterile --Never fold inner peel pack or edges

Other Packaging issues

Package too small for contents

Crowded instruments in a container

Failure to put indicator inside

Use of non-standard packaging (washcloth, paper bag, plastic baggies)

Use of non-standard seals (rubber bands, scotch tape, bandage tape, safety pins)

Preventing Infection in the OR

  

Know what is clean – Know what is sterile – Know what is contaminated…… AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET! (keep them all separated!*)

*Crow, S. Aseptic Practice