Transcript WIPO logo

LICENSING AND
FRANCHISING;
FUNDAMENTALS
Tamara Nanayakkara
Outline
Challenge to businesses – how to keep
growing in a slowing economy; Importance
of finding new ways of generating income
 Thinking of intellectual property as assets
 Licensing (and Franchising), strategic use
of these assets
 Negotiating

Economic Growth

Traditionally, economic winners were
those who had natural resources.
 Scarce=assumption
of finite growth.
Resources down or constant, population up.
But growth up!?
New Economy
Reason the “new economy”. Knowledge
making more effective use of resources 1950 knowledge component in
manufactured goods 20%, 1990s 70%
 Application of knowledge, key to
competitiveness

The IP System
Provides a legal means for protecting
creativity and knowledge; patents, TM,
copyrights, design rights etc provide the
creator the means to prevent others
from using his knowledge/creativity
 Ensures the continued production of
knowledge and its dissemination

IP Assets

By providing such protection the IP system
gives more than the right to prevent others
but in fact creates valuable tradable
(intangible) assets.
Licensing


Licensing is when an owner of such an
intangible asset, transfers the right to use that
asset to another, for a price, while retaining
ownership of that asset.
In practice, the owner of technology protected by
patents or trade secrets or both gives another
the right to use that technology to manufacture
given product(s)
Licensing of IPR
Licensing is only relevant where there is
an intellectual property right
 Territorial nature of IPR
 If the technology (or other kind of
expression of human creativity) is not
protected by an IPR, it is then not property
owned by someone and as such the issue
of licensing does not arise.

Why License

For the Licensor
 Simultaneous
use
by many
 Expand
manufacturing
 Earn revenue
 Access to markets
 Stick licensing
 Create standard
 Cross license

For the Licensee
 Stay
current in
evolving market
 No in-house R&D, yet
access to technologies
 Expand into new
product line
 Settle dispute
 Manufacture
standardized product
 Access to patent,
know-how, training
Why Not License

For the licensor
 Create
competitor
 Bad choice of licensee
could damage
reputation
 Lose control of
proprietary information
 Administrative cost
 Legal complications

For the Licensee
 Royalties
add cost
 Secrecy requirements
 Administrative burdens
- audits, reports etc
 May be obliged to
grant back
improvements
Negotiation
 you don’t get the deal you
deserve but you get the deal
you negotiate
Preparation - information
gathering
General information on the relevant
market
 Companies active in that market and their
products
 Existing technologies used by such
companies
 On going R&D about relevant technologies
 Prevalent licensing practices in the
relevant markets and products

Preparation - sources of
information




Publicly available information
of publicly traded companies.
Online and subscription
database services for the
relevant market or products
Trade publications, trade and
technology exhibitions, fairs
and shows
Technology licensing offices of
research based universities






Relevant government
departments
Professional and business
magazines, journals and
publications concerning the
relevant products and markets
Professional and business
associations
Technology exchanges,
Innovation centres
Patent information services
Preparation - Patent
Information
Patent information is the collection of
patent documents consisting of patent
applications and grants worldwide.
 For technologies that are patented it is the
most useful yet the least utilized

 it
is the most recent, gives the legal status,
information on technological activity (possible
alternatives) and those involved in such
technological activity
Preparation
Analyze your strengths and
weaknesses
 Identify your team

 leader
supported by financial, legal and
technical people

Prepare summary of key issues
 (Heads
of Agreement, Term Sheet)
The Agreement – who, what
Parties - who will be bound by it
 Subject matter - what exactly is being
licensed

The Agreement - Extent
Exclusive, non exclusive or sole (licensor
and licensee can operate in the territory)
 Sub licenses – must be expressly granted
 Field of use – technology divided
 Scope - make, use or sell, offer for sale,
import
 Territory
 Improvements

The Agreement - Financial
Lump sum - payable on the happening of
a particular event
 Royalties - recurring payments tied to the
use of the technology, commonly based on
sales. Could go down as production goes
up (fixed price per unit or % of sales)
 Annual minimum royalty - usually where
the license is exclusive and the licensor
needs to ensure a regular income.

The Agreement -Other

Best efforts

Usually with an exclusive license. An
ambiguous obligation. Better to specify
particular actions, such as an obligation by
the licensee to spend agreed amounts on
research or marketing or other activities
tailored to increase the likelihood of success.
The Agreement

Infringement
 A third
party may be using the technology with
no license. Essentially harms the
competitiveness of the legitimate licensee. A
non exclusive licensee may get no assistance
from the licensor. An exclusive licensee may
bring suit on its own and join licensor. If the
licensor fails to assist exclusive licensee could
suspend paying royalties.
The Agreement
Product liability insurance
 Dispute settlement - Increasingly parties
opt for alternative dispute resolution
procedures, such as arbitration and
mediation, or mediation followed by
arbitration.
 Termination - either on the happening of
an event such as the expiry of the patent
or on termination by one of the parties

The Agreement

Clauses to pay attention to - grant back
provisions (obliging licensee to give
improvements to licensor), post
termination use of know how, price and
volume fixation by the licensor, tie in
clauses (obliging licensee to take other
technology that he does not need)
Nothing
is cast in stone
Everything
is negotiable
Golden Rule
Aim
for win-win outcome
Trade Mark License



A license giving the right to manufacture a particular
product using the licensors technology may also include
an agreement to use the licensors trademark. It may
also be only a trademark license agreement
In either case in addition to the general clauses above
there may be clauses particularly relevant to trademark
license agreements
Particularly quality control – products must meet the
quality standards set by the licensee, submit samples of
products, labels, packaging etc for checking
Franchise


A specialized license where the franchisee is
allowed by the franchisor in return for a fee to
use a particular business model and is licensed
a bundle of IP rights (TM, service marks,
patents, trade secrets, copyrighted works…) and
supported by training, technical support and
mentoring
All franchisees are licensees but not all
licensees are franchisees

Both the franchisor and the franchisee
share the overall aims and goals of the
franchise and work for their mutual benefit



The franchisor maintains and updates the manuals,
procedures and practices of the business model and
trains and assists the franchisee in its use and
implementation
The franchisee maintains and promote the franchise and
conducts the business as prescribed in the manuals and
guidelines, including protecting the IP of the franchise
system, and to operate in accordance with territorial or
geographical obligations agreed
The franchisee has the obligation to pay the agreed fees.
Why enter into a Franchise


Self employed
Lower risk of failure





Recognisable image
On going support
Easier to obtain financing
Benefit from franchisors R&D
Ready made customer base
Why not enter into a
Franchise
 All IPR owned by the
Franchisor
 Payment of fees
 Obliged to follow the
business model
 Innovations may be
assigned back to the
Franchisor
 Depend on the success
of the Franchisor
Summary



To survive and flourish in the global business
environment where competition is acute and
product cycles are short, business have to find
new ways of being competitive.
Identifying IP assets and strategically using and
leveraging them is crucial in this environment.
Licensing is an efficient way of maximizing IP
assets