Transcript Διαφάνεια 1
COURSE: GLOBAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
MGT610
DR. DIMITRIS STAVROULAKIS
PROFESSOR OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
DEPT OF ACCOUNTING
TEI OF PIRAEUS
Unit 2: Globalization of business
Training Material: Textbook (3-15 & 39-48).
World largest companies in 2009
(http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500
/2009/
1- Wal-Mart Stores
2- Exxon Mobil
3- Royal Dutch Shell
4- BP
5- Toyota Motor
6- Chevron
7- ING Group
8- Total
9- General Motors
10-ConocoPhillips
Nationalities of World’s
Largest Companies (2008).
1. U.S. - 153
2. Japan - 64
3. France - 39
4. Germany - 37
5. Britain - 34
6. China - 29
7. South Korea -15
8. Canada - 14
8. Switzerland - 14
10. Netherlands - 13
11. Spain - 11
12. Italy - 10
13. Australia - 8
14. India - 7
15. Sweden - 6
15. Taiwan - 6
17. Mexico - 5
Source: Forbes
.
.
4
GREECE
DATA
GREECE
o Number of days to establish a foreign
business: 22
o Number of procedures: 18
RANKING
o Global Competitive Index: 83/139
o Ease of doing business: 100/183
o Ease of starting a business: 135/183
o Protecting investors: 155/183
o Getting electricity: 77/183
o Getting credit: 78/183
o Registering property: 150/183
o Trading across borders: 84/183
o Enforcing contracts: 90/183
o Construction permits: 41/183
o Resolving insolvency: 57/183
Ease of doing business (ranking)
Drivers for globalization of business
Economic development & technical innovations
Facilitation of cross-border trade & capital
transfer
Development of services that support
international business (transports,
communications)
Consumer demands
Intensified competition of companies at the
international level
Drivers for globalization of business (cont)
Lower or no tariffs within commercial zones (EU,
NAFTA, ASEAN)
Intercultural understanding through common
language (e.g. Spain-Mexico-Argentina, PortugalBrazil)
Shortening product cycles
Factors deterring business from going global
Strong local culture & traditions
Local religions
Political instability
Trade barriers
National trade union mentality &
practices
Positive side of MNCs
Promote economic growth
Provide lower-priced, higher-quality
goods to consumers
Bring funds & capital
Transfer technology, including
organizational, management and
marketing skills
Pay higher wages (increase productivity)
Introduce competition to domestic firms
Offer job openings
Negative Side of MNCs
Poor citizens of host countries
A permissive attitude on the part of the host may generate
exploitation of workers & destruction of the environment
Foreign superpowers may destroy local business
i.e. soft drinks, Coke and Pepsi versus small local
manufacturers
There are concerns among small shopkeepers when Wal-Mart
comes to town
In many European cities under 100,000 local authorities
forbid the installation of big commercial centers
Market power
After local firms are driven out, MNCs can exert market
pressure and increase prices
MNCs can easily create oligopolies and barriers to entry
When confronted with new regulations or trade union activity
they can easily move away (or threaten to). Greece: Pirelli,
Goodyear, Triumph, Levis, Palco-Schiesser etc.
Negative Side of MNCs (cont):
=Balance of payments
-Initially positive, then negative (import of raw materials &
resources, repatriation of profits)
=Tax avoidance
=Involvement in local politics
-Stiglitz provides examples of U.S. government pressuring
governments (Indonesia) to provide privileges to MNCs
-Puppet governments formed through the power of
multinationals (bananaland) - e.g. United Fruit in Guatemala &
Chile
-Greece under pressure to purchase armament
-World Bank pressuring Pakistani government to buy high
priced power from MNC
=MNC established with privilege (preference to state supplies,
cheaper energy & resources than local competitors)
What should go right and what can go wrong in MNC-host
country relationships
16
MNC Stakeholders
Go International or Stay Domestic?
Critical Questions.
Availability of international demand for company’s products?
Can products be modified to suit foreign market?
Is foreign market business climate receptive to imports?
Does the company have necessary skills, knowledge, capacity,
financial, and other resources to do business abroad?
Do benefits outweigh costs ?
Theoretical benefits of global expansion may prove
extremely difficulty to reap in practice.
Going global is not necessarily good for business.
Not going global is not necessarily bad for business
Internationalization motives
INTERNAL
EXTERNAL
PROACTIVE/
AGGRESSIVE
(PUSH
FACTORS)
PROFIT AND GROWTH
GOALS
MANAGERIAL EXCELLENCE
MARKETING ADVANTAGE
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
UNIQUE PRODUCT /
TECHNOLOGY
KNOW-HOW & COMPETENCE
FOREING MARKET
OPPORTUNITIES /
MARKET INFORMATION
ACCESS TO R&D, KNOWLEDGE
CLUSTERS
REACTIVE/
DEFENSIVE
(PULL
FACTORS)
RISK REDUCTION THROUGH
DIVERSIFICATION
EXTEND SALES OF
SEASONAL PRODUCTS
EXCESS CAPACITY/
OVERPRODUCTION
UNEXPECTED FOREIGN
ORDERS
DOMESTIC MARKET:
SMALL AND SATURATED
COMPETITIVE PRESSURES
EXISTING RELATIONSHIP WITH
INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMERS
(E.G. SUBCONTRACTORS OF APPLE)
Motives for International Expansion
Market Share
Domestic market may lack the size to support
efficient scale manufacturing facilities
Return upon Investment
Large investment projects require expansion to
global markets to compensate costs
Weak patent protection in many countries
renders rapid overseas expansion necessary in
order to preempt imitators
Exploitation of company capabilities
Knowledge + R&D
20
Motives for International Expansion (cont)
Economies of Scale
Expanding size or scope of markets helps to
achieve economies of scale in manufacturing,
marketing & distribution
Costs are spread over a larger sales base
Profit per unit is increased
Location Advantages
Low-cost markets aid in developing competitive
advantage
Easier access is achieved with regard to:
• Raw materials • Key customers
• Lower cost labor • Energy
21
23
Definitions of MNCs
OECD: “An enterprise that engages in foreign direct investments
(FDIs) and owns or controls value-adding activities in more than
one country”
United Nations (1973): An enterprise “which controls assets,
factories, mines, sales offices, and the like in two or more
countries”.
United Nations (1984): An enterprise:
comprising entities in two or more countries, regardless of the
legal form and fields of activity in these entities
which operates under a system of decision making permitting
coherent policies and a common strategy through one or more
decision-making centers
in which the entities are so linked, by ownership or otherwise,
that one or more of them may be able to exercise a significant
influence over the activities of the other, in particular to share
knowledge, resources, and responsibilities.
Definitions of MNC * (cont)
Bartlett & Ghoshal: Two preconditions:
1. Substantial FDI
2. Active, coordinated management
“What really differentiates MNC from ordinary
business, is that it creates an internal organization to
carry out key cross-border tasks and transactions
internally rather than depending on trade through
the external markets” (p. 10)*.
According to Bartlett & Ghoshal, most companies
involved in activities abroad should not be
considered MNCs, since they are not managing their
subsidiaries actively or in a coordinative manner.
Definitions of MNC * (cont)
Any internationally active company must fulfill
3 important strategic goals:
GLOBAL EFFICIENCY in existing activities
INTERNATIONAL FLEXIBILITY and LOCAL
RESPONSIVENESS (appropriate management
of risks and opportunities) THINK GLOBAL,
ACT LOCAL
WORLD-WIDE LEARNING through its
exposure to local contexts