Transcript Document

Project Manager’s Report
David Britton 31/Jan/2005
D. Britton
Outline
1. Project Maps
2. Resources
3. Quarterly Reports
4. Tier-1 Hardware
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
GridPP1 Final ProjectMap
Update
GridPP Goal
Clear
To develop and deploy a large scale science Grid
in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community
1
CERN
2
DataGrid
3
Applications
In Summary:
LCG Creation
1. 1
1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 1.1.4
1.1.5
WP1
2. 1
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4
2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8
2.1.9
WP2
2. 2
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4
2.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7
4
Infrastructure
5
Interoperability
6
Dissemination
ATLAS
3. 1
3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4
3.1.5 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8
3.1.9 3.1.10
ATLAS/LHCb
3. 2
3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4
3.2.5 3.2.6 3.2.7 3.2.8
3.2.9
LHCb
3. 3
3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4
3.3.5 3.3.6
Tier-A
4. 1
4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4
4.1.5 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8
4.1.9
Tier-1
4. 2
4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4
4.2.5 4.2.6 4.2.7
Int. Standards
5. 1
5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3
Tier-2
4. 3
4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4
4.3.5
5. 3
5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3
CMS
3. 4
3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4
3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8
3.4.10
BaBar
3. 5
3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4
3.5.6 3.5.7
Testbed
4. 4
4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4
4.4.5 4.4.6
UK Integration
5. 4
5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4
5.4.5
CDF/DO
3. 6
3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4
3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8
3.6.103.6.113.6.12
UKQCD
3. 7
3.7.2 3.7.3 3.7.4
3.7.6
Data Challenges
4. 6
4.6.1 4.6.2 4.6.3
7
Resources
Presentation
6. 1
6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4
6.1.5
Deployment
7. 1
7.1.1 7.1.2 7.1.3 7.1.4
All the GridPP1 milestones due by 30/Sep/04 have been
successfully completed (88% of the milestones defined
in the ProjectMap). Of the remainder, 9 have been
deactivated during the project; 14 have been
incorporated into the GridPP2 planning; and 3 Tasks are
due soon . All 44 of the monitoring metrics were
satisfied at the end of the project.
Applications
1. 2
1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4
1.2.5 1.2.6 1.2.7 1.2.8
1.2.9 1.2.10
Fabric
1. 3
1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4
1.3.5 1.3.6 1.3.7 1.3.8
1.3.9 1.3.101.3.11
Technology
1. 4
1.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4
1.4.5 1.4.6 1.4.7 1.4.8
1.4.9
Deployment
1. 5
1.5.1 1.5.2 1.5.3 1.5.4
1.5.5 1.5.6 1.5.7 1.5.8
1.5.9 1.5.10
Metric
OK
44
Metric
not OK
0
31/Jan/2005
WP3
2. 3
2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4
2.3.5 2.3.6 2.3.7
WP4
2. 4
2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4
2.4.5 2.4.6 2.4.7
WP5
2. 5
2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4
2.5.5 2.5.6 2.5.7
WP6
2. 6
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4
2.6.5 2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8
2.6.9
WP7
2. 7
2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4
2.7.5 2.7.6 2.7.7 2.7.8
Tasks
Complete
168
WP8
2. 8
2.8.1 2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4
2.8.5
3.4.1
3.4.5
3.4.9
3.5.1
3.5.5
3.6.1
3.6.5
3.6.9
3.7.1
3.7.5
Tasks
Overdue
0
Other
3. 8
3.8.1 3.8.2 3.8.3
Open Source
5. 2
5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3
Worldwide Integration
Participation
6. 2
6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3
Monitoring
7. 2
7.2.1 7.2.2 7.2.3
Engagement
6. 3
6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4
Developing
7. 3
7.3.1 7.3.2 7.3.3 7.3.4
Status Date
Metric OK
Metric not OK
Task complete
Task overdue
Due within 122 days
Task not due soon
Not Active
No Task or metric
Rollout
4. 5
4.5.1 4.5.2 4.5.3 4.5.4
Tasks due in
next 90 days
3
Project Manager’s Report
30-Sep-04
Tasks
deactivated
20
Navigate up
Navigate down
External link
Link to goals
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
Change Forms
Enacted
7
D. Britton
GridPP2 ProjectMap
GridPP2 Goal
To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community
K
0.
Tier-A
H
Tier-1
H
1
LCG
K
Tier-2
1. 1
I
K
Applications
K
1. 2
1. 3
I
K
1. 4
2.1
I
I
I
2.2
K
2.3
K
Grid Deployment
2.4
I
K
2.5
I
K
2.6
Network
31/Jan/2005
I
K
3.2
3.3
I
K
3.4
I
K
3.5
4.1
K
4.2
I
K
4.3
K
3.6
Grid Operations
H
5
Management
K
I
5.1
6
External
K
Planning
I
K
I
5.2
I
K
4.4
6.1
K
Deployment
I
6.2
6.3
I
Engagement
I
K
6.4
Knowledge
Transfer
I
Navigate down
External link
Link to goals
LHC Deployment
Project Manager’s Report
I
Interoperability
K
UKQCD
I
I
Dissemination
Portal
PhenoGrid
I
I
SAMGrid
CMS
I
H
BaBar
LHCb
Information
& Monitoring
K
3.1
Experiment Support
4
Non-LHC Apps
Ganga
Security
K
H
ATLAS
Workload
Management
K
Middleware Support
3
LHC Apps
Data & Storage
Management
Grid Technology
K
H
Metadata
Computing Fabric
K
Deployment
2
M/S/N
I
Production Grid
D. Britton
K
I
H
I
GridPP2 ProjectMap
GridPP2 Goal: To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community
J
0.1
0.18
0.35
0.52
H
Production Grid Milestones
0.2
0.19
0.36
0.53
0.3
0.20
0.37
0.54
0.4
0.21
0.38
0.55
0.5
0.22
0.39
0.56
I
1. 1
I
1. 2
Computing Fabric
K
I
1. 3
Grid Technology
K
I
1. 4
Grid Deployment
0.9
0.26
0.43
0.10
0.27
0.44
0.11
0.28
0.45
J
Metadata
2.1
J
K
I
H
Storage
2.2
K
K
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5
2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10
2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15
J
Workload
2.3
K
2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5
2.3.6 2.3.7 2.3.8 2.3.9 2.3.10
2.3.11
J
Security
2.4
K
2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5
2.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.10
2.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.15
InfoMon
2.5
K
2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.5
2.5.6 2.5.7 2.5.8 2.5.9 2.5.10
2.5.11
J
Network
2.6
K
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5
2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8 2.6.9 2.6.10
2.6.11 2.6.12 2.6.13
31/Jan/2005
0.12
0.29
0.46
H
2
M/S/N
J
Navigate down
External link
Other Link
0.8
0.25
0.42
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5
2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10
2.1.11 2.1.12
Applications
K
0.7
0.24
0.41
H
1
LCG
K
0.6
0.23
0.40
0.57
K
Production Grid Metrics
0.13
0.30
0.47
0.14
0.31
0.48
0.15
0.32
0.49
0.16
0.33
0.50
0.17
0.34
0.51
H
3
LHC Apps
J
ATLAS
3.1
K
3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5
3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.10
3.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13
J
GANGA
3.2
K
3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5
3.2.6 3.2.7
J
LHCb
3.3
K
3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5
3.3.6 3.3.7 3.3.8 3.3.9 3.3.10
3.3.11 3.3.12 3.3.13
J
CMS
3.4
K
3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5
3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.10
3.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.15
J
PhenoGrid
3.5
0.100
0.117
0.134
0.151
0.101
0.118
0.135
0.152
0.102
0.119
0.136
0.153
0.103
0.120
0.137
0.154
J
BaBar
4.1
K
4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.10
4.1.11 4.1.12 4.1.13 4.1.14
J
SamGrid
4.2
K
4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5
4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.10
4.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14
J
Portal
4.3
0.105 0.106 0.107 0.108 0.109 0.110 0.111 0.112 0.113 0.114 0.115 0.116
0.122 0.123 0.124 0.125 0.126 0.127 0.128 0.129 0.130 0.131 0.132 0.133
0.139 0.140 0.141 0.142 0.143 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.147 0.148 0.149 0.150
0.156
H
4
Non-LHC Apps
H
5
Management
J
6
External
Project Planning
5.1
K
5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.1.5
5.1.6 5.1.7 5.1.8 5.1.9 5.1.10
5.1.11 5.1.12
J
Dissemination
6.1
J
K
6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5
6.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.9
Project Execution
5.2
K
J
5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5
5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.10
5.2.11 5.2.12 5.2.13 5.2.14 5.2.15
Interoperability
6.2
K
6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5
6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 6.2.9 6.2.10
6.2.11 6.2.12 6.2.13
K
J
Engagement
6.3
K
4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5
4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.10
4.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13
6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5
UKQCD
4.4
Knowledge Transfer
J
6.4
K
J
K
4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5
4.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9
K
3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.5.5
3.5.6 3.5.7 3.5.8 3.5.9
J
0.104
0.121
0.138
0.155
LHC Deployment
3.6
K
3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.6.5
3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 3.6.9 3.6.10
Project Manager’s Report
6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4
Status Date -
30/Sep/04
Monitor OK
Monitor not OK
Milestone complete
Milestone overdue
Milestone due soon
Milestone not due soon
Item not Active
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
D. Britton
+ next
60
Days
Update
Clear
Production Grid
Functionality:
- Services (CPU, Disk, Tape, Core Services, Operations, Networking,
Deployment, Experiment Support, Middleware Support, Grid Support,
Scheduling, Monitoring, Security, etc)
- Features (Usability, compatibility, interoperability, etc)
Scale:
- Amount of Disk, CPU, Tape, Bandwidth, etc.
- Number of Tier-2’s
- Number of users, VO’s supported, etc.
Robustness:
- Successful participation in Service Challenges and Model tests.
- Reliability (job throughput; uptime; response-times)
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
GridPP2 ProjectMap
GridPP2 Goal: To develop and deploy a large scale production quality grid in the UK for the use of the Particle Physics community
J
0.1
0.18
0.35
0.52
H
Production Grid Milestones
0.2
0.19
0.36
0.53
0.3
0.20
0.37
0.54
0.4
0.21
0.38
0.55
0.5
0.22
0.39
0.56
I
1. 2
I
1. 3
Grid Technology
K
I
1. 4
Grid Deployment
0.10
0.27
0.44
0.11
0.28
0.45
Metadata
2.1
0.12
0.29
0.46
H
2
M/S/N
J
J
K
K
I
H
Storage
2.2
K
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 2.2.5
2.2.6 2.2.7 2.2.8 2.2.9 2.2.10
2.2.11 2.2.12 2.2.13 2.2.14 2.2.15
J
Workload
2.3
K
2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5
2.3.6 2.3.7 2.3.8 2.3.9 2.3.10
2.3.11
J
Security
2.4
K
2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5
2.4.6 2.4.7 2.4.8 2.4.9 2.4.10
2.4.11 2.4.12 2.4.13 2.4.14 2.4.15
J
Navigate down
External link
Other Link
0.9
0.26
0.43
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5
2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.1.9 2.1.10
2.1.11 2.1.12
Computing Fabric
K
0.8
0.25
0.42
K
Production Grid Metrics
0.13
0.30
0.47
0.14
0.31
0.48
0.15
0.32
0.49
0.16
0.33
0.50
0.17
0.34
0.51
H
3
LHC Apps
ATLAS
3.1
0.100
0.117
0.134
0.151
0.101
0.118
0.135
0.152
0.102
0.119
0.136
0.153
0.103
0.120
0.137
0.154
0.104
0.121
0.138
0.155
H
4
Non-LHC Apps
BaBar
4.1
0.105 0.106 0.107 0.108 0.109 0.110 0.111 0.112 0.113 0.114 0.115 0.116
0.122 0.123 0.124 0.125 0.126 0.127 0.128 0.129 0.130 0.131 0.132 0.133
0.139 0.140 0.141 0.142 0.143 0.144 0.145 0.146 0.147 0.148 0.149 0.150
0.156
H
5
Management
6
External
Project Planning
5.1
K
Dissemination
6.1
253 Milestones, 112 Monitoring Metrics at present.
Work to be done:
LCG area to be defined.
Production Grid details refined.
Some metrics are not yet finalised.
Specific risks and dependencies to be included.
I
1. 1
Applications
K
0.7
0.24
0.41
H
1
LCG
K
0.6
0.23
0.40
0.57
InfoMon
2.5
K
2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.5
2.5.6 2.5.7 2.5.8 2.5.9 2.5.10
2.5.11
J
Network
2.6
K
2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 2.6.5
2.6.6 2.6.7 2.6.8 2.6.9 2.6.10
2.6.11 2.6.12 2.6.13
31/Jan/2005
J
K
3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.1.5
3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 3.1.9 3.1.10
3.1.11 3.1.12 3.1.13
J
GANGA
3.2
K
3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.2.5
3.2.6 3.2.7
J
LHCb
3.3
K
3.3.1 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5
3.3.6 3.3.7 3.3.8 3.3.9 3.3.10
3.3.11 3.3.12 3.3.13
J
CMS
3.4
K
3.4.1 3.4.2 3.4.3 3.4.4 3.4.5
3.4.6 3.4.7 3.4.8 3.4.9 3.4.10
3.4.11 3.4.12 3.4.13 3.4.14 3.4.15
J
PhenoGrid
3.5
J
4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5
4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 4.1.9 4.1.10
4.1.11 4.1.12 4.1.13 4.1.14
J
SamGrid
4.2
K
4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5
4.2.6 4.2.7 4.2.8 4.2.9 4.2.10
4.2.11 4.2.12 4.2.13 4.2.14
J
Portal
4.3
J
J
5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.1.5
5.1.6 5.1.7 5.1.8 5.1.9 5.1.10
5.1.11 5.1.12
J
K
6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.5
6.1.6 6.1.7 6.1.8 6.1.9
Project Execution
5.2
K
J
5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5
5.2.6 5.2.7 5.2.8 5.2.9 5.2.10
5.2.11 5.2.12 5.2.13 5.2.14 5.2.15
Interoperability
6.2
K
6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3 6.2.4 6.2.5
6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 6.2.9 6.2.10
6.2.11 6.2.12 6.2.13
K
J
Engagement
6.3
K
4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.3.5
4.3.6 4.3.7 4.3.8 4.3.9 4.3.10
4.3.11 4.3.12 4.3.13
6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.4 6.3.5
UKQCD
4.4
Knowledge Transfer
J
6.4
K
J
K
4.4.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 4.4.4 4.4.5
4.4.6 4.4.7 4.4.8 4.4.9
K
3.5.1 3.5.2 3.5.3 3.5.4 3.5.5
3.5.6 3.5.7 3.5.8 3.5.9
J
K
LHC Deployment
3.6
K
3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.6.5
3.6.6 3.6.7 3.6.8 3.6.9 3.6.10
Project Manager’s Report
6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4
Status Date -
30/Sep/04
Monitor OK
Monitor not OK
Milestone complete
Milestone overdue
Milestone due soon
Milestone not due soon
Item not Active
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
1.1.1
D. Britton
+ next
60
Days
Update
Clear
Risk Register
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
R9
R10
R11
R12
R13
R14
R15
R16
R17
R18
R19
R20
R21
R22
R23
R24
R25
R26
R27
R28
R29
R30
R31
R32
R33
R34
R35
R36
R37
R38
R39
R40
R41
R42
Alt-i-r
Recruitment/retention difficulties
Sudden loss of key staff
Minimal Contingency
GridPP deliverables late
Sub-components not delivered to project
Non take-up of project results
Change in project scope
Bad publicity
No publicity
External software dependence
Lack of monitoring of staff
Withdrawal of an experiment
Lack of cooperation between Tier centres
Scalablity problems
Software maintainability problems
Technology shifts
Repitition of research
Lack of funding to meet LCG PH-1 goals
Adequate persistency solution not ready
Conflicting software requirements
Tier-A hardware fails to meet requirements
Other Hardware fails to meet requirements
Hardware physical risk (large scale)
Hardware physical risk (small scale)
Hardware procurement problems
LAN Bottlenecks
Tier-2 organisation fails
Tier-2 hardware not used as planned
SYSMAN effort inadequate
Firewalls interfere with Grid
Inablility to establish trust relationships
Security inadequate to operate Grid
GGF does not establish standards
Minimal open source code development
Failure of international cooperation
e-Science and GridPP divergence
Institutes do not embrace Grid
Grid is not stable enough for use
Delay of the LHC
Lack of future funding
Network backbone failure
Network backbone bottleneck
31/Jan/2005
Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li Im Risk Li
3 2
6
2 2
4
2 2
4
2 2
4
1 4
4
1 3
3
1 3
3
1 3
3
1 2
2
2 2
4
1 2
2
1 3
3
4 2
8
2 4
8
2 3
6
2 3
6
2 4
8
2 3
6
2 1
2
2 3
6
1 4
4
1 1
1
2 2
4
1 1
1
2 2
4
1 3
3
1 3
3
1 1
1
2 3
6
2 4
8
1 4
4
3 2
6
1 2
2
2 2
4
2 3
6
1 2
2
1 4
4
1 4
4
1 2
2
1 4
4
1 2
2
1 3
3
2 3
6
1 3
3
2 2
4
1 3
3
1 3
3
1 4
4
1 3
3
2 3
6
3 2
6
1 3
3
1 3
3
4 1
4
2 2
4
1 3
3
1 1
1
1 4
4
2 2
4
2 2
4
2 1
2
2 2
4
2 1
2
2 3
6
1 3
3
2 2
4
3 3
9
1
2
3 2
6
1
2
1 3
3
1 3
3
2 2
4
1 4
4
2 2
4
0 4 0.4
1 2
2
Im Risk
Currently using GridPP1
Register.
13 Changes made:
2 Risks added
5 risks reduced
5 risks increased
1 adjusted
3
2
4
2
Project Manager’s Report
3
4
4
4
2 previously High risks
were reduced.
R10_GridPP (S.linux)
R14_LCG (Stability)
1 risk elevated to High.
R32_INF (Security)
D. Britton
Overview
1. Project Maps
2. Resources
3. Quarterly Reports
4. Tier-1 Hardware
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
GridPP1 Financial Summary
RAL
University
Grants
CERN
Miscellaneous
SLA FY01
SLA FY02
SLA FY03
SLA FY04
£1,522,055
£1,639,723
£1,602,243
£1,778,706
SLA Subtotal
Non SLA
Issued
£4,746,476
Carried forward
£143,050
GridPP1 Grants Subtotal
Globus Support
Grand Total GridPP1 Expenditure
Over (under) spend
Recoverable costs (estimate)
Total GridPP1 funds remaining (estimate)
31/Jan/2005
£6,542,727
£171,911
£4,603,426
£5,666,835
£12,658
£16,997,556
(£2,444)
£99,633
£102,077
(Note-1)
Balance of £3.6m attributed
to GridPP2
(Note-2)
To be confirmed by PPARC
(Note-3)
Dissemination officer Grant
(Note-4)
Planned.
£56,283 EDG cost claim
(Note-5) £18,349 (Est.) Institute.
£25,000 (Est.) Institute.
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
GridPP1 Financial Summary
1/Jan/2005
Applications
£2.05m
Operations
£1.87m
No significant changes to categories
Tier - 1/A
£3.65m
CERN
£5.67m
FY03 hardware spend slipped to FY04
DataGrid
£3.65m
CERN
DataGrid
Tier-1/A
Tier-2
Applications
Operations
TOTAL
31/Jan/2005
TOTAL
£5,666,835
£3,647,223
£3,654,985
£102,143
£2,051,827
£1,874,543
£16,997,556
FY2001
£0
£561,819
£836,345
£0
£97,403
£417,827
£1,913,394
Breakdown by Financial Year
FY2002
FY2003
£907,843
£2,379,162
£1,098,147
£1,272,651
£913,455
£630,552
£0
£24,499
£662,348
£738,856
£431,181
£590,750
£4,012,973
£5,636,469
Project Manager’s Report
FY2004
£2,379,829
£714,606
£1,274,634
£77,645
£553,221
£437,786
£5,437,721
D. Britton
GridPP2 Financial Summary
Jan 2005
LCG-2
Travel
Mgr
£0.81m
Ops
£1.00m
Tier-1/A
Hardware
£0.66m
£0.82m
£2.40m
M/S/N
Total includes £102,077 carried
forward from GridPP1.
£2.77m
£2.70m
£2.86m
Tier-1/A
Operations
£2.99m
Applications
Tier-2
Operations
Category
Sub-Cat
LCG
Tier-1
Staff
Tier-1
Hardware
Tier-2
Staff
Tier-2
Hardware
Applications
Staff
N/M/S
Staff
Operations
Managers
Operations
Staff
Operations
Travel
Operations
Misc
GridPP2 Total
Total Available
Surplus (Deficit)
31/Jan/2005
Funds are fully allocated.
Posts
iSY
13.5
39.5
19.0
50.2
19.0
14.5
3.4
2.0
50.0
42.6
10.5
5.3
71
198
FY04
FY05
£437,914 £906,278
£700,000 £800,000
£447,783 £813,941
£150,000
£50,000
£313,190 £1,027,785
£458,194 £920,174
£161,910 £319,853
£35,224 £145,994
£131,284 £272,000
£30,000
£40,000
£2,865,499 £5,296,026
Project Manager’s Report
FY06
£942,529
£900,000
£1,082,032
£0
£1,072,414
£964,050
£329,170
£150,823
£284,000
£40,000
£5,765,018
FY07
£408,429
£0
£448,302
£0
£450,704
£426,559
£143,529
£64,893
£119,000
£15,000
£2,076,417
Total Cost
£0
£2,695,151
£2,400,000
£2,792,059
£200,000
£2,864,093
£2,768,977
£954,463
£396,934
£806,284
£125,000
£16,002,961
£16,002,077
(£884)
D. Britton
GridPP1 Effort Summary
Effort Expected (Months)
Effort Delivered
Months
Fraction
Effort funded via SLA
~600
575
96%
Effort funded via Grants
795
~750
94%
TOTAL
“Unfunded” effort reported
on Middleware
“Unfunded” effort reported
on Applications
TOTAL
1395
1325
95%
254
155
409
Approximately 38.7 FTE/year funded in GridPP1 and approximately
48.2 FTE/year effort reported against deliverables.
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
GridPP2 Effort Summary
GridPP2 Funding
FTE
Total Posts
Unfilled
18.5
20
1
14.5
18
2
14
21
13
13.5
13.5
2
Work Area
Application Interfaces
Middleware/Security/Networking
Tier-2
Tier-1
EGEE Infrastructure Support
Project Management Board 3.4 (Note-3)
Operations (Note-4)
2
TOTAL
62.5
Note-1:
Note-2:
Note-3:
Note-4:
6
2
80.5
Other Funding
FTE
(Note-1)
~10
~8 (Note-2)
3
9.5
0
0
18
~30
Not possible to estimate
May fall once Tier-2 posts are in place; expected about 4.
Reduced from 3.6 in previous planning.
Dissemination officer and Production Manager.
62.5 FTE/year (c.f. GridPP1 38.7).
Tier-2 hardware posts currently being filled.
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Outline
1. Project Maps
2. Resources
3. Quarterly Reports
4. Tier-1 Hardware
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Reporting Lines
CB
PMB
OC
Project Manager
Application
Coordinator
ATLAS
BaBar
GANGA
CDF
LHCb
D0
CMS
UKQCD
PhenoGrid
SAM
Tier-1
Manager
Tier-1
Staff
Production
Manager
4 EGEE
Funded
Tier-2
Coordinators
Tier-2
Board Chair
Tier-2
Hardware
Support
Posts
Middleware
Coordinator
Metadata
WLMS
Data
Security
Info.Mon. Network
LHC Dep.
Portal
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Information Flow
Collaboration
(Board)
ProjectMap
PMB
(Milestones and Metrics)
Quarterly Review
Logbook
ProjectPlan
Oversight
Committee
(Money and Effort)
External
Review
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Quarterly Reports: Effort
HW 04Q3
Sup (Live)
Post
TBD1
CPU Service1
ADS Service1
TBD2
ADS Service2
Deployment Service1
T1 Manager
TBD3
TBD4
Disk Service1
Deployment Service2
Expt Support1
Core Service1
Core Service2
Core Service3
TBD5
Operation Service1
Tier-1 GridPP Funded
Tier-1 CCLRC Funded
T2 Security
T2 WLMS(HEP)
T2 WLMS(LeSC)
T2 Network
T2 HP Post
T2 Data Man.
T2 Data Man
T2 VO Man
HW Sup (Edin)
HW Sup (Glas)
HW Sup (Durh)
HW Sup (Man1)
HW Sup (Man2)
31/Jan/2005
05Q1
05Q2 3.00
05Q30.00 3.00
Imperial
CMS
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
1.00Frwk
Actual
Planned
Planned
Planned
Cambridge
ATLASActual
0.00 3.00
0.00 3.00
0.00 3.00
1.00
3.00 Actual
PhenoGrid0.50
Post
1.00 1.50
3.00 1.50
3.00 1.50
HW Sup (Shef)
1.50 0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00 04Q3
3.00
Applications
Total3.00
3.00
3.00 3.00
15.00 3.000.00
52.50 3.000
HW Sup (Impe)
1.00
3.000.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
GridPP
EU
Other2.25
Total 1.003.00
Metadata 0.75
(Gla)
1.00
3.00 2.25
3.00 2.25
HW
Sup (QMUL)
2.25
0.70
0.70
2.10
2.10
2.10
2.10
Data
Storage1
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00 0.75
HW Sup
(RHUL)
0.25
0.75
0.75
0.75
InfoMon
15.00
0.00
19.50 3.00
1.00
3.00 4.50
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.00 0.75
3.00 0.75
HW
Sup
(Brun)
0.25
0.75
0.75
MetaData
2.00Storage2
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.80
0.80
2.40 Data
2.40
2.40
2.40
WLMS1 (1/2)
0.00
1.50 0.75
1.50 0.75
HW Sup (UCL)
0.25
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Network
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.50
1.50 3.00
1.50 3.00
HW
Sup (Birm)
1.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
1.00
3.00 WLMS2 (1/2)
3.00
3.00 0.50
3.00
Storage
1.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
3.00 Security1
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
1.40 0.00
3.00 0.00
ScotGrid
T21.00
Coord
0.00
0.00
0.00
Security
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
3.00 Security2
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
1.40 0.00
3.00 0.00
NorthGrid
T2
Coord
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50WLMS
1.50 Security3
1.50
1.50
1.50
(1/2)
0.00
0.70 0.00
1.50 0.00
LonGrid
T20.50
Coord
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.50 Security4 0.00
1.501/2)
1.50
1.50
(RAL
0.50
1.50
1.50 0.00
SouthGrid
T2
Coord
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 2.10
0.70LCGDep
0.70
2.10 0.00
2.10
2.10
Security5
(RAL
1/2)
0.50
1.50
1.50
Tier-2 GridPP Funded 0.50
14.00
0.00
44.20 0.00
45.00 0.00
45.00
0.00
45.00
0.00
6.80
13.30 0.90
0.30Tier-1
0.30
0.90 6.50
0.90
0.90
RGMA Tech. Man
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
Tier-2 Unfunded 24.40
1.00Tier-2
1.00
3.00 0.50
3.00
3.00
3.00
12.00
24.40
36.90
0.50
1.50 3.00
1.50 3.00
RAL LHCb
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.50
1.50 RGMA Cluster
1.50Man
1.50 0.50
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.40
0.40
RMGA
QA
(1/2)
1.00
0.50
1.50
1.50 3.00
OxfordATLAS
Ganga
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
0.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
Cambridge
Ganga
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.00 Architect
0.00
1.10
1.00CMS1.00
3.00 RGMA
3.00
3.00 1.00 1.10
3.00
RGMA
Developer
1.00
1.00
3.00
3.00 3.00
Birmingham
Atlas 0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
6.50 LHCb
10.50
31.50
0.00
40.50
0.00
40.50
0.00
40.50
0.00
0.00
3.50
3.50
6.80 1.5yr
9.00CMS
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.003.00
Networking1
1.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
Brunel
0.00
0.00
BaBar
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
3.00 Networking2
3.00
3.00 0.70 0.00
3.00
(DL)
1.00
3.00 1.50
3.00 1.50
IC 50% CMS
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00 Post0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00 CMS
1.50 Portal
1.50
1.50 1.00 0.30
1.50
1.00
3.00 0.00
3.00 1.00
BristolSAM
combined
0.00
0.00
0.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
Portal
1.00
0.00
0.10
1.10
MSN Total0.008.70
10.50 3.000.00
36.50 3.000.00
43.50 3.000
RAL BaBar
0.00
0.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
Grand Total
Funded Effort
18.70 3.20
38.00 1.50
127.20 3.000.00
181.50 3.000
Manchester
BaBar
0.000.00
0.00
3.000.00
UKQCD
2.00
1.20
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Imperial
D0 SAM
0.000.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
PhenoGrid
0.00
0.00 3.00
1.00
3.00 0.00
3.00
3.00
Glasgow CDF
SAM
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.00 Reported 3.00 18.70
3.00
3.00
Total
27.00
37.80
83.50 3.00
Oxford CDF
SAM
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.70
1.50
1.50
1.50
Total
Expected
38.00
27.00
65.00
Lancaster
D0
SAM
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
UKQCD
Post
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
0.30 Generic
0.33 Fraction
1.00 2.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
49%
100%
128%
0.20
0.17
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
LHC
Deployment
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Oxford LHCb Metadata
0.00
0.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.00Metadata
3.00 1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Glasgow Atlas
1.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
Actual
HW SupPlanned
(Lanc)
04Q4
Actual
Planned
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Quarterly Report: Example
Note completed deliverables AND provide a link
04Q3 Comments
Note started
delayed
ChangeForm
mustand
bepresented
completed.
Gidon
ondeliverables.
September 1st.AAttended
GridPP11
the following talk:
http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/portal/talk_2004.09.13.pdf
Provide
some
details for information.
Work
started
on technical
the first deliverable.
04Q4 Comments
The first deliverable (4.3.1 “Requirements Capture Document”) has been completed
(though some iteration is currently continuing with the Applications Manager) and the
present draft version is available at http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/portal/requirements.pdf .
Substantial work was done on the second deliverable (4.3.2 “Technical Review
Document”) though this was not completed on schedule by Dec 15th. Part of the holdup
here is that we would like to liaise with Rob Allen on the technical direction as a reality
check and a meeting could not be arranged until early February. Nevertheless, a draft
document exists and the technical direction of the project is now being defined (subject
to the discussions in February). Specifically, Gidon has established that Apache +
mod_gridsite + mod_jk + Tomcat + GridSphere can all work together to provide a portlet
inside the GridSphere application to have access to the DN of a user who can only get
onto the https using their X.509 CA signed certificate. Gidon has also learnt enough
about Java Web Start and JAR signing and ant to be able to get the
visual_grid_proxy_init to launch from a jnlp. See http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~gidon/ .
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Outline
1. Project Maps
2. Resources
3. Quarterly Reports
4. Tier-1 Hardware
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Tier-1 Hardware
The issues here are:
•The “fair” allocation of Tier-1 hardware
•International MOU’s and other less formal commitments
•The Disk-CPU balance and the real cost of Tape
•The absolute scale.
Enter the Spreadsheet
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Tier-1 Hardware
M&O Authors
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Th.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
6
109
36
45
40
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
2004
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2005
1
1
1
1
2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.9
0.9
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2006
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
0.8
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2007
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2008
1
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
 Table of “M&O Authors.
 Future information sketchy.
 CB has agreed to provide the
“Form-X” information
 New table will be an FTE count
Weights
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
31/Jan/2005
Input
Splits
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
33% 67%
0% 36% 49% 15% 33% 55% 12% 28% 57% 15% 25% 57% 18%
25% 75%
0% 38% 56%
6% 42% 43% 15% 36% 46% 18% 36% 49% 15%
28% 69%
3% 60% 27% 13% 45% 25% 30% 37% 24% 39% 39% 43% 18%
62% 34%
5% 16% 72% 12% 14% 77%
9% 12% 78% 11% 15% 82%
3%
43% 54%
3% 34% 59%
7% 34% 62%
4% 32% 65%
3% 31% 65%
3%
39% 61%
0% 32% 68%
0% 31% 69%
0% 51% 49%
0% 48% 52%
0%
23% 77%
0% 68% 23%
9% 69% 23%
8% 76% 10% 13% 71% 11% 18%
0% 100%
0% 56% 25% 19% 54% 30% 16% 47% 32% 21% 42% 32% 26%
100%
0%
0%
9% 62% 30%
7% 61% 32%
5% 52% 43%
4% 47% 49%
60% 40%
0% 61% 34%
5% 57% 39%
4% 51% 43%
6% 48% 45%
7%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
75% 25%
0% 69% 31%
0% 65% 35%
0% 60% 40%
0% 57% 43%
0%
6% 94%
0%
5% 95%
0%
5% 95%
0%
4% 96%
0%
3% 97%
0%
23% 77%
0% 18% 82%
0% 25% 75%
0% 34% 66%
0% 31% 69%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
September
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Shares
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
ALICE
3
12
0
6
16
22
12
31
20
23
64
30
38
97
64
ATLAS
36
237
0
112
339
177
283
462
493
553
960
690 1038 1588
949
CMS
13
72
37
75
68
149
127
111
402
237
207
626
466
572
496
LHCb
36
44
67
21
194
143
42
367
129
78
719
186
189 1173
82
BaBar
68
187
117
78
280
156
90
260
48
95
264
24
106
246
23
CDF
10
36
0
15
66
0
30
105
0
68
91
0
73
89
0
D0
6
44
0
32
22
39
66
35
39
103
19
46
109
19
61
H1
0
76
0
34
31
109
67
59
97
83
77
93
83
71
117
MINOS
17
0
0
3
43
93
5
76
117
9
126
191
13
176
363
SNO
0
0
0
13
15
10
25
27
9
31
36
9
33
35
11
ZEUS
0
73
0
0
121
0
0
191
0
0
231
0
0
214
0
Other Exp.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PhenoGrid
0
6
0
0
11
0
1
19
0
1
37
0
2
58
0
UKQCD
1
10
0
2
20
0
7
32
0
20
55
0
36
88
0
Other Thr.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
191
796
221
392 1224
898
756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Tier-1 Hardware
M&O Authors
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Th.
Other
Weights
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
31/Jan/2005
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
6
109
36
45
40
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
2004
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2005
1
1
1
1
2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.9
0.9
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2006
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
0.8
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2007
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2008
1
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
Table of “Splits”: CPU/Disk/Tape ratio.
Future information is sketchy. However,
new “approved” information expected
from LHC experiments, imminently.
Input
Splits
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
33% 67%
0% 36% 49% 15% 33% 55% 12% 28% 57% 15% 25% 57% 18%
25% 75%
0% 38% 56%
6% 42% 43% 15% 36% 46% 18% 36% 49% 15%
28% 69%
3% 60% 27% 13% 45% 25% 30% 37% 24% 39% 39% 43% 18%
62% 34%
5% 16% 72% 12% 14% 77%
9% 12% 78% 11% 15% 82%
3%
43% 54%
3% 34% 59%
7% 34% 62%
4% 32% 65%
3% 31% 65%
3%
39% 61%
0% 32% 68%
0% 31% 69%
0% 51% 49%
0% 48% 52%
0%
23% 77%
0% 68% 23%
9% 69% 23%
8% 76% 10% 13% 71% 11% 18%
0% 100%
0% 56% 25% 19% 54% 30% 16% 47% 32% 21% 42% 32% 26%
100%
0%
0%
9% 62% 30%
7% 61% 32%
5% 52% 43%
4% 47% 49%
60% 40%
0% 61% 34%
5% 57% 39%
4% 51% 43%
6% 48% 45%
7%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
75% 25%
0% 69% 31%
0% 65% 35%
0% 60% 40%
0% 57% 43%
0%
6% 94%
0%
5% 95%
0%
5% 95%
0%
4% 96%
0%
3% 97%
0%
23% 77%
0% 18% 82%
0% 25% 75%
0% 34% 66%
0% 31% 69%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
September
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Shares
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
ALICE
3
12
0
6
16
22
12
31
20
23
64
30
38
97
64
ATLAS
36
237
0
112
339
177
283
462
493
553
960
690 1038 1588
949
CMS
13
72
37
75
68
149
127
111
402
237
207
626
466
572
496
LHCb
36
44
67
21
194
143
42
367
129
78
719
186
189 1173
82
BaBar
68
187
117
78
280
156
90
260
48
95
264
24
106
246
23
CDF
10
36
0
15
66
0
30
105
0
68
91
0
73
89
0
D0
6
44
0
32
22
39
66
35
39
103
19
46
109
19
61
H1
0
76
0
34
31
109
67
59
97
83
77
93
83
71
117
MINOS
17
0
0
3
43
93
5
76
117
9
126
191
13
176
363
SNO
0
0
0
13
15
10
25
27
9
31
36
9
33
35
11
ZEUS
0
73
0
0
121
0
0
191
0
0
231
0
0
214
0
Other Exp.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PhenoGrid
0
6
0
0
11
0
1
19
0
1
37
0
2
58
0
UKQCD
1
10
0
2
20
0
7
32
0
20
55
0
36
88
0
Other Thr.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
191
796
221
392 1224
898
756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Tier-1 Hardware
M&O Authors
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Th.
Other
Weights
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
6
109
36
45
40
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
2004
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2005
1
1
1
1
2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.9
0.9
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2006
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
0.8
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2007
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2008
1
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
Table of “Strategic Weights.”
 Previously accounted for
movement of M&O authors.
 Will now show real deviations
from “fair-shares” which should
be transparent and justifiable.
31/Jan/2005
Input
Splits
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
33% 67%
0% 36% 49% 15% 33% 55% 12% 28% 57% 15% 25% 57% 18%
25% 75%
0% 38% 56%
6% 42% 43% 15% 36% 46% 18% 36% 49% 15%
28% 69%
3% 60% 27% 13% 45% 25% 30% 37% 24% 39% 39% 43% 18%
62% 34%
5% 16% 72% 12% 14% 77%
9% 12% 78% 11% 15% 82%
3%
43% 54%
3% 34% 59%
7% 34% 62%
4% 32% 65%
3% 31% 65%
3%
39% 61%
0% 32% 68%
0% 31% 69%
0% 51% 49%
0% 48% 52%
0%
23% 77%
0% 68% 23%
9% 69% 23%
8% 76% 10% 13% 71% 11% 18%
0% 100%
0% 56% 25% 19% 54% 30% 16% 47% 32% 21% 42% 32% 26%
100%
0%
0%
9% 62% 30%
7% 61% 32%
5% 52% 43%
4% 47% 49%
60% 40%
0% 61% 34%
5% 57% 39%
4% 51% 43%
6% 48% 45%
7%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
75% 25%
0% 69% 31%
0% 65% 35%
0% 60% 40%
0% 57% 43%
0%
6% 94%
0%
5% 95%
0%
5% 95%
0%
4% 96%
0%
3% 97%
0%
23% 77%
0% 18% 82%
0% 25% 75%
0% 34% 66%
0% 31% 69%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
September
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Shares
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
ALICE
3
12
0
6
16
22
12
31
20
23
64
30
38
97
64
ATLAS
36
237
0
112
339
177
283
462
493
553
960
690 1038 1588
949
CMS
13
72
37
75
68
149
127
111
402
237
207
626
466
572
496
LHCb
36
44
67
21
194
143
42
367
129
78
719
186
189 1173
82
BaBar
68
187
117
78
280
156
90
260
48
95
264
24
106
246
23
CDF
10
36
0
15
66
0
30
105
0
68
91
0
73
89
0
D0
6
44
0
32
22
39
66
35
39
103
19
46
109
19
61
H1
0
76
0
34
31
109
67
59
97
83
77
93
83
71
117
MINOS
17
0
0
3
43
93
5
76
117
9
126
191
13
176
363
SNO
0
0
0
13
15
10
25
27
9
31
36
9
33
35
11
ZEUS
0
73
0
0
121
0
0
191
0
0
231
0
0
214
0
Other Exp.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PhenoGrid
0
6
0
0
11
0
1
19
0
1
37
0
2
58
0
UKQCD
1
10
0
2
20
0
7
32
0
20
55
0
36
88
0
Other Thr.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
191
796
221
392 1224
898
756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Tier-1 Hardware
M&O Authors
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Th.
Other
Weights
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
31/Jan/2005
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
6
109
36
45
40
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
6
113
47
50
44
20
20
26
13
9
25
0
7
15
0
0
2004
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2005
1
1
1
1
2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.9
0.9
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2006
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
1
0.8
0.8
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2007
1
1
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
2008
1
1
1
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.1
Input
Splits
ALICE
ATLAS
CMS
LHCb
BaBar
CDF
D0
H1
MINOS
SNO
ZEUS
Other Exp.
PhenoGrid
UKQCD
Other Thr.
Other
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
33% 67%
0% 36% 49% 15% 33% 55% 12% 28% 57% 15% 25% 57% 18%
25% 75%
0% 38% 56%
6% 42% 43% 15% 36% 46% 18% 36% 49% 15%
28% 69%
3% 60% 27% 13% 45% 25% 30% 37% 24% 39% 39% 43% 18%
62% 34%
5% 16% 72% 12% 14% 77%
9% 12% 78% 11% 15% 82%
3%
43% 54%
3% 34% 59%
7% 34% 62%
4% 32% 65%
3% 31% 65%
3%
39% 61%
0% 32% 68%
0% 31% 69%
0% 51% 49%
0% 48% 52%
0%
23% 77%
0% 68% 23%
9% 69% 23%
8% 76% 10% 13% 71% 11% 18%
0% 100%
0% 56% 25% 19% 54% 30% 16% 47% 32% 21% 42% 32% 26%
100%
0%
0%
9% 62% 30%
7% 61% 32%
5% 52% 43%
4% 47% 49%
60% 40%
0% 61% 34%
5% 57% 39%
4% 51% 43%
6% 48% 45%
7%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
0% 100%
0%
75% 25%
0% 69% 31%
0% 65% 35%
0% 60% 40%
0% 57% 43%
0%
6% 94%
0%
5% 95%
0%
5% 95%
0%
4% 96%
0%
3% 97%
0%
23% 77%
0% 18% 82%
0% 25% 75%
0% 34% 66%
0% 31% 69%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
September
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Shares
Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape Disk CPU Tape
ALICE
3
12
0
6
16
22
12
31
20
23
64
30
38
97
64
ATLAS
36
237
0
112
339
177
283
462
493
553
960
690 1038 1588
949
CMS
13
72
37
75
68
149
127
111
402
237
207
626
466
572
496
LHCb
36
44
67
21
194
143
42
367
129
78
719
186
189 1173
82
BaBar
68
187
117
78
280
156
90
260
48
95
264
24
106
246
23
CDF
10
36
0
15
66
0
30
105
0
68
91
0
73
89
0
D0
6
44
0
32
22
39
66
35
39
103
19
46
109
19
61
H1
0
76
0
34
31
109
67
59
97
83
77
93
83
71
117
MINOS
17
0
0
3
43
93
5
76
117
9
126
191
13
176
363
SNO
0
0
0
13
15
10
25
27
9
31
36
9
33
35
11
ZEUS
0
73
0
0
121
0
0
191
0
0
231
0
0
214
0
Other Exp.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PhenoGrid
0
6
0
0
11
0
1
19
0
1
37
0
2
58
0
UKQCD
1
10
0
2
20
0
7
32
0
20
55
0
36
88
0
Other Thr.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
191
796
221
392 1224
898
756 1777 1354 1301 2886 1895 2186 4426 2166
Output – guidelines for the User Board within
which to perform actual allocation.
Output – guidelines within which international
MOU’s can be discussed.
Note current lack of information on absolute
scale.
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Next Steps
1. Replace the MOU Author table with the Form-X information.
2. Update the requested splits for the LHC experiments
3. Determine the absolute shortfall in hardware as a function of time.
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Conclusions
• GridPP1 is complete and a success.
• GridPP2 is underway and we are trying to plan for success.
• Quarterly reporting is a necessary evil but we make good
use of the information gathered to monitor, present and
promote the project.
• The are many hurdles ahead and we are trying to keep
our heads up despite the start of GridPP2.
Tier-1 hardware is becoming an issue.
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Feedback from the OC?
Tony
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton
Beyond GridPP2
Tony,3 Dave,
and Steve circa
2007? coordinators?
The
LHC experiments
computing
(GridPP)
31/Jan/2005
Project Manager’s Report
D. Britton