Fundamentals of Acoustics - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Download Report

Transcript Fundamentals of Acoustics - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Acoustics at Rensselaer
Microphones and Loudspeakers
Architectural Acoustics II
April 3, 2008
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Final Exam Reminder
•
•
•
•
Wednesday December 10
3:00 – 6:00
Greene 120 (this building, first floor)
Handwritten notes on 2 sides of 8.5” x 11”
paper are allowed, along with a calculator
• No laptops
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Transduction
•
•
•
•
Conversion of one form of energy into another
For microphones: acoustical → electrical
For loudspeakers: electrical → acoustical
Two basic categories of transducers

Sensors
• Small
• Low power
• Don’t affect the environment they are sensing

Actuators
• Large
• High power
• Meant to change the environment they are in
Simple EE Review
• V = I·R (Ohm’s Law)

Acoustics at Rensselaer


V = voltage (volts)
I = current (amperes)
R = resistance (ohms)
• V = B·l·u (Electromagnetic induction)

V = voltage
 B = magnetic field (Teslas)
 l = length of wire (m)
 u = wire or magnet
Velocity (m/s)
Rossing, The Science of Sound, Figure 18.2, p. 370
http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/encyclopaedia/hutchinson/images/c01347.jpg
Simple EE Review
• Capacitors (formerly known as condensers)
Acoustics at Rensselaer

Q = C·V
• Q = charge (coulombs)
• C = capacitance (farads)
• V = voltage (volts)

C  A/d
• A = area of the capacitor plate (m2)
• d = plate separation distance (m)
Image from http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b5/Capacitor.png
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Basic Microphone Types
•
•
•
•
•
Dynamic (moving coil)
Condenser (capacitor)
Electret
Ribbon
Piezo-electric (crystal or ceramic)
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Dynamic Microphone
• Sound pressure on the diaphragm
causes the voice coil to move in a
magnetic field
• The induced voltage mimics the
sound pressure
• Comments



Diaphragm and coil must be light
Low output impedance – good with
long cables
Rugged
Long, Fig. 4.1, p. 116, 2nd image courtesy of Linda Gedemer
V = B·l·u
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Condenser Microphone
• Diaphragm and back plate
form a capacitor
• Incident sound waves move
the diaphragm, change the
separation distance, change
the capacitance, create
current
• Comments





Requires a DC polarizing
voltage
High sensitivity
Flat frequency response
Fragile
High output impedance,
nearby pre-amp is necessary
Q = C·V
C  A/d
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Electret Microphone
• Same basic operation principle
as the condenser mic
• Polarizing voltage is built into
the diaphragm
• Comments




High sensitivity
Flat frequency response
Fragile
High output impedance, nearby
pre-amp is necessary
Long, Fig. 4.1, p. 116
Q = C·V
C  A/d
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Ribbon Microphone
• Conductive ribbon diaphragm
moving in a magnetic field
generates an electric signal
• Comments




Lightweight ribbon responds to
particle velocity rather than
pressure
Both sides are exposed resulting in
a bidirectional response
Sensitive to moving air
Easily damaged by high soundpressure levels
Long, Fig. 4.1, p. 116, 2nd image courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Piezo-Electric Microphone
(a.k.a. Crystal or Ceramic Microphone)
• Diaphragm mechanically coupled to
a piezoelectric material
• Piezo (lead zirconate titanate (PZT),
barium titanate, rochelle salt)
generates electricity when strained
• Comments



No polarization voltage
Generally rugged
See Finch, Introduction to Acoustics,
Chapter 7, “Piezoelectric Transducers”
for details
Long, Fig. 4.1, p. 116
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Microphone Parameters
1/2-inch diameter B&K measurement microphone
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Microphone Parameters
Neumann U87 Ai Large Dual – diaphragm Microphone
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Frequency Response and
Incidence Angle
Long, Fig. 4.8, p. 121
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Frequency Response and
Incidence Angle
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Off-axis coloration
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Transient Response
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Other Microphone Types
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Shotgun Microphone
Rossing, The Science of Sound, Figure 20.10, p. 398
http://aes.harmony-central.com/115AES/Content/Audio-Technica/PR/AT897.jpg
Other Microphone Types
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Parabolic Microphone
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/christopher.owens2/Images/TelingaMount.jpg
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/audio/mic3.html
Other Microphone Types
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Contact Microphones
www.BarcusBerry.com
Other Microphone Types
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Pressure Zone Microphone (PZM)
www.crownaudio.com
www.shure.com
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Use of Boundary Mics
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Effects of Floor Reflections
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Soundfield Microphone
• 4 diaphragms in a
tetrahedral pattern
• Essentially measures omni
pressure (W) and X,Y, and
Z-dimension pressure
• Used for 1st-order
spherical harmonic
encoding of a sound field
(1st-order Ambisonics)
http://www.soundfield.com/soundfield/soundfield.php
Microphones and Diffraction
Acoustics at Rensselaer
9.9 cm
0.2 cm
Blackstock, Fundamentals of Physical Acoustics, Figure 14.12, p. 487
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Directivity Patterns
• Single-diaphragm microphones are typically
constructed to have one of a variety of
directivity patterns






Omni directional
Bidirectional
Cardioid
Hypercardioid
Supercardioid
General mathematical form A + B·cos(θ)
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Directivity and Ports
 In a directional (ported) microphone, sound reflected from surfaces behind the diaphragm is
permitted to be incident on the rear side of the diaphragm.
 Sound reaching the rear of the diaphragm travels slightly farther than the sound at the front,
and it is slightly out of phase. The greater this phase difference, the greater the pressure
difference and the greater the diaphragm movement. As the sound source moves off of the
diaphragm axis, this phase difference decreases due to decreasing path length difference. This is
what gives a directional microphone its directivity.
Shure Pro Audio Technical Library
Directivity Patterns
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Omnidirectional
P 1
Bidirectional
Cardioid
P  cos 
1  cos 
P
2
Directivity Patterns
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Hypercardioid
1  3  cos 
P
4
Supercardioid
P  .37  .63  cos 
All Five
Omni
Bidirectional
Cardioid
Hypercardioid
Supercardioid
Directivity in 3D
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Omnidirectional
P 1
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Bidirectional
Cardioid
P  cos 
1  cos 
P
2
Directivity in 3D
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Hypercardioid
Supercardioid
1  3  cos 
P
4
P  .37  .63  cos 
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Directivity Patterns
Omni
Bidirectional
Cardioid
Hypercardioid
Supercardioid
Polar
Equation
1
cosθ
[1+ cosθ]/2
[1+
3·cosθ]/4
0.37+0.63·cos
θ
Output at 90º
(dB re 0º)
0
-∞
-6
-12
-8.6
Output at 180º
(dB re 0º)
0
0
-∞
-6
-11.7
Angle for
which output
is 0
NA
90º
180º
110º
126º
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Pattern
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Combining Patterns: Dual Capsules
Neumann U87Ai Georg Neumann GmbH
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Basic Cone Loudspeaker Principles
• Paper (or other light-weight
material) cone attached to a
coil suspended in a
magnetic field
• Audio signal (voltage) is
applied to the wire, causing
it to move
• Mechanism is enclosed to
prevent dipole radiation
• Typical characteristics

Sensitivity
 Impedance
 Frequency response
 Directivity
Rossing, The Science of Sound, Figure 20.13, p. 402
Speaker Directivity
Acoustics at Rensselaer
• Directivity Factor
I  ,  
Q ,   
I Avg
I Avg
W

4r 2
Average intensity (I) if total power (W) is
radiated uniformly over a spherical surface.

I usually measured on axis
• Directivity Index
DI  10 log10 Q
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Speaker Directivity
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Speaker Parameters
JBL Control 29 AV-1
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Speaker Parameters
JBL Control 29 AV-1
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Enclosures
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Direct
radiator or
Acoustic
suspension
Bass reflex
with passive
radiator
Slide courtesy of Linda Gedemer
Bass reflex
Bass reflex
with acoustic
labyrinth
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Cabinets and Diffraction
Svensson and Wendlandt, “The influence of a loudspeaker cabinet’s shape on the radiated power”, Baltic Acoustic 2000.
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Cabinets and Diffraction
Svensson and Wendlandt, “The influence of a loudspeaker cabinet’s shape on the radiated power”, Baltic Acoustic 2000.
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Cabinets and Diffraction
Svensson and Wendlandt, “The influence of a loudspeaker cabinet’s shape on the radiated power”, Baltic Acoustic 2000.
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Cabinets and Diffraction
Svensson and Wendlandt, “The influence of a loudspeaker cabinet’s shape on the radiated power”, Baltic Acoustic 2000.
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Array Behavior
•
•
•
•
•
•
Proper calculations
Far-field approximations
Change in behavior with number of elements
Change in behavior with phasing
Change in behavior with spacing
Change in behavior with frequency
Array Calculations
e  jkri  i
p R   A  
ri
i 1
n
Acoustics at Rensselaer
R
•
•
r1 r2 r3 r4
1
2
3
4
•
rn
…
•
n
Array of n elements
(loudspeakers or microphones)
•
•
•
•
p(R) = pressure at position R
A = agglomeration of various
constants
ri = distance from element i to
position R
e-jkr - δ = Green’s function for a
point element
k = wavenumber
δ = phase
Sweep R in an arc centered at the center of the array to create a polar directivity plot.
This expression does not account for the directivity of individual elements in the
array! All are assumed to be point sources or omnidirectional microphones.
Far-Field Approximation
 n 
sin 

2 

I
2  
sin  
2
Acoustics at Rensselaer
2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
I = intensity of the array
n = number of array elements
β = kd·cos(θ) – δ
k = wave number
d = distance between array elements
θ = angular position relative to the center of the array
δ = constant phase difference between elements
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Intensity vs. Log Magnitude
Intensity
Log Magnitude
8 elements at 10 cm spacing, 1 kHz, R at 10 m
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Number of Elements
2
4
8
16
Phase (between elements)
Acoustics at Rensselaer
0º
110º
60º
140º
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Frequency
500 Hz
1 kHz
2 kHz
4 kHz
Acoustics at Rensselaer
Spacing
5 cm
10 cm
20 cm
40 cm
Other Array Ideas
Acoustics at Rensselaer
• Random spacing to address side lobes
• Constant beam width