Transcript Document

Air Toxics Rule Changes
(pursuant to Session Law 2012-91)
North Carolina Division of Air Quality
Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting
March 20, 2013
Air Toxics – Summary of SL 2012-91
Section 1
◦ Exempts sources subject to certain federal regulations
◦ Codifies “Director’s Call” provision
Section 2
◦ Requires rule amendments
Section 3
◦ Requires review of rules and their implementation
Section 4
◦ Requires reports on implementation of this act
Air Toxics – Section 1

Exempts from the State air toxics rules
sources of toxic air pollutants subject to
certain federal regulations, including:
 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAPs), 40 CFR Part 61
 Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT)
standards, 40 CFR Part 63
 Generally Available Control Technology (GACT) standards,
40 CFR Part 63
 Subject to case-by-case MACT, 112(j) of the Clean Air Act
Air Toxics – Section 1
When DAQ receives a permit application for a
new or modified source or facility that
would result in a net increase in toxic air
pollutants:
◦ Requires DAQ to determine if the toxic air emissions
would pose an unacceptable risk to human health… and
if it does, the Division Director would make a written
finding and require a permit application that eliminates
the unacceptable risk… (for all practical purposes this is
the existing Director’s Call provision)
Air Toxics – Section 3
Requires DAQ to review the State air toxics
rules and their implementation to determine
whether changes could:
◦ Reduce unnecessary regulatory burden
◦ Increase the efficient use of DAQ
resources while maintaining protection of
public health
 Conduct the review in consultation with
interested parties
 Report the results of the review and include
recommendations to the ERC by 12/1/12

5
Recommendations for Rule
Changes
Develop an additional set of emissions
thresholds for pollutants coming from
unobstructed vertical stacks
2. Exempt natural gas and propane fired
boilers
3. Exempt emergency engines
4. Eliminate SIC call
5. Clarify use of actual rate of emissions
6. Remove the term “unadulterated wood”
from rules
1.
1. Develop additional toxic permitting
emission thresholds

Develop an additional set of emissions
thresholds for pollutants coming from
unobstructed vertical stacks
◦ Additional thresholds approximately 1.2-4
times higher than current thresholds
◦ Health based standards stay the same.
Impact:
 Fewer facilities modeling
1. Develop additional toxic permitting
emission thresholds

TPERs calculated from AAL based on
dispersion modeling parameters

AAL* (1/(Cmax * averaging time
factor)) * hours in averaging period
=TPER
1. Develop additional toxic permitting
emission thresholds

Cmax is maximum emission rate
derived from dispersion model using
conservative input parameters
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
Physical stack height=5.0 meters
Stack gas temperature=293 degrees Kelvin
Stack gas velocity=1.0 m/s
Stack diameter=1.0 m
Resulting Cmax= 0.9306 grams/sec
Averaging Time Factor: Annual=0.1, Daily=0.6
2. Exempt natural gas and propane fired
boilers

US EPA has exempted certain gas-fired
combustion units from federal air toxics
rules. Another federal rule only prescribes
work practice standards on affected units.

Toxic air emissions from these sources are
well below the TPERs.
Impact:
 Up to 150 facilities have sources that may
qualify for this exemption.
2. Exempt natural gas and propane
combustion units

Reviewed emissions profile all TAPs from
combustion of natural gas and propane

Using emissions estimation spreadsheets,
back calculated what heat input would
would result in emission rate that would
exceed an existing TPER

Result: Benzene was controlling pollutant
exceeding TPER at 450 million BTU/hr
3. Exempt emergency engines
US EPA federal air toxics rules apply to all
emergency engines and only prescribe
work practice standards.

Used temporarily in emergency situations.

Small.

Few hours of operation.

Peak shaving engines are not considered
emergency engines.
Impact:
 Up to 150 facilities have sources that may
qualify for this exemption.

3. Exempt emergency engines

Reviewed emissions profile all TAPs from
combustion of diesel fuel in emergency
engines

Using emissions estimation spreadsheets,
back calculated through iterative process
what size unit exceeds an existing TPER

Result: Formaldehyde controlling pollutant
for daily and hourly at 4843 horsepower
4. Eliminate SIC call


15A NCAC 02Q .0705 provides a
mechanism for the Director to require all
facilities under the same four-digit
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) to
submit an application to comply with the
NC air toxics rules.
The existing Director’s Call rule and SL
2012-91 provide adequate authority to
address any unacceptable risks to human
health from any facility.
5. Clarify use of actual rate of emissions

Clarify in the rule to ensure that DAQ is
implementing it consistently.
6. Remove term “unadulterated wood”
from rules

Elimination of this term will prevent
confusion with definitions for combustion
sources in federal rules.
Comments?

Please submit written comments by April
4, 2013 to:
[email protected]

Draft Rules:
http://www.ncair.org/rules/toxics/Toxics_3-13-2013.pdf
Rules:
http://www.ncair.org/rules/rules/Sec1100.shtml
and
http://www.ncair.org/rules/rules/SecQ0700.shtml

Next Steps










Stakeholder meeting
3/20/13
Draft rule to AQC
7/10/13
Public hearing request – EMC
7/11/13
Comment period begins
8/15/13
Public hearing
8/30/13
Comment period ends
10/15/13
EMC adoption
1/9/14
RRC review/approval
2/20/14
Effective date
3/1/14
Effective date w/ General Assembly review Mid-2014
North Carolina Division of Air Quality
Mike Abraczinskas
Deputy Director
North Carolina Division of Air Quality
Don van der Vaart
Permits Section Chief
[email protected]
919-707-8447
[email protected]
919-707-8475
North Carolina Division of Air Quality
Joelle Burleson
Planning
[email protected]
919-707-8720