Transcript Les nouvelles techniques de radiologie interventionnelle
QuickTime™ et un décompresseur codec YUV420 sont requis pour visionner cette image.
Drug Eluting Beads for TACE
T de Baere Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
• Clinical results of Drug eluting beads - Rational - HCC - NET
(neuroendocrine tumors)
or GEP
(gastroanteropancreatic endocrine tumors) -
Colrectal cancer metastases
Rational
100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0
Carboplatin IV IAH Liver IAH+embolization Tumor
(Pohlen, U et al. J Surg Res 2000; 92 : 165-70)
R art Q CL A (1 - E r )
• • •
High clearance (CL) High extraction ratio (Er)
Er at first pass Keep it longer in the liver
Low blood flow (Qa)
Embolization 101 81
R art
61 41 21 1 24 18
Q A (L/h)
12 6 0.9
0.5
E r
0.1
0.45
Rational
Doxorubicin Pharmacokinetics
Pharmakokinetic in animal
450 400
Doxorubicin in tumor
0.40
0.35
Doxorubicin in plasma
350 300 250
IA free doxorubicin IA DEB doxorubicin IA free doxorubicin IA DEB doxorubicin
0.30
0.25
0.20
IA Control DEB 200 150 100 IA Control DEB 0.15
50 0 0.10
200 300 400 0.05
0 100
Courtesy of J Geschwind
0.00
0 1
Courtesy of J Geschwind
2
Time (hrs)
3 4
Time (hrs)
Rational
Doxorubicin Pharmacokinetics
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
Doxorubicin in plasma
0.00
0 1
Courtesy of J Geschwind IA free doxorubicin IA DEB doxorubicin
2
Time (hrs)
3 4 IA Control DEB 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 100
Courtesy of J Geschwind Doxorubicin in tumor IA free doxorubicin IA DEB doxorubicin
200
Time (hrs)
300 400
Pharmakokinetic in human
IA Control DEB
Preliminary clinical results
Difficulties in evaluating Preliminary clinical results
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 64% DEB** Response rate
** Varela M, Llovet J, Bruix J, J Hepatol 2007
Difficulties in evaluating Preliminary clinical results
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 35-37% 20% 44% Conventional TACE * DEB** RECIST EASL
* Lo C, Hepatology 2002 & Llovet JM, Lancet 2002 ** Varela M, Llovet J, Bruix J, J Hepatol 2007
Difficulties in evaluating Preliminary clinical results
RECIST
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Partial Response Stable Disease Progressive Disease 3 months 6 months
71 patients HCC (3-10cm) Child A (27), Child B (44) EASL (intention to treat) CR : 15.5% OR : 66.2% to 85.5% across the 4 treatments
(Malagari K, Abdominal imaging 2007)
71 patients HCC (3-10cm) Child A (27), Child B (44) EASL (intention to treat) CR : 15.5% OR : 66.2% to 85.5% across the 4 treatments
Best Overall response : 53/71 = 74%
(Malagari K, Abdominal imaging 2007)
71 patients HCC (3-10cm) Child A (27), Child B (44) EASL (intention to treat) CR : 15.5% OR : 66.2% to 85.5% across the 4 treatments Survival 97.5% @ 12 months 91.1% @ 18 months 88.2% @ 30 months
(Malagari K, Abdominal imaging 2007)
4ml of 300-500 m DEB
+
100 mg doxorubicin • Neuroendocrine liver metastases • • • • • Morphologic RECIST @ 1 months
Partial response Minor response Stable disease Progressive disease
8/20 (40%) 2/20 (10%) 5/20 (25%) 1/20 (5%)
4ml of 300-500 m DEB
+
100 mg doxorubicin • Neuroendocrine liver metastases • • • • • Morphologic RECIST @ 1 months - 3 months
Partial response Minor response Stable disease Progressive disease
8/20 (40%) 2/20 (10%) 5/20 (25%) 1/20 (5%) 16/20 (80%) 2/20 (10%) 1/20 (5%) 1/20 (5%)
DEB preliminary results
4ml of 300-500 m DEB
+
100 mg doxorubicin • Neuroendocrine liver metastases • Morphologic RECIST @ 1 months - 3 months • • •
Partial response Minor response Stable disease
8/20 (40%) 2/20 (10%) 5/20 (25%) 16/20 (80%) 2/20 (10%) 1/20 (5%) •
Progressive disease
1/20 (5%) 1/20 (5%) 20% peripheral liver necrosis associate with more post-procedural pain
(In press, JVIR)
DEB preliminary results
4ml of 300-500 m DEB
+
100 mg doxorubicin • Neuroendocrine liver metastases • Morphologic RECIST @ 1 months - 3 months • • •
Partial response Minor response Stable disease
8/20 (40%) 2/20 (10%) 5/20 (25%) 16/20 (80%) 2/20 (10%) 1/20 (5%) •
Progressive disease
1/20 (5%) 1/20 (5%) Lipiodol TACE PR: 41% MR: 33% SD: 15%
(A Roche & T de Baere; Europ Radiol 2003)
Irinotecan DEB Proof-of-Concept Study: Design Evaluation of TACE in a rat liver metastasis model Model: Diffuse liver metastasis is induced by injecting 4x10 6 CC531-lac-Z rat colorectal carcinoma cells into the portal vein of male Wag/Rij rats Objectives: Compare embolization only to Irinotecan (low and high dose) Doses chosen: 20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg Irinotecan Determine the effectiveness in terms reduction in tumor cell load liver weight
Irinotecan DEB Proof-of-Concept Study: Preliminary Data • Preliminary results presented at AACR (Washington, April 06) 140 Tumour cell number Liver weight 120 100 80 p=0.05
p=0.07
60 40 20 0 DC Bead No Drug
Chemoemebolization of rat colorectal liver metastases with drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan or doxorubicin. Clin Exp Metastasi 2008. Eyol E et al
DC beads and colorectal metastases
62 patients with CRC metastases At least 2 previous lines of chemotherapy Tumor burden < 70% Bilirubin w X2 normal value 138 courses of TACE with Irinotecan-DEB 2ml DEB 100-300 & 2ml 300-500 / 200 mg irinotecan 1-3 courses TACE every 3/4 weeks 55 right, 47 left, 39 right+left 48 X 2ml & 90 X 4ml
(Aliberti C, Fiorentini G, Cancer Research 2006) (Aliberti C, Fiorentini G, CIRSE 2008)
DC beads and colorectal metastases
62 patients with CRC metastases Med Follow-up = 15.4 months Response EASL = 85% RECIST = 78% @ 3 months Improvement of QOL = 90% during 3-12 months (med= 6.5) Survival Median survival not reached at 22 months Median free of symptioms 5.3 months Median to new chemo 6.3 months
(Aliberti C, Fiorentini G, Cancer Research 2006) (Aliberti C, Fiorentini G, CIRSE 2008)
Combined treatment
Angiogram Post RF of colorectal mets CT immediately post DEB injection CT at 6 weeks (R Lencioni, J Hepatology 2008)
DEB future
Randomization DEB / Conventional Precision V in Europe (completed) MRI at 3m and 6m Efficacy (treatment response). European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) SURVIVAL ?
Colo-rectal cancer Hudge population, numerous drugs in 1st to 3rd lines
Drug Eluting Beads
Reproducibility > Lipiodol
Low systemic level drug
Increase in efficacy
Decrease toxicity
Encouraging preliminary results
combination with so called targeted therapy ?
sorafenib, sunitinib, …