Transcript xxx
PGE Renewable Energy Co. Renewable Energy and System Services Business Area Overview Warsaw, 20 April 2009 Why PGE Renewable Energy Co. ? The Company's mission is to provide system services that guarantee security of the national transmission system, as well as to ensure the highest quality electrical energy, generated by environment friendly technologies, using both renewable energy sources and gas. PGE Renewable Energy Co. owns: Hydro: Żarnowiec: 716 MW Żar:500 MW Solina: 200MW Dychów: 90 MW 19 small hydro power plants Wind: Kamieńsk: 30 MW Other reneweables: Biogas Power Plant ( test plant) 2 Dychów: 90 MW 3 Żarnowiec: 716 MW 4 Żarnowiec: 716 MW 5 Żar:500 MW 6 ZEW Solina-Myczkowce: 208,3 MW 7 Solina: 200MW 8 Kamieńsk: 30 MW 9 Portfolio of PGE’s existing generation assets Generation assets portfolio of PGE, by installed capacity (GW) 0,7% 0,2% Thermal (hard coal) 12,1% 30,4% 3,4% Thermal (lignite) Thermal (gas) 83,6% Water (pumped storage) Water (other) 53,2% PGE 100% = 12,3 GW ESP 13% = 1,6 GW 10 Wind PGE – main assets El. Żarnowiec 716 MWe El. Szczecin 88 MWe 220 MWt El. Pomorzany 134 MWe 323 MWt El. Dolna Odra 1 772 MWe 117 MWt El. Wodna Raduszec Stary El. W. Gubin El. W. Zasieki El. W. Przysieka El. W. Żarki Wielkie El. W. Zielisko El. W. Bukówka El. W. Sobolice Distribution ZEB 2,9 TWh EC Gorzów 97,5 MWe 399 MWt ZEC Bydgoszcz 262 MWe 857 MWt El. W. Gorzupia I i II El. W. Grajówka El. W. Żagań I i II El. W. Małomice El. W. Szprotawa El. W. Kliczków ZEŁ-T 4,3 TWh . KWB Bełchatów El. Bełchatów 4 440 MWe El. Wiatrowa Kamieńśk 30 Mwe 376 MWt El. Opole 1492 MWe 102,5 MWt KWB Turów Lignite power plants/mines El. W. Januszkowice Gas CHPs ZEW-T 5,2 TWh ŁZE 2,8 TWh El. Wodna Dychów 90 MWe El. Turów 2088 MWe 295 MWt Hard coal power plants/CHPs El. Wodna Dębe 20 MW Lubzel 3,3 TWh ZEORK 4,4 TWh Ciepłownia Kielce 286 MWt RZE 3,8 TWh El. W. Krępna zakłady energetyczne Elektrownie i elektrociepłownie węgla kamiennego Hydro Elektrownie węgla brunatnego Elektrownie i elektrociepłownie gazowe Elektrownie wodne, w tym szczytowo-pompowe Wind Elektrownie wiatrowe 11 El. Wodna Porąbka El. Wodna Tresna El. Porąbka-Żar 500 MWe El. Wodna Myczkowce EC Lublin 246,5 MWe 592 MWt ZKE 1,9 TWh EC Rzeszów 102 MWe 332 MWt El. Solina 200 MWe Integration Implementation of managerial structure granting: - Unifaction of targets within PGE - Centralisation of specific activities within PGE - Specialisation within PGE Assets arrangement within PGE group: - Shifting RES assets from PGE group to PGE EO Capital assets arrangemenet within PGE EO group: - Internal rearrangement within PGE EO: production assets contrentration in PGE EO and spinning off exploatation operators PGE trade mark promotion 12 Organisational structure (functional) PGE Managing companies Operational units Mining and generation (BOT GiE) Wholesale (PSE-Electra) KWBB KWBT Retail ZEŁT ŁZE ZEB Opole power plant RZE Bełchatów power plant ZEWT Turów power plant ZEORK ZEDO power plant EC Gorzów LUBZEL ZKE Distribution OSD ZEŁT OSD ŁZE OSD ZEB OSD RZE OSD ZEWT OSD ZEORK Renewables (PGE EO) Hydro: Hydro Żarnowiec: 716 MW Żar:500 MW Wind Solina: 200MW OSD LUBZEL OSD ZKE Dychów: 90 MW EC Lublin Dębe: 20 MW EC Rzeszów Wind ZEC Bydgoszcz Kamieńsk: 30 MW Other Other reneweables: 13 Biogas Power Plant ( test plant) Role of business segments Mining and generation Building of integrated Group Lowering generation cost Increasing the availability of the generating units Minimising investment with the lowest ROR Adhering to the environmental regulations Increasing revenues from other activities, including heat generation and distribution Wholesale Maximising the sales margin Minimising the costs of balancing market of the entire Group Maximising the margin from sales on foreign markets Developing trading Minimising the costs and risk of fuel purchase Minimising the trading costs Retail Maximising the electricity sales margin Increasing the market share in retail sales Developing and maximising the margin from sales of other products Minimising own sales costs Distribution Minimising distribution costs Minimising investment with the lowest ROR Increasing the revenues from services to the existing customers Minimising the time Renewable energy • Production capacity enhancement on renewable energy sources • Development of the Center of the Competence of new connections Improving the quality of delivery and technical services to the clients • Increasing the green certificates production • Lowering generation cost • Increasing the availability of generating units • Minimising investments with the lowest ROR 14 Environmental regulations Required energy mix sold to the end-consumers in Poland, % 71,3% 67,8% 65,2% 64,1% 62,9% 7,0% 2,7% 8,7% 2,9% 10,4% 3,1% 10,4% 3,3% 10,4% 3,5% 16,5% 19,0% 20,6% 21,3% 22,2% 23,2% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 77,6% 5,1% 0,8% Electricity from other sources Electricity from RES Electricity form highly efficient gas cogeneration Electricity from highly efficient cogeneration other than gas 15 Comparison of forecasts of renewable energy market share in 2020 Eleboration/ Forecast for 2020 Share in energy production Ministry of Environment, Strategy of Renewable Energy Development, 2000 16,8% EC BREC, ESD, Utilization of SAFIRE programm for elaboration of development of renewable energy sources in Poland up to 2020, 2001 9,8 – 13,4% ARE S.A., Ecological scenario of development of national energy sector, 2002 6,6 – 16,2% Fraunhofer ISI, Analysis of the renewable energy’s evolution up to 2020, 2003 7,2 – 22,2% Ministry of Economy, Energy Policy of Poland untill 2030, 2007 10,8% 16 PGE and sources of renewable energy PGE aspirations by 2012 regarding renewable energy generation Reaching 30-45% share in domestic market of renewable energy Areas of renewable energy development within the PGE Group Hydro-energy Large HPPs on Wisla and Odra Small HPPs HPP Porąbka-Żar Wind farms On-shore wind farms Off-shore wind farms Biomass Co-combustion/ combustion Dispersed energy PGE investment in renewable energy in 2008-2012: PLN 4-8 bn 17 Wind farm Kamieńsk PGE’s renewables aspirations PGE’s aspiration is to increase its production from renewable sources up to tenfold until 2012. PGE’s aspirations concerning renewable energy production (TWh) Potential options to increase PGE’s market share in renewables 6,1 Market leader aspiration To obtain a market share in renewables equal to PGE’s market share in generation (45% market share) • Large hydro power plants on Vistula and/or Odra 5,2 • Small hydro power plants 4,3 • Wind farms 3,4 4,1 1,8 0,6 1,2 2007 2008 18 • Biomass co-firing Risk minimazing aspiration To secure Renewables Obligation Certificates supply for PGE’s sales company (30% market share) 0,6 2006 • Biomass / biogas 2,9 2,3 1,5 2009 2010 • Wind farms on-shore • Wind farms off-shore 3,5 2,4 • Waterpower engineering 2011 2012 • Distributed biomass / biogas generation • Geothermics Wind Potential capacity: 445 PJ • Including onshore 377 and offshore 67 Actual utilisation: • Onshore just 0,22% • Huge number of projets under evaluation (26GW) Forecast: • Till 2012 only 10% of projets under evaluation will be executed • Till 2020 30% of onshore potential and 10% of offshore potential will be utilized • Offshore development after 2015 depending on strategical decisions (government, grid operators, big power producers groups) • After 2015 new development possibilities should emerge (new generation of wind turbines – 5MW, and increasing connection to the grid possibilities (transeuropean transfer lines) 19 Wind Risks • Environmental – restrictions due to protected areas (Natura 2000), not fully clear policy concerning possibilty of investing in this areas • Restrictions in optimal wind areas due to problems with grid connection • Risk of ability of power absorbtion of national electroenergetic system (above 3 – GW installed power), • Changes in RES supporting system (after 2020 national goals achived) 20 ESP Wind Projects in Poland 1. Kamieńsk (30MW) 3 4 2. Wola Rafałowska (8MW) 6 3. Wojciechowo – 28MW 9 5 4. Miłogoszcz - Etap I/II/III (do 100MW) 8 7 5. Resko - Etap I/II (10/80MW) 6. Gniewino 55,2 MW; Strefa Żarnowca (Zbiornik Górny 48 MW, Prusiewo 30 MW, Osieki 42 MW) 1 7. Banie - Etap I/II 90 MW 2 8. Łęczyca 24 MW 9. Polanów - Etap I/II (do 100MW) 21 National grid connection status Wind projets location 22 PGE EO share in Wind Projects in Poland EW Kamieńsk consists actually 15% on wind generated installed power. Actually in PGE EO there are 20 projets at different stage of execution and at total planned instaleld power ca 900 MW. It consist app. 10% projects under execution in Poland. 23 Water Potential capacity: 18PJ (5TWh/year) •Entire potential is estimated to be at the level of 8,5 TWh but due to actual environmental restrictions and economical situation the project of HPP on Wisla River seems to be questionable, Actual utilisation: 41% Forecast: •According to Hydro Power Plants Asociation development will base on small HPP (theoretically up to 10MW but in practice app. 1MW) with the installed power increase by 10MW/year. •Up to 2020 can be utilised up to 62% of potential capacity (Average in EU 67%). 24 Water Risks: •Location – Implementation of NATURA 2000 and other restrictions (EU water directive) can limit avaliability of locations of small hydro power plants (below 10MW) •Increase of costs of investments due to lack of suitable locations. •Small HPP projets are executed mainly by small inwestors – as they are not reciving support from the government and the costs are high and execution time is extending the potential can not be fully utilized. 25 Biomass Potential: 600 PJ •Including dry solid waste 166, biogas (wet waste) 123, wood 24, energetic plants 287 (celulosis, oil etc) Actual utilisation: •Utilised (fully ?) dry solid waste and wood •Rarely utilised biogas, agricultural not at all •No energetic plants plantations Forecast: •Dry solid waste nearly fully utilised – no space for development •Development of biogas utilisation - first wastebased after 2015 farming •Energetic plants plantations development – first as a fuel after 2015 farming biogas 26 Biomass Risks: •Plantations – agricultural production intensification – competition to food production •Envirnmental risks – unknown consequences of lasting big surface plantations •Export of bio-fuels (solid and liquid) – decreasing possibilities of acheiving national targets. 27 Effectivness of different projets in RES area Big HPP Wind PP Bio-fuel cogeneration plant Installed power (electrical) [MW] 100 38 10 1,8 12,7 Installed power (heat) [MW] - - 23 - - Inwestment cost (tho. PLN) 850 000 216 600 80 000 29 000 14 000 Unit investment cost (tho. PLN/MWe) 8 500 5 700 8 000 16 100 1 100 Unit investment cost (tys. PLN/MWh) 2 174 2 617 1 533 2 712 220 Small HPP Biomass cofiring Electrical energy price = 118+240=358 PLN/MWh IRR,NPV for the project: NPV(tho.PLN) s=5,24% 330 053 42 225 102 746 4 289 114 019 IRR(%) 9,00% 7,53% 16,88% 6,75% 60,86% -2 869 55 718 IRR,NPV for own capital: NPV(tho.PLN) s=12,0% 27 645 -9 174 40 266 IRR(%) 13,20% 10,59% 27,85% 28 9,03% 125,47% Investement plans Category of investment plans: • Development investments of electricity generation from renewable sources • Modernization • Conceptual works and Development Fund • Other investments 29 Development investments Development investments in the area of RES include: A.1. Wind projects Wind farms construction A.2. Bioenergetics Construction of dispersed, local sources of electrical energy and heat based on technology of biomass fermentation A.3. Hydropower Construction of new SHPP Only this investment category is increasing and defining the total investments planned 30 Investment plans - RES Technology Wind PP Installed power increase MW 870 Production increase TWh 1,5 – 2,1 Bio energy 50 0,3 HPP 10 0,05 930 1,9 – 2,4 Total: 31 Investment plans RES - outlays Investment outlays for Renewable Energy Sources are estimated at the level of 3,8 bln PLN – ( 1 bln Euro) 4,0 3,0 [mld PLN] Financing sources: • own capitals • PGE capitals • EU funds • Commercial credits • other RES investment outlays 2,0 1,0 0,0 2008 2009 2010 Year 32 2011 2012 PGE Renewable Energy Co. Thank you for attention 33