Transcript Slide 1
ARLISS Presentation
September 18, 2009
Bruno’s Country Club
Holo Mua, “Moving Forward”
Premo Ames II – Electronics & Project Manager
Joleen Iwaniec – Programmer
Todd Esposito – Airframe Development
Makana Ciotti – Airframe Construction
“Holo Mua”
Moving Forward
The Continuing Efforts at
Windward Community College
Sponsors
Hawaii Space Grant Consortium
AeroPac
Center for Aerospace Education
ARLISS
A
R ocket
L aunch for
I nternational
S tudent
S atellites
Simulated Satellite
recording data
simultaneously
navigating it self to a
predetermined
location on earth
autonomously.
SUAV
Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Advantages vs. Ground Traverse Vehicle
Higher return velocity
Requires less power
Has a better chance against a headwind
Obstacles to be overcome
Autonomous flight control
Navigation in 3D vs. 2D
The intricacies of aerodynamics
HALO (High Altitude Low Opening)
Descent Phases
Rapid Descent Phase
Take initial heading
Begin steering toward the target
Release parasail at 1100 ft.
Parasail Descent Phase
Continue steering towards target via parasail
Descent Phases
2008 ARLISS Results
1st launch – Failure
Module failed to eject from carrier
2nd launch – Failure
Module failed to eject from carrier
Cause of Failure
Module built to previous carrier
specifications.
Carrier unable to seal properly
HCX Flight computer confused at apogee
event sending carrier back into rocket
New Direction
New Air Frame Design
Built to current carrier specifications
25% volume increase for electronics
Parafoil chamber volume increase
Improved Electronics
Isolated electronic systems
Easier programing
2009 Air Frame Design
2009 Air Frame
Proto Design Testing
Mock
Prototype
design used for
testing flight
characteristics.
Larger scale
model under
construction for
future testing
2009 Module
Electronic Systems
Navigation and Steering
Parallax Propeller Micro Controller
Parallax GPS Module
Parallax Servo Motor
Utilized Spin program
Electronic Systems
Data Collection Unit 1 (PB2)
Parallax BS2P Micro Controller
Parallax DS1620 Temperature Sensor
Parallax GPS Module
Parallax EEPROM
Electronic Systems
G-Wiz HCX Flight Computer
Parasail Release
Data Collection
Acceleration
Altitude
Pressure
Speed
GPS Navigation
Orientation relative to the target
determined via GPS signal
uses the angle of the craft’s position
relative to the target to determine
whether to turn or not
• greater than a certain degree – right turn
• Less than a certain degree – left turn
2009 ARLISS Results
1st launch – Successful Deployment
0.6 miles from target
2nd launch – Successful Deployment
2.0 miles from target
1st Launch Details
Low Risk Flight
High winds non-existent
Module deployment with parasail deployed
upon exit from carrier
GPS data from PB2 (passenger board – data
collection) corrupt. **possible cause – weak
GPS signal**
Navigation appears to be working – module
found heading towards target, while rocket
parts found further away.
2nd Launch Details
Low Risk Flight
High winds non-existent
Module deployment with parasail deployed
upon exit from carrier
Moved GPS sensor for PB2 out of module for
increased GPS sensitivity
Module parasail shroud lines found tangled –
module could not steer
2nd Launch Data
Event ID
Valid
Date
Time:UTC
Target
# Sats.
Latitude
Longitude
Celcius
Fahrenheit
Meters
Feet
40.840944 -119.143972
502
1 09/18/09
00:49:09
5 40 50.325
-119 6.7654
49.5
121.1
3995.4
13108.27
503
1 09/18/09
00:49:14
6 40 50.311
-119 6.7607
49.5
121.1
3977.1
13048.23
504
1 09/18/09
00:49:19
6 40 50.353
-119 6.7557
49.5
121.1
3942.4
12934.38
505
1 09/18/09
00:49:24
6 40 50.343
-119 6.7500
49.5
121.1
3906.8
12817.59
506
1 09/18/09
00:49:29
6 40 50.248
-119 6.7444
49.5
121.1
3855.9
12650.59
507
1 09/18/09
00:49:34
6 40 50.172
-119 6.7398
49.5
121.1
3778.4
12396.33
508
1 09/18/09
00:49:39
8 40 50.42
-119 6.7370
49.5
121.1
3700.2
12139.76
509
1 09/18/09
00:49:44
8 40 49.9952 -119 6.7323
49.5
121.1
3635.7
11928.15
510
1 09/18/09
00:49:49
8 40 49.9847 -119 6.7285
49.5
121.1
3574.1
11726.05
511
1 09/18/09
00:49:54
8 40 49.9725 -119 6.7215
49.5
121.1
3512.8
11524.93
512
1 09/18/09
00:49:59
8 40 49.9591 -119 6.7147
49.5
121.1
3450.4
11320.21
Acknowledgements
Dr. Luke Flynn, HSGC
Dr. Ed Scott, HSGC
Marcia Sistoso, HSGC
Dr. Joseph Ciotti, Professor, WCC Astronomy
Dr. Jacob Hudson, Professor, WCC Physics
Professor Robert Twiggs, Stanford University
Jim and Becky Green, AreoPac